You'd probably get some more responses if you re-write some of your original post... The first sentence is ridiculously hard to read, for example, because it lacks any punctuation.
The proposal: Increase profitability transparency on profit switching pools - expose calculated/predicted profitability and coin price, actual sell price, and the difference.
Is that what you meant?
--
I would much rather the development efforts for multi-pools like WafflePool go towards algorithm switching and alternative payouts currencies. This kind of statistic gathering just seems superfluous.
Basically looking to propose to all mining pool operators not just waffle pool, the ability to view 2 additional stats that would show more transparency on what is mined as "most profitable" meaning the price it was when it was "most profitable" and the price when it was sold. Ultimately it would give current miners and any new possible miners the additional transparency of not only showing what the "most profitable " coin is being mined and its current price and what it actually was exchanged for to be paid out to all miners.Keep in mind the 2nd number basically is already being used in the formula to pay miners. This would just make it more tranparent and to show that just because a coin is "most profitable" at any given time, it doesnt matter if it is +298% of LTC profitability if said coin does not also exchange for the exact same price and exact same LTC Price as the miner is only getting paid at the exchange price which often times is not the same as when it was most profitable due to timing issues with coins being immature and the time it takes to sell and exchange the coins.
I just want to make it more transparent to new or current miners that while most pools now can multi mine and can mine the most "most profitable" doesnt mean you get paid that "most profitable" price unless it is instant sold as it was mined. I know some miners and have seen others in this forum that think they are getting paid by that "most profitable" stat and that is not exactly true.
Think about this: While i love Waffle pool to have algorithm switching and alternate payouts, my proposal actually works in very nicely with those. If a pool is always mining the "most profitable" but not maybe exchanging said coins for the same or higher, it could very well be losing quite a bit of earnings and could ultimately be forced to close down.And no one is in business to lose earnings or to be forced to shut down.