Author

Topic: Proof-of-Signature (PoSign) (Read 372 times)

jr. member
Activity: 113
Merit: 1
In XBY we trust
August 31, 2018, 09:17:01 AM
#4
Sounds like a 51% attack can be achieved with owning the majority of nodes. Unless there are some higher tier, centralized nodes.

Quote
Why isn't XTRABYTES vulnerable to a 51% attack?

The foundation for this protection flows from XTRABYTES’ decentralized node network. Comprised of 3584 ‘STATIC’ (Services, Transactions, and Trusted in Control) nodes, XTRABYTES issues transactions fees to its STATIC node owners rather than to miners. Network security is dependent upon these STATIC nodes signing each transaction block, through our new algorithm called Proof-of-Signature (PoSign). A private virtual network interconnects these online STATIC nodes, creating a virtual private network-like (VPN) functionality for the nodes.

With Proof-of-Signature requiring that every node signs every transaction, the entirety of the STATIC node network would need to be compromised simultaneously to undermine the integrity of the blockchain. Furthermore, by leveraging the use of digital signatures extensively in security algorithms, the XTRABYTES developers go several steps further than SSL and Microsoft’s signed software to ensure the security of the signature protocol.

If a signature is compromised, the associated [node network] signature will automatically be revoked as the consensus among nodes has been violated. The owner of the affected node is then warned to generate a new signature before the node can resume participation of the network. In short, a bad node will be “greylisted” and given a few more attempts to fix itself. If it continues to broadcast false information, it will be blacklisted by the network and excluded until further notice.

If a disruptive agent attacks and disables a STATIC node, one or more of the other STATIC nodes in the network will take control until the affected node has been brought back online and/or verified as stable.



Found it here https://support.xtrabytes.global/hc/en-us/articles/360000068751-Why-isn-t-XTRABYTES-vulnerable-to-a-51-attack-
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
August 26, 2017, 07:20:03 AM
#3
Like to know this too.

Let's hope someone like our old friend drops in to review it one day and give us an answer we can understand.
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
August 26, 2017, 07:12:17 AM
#2
Sounds like a 51% attack can be achieved with owning the majority of nodes. Unless there are some higher tier, centralized nodes.
hero member
Activity: 800
Merit: 502
August 26, 2017, 05:46:24 AM
#1
Hi,

XTRABytes use the Proof-of-Signature (PoSign) consensus algorithm.
But which one is better?

Proof of work
Proof of stake
Proof of Signature


Proof of signature looks good but it this true?
-----------------
In all other existing blockchain technologies, transactions are verified and blocks created by only one randomly selected node in the network. Common consensus algorithms such as Proof-of-Work, Proof-of-Stake, and Proof-of-Importance attempt to ensure that the node selected is not malicious or faulty, but they cannot guarantee that this is the case.

PoSign comprises a radically different approach. Transactions are verified by a network of what are called STATIC nodes—importantly, each of these nodes must sign off on a transaction before the associated block can be appended to the chain. Should a malicious node repeatedly attempt to compromise the chain, it will be blacklisted automatically.
-----------------
See also https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/new-xby-ann-xtrabytes-because-the-blockchain-can-be-better-1864397
Jump to: