Author

Topic: Possible scam at P2PS token's (Read 73 times)

newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
April 01, 2021, 10:45:56 AM
#1
Token: P2PS (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/p2ps-worlds-first-only-secure-interference-free-communication-system-2419138)

Communication/so far...:
  • little to none; they seam to make a significant effort to silence every question that doesn't fit their agenda
  • I got banned from their telegram group without any reason at all! I only asked for assistance regarding some ( later alarming ) issues, that I thought of as  ordinary business. Well, they didn't.
  • On this same Telegram group there's a pretty faced chick answering BS on every message, the little time I spent there didn't show any attempt to keep the P2PS token as the main topic. Huge red flag IMHO.
  • There was a topic here yesterday complaining about tx issues. This morning the topic is gone, it is not on this forum any more. I cannot imagine how is this possible. I still have a copy of my reply, it details a "successfully failed" transaction that eventually never moved anywhere. <<< wrong, I found it later. Somehow it was gone from my search results.
  • Social media is somewhat active, like Twitter and Facebook, but they act as a news aggregator and there is no talk about the project at all.
  • Email not answered, not even gonna insist, however each public email address they have is listed in the footer of the Pear 2 Pear Solutions project's website. www [.] p2psf [.] org
  • Most of the exchanges where they are supposedly listed are are not actually listing the token at all, other dex logos are just same domain, not linking anywhere.
  • links on the dev company's website are all linking back to the same domain but are presented as a multitude of clients.

More:
  • They have 2 contracts on etherscan, both listed under the same name, same ticker. One has a custom logo. At this point I can't be bothered to look into it, but I'm quite sure that it coincides with the date when they forked a "how to add custom logo to your eth token" repository. TBH in this context their git repo is quite sad.
  • Let's look at git repo then: virgin, untouched repo, with some forks.
  • So both contracts have P2PS transactions in it, however the wast majority is of "0ETH" only GAS charged but no actual transaction executed. Like almost all of their tx.
  • and so on, please spear my noob ass, I'm kind of tired of typing.[\li]
So, to wrap it up, I can't tell if it's a scam or  a painfully unprepared team. It would be wonderful if it wans-t a scam
Jump to: