Topic: Profit By Betting on Losing Teams (Read 539 times)

You forgot to include the asian handicaps as they're one of the best alternatives to bet on the underdogs, and it's why "against the spread" or ATS was mentioned by the OP.

They are a lot risky if you're only looking at the match-winner market, but you can get away with them if you take advantage of the other available betting markets like the team totals and asian handicaps.

It if is a underdog, then obviously the pay returns might be very good though, but there are games that the odds might be close though. And just like what the OP has mentioned, Miami Heat was the underdog in every playoff run and yet they won until the finals against the Nuggets.

And so with they apply this strategy, then for sure they will have a good profits betting on the Heat.

But still, it's really hard to look for a live underdog that can go like what the Miami did in their playoff runs.

Yeah it is, because the odds on them are much better. I mean you can make more money if these less favored teams win the game. It's one example of high risk high reward. When you say team that is likely to win, I think that still sounds unsure so the return here in case we win is still decent than those games who are very obvious if who will win.

There is a difference between the two types of bets that we are explaining here and the difference is major but like you I also feel more entertained when I bet on a much riskier game and it's okay if in case I get unlucky and did not win my bet. That is already expected anyway. If I win, then the joy that I will feel is superb.

What the heck are you even talking about? Op's strategy seemed different and creative which is why I developed interest in it. You can find more information related to this strategy through some research.

I am aware of the fact that these strategies are only viable in the short-term. Think before spamming random statements.

^ Because for me, when it comes to placing bets, it is important to have a level-headed mindset and conduct thorough research on the teams involved. Whether we lean towards a winning or losing team, understanding how each team operates it. Because it is important to consider all possibilities, as the outcome of a game is never guaranteed, regardless of public sentiment. Analyzing and exploring the capabilities of players is a valuable strategy. However, consistently betting on the losing team can be inherently risky unless we have extensively tested the strategy and achieved successful results multiple times. Always keep in mind that in the world of sports betting, being knowledgeable enough and making wise decisions is key to increasing our chances of success.

Whether we choose to bet on a winning team or a losing team, we must do research so we'll have an idea about how each team works. No matter where we bet, we should be cautious and always consider the possibilities. If the public are betting on a certain team, it doesn't mean that the result will always favor them. Anything could happen anytime so we must analyze, discover and explore about the players' capabilities. Betting on the losing team all the time would be a lot risky unless we have tried the strategy multiple times and it worked successfully for us.

Gambling is something that can destroy a person very quickly. It is still used by many as a source of income as they may still be able to make good profits. But it is true that if they use it as a source of income for a long time, it will destroy them at some point. OP can profit by using his strategy it is his personal matter but there is no guarantee that others will be able to profit like him. Gambling largely depends on luck. And gambling does not work for eveyones luck. So this must be kept in mind before starting gambling

Betting using these strategies for gambling will reduce the risk of losing you shouldn't jump into the various online gambling opportunities without researching them and getting some strategy. Like physical casinos, online casinos want you to part with your money while gambling. There are many online gambling platforms and many more are being created. But not every betting website should be trusted. There are many scam platforms don't just pick a game, and expect to win when you play. Know what it means, game volatility betting flashing and more.

I have placed many bets so far but have not won a single one Always have to lose.
So I think everyone should be careful before betting so that you don't end up losing money.

But you have to be very careful when choosing a team and not blindly follow the system. In reality, many bettors tend to simply bet on the winning team without considering whether the spread will be covered or not. It may seem easy to decide which team will win, but the concept of betting against the public, although said to be profitable, requires caution and careful consideration when using this strategy.

These are the causes of failure, mate. I don't believe it is necessary for you to use the strategies offered by the OP because the OP hasn't provided any evidence, so how can we believe in it? I also believe you should keep using the methods you were using before you saw these strategies here because you said you were only going to use a small amount of money. Yes, we all know that when gambling, one should only use the money they can afford to lose. However, this does not mean that when we know we cannot win or have doubts about our strategy, we should continue to bet on it. Instead, we should make sure to employ the strategy that will increase our chances of winning.

However, I think that even though the money is still small, losing it won't make us happy, so I think you should use the strategy that will benefit from the possibility that you may use these methods and everything will go according to plan, which may encourage you to continue using the strategy even though you risk losing a second time.

I think it depends on the situation. If the score is already too deep that it is almost impossible to chase for the losing team then you can safely say that they are now doomed but not if the gap of the scores are not that wide enough. Rolling the dice was still gambling because we don't know what will be its outcome.

And when we gamble we do wager. Sports betting supposed to be a game of skill not chance but if we are mostly betting on the weaker teams, then yeah it can be consider as one. Losing money is not an enjoyable thing so I believe that most of us will always pick on the strong teams. We rarely bet on the underdogs and we do it when there is only tiny amount left in our balances.

Well, maybe that's what will happen. But those who still bet on their team won't think like that, especially for people who are fanatical about their team. They might even bet for an amount that exceeds everyone else's. But for people who could see through the situation, they would probably act differently from other people so that each person would have their own choice. And it's up to them; we should also stick to our choices and not harm us. And if we think that betting for outsiders is best for us, we can just as well bet for them. So it will come back to each person's thinking.

Sometimes, a match can change midway and it will surprise many people because they have chosen their team and now they have to see their team suffer a setback and look even weaker. This happens a lot in matches, so we have to do proper checks, as you said. And don't follow other people's opinions in choosing the team you want because you are responsible for your money and not someone else's. The important thing is that we have to be wise in betting and know when we are betting and when we only need to watch the game.

Betting on the favorite team is surely safer and you can accumulate your profit after few matches, but if the odds as low as @1.10, I wouldn't bet because it need ten time of bets to double your money. But you can increase your odds by parlay bets, just pick favorite team and you can earn more money.

I think it's better than put on an underdog where the possibility to win is lower.

True but is the OP strategy going to work, I mean you know the stronger teams always win most of the time so why will you be putting yourself in an awkward situation that most of the time won't favor you. We know underdogs wins at time but that doesn't happen always.

In a situation when the underdogs win and you had a bet on them winning, you'll make more money since their odds are always higher than the favorite teams that has more strength and better chances of winning the game. Still it's a very risky strategy that'll fail you most of the time.

Every gambler knows what works for them but you shouldn't be bringing an idea that won't work for majority of the players to the public as you'll be tempting others to try it and when they do, they'll fail. I prefer betting on the favorite team and win small than risking it for the underdog.

Without proper checking it can lower down the odds to win since you don't know if the underdog team is complete. There are times that they are more behind since there main star is out of the game due to injury so to avoid this mistake and still want to make sure that you are in good position while betting on underdog teams a good research is really needed to know the current situations on both teams. Although its not wise decision to place bet on underdog team but sometimes its rewarding.

At first glance, and following the elementary logic, betting on an outsider is just stupidity and madness.  But this is only at first glance.  If it were so, then no one would ever put their bets on such teams.  But many players do have reason to make such bets.  This may be, as you noted, the athletes you know are on the outsider team.  And then you will not be ashamed to tell him that you believed in their victory and even put money on the victory of their team.  This will definitely be a good incentive for your friend athlete.  And he will certainly inform other players about it.  And the mental attitude of any sports team, even an outsider, is important.  So for some players, betting on an outsider team is the right thing to do, and from their point of view, this is exactly what should be done. 
I don’t even remember the rare cases when outsiders win, which actually happens sometimes too.  Then such bets will generally bring not a small profit.  And at the same time, double joy for an accidental, so to speak, victory of your favorite team, and for winning money.

But before you place a bet on the underdog team, you should check how likely they are to win so you won't be disappointed or upset. If their odds are not big, you don't need to place a bet and just watch it. Watching them compete is also a form of support for them. After all, they also wouldn't know how many people supported them in that match. We must be wise in placing bets and not waste our money on bets. But it's okay if you want to place a small bet for your team as a form of support so that if your friends ask you, you can answer by placing a bet for your team.

We should not just bet on an underdog without learning the capability of the lesser favorite.  Just like in a match of both promising boxers, obivously one of them will be the underdog but in that case, being the underdog does not mean that there is no chance of winning but rather I think there is a better chance of winning huge amount since the underdog has the ability to KO the favorite.  But in case of a match where the oponent is just a filler, then it is not advisable to bet on the underdog.

Betting on a huge underdog and simply hoping for an upset which you yourself don't even know how to happen or where to come from is like betting on luck. That's not going to be profitable. Betting on an underdog because of a distinct analysis could be reasonable. Betting on the huge underdog Miami heat, for example, versus the most favorite team to win the NBA championship, Boston Celtics, could have some reasonable bases. This could turn out profitable.

Bigger odds means bigger profit. Also, anything could happen in a match 'coz first of all, they won't be in the tournament if they don't have the capability to win. Underdogs as we all know will still have the chance to come up with a win, it just so happened that betting on the underdog will put your money at a bigger risk, but as I've said with bigger rewards by chance.
There are times underdogs are just being underestimated by the majority which creates huge odds on their end. No one is certain of the outcome which is why we call it gambling. As long as you are aware of the tendencies then you're good to go. A gambler in the first place is not required to go all in for a single bet especially in favor of the underdog, so just practice managing the risk if you are really willing to bet on the 'losing' team or player.

If the popular team or fighter become an underdog, I think it's good to bet them because usually they have a good chance to pull an upset. But for a mediocre team or fighter, I don't think it's wise to bet them because they mostly lose, only few times they win.

I never want to bet on a huge underdog, it's just like a lottery where the chance to win is near to zero.

How do you do it all, it sounds ridiculous and preposterous.

As far as I know, below are the sports betting methods that are often used by gamblers.
For example:

And I have never seen someone betting like the title of your topic, is it a bet like what @Ivan Toney did.

It seems that we are still in control and sane in placing sports bets, maybe we are not yet at the level of addiction and crazy to place bets on losing teams, it seems that betting is like that, betting people are addicted to gambling and people who often lose and are frustrated.

Betting on underdogs is almost always better than betting on heavy favorites, but most punters prefer betting on favorites even if the odds are low since they get tempted by the higher winning chances after factoring in the vig.

For example, some whale bet more than a million bucks on odds less than 1.01 and lost it all. Higher winning chances don't always translate to favourable results basically.

Personally, I prefer sticking to odds > 1.3 in order to try and get the best bang for my buck.

Using a VPN worked for me, and similarly, I had to switch connections several times because I didn't expect them to block that many countries.

Sometimes the house edge won't even cut it, and they have to weed out some of their players specifically the winners since they can't always take the loss.

it is obvious that decision taken in gambling especially in Casino platform is what you determine your prophet or You're Winning so if you don't refer and make a proper decision in any gambling platform that you want to make your bed with he will end up in losing your your money

Gambling on losing teams is a legitimate strategy, but more than betting on losing teams I think it is evaluating the risk/reward scenario with a specific bet. Sure, there might be a team that is likely to win, but maybe it pays a penny to the dollar. Basically, winning that bet doesn’t make a difference. I get more entertainment out of betting longshots and making sure the reward is worth the risk.

I think the ops is a chiller who is looking for client's to register with his referal code on a shity casino that is already red flagged and that has no form of official presence here in the forum, I was able to visit the link and Netrobet is what came up from the link and I immediately get off the site since it is not one of my preference and there don't have a good reputation around the industry.

This is a bad way to interact with potential customers hiding under false identities to chil for your projects.

Gambling is more of luck than skills. No matter how skilled anyone may present themselves to be, ni matter any strategy the perso6is using, they do not hold true always for a longer period of time.
If cryptocurrency trading strategies that is more dependent on skills and TA ability fails at a point, there is no guarantee that gambling strategies will not fail.
Even if I can spend money to acquire trading strategies which I doubt, I will not spend money for any gambling strategies.

You raise an important point regarding the house edge in gambling. In the long run, the odds are typically in favor of the house, giving the casino or other gambling business the upper hand over the players. The house will always win money over time thanks to this advantage, often known as the "house edge."
The inherent house edge cannot be completely eliminated by any strategy or method, even though they may offer temporary success or minor advantages. Gamblers must be aware of this fact and comprehend that, at its core, gambling is a type of entertainment with a built-in statistical advantage for the casino.

What ever we want to bet on, we need to very careful how we make decisions if not, we might make some bad loses that might cost us a lot of money for us to recover back. Our motive should not be only for gambling and to make fast profits, we need to know what we are doing so that we are not going to create more problems for ourselves, so we need to bet with small funds to be at the safe side.

True. However, all the strategies that we use don't really improve our winning/losing chances since the house always wins in the long-term due to house edge factor which many gamblers tend to forget.

Op's strategy might work in the short-term, but will inevitably fail in the long-term just like all other strategies.

There's nothing much to worry on this because if OP think it's the best for him then he can go ahead but if he thinks that isn't going to be profitable for him then why sharing to the public, everyone of us have developed one or two mea s whereby we gamble using a particular strategy to make our chances of winning increases, everyone is just working on their own end to see what works to their own favour while gambling.

I agree with your friend, over time, we have seen gamblers come up with various ways and strategies they think makes winning in sports betting easier, but if properly checked, we discover that it's all the same, it's like a two different roads, one being straight, and the other being filled with corners, but both roads leads to the same destination, some may assume the straight road is shorter, while other may argue that the one being filled with corners is shorter, but if checked like I said before, you discover both roads are just about the same distance, and the efforts it takes on the straight road, to get to the destination, is just about the same amount of efforts, it will take on the road filled with corners..

And the end of it all is that, winning a bet from the loser side or the winning side requires the same amount of energy, none is easier, if winning bets becomes pretty easy for everyone, then betting will become less and less interesting.

gambling can be very difficult when we make the wrong decisions that could affect our portfolio and our results.
I will prefer to gamble with small funds on this kind of matches because there could anything that can happen so staking with small amount of money is the idea that could give a moderate winnings without greed of winning big amount of profits.

I have never created an account on nitrobetting before, so the reason can't be that it was flagged because it doesn't exist. The warning keeps appearing today although I changed my IP several times and even after selecting different countries.

If other users are connecting through a VPN and don't have such a problem, please, let me know.

I think that betting on a team to lose the game and making a correct prediction is just as difficult as betting on a team to win and getting it right. I think mostly because when matches are played, the players are on an eye to eye level. Otherwise the match would not be worth it and gambling would be too easy. Nobody wants to see or bet on a Mike Tyson vs a baby match...

This isn't some new strategy or something. Op just tweaked the underdog betting strategy basically which is quite risky for obvious reasons. I don't think he will provide more proof to support his strategy.

True. They have teams working for them which is why beating them at their own game is tough as hell.

But if you know very well the sports, you have the insights on why bookies are making them as underdogs.
Because if you follow a specific sports closely, you can get the idea about their weaknesses and strengths.
And if you still prefer to bet on a losing team, it means, you are seeing some advantage that you think can play out during the game.
A good example is in the boxing sports, even if the boxer is the underdog, he has the chance to win and get an upset as there are some blind factors that bookies and bettors can't see.
Like the preparation, their strategies, actual power during the fight, coaching and many others.
Now, when it comes to football, a lot of factors are in play as well, the actual line-up during the match, weather, coach, strategies among many others.
So for the bookies to identify the favorite, will be considering a lot of factors as well. But most bookies have the same favorite as they will have offering of similar odds.

Kinda weird how we're basing the strength of a team based on the best placed by bookmakers on them, and not how bookmakers base their odds based on the strength of the teams themselves. I've never really tried this (or ever will) really, just doesn't make sense to me. Has anyone actually tried this and made work of it? Preferably in cases where you ignored the teams themselves, just the odds.

Granted I've rarely bet on underdogs though. They're called underdogs for a reason after all, they may have made a significant one or two matches, but it doesn't mean it's a solid display of their strength. Can't exactly forget their past records ofc.

Unfortunately, I can't check the link since I still get the geo-restriction message from Cloudflare, but there is money to be made on losing teams because the odds provider would sometimes overestimate the favorites and give the underdogs too many points on the handicap. During the start of the regular season, the OKC and the Magic were a couple of good examples. They were at the bottom of the standings but still consistently covered more than half of the time as the underdog whenever they play at home. Most teams play better overall at home, but these two are always good at keeping their losses close regardless of the teams they're playing.

You gamble, means you bet; these two are the same. Do you win 100%? 'coz if not, that simply makes gambling a "gamble", meaning, there's no assurance with the result. You can indeed create yoir own analysis of the possible outcome but that won't guarantee winning. With regards on betting to a team you don't like, no one would force you to do so, so if you still did, that is your initiative. You don't need to like a team for betting into them, it is probably yoy saw something or some sort of chance which made you bet unto them; homecourt advantage, star player of opposing team won't be able to play and such.Unless you just cannot help not betting on a single game, that would be a different story 'coz you might be addicted into gambling.

Do not misunderstand me, nobody wants to make themselves a path towards to disappointment. It is rather a very situational approach towards sport betting. I have seen my cousin not to bet when the matches are rather "boring" because both teams are unappealing, but I could see myself betting anyways on one of those teams if I can afford to lose a couple of bucks.

Again that is a very situational approach, in normal circumstances it would not be necessary to bet like that.  

I did a test like this once and it often works.

Imagine that you have $100 and want to bet 25 on 4 bets. You can bet it all on favored teams and if 1 out of 4 loses you don't make any money even though 3 of 4 won.
At the same time if you bet on 4 losing team and 1 wins you will make more money than you would in the above situation

The challenge is, whether you'll manage to win at least 1 losing bet, or win all 4 winning bets., because if you lose all 4 losing bets you'll be down on your balance, but if you win at least half of your winning bets, you will not be down.

It comes down to strategy. Some people prefer to be down 3/4 bets and make money this way, and others prefer to make money by winning 3/4 of their bets.

Mate, your outlook seems a bit stormy, don't you think? Pouring your sweat-earned dough into a sinking ship? You're virtually inking your pact with disappointment. Isn't the esence of wagering to experience the exhilaration of victory, not brace for the torture of loss? Gambling on a hopeless team, isn't that akin to casting your cash into a fountain, praying for a Hail Mary? But I concur, life's a box of cocolates. There have been underdog triumphs, but aren't those more outliers than the norm, right? Your closing argument hits the bullseye, though! Laying bets on a doomed squad is closer to rolling the dice than wagering. It's not a game of chess; it's more like a game of chance. But, as the saying goes, different strokes for different folks, yeah?

Probably the only instance I would think of myself putting money on a team I do not like or I don't trust in, it would be that both teams facing each other are almost as equally bad, in comparison so I would go in with a small quantity of money which I would not mind to lose in a single bet.

Who knows, life is unpredictable there has been cases of very unexpected winners, and those who bet on them can get juicy rewards.

But to be honest with you, betting on something one does not have much hope in sounds rather like gambling and not betting, there is an important difference between them.

Regardless of what you try to promote mate, you will not get my attention because if you claim that your strategy works then you can share further evidence of how you end up with the winning and how consistent you are in the use of this strategy and the result it provides.
So ops I suggest you try as much as possible to share clear evidence to support your claims since many here won't believe that you can use that strategy to win.

The article made sense, although it would be difficult to make it as consistent as possible given that it isn’t always the case for teams and that the team dynamics always changes. If I were OP, I’d just do arbitrage betting, although it would be difficult to perform such since bookies are also on the lookout for such activities. All in all, what OP is saying could work at the right circumstances, although not as consistent to make money off of it in the long run.

I read through the article and it was not bad at all.  It just give us guidelines on the different grounds how a team losses and give us hints whether the losing team will have a chance on winnings on their next game as long as the circumstances changes such as their star player being 100% recovered or the team removed the handicapped (reason why they lose).  I don't know how some of the replies meet @OP's post with a little hostility when @OP just shared an article that can help new comers in betting sports to analyze teams.

Anyway, we know it is some kind of click baiting towards the site which OP wanted to promote but he never told us to bet there or asked money or something but I really appreciate if @OP will somehow give full details of an article he wanted to share in his post so that we don't have to move out of the forum just to read the entire story.

To the best of my knowledge, blocked IPs gives this response when ever you load the network, restricted countries also have the same response whenever you do the same too. Possibly your account is blocked from accessing that  website. I think your
IP and accountt with the casino is been flagged or so otherwise I see no reason Why you should be having such response loading the web page. Try using another system to load the page and see what happens.

But in this case, was the op even promoting any service? Because i totally missed that. He was just telling about this tactic and seems like OP wanted traffic to a site trough a betting guide article OP wrote.

You can all think what you want about the tactic but op wasn't asking any money for it but published it for free use. It's wasn't a subscribe model or that you would get more by paying.

And tactic wasn't anything special really, just OP's take on it.

Definitely it is only a shit casino or gambling platforms that will start establishment with the gambkers money deposited on their websites wallet or depends on the stake the bet with to maintain the running of their gambling platform, you must have eaten and feels alright that you aren't hungry which is a clear definition to the fact that you have successfully earned alot to use for the promotion of your platform through adverts, and I will drop this as an additional advise that you shouldn't start if you're yet to get established first.

We have the same thinking it's actually a promotion of their casino, unfortunately, I cannot access the whole article because my location is restricted, I've read a lot of these as advertisements from casino platforms or systems.

This is too good to be true and, when it comes to casinos, whether it's luck-based or sports betting a guide about profit is hard to believe OP did not even post a disclaimer that this is not guaranteed betting advice.

People should be responsible when it comes to posting about profit in gambling, this is gambling where your chances cannot guranteed.

Attention required! Cloudflare:



Am I the only one being redirected to this page when I try to follow OP's link? I usually use a VPN to connect everywhere and I hardly ever have problems of any kind, is the private network the problem here or maybe another reason?

As per the strategy itself, we all know that there is no 100% safe betting system, not even 50%, son don't be fool. As OP correctly stated, we are used to bet for winning teams because it is more fun or Idk why but that's true, and this is just a reminder that there are other ways to bet as well.

If you take the time to do the research on why a team will lose, why not just use the time and find out why they will win? I see strategies like this and I try them, but I never go into profit.... because the house is rigged to win. 

I like to bet on the teams with the highest change for the win, even though the odds are small... just pop a few of those into a small multi bet with a large amount and put your head between you legs and hope for the best. 

Of course, if we want to spend more time looking, we will find other options that turn out to have better odds, even though it's a choice for a weak team because in the money line, it will always be doubtful for the weak to win, but yesterday in a tennis tournament two of the top players faced each other and the underdog got very attractive odds and it would be impossible to see the player going to get those odds because usually he would be under 1.50, with odds around 2.70 and he won, and I was lucky enough to bet money on him even though it was very rare for me do bet on the weak because it's not a comfortable bet at all, because betting on a strong team alone does not always provide profit, especially on a weak team, the chances of winning will be slimmer.

When you are trying to teach people a trick or strategy you should also show them the proof to believe that your strategy works, it makes sense to bet on the losing team but still we are not out of the gambling idea here, the risks are still present.

Thanks for sharing but what will be will be in the end, in every game of chances and luck, you can't always be a winner, very hard to keep your head up like you know how things are going to end, forget about any strategy you know.

The best strategy is building a way to spend less on gambling or try to avoid ruining your life through gambling.

I think this is where most people fail.They usually are attracted as you say by really low odds from winning teams which most of the time though we see surprise results that make our bets lost ones.I think that it would be great to find a good market for the "losing" team from bookmakers and let me make you an example with a Premier League game that we had this season.In the game of Arsenal vs Southampton,Arsenal was the leader of the standings and Southampton the bottom of the standings,Arsenal had an odd of 1.33 which in the end did not come true,so the great bet was to bet on Southampton over 0.5 goals and near 2 as an odd,the game ended 3-3 as a result.This I think is a clear example that there are many other markets beside money lines that we can profit from these "losing" teams.

Interesting strategy op. Never knew about this strategy, but I will try it out with small amounts since I understood it pretty easily. I don't advise trying it out with large amounts though to be frank.

I usually bet on underdogs only when I have a lot of confidence in the player/team in question.

No mate , I also have that same thought because obviously that OP is presenting His own site by holding His name so what we can expect here?

and checking the threads created of OP? yes he is promoting that said site .

_________________________

But about the topic? well How many times that I consider betting in losing team but it is harder to make through .

Maybe better to bet in any team that you believe will generate you profit .

I don't think so, in this case the OP is summarising an article from a sports betting site, which is usual, the bookmakers giving you tips on how to bet, without actually telling you that the big winners are going to be them. Here as we are talking about sports betting there is a small chance that people who employ the strategy can get winning results in the long run, but the vast majority will lose.

Im with this and im supposed to say the same thing on which there's no f*ckin sense for someone to reveal out their methods or ways of them on being profitable or guaranteeing profits which we know that it is

really that impossible on gambling field which is something bullsh*t for someone to claim. I do also have the feels basing up on the title alone that there would be some sort of advertisement of services.
Its true that we do have some some tipsters on this forum which are actually for free for someone to follow on on which i would say that it is really better to stick into that one.

If this one is really that real on having the general idea on betting into the underdog or against the ML then you would be able to make win if there's an upset but we know that this doesnt happen all the time.

I am the only one who believes this is likely some sort of advertisement campaign to some "services" which offers something which is unlikely to happen?  
Honestly, sometimes it messes with my mind that there is people out there who can actually fall for stuff similar to these and other I have read in the past.

I'll say it clearly: Any person/organization who can get guaranteed profits constantly would not have a reason to promote themselves and ask for other's people money to spoil their own secret

Of course, there are some legitimate tipsters but we should be careful where we put out hard earned money on, for Satoshi's sake.  

Exactly. Show proof first and then we'll believe. You OP are not something special right here (pardon if it sounded rude) as there are countless people here that are like you, who advertised some form of winning strategy, mostly to unsuspecting  and stupid bettors here who are in it for the money and not for the entertainment, only for these people to lose considerably in the process. I suggest you give us something to work with, as a lot of newbies here in the betting parts of the forum fall victim to scams that involve some form of betting edge to give them more wins in exchange for fees.

Plus these games although player skill still has a role, are all in essence games of chance (as Slow Death mentioned) so to find how they lose and then use that information to win games tells me that you're either scamming people out of their betting money, or you're a time traveler in the future hoping to make quick cash out of your apparent clairvoyance given the fact that you lived in the future, seeing all the wins from these games. In which case I'd tell you to either piss off, or to piss off cause what benefit would you get from this?

gambling are not to be seen as a source of income and in the long run they do not generate profits, but as you posted your strategy here on the forum then I suggest that you also post pictures of your profits using your strategy, only with proof and that I'm going to believe that your strategy works, I didn't click on your link, to be honest, so I think that posting pictures in this thread will be more practical for us to see how much profit you've already made with your strategy and in which casino you played, I suppose that you didn't play in your casino and in the other thread you created about the advantages of using bitcoin to gamble in casinos

You also put a link in case people wanted to read more about the topic something I can't understand is why you don't just post all the information on the forum, if you want to attract people to your casino then run a signature campaign, offer contests and bonuses , pay advertising on other sites, but don't do the same thing you are currently doing because people will think like this: if you don't have money for advertising and you are using low methods then you don't have money to pay people who play in your casino . then nobody will use your casino, and something very obvious. I hope you change your marketing strategy because the current one is not good

Determine if the team is a loser against the spread, a loser on the money line, or a loser on both

Teams that lose against the spread and money line are usually bad bets. You can find a winning game among an SU and ATS loser, but it doesn’t happen often enough for you to make long term profit betting on the team.

We want teams that have no worse than a .400 record against the spread or no worse than a .400 record on the money line.

A lot of times straight up winning teams are bad against the spread bets. The more a team wins straight up, the more oddsmakers adjust spread lines in favor of underdogs.

Remember, human beings like to bet on winners. So to attract action on the other side of the line, oddsmakers turn favored teams into underlays with ridiculous spreads.

Once we find the team, we can move to step 2.

Discover why the team loses
.400 teams aren’t the same as a .300 team. A .300 team is likely just a bad team. But a .400 team often has a losing record due to some anomaly, like an injured offensive lineman, or like in Milwaukee’s case versus Miami in this year’s NBA Playoffs, their best player not being one-hundred percent.

Try to find out why the team loses. Once you believe you’ve discovered why, move to step 3.



Read more→ https://n2g.io/43c2c11