Topic: [POTENTIAL SCAM] Invech - Licensed Crypto Exchange & Blockchain Smart City (Read 468 times)

Good catch. I'm thinking the entire thing was a scam from the get go. They milked as many token sales as they believed they could from it, and are now closing up shop. I would be surprised if anybody gets anything.

As far as I remember, the first user who managed this bounty campaign has claimed that the project has already sold about 36% of tokens, but now I can't find these posts. In any case, they have recently "paused" their bounty campaign:


Archived: http://archive.fo/hrkYZ


Members who participated in these campaigns have complained in the bounty thread:



I also don't know whether the second user who managed this bounty campaign is part of the project owners or not.

I see these people have not even bother to resolve this accusation of potential scam
Another full member account, masfaii made a bounty thread for them https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-1512k-invech-ieo-licensed-crypto-exchange-blockchain-smart-city-5158357

I don't know if he is part of them or not as there is no disclaimer of not being part of the project owners

Right well, they probably should if they want to be seen as a legitimate enterprise. You're welcome.


I like your avatar by the way. You're like a slavic ninja.

You have pretty solid classification of criteria, which i mostly agree with. I want to ask the project team a simple question. Why should I use their services if it is safer for me to go to the original source of their white paper and use their services instead?

I think in general 2 tiers of criteria to determine the likelihood that a project is going to be a scam.

Top-tier criteria are bright red flags which put the project in a 90%+ likelihood of being a scam. These include:

- Ponzi-esque features (huge ROIs)
- fake team (actually using somebody else's picture and passing it off as your own)
- malware in wallet client (duh)

Lower-tier criteria are yellow to dark orangish flags that put the project in a 50-89% likelihood of being a scam. These include:

- plagiarized white paper
- no team or anonymous team
- uses bumping service to bump thread

Logical inconsistencies in the project design can be either lower or top depending on what they are... There's probably a few other things I forgot to mention that can be squeezed in one category or the other.

Anyway, because this project only has 2 of the lower-tier 3, I can't say for sure its a scam, however, there's a strong chance that it is.

I'm not sure that Binance would be successful copying other people's white papers. Of course, that many exchanges are lazy enough, and do not write their own documentation by own hands. Just copy, because it's easy.  And we also know that in most cases this is a sign of fraudulent projects. I would not advise dealing with such guys if they look unreliable at the very beginning of their careers.

Project ANN: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-invech-token-ieo-licensed-crypto-exchange-blockchain-smart-city-5052844
ANN creator: invech.group
Flag warning: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=298

About the project:

Why its possibly a scam:

This project's white paper is heavily plagiarized from the Binance whitepaper:







I posted a warning in their thread about this and this was their response:


So, if they're a different project, why didn't they write their own white paper?

Another thing odd about this project is their use of a bumping service which has written hundreds of 1 or 2 line comments in its thread. Some accounts linked to this service have been used to bump scams in the past, which leads me to believe their presence is another indicator that this project might be a scam. Bumper service accounts include:


In the Invech thread, there are dozens of pages of these accounts just mindlessly talking to each other, asking questions and then answering themselves, in order to create the illusion of community interest in the project (to me this is a deceitful practice). I'm pretty sure they are all operated by the same person as they ALL have the same obscure Iceland Local Time and the exact same writing style... Just 1 or 2 lines of basic English over and over and over and over....

Just for fun, here's an example of a bumper account talking to itself, who forgot to log in to the next account before responding to the same account:



Regardless of the aforementioned, if somebody from the Invech team can respond here saying that they will update their white paper to include their own verbiage (instead of Binance's), and then replace their old WP with it, then I will withdrawal my warning flag for their project.