Topic: Pre sales started for huge potential Invacio ICO...grab your chance (Read 398 times)

also roger i would like to say for the most part you were fairly professional with me until recently. unlike your bossman.

unfortunately you are a very dishonest person. if you are a person lol. i know it was you who banned me it was literally 1 second after your response.

and no it was not i who banned you. another admin banned you for being dishonest in your post.

Sorry Dave, I haven't logged in here for a couple of days.. it seems you are right. I must have caught the wrong button at some point, it is one of those things when multiple widows are open at any one time (I am still all fingers and thumbs with some aspects of the net - thank god I am not the AI guy) I will take a look at the settings and see if their is a ban on you (if there is, I will remove it).

I would say regardless of our more recent interactions, if you were to put some more attention on the real, verifiable, facts surrounding our project, you would would come away with a remarkably different opinion.

I fear that with our initial connection (shilly post on your group) coupled with some extremely brief googling you have got the completely wrong idea about Invacio.

I would welcome an opportunity to clarify any points you see fit directly. Please email me [email protected]

I look forward to hearing from you.

Many thanks.

(EDIT: I have looked to see if there is a ban in place and I can't find one. I have sent a friend request, please accept it and then ~I can invite you to the group again.
(2nd edit: just been thinking, perhaps when you blocked the messenger chat, and stopped me from replying, it also blocked you from accessing the pages I manage.)

I love the way that you can't accept things that are right in front of your eyes. Your concerns regarding github etc were addressed previously by our directors. I am part of the team and  as you know. There are no multiple accounts being run by anyone in the team although you still seem to believe William and I are the same person.

I know that you did read the response to your question RE: the logo as I have your response directly to hand. By the way, I think you blocked yourself from the group or left it by mistake. But Just in case you were that trigger happy, here they are again.

My response in regards to your accusation of stealing Angellist's logo was as follows (copied and pasted from Messenger direct including original auto-correct mistake - where it says undermanned it should read either):

No theft involved... logo has been in use since company founded.. UK registered trademark.. also if you look, they are opposite hands Dave. Thanks for keeping up with our activities.

I deleted your message also... we have addressed various questions and statements by you. Relating to the validity and standing of our ICO... undermanned you are unable or unwilling to understand our true nature and purpose. My Man always said, if you have nothing good to say, say nothing. Wise words I think.

At this point you accepted my connection on messenger then posted your reply:

you cant tell me what to do asshole

After this you immediately blocked me from messaging you again. Seems legit... (is that line familiar to you.) We have done nothing to directly insult or injure you in anyway and yet you seem intent on sharing your own grossly misshapen views of our project to as many individuals that you can.

Yes, I hold my hands up to a badly worded post in your group. The content was removed (unsure whether it was yourself or facebook that did that) and I was unceremoniously removed from the group in which it was made. I had neither the opportunity to answer your queries nor apologize for the wording of my original post.

Founder here, the response from "Bigfish321".

The person was not banned (not to my knowledge), only one issue, the promoting of another ICO in the Invacio ICO chat, if this is a chat set up by a 3rd party there is no problem, but it is ours to contact with our followers, the post was removed, the person was not, we tested out our banning facility on one of the investors last evening and advisors, this is public and stated post event "Hans".

We have multiple sites, our registered office is for accountancy purposes, our office at Unit 11 Whitstable Harbour, Kent, Whitstable, CT5 1AB is another operations office for Invacio, further there are operation offices in HK, Bangkok etc.

No we are not mentioned on here privately, i personally funded the development to viable products ready to launch which are detailed within this live draft white paper. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-bOaHPFoG1DJfquXi1vtwUOrDqQ46cA2lZIEtoqur-I/edit?usp=sharing

As to the Keylogger, we're in data, we have ai, and i suggest you head to our vimeo or listen to the UN video below or read our white paper, we're a technology company, that means using technology in all different ways, you will also notice the security expert on our white paper, and the sheer amount of penetration testing we have to run on our 50m line system(s)

Validation, should you still have concerns see this.

United Nations own website.....
http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/FDI%20Network%20Meeting%202017-Programme-final.pdf

Our statement at the UN : https://vimeo.com/241562534

----

Founders Passport : https://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/invacio/invacio_home_newsite/invest/wjdw-passprt.jpg
UK Corporation : https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/08928794
Seychelles Subsidiary : https://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/invacio/invacio_home_newsite/ico-docs/Invacio+-+Scan+COI.pdf

Should you have any questions hit the team up on [email protected], but i'd hazard we'd be the most solid ICO of this year .

William J D West
Founder Invacio