Topic: Posts just for signature purposes or adding to knowledge? (Read 358 times)
Im doing both, posting for signature and gaining some knowledge about cryptocurrencies by participating into different crypto threads.
Mostly posts for signature purpose only. Even I am posting for signature. But some topics are out of my knowledge. Then I only read that topics and I not goes for post. I think signature post is best way to give and take knowledge.
If you cannot contribute something to the community with your knowledge then better find a topic that would let you express your idea. If you are posting in a topic that you have no idea then that would purely be for signature purpose but if you are posting about what you think about it and somehow adding knowledge for the community to know then that would be better. I prefer to add some knowledge because it is give and take anyway. I learn from you people and somehow I can share what I know.
Signature is your message and distribution of company advertising the bounty on the forum and that is , the participants of the bounty projects and investments for the company . This is success for everyone . Also you learn a lot of interesting information on the forum
Mostly posts for signature purpose only. Even I am posting for signature. But some topics are out of my knowledge. Then I only read that topics and I not goes for post. I think signature post is best way to give and take knowledge.
I think they want more weekly number of posts because they want more frequency of their signatures, so many people know more. That is also the basic principle of advertising, so I have no problem with this policy of them.
Not a bad idea. Not many posts really matter with the experience sharing the bonus campaign.
Writing posts on the forum I think serves not only for the purposes of the signature, sometimes reading the topics you find out for yourself something new and interesting, reading reviews of various people on a particular issue, thereby helping to resolve their questions)
Depends on the member, cause some members here only join signature campaign to earn rewards and they dont have intention to gain knowledge about crypto.
At the present many people use forum just for signature campaign. I thinks the bounty managers should reduce number of post for hunters who can make more educative posts.
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
To be honest most of the people using this forum for making money from bounties so they are not much involving in informative posts since they need to complete their minimum quota to get stakes for that week,if the manaers decrease the minimum post requirements then more alt accounts will get involved if we don't want to see any spam here then better to take away signatures from the users.Sad to see the current situation of forum which is full of garbage threads but I do see its much better compared into last years when the forum hasn't that merit system. It did really somehow stop all the spams and abuse of newbie and jr accounts when it comes to bounties, giveaways and other way to earn on simple ways.
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
If you are asking like this, here my answer
I posting in this forum is both for signature campaign purposes and adding knowledge on my post...
I only choose what I think is an interesting topic and then I put my comment/post on this thread, I don't want people to call me "shitposter/junkers" so I always try to make a good and on-topic in my every post...
Also, I trying to improve my English writing skill too...
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
To be honest most of the people using this forum for making money from bounties so they are not much involving in informative posts since they need to complete their minimum quota to get stakes for that week,if the manaers decrease the minimum post requirements then more alt accounts will get involved if we don't want to see any spam here then better to take away signatures from the users.Sad to see the current situation of forum which is full of garbage threads but I do see its much better compared into last years when the forum hasn't that merit system. It did really somehow stop all the spams and abuse of newbie and jr accounts when it comes to bounties, giveaways and other way to earn on simple ways.
90% of the users in the Bitcointalk forum are bounty hunters. It is our mission to complete the bounty mission, so most of the posts are just for signature!
Before you decided to join the Signature Campaign, you have to read the requirements and be sure to yourself that you are qualified and able to do the number of posts per week. There is an advantage towards to the number of post because it can widen your knowledge about this crypto world.
May be you are right, once i saw signature campaign that required 25 posts per week, i think it is trash. For me 10 posts per week is ok, i think it is possible to write something acceptable during seven days.
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
To be honest most of the people using this forum for making money from bounties so they are not much involving in informative posts since they need to complete their minimum quota to get stakes for that week,if the manaers decrease the minimum post requirements then more alt accounts will get involved if we don't want to see any spam here then better to take away signatures from the users.Sad to see the current situation of forum which is full of garbage threads but I do see its much better compared into last years when the forum hasn't that merit system. It did really somehow stop all the spams and abuse of newbie and jr accounts when it comes to bounties, giveaways and other way to earn on simple ways.
If you have understood how cryptocurrency works, and how the functions this forum I am sure that every post you made will provide important information for people who read it or will give an informative post. So, you don't just come from commenting on a post or as long as you made a post to meet the target post per week when you have joined in the signature campaign.
Make 25 posts per week If you keep up the signature campaign that is paid with BTC you can make 5 posts per day, I guess it's not too much for you to do it. Indeed, I have experience and I once imagined when I was newbie 25 posts were too much for the signature campaign. However, after I had read some information about cryptocurrency and found out about the ins and outs of this forum, I was able to do that.
Make 25 posts per week If you keep up the signature campaign that is paid with BTC you can make 5 posts per day, I guess it's not too much for you to do it. Indeed, I have experience and I once imagined when I was newbie 25 posts were too much for the signature campaign. However, after I had read some information about cryptocurrency and found out about the ins and outs of this forum, I was able to do that.
Your opinion is very good and very healthy, but those merchants will not agree, because the more replies or articles that the signature needs to be published, the larger the area representing the communication!
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
To be honest most of the people using this forum for making money from bounties so they are not much involving in informative posts since they need to complete their minimum quota to get stakes for that week,if the manaers decrease the minimum post requirements then more alt accounts will get involved if we don't want to see any spam here then better to take away signatures from the users.
I completely agree that in many signature companies the number of posts in a week is overestimated. And unfortunately it affects quality of the majority of posts. That's because signature campaign requires to write many posts and majority of them are senseless. But what to do if requirements are so, and writing of a qualitative post with sense requires time. On the other hand if to reduce quantity of posts, then the main objective of the signature company won't be achieved. Therefore the compromise is necessary. I think it's need to limit quantity of posts to 5-7 in a week. Or to begin to consider their quality. Maybe that avoid from flood.
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
If you be long time in anywhere you will get the reasons and answers automatically buddy, I see the investors are needed the people who can promote the project with the forum so need to get the people kind of that so you need to deserve it buddy.
Since merit system came up small rank members like you will feel that for sure and I know that too. Kindly ignore the negative views and thoughts first before you decide it waste of time to have signature campaign.
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
I believe we are all guilty of this because of the number of post some signature campaign require. Many of the signature campaign and bounty required us to makes around 15 to 30 post par week and this requires time but most of the post are just made for earning purposes and not education. Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
Yes, I also agree with your suggestion that there should be a reduction in the number of posts for signature because this will really help participants too relax and think of educative and meaningful post to make unlike having too much and not being able to make educative posts or suggestion all because they want to try to complete the given task. Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
What you are saying is very true to some point. A signature participant is usually expected to make 15 posts in a week. Though we have people who do not have anything doing aside bounties, there are others who do crypto as part time business. Sometimes the week will almost be ending and the person will realize he has to topped up. Such a person will be tempted to just post without even thinking through the topic to make any meaningful comments about the topic Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
I agree with your opinion ,,, average campaign signature requires at least 10 - 15 posts per week and it is mandatory, if it does not meet the target post it will not get the stake ,, it would be nice if the rules make the post is predicted to be 5-8 posts per week ,, , so not too many post spamI agree but the thing is we shouldn't focus on not only for posting we have to acquire some knowledge about the different people has a different perspective about their views and ideas about the market. Till now, i have learnt much knowledge from the people about the market and about the ICO point of view.
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
I agree with your opinion ,,, average campaign signature requires at least 10 - 15 posts per week and it is mandatory, if it does not meet the target post it will not get the stake ,, it would be nice if the rules make the post is predicted to be 5-8 posts per week ,, , so not too many post spam Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
Yes, I also agree with you because if the number of post per week is reduced, people can be able to focus on making very educative and informative post and not only be concerned with posting just to make the stake for the week. Some signature requires high amount of post per week while some require little number of post but all the same, I believe if the number is minimal, people will make more reasonable posts that everyone can learn from.
For me I didn't see any much task here writing or posting your opinion about a topic you know about, for me it's fun to do that, though there are many people who write post for the sake of stakes
I have time to learn a lot. Here I remember and learn English, because it is necessary to read and write not in the local conditions of the current bounty company. I learned about many interesting ico because of the posts that I wrote on the bounty, they were profitable for me. 
actually, it depends on each person. in a week the average of a project takes 10-15 posts, I think it still takes a lot of time, so we can still work the post well. but for people who follow more than one campaign then they will work harder for it.
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
You do have some points but the entire decision would always vary or depending by the team itself since we do know signature campaigns are being made to put max exposure of such project or ICO.They do need to be seen on any boards of this forum with a specific number of post required per week. Sad to say some or most participants do really lead up to spamming just to cope up the post count.
This is the reality on whats happening on this forum which it turns out to be a ground for those who do seek money on campaigns.
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
I will side with you on this. I think signature is just secondary to the purposes of making contributions on this platform. Signature campaigns establishes posting as a task rather than a contribution to enrich your knowledge or that of someone else.If the number of postings are reduced then people can get time to read well and react meaningfully.
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
Yes,it is profitable for bounty hunters, but may reduce the number of ads from a project that we follow. to the extent that the failure rate of a project becomes larger due to the lack of popular and ignorant investors.
It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out
I think the signature campaign is not as you say because I myself am free out every day and this I think is not too heavy because it only makes 2-3 posts every day and it only takes 20-30 minutes
It is more beneficial when post are educative, but when you need to make 20-35 post weekly, it is intensely difficult to meet up with standard posts and comments.
Exactly, if you look at the requirements for btc paying campaign, you would see that their are some who actually put a high task in number of posts to make.
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
I think it depends on the person who are writing the post, because some of the guys are just expressing their thought in very simple language using small amount of words, and another guys are just opposite and they love to describe everything in details. Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
You do have a point though. Signature campaign posts shouldn't be too much, maybe at most 7 or 10. You will see some campaigns requiring 15 or 20 posts and sometimes giving extra conditions to such posts. It puts some people under undue pressure trying to meet up. Maybe if the posts are fewer, people will be more constructive as they also have other bounty campaigns other than Signature alone.
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
Hmm... I think to decrease the number of posts for signature campaign won't make the participants create constructive or educative posts. It just makes lazy people complete their task easily Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
It is more beneficial when post are educative, but when you need to make 20-35 post weekly, it is intensely difficult to meet up with standard posts and comments.
The best that can be done is probably just 10 post weekly, and i can assure, the forum topic will improve at an immense rate.
Lets hope bounty manager take not of this.
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
You are right in some part, but the signature campaigns (you can wear only 1 at the time btw) are requiring only 10-15 posts per week, and it is 2-3 posts per day only. You can go constructive with that amount, people are just lazy 
Unfortunately, almost all forum participants stuff messages for signature campaigns and to increase their rank on the forum. Therefore, it is often not even interesting to sit on the forum, as many write some kind of fiction and nonsense. Unfortunately, the situation will only worsen. I think in this regard, campaign managers will reflect and change the requirements for the signature campaign
There's the point there, you need to post in order to finished your activity to have stake for the week, but on the other hand you have to be created since the manager is checking if you put an effort to your post or you just places a line there and cha-ching... You can share your idea everywhere so why not do it instead unlike just putting some similar line like the others..
Heh, if a person does not have multi-accounts, then writing posts by signature is not so difficult (they usually require 10-15). In another way, companies simply do not want to attract bounty hunters from the forum) 
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
Its varies from different bounty manager to others.. but even though it remain number of post if one really cares about the project then bounty hunter itself will do a quality post..
This is a very good insight and topic. I'm very lucky with my signature campaign this round as it only requires 7 posts per week which is a very fair amount. I have had some campaigns which require a massive amount of posting which I agree with you may be adding to the spam situation. I also agree that with a lower posting rate the quality will improve and more educational and thoughtful posts can be made.
Well, a small observation I want to share.It looks like signature campaigns require so many posts in a week so people do not get the time to come out with very educative and informative posts.The person has to make as many posts as possible just to make the stakes for the week.I think the number of posts for signature should decrease so that people can make only educative posts on the forum.my humble opinion.
Jump to: