Author

Topic: Proposal: remove steemit links (Read 2227 times)

legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
August 09, 2016, 11:22:07 PM
#30
While there are some posts with steemit links that don't just point to steemit articles, there is a bunch of them that only is used for spam, and begging for likes/upvotes.

I agree begging for upvotes should be considered spam and not allowed.

However, just linking to a blog post isn't necessarily spam or in any way bad just because of the platform it happens to be on.

This post was made around the time of the DAO token sale, and was very influential.

https://steemit.com/crypto-news/@dan/is-the-dao-going-to-be-doa

It was widely linked and discussed on many crypto blogs, forums, news sites, widely retweeted, etc. (it even got a bit of mainstream coverage). A rule against posting that link here in a thread about Ethereum or The DAO, where it is clearly relevant, would be a harsh form of censorship. That certainly isn't the only substantive and influential blog post on steemit. Charles Hoskinson made one recently as well, and there certainly are (and will be) others. Those two just happen to come to mind right away.


As you can clearly see, thread contains no valid data, and only serves to leech traffic from forum to steemit, +backlinks
This is bad for the forum, and it would be better to regulate these cases/topic now, rather than later (when it spreads even more throughout, and people start taking it for granted)

I'm not sure about the point about links, backlinks, traffic, etc. There are other threads that are just links to other sites that were reported and allowed. One I happen to know about (I'm sure it isn't the only one) is the Dash Nation progress thread. There is no discussion there (other than some early discussion on the thread about the pointlessness of it) and just links posted every day to Dash and Dash Nation web sites and the Dash forum.

If links to other web sites without significant relevance to discussion here aren't allowed that should be applied consistently.

(LOL. I just checked and Dash Nation is posting steemit links now. But the issue isn't steemit links here; the Dash Nation thread was just as worthless a link farm before, and was allowed.)

The above game giveaway post may be off topic. I didn't notice where it was posted.

Charles Hoskinson is an insider, having worked with Bitshares and whatnot, so I don't think he counts as an example of steemit's credibility. Although I'm sure there is some useful stuff unfortunately 90% of steemit links I find here are:

1) posted by authors themselves; and
2) utter garbage.

As for some other shitcoin having shitty links... I'm fine with it as long as it stays in their own thread and doesn't infect the rest of the forum. There are perfectly valid ways to share one's point of view, e.g. quote the text or post it on neutral platform and link it that way instead of expecting everyone to participate in someone's misguided idea of how to "monetize" garbage.

Hoskinson's post had nothing at all to do with Steemit; he just posted a blog there, as have many other people including a number of prominent cryptocurrency (and non-cryptocurrency) personalities having nothing at all to do with its development. It was related to his returning to work on Ethereum (via ETC), where he was one of the original founders. I also don't think he has anything to do with Steemit; your claim he is an insider is unsupported and probably incorrect. Just because he once worked with some of the same people at a different company/coin doesn't make him an insider.

As for others prominent people blogging there who may, and probably will, be quoted on this forum based on the substance of their posts, I'd list Jeff Berwick (known popularly as "The Dollar Vigilante"), Benbrick (successful songwriter), Rick Falkvinge (Pirate Party founder), Larkin Rose (tax protester), Brenda Zambrano (Playboy Playmate), Barry Cooper (drug war opponent), and many others. None of these people are insiders or have any involvement with running Steemit afaik.

I had several posts of mine deleted from this forum that were in the Steem ANN thread, presumably because they contained links to the site. I was not the author of the Steemit posts. The links related to posts that were highly relevant to the adoption of the coin and therefore speculation on the coin. This is discussion right at the core of the entire purpose of the Altcoin section of this forum. I strongly protest the deletion of those posts.

The Dash Nation thread is not the Dash ANN thread. It is another discussion thread created solely for the purpose of link spamming.

So I agree with most of your comments here, except that the moderation that is occurring does not follow those guidelines either in the positive or the negative. Change is needed.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
August 09, 2016, 10:51:56 AM
#29
While there are some posts with steemit links that don't just point to steemit articles, there is a bunch of them that only is used for spam, and begging for likes/upvotes.

I agree begging for upvotes should be considered spam and not allowed.

However, just linking to a blog post isn't necessarily spam or in any way bad just because of the platform it happens to be on.

This post was made around the time of the DAO token sale, and was very influential.

https://steemit.com/crypto-news/@dan/is-the-dao-going-to-be-doa

It was widely linked and discussed on many crypto blogs, forums, news sites, widely retweeted, etc. (it even got a bit of mainstream coverage). A rule against posting that link here in a thread about Ethereum or The DAO, where it is clearly relevant, would be a harsh form of censorship. That certainly isn't the only substantive and influential blog post on steemit. Charles Hoskinson made one recently as well, and there certainly are (and will be) others. Those two just happen to come to mind right away.


As you can clearly see, thread contains no valid data, and only serves to leech traffic from forum to steemit, +backlinks
This is bad for the forum, and it would be better to regulate these cases/topic now, rather than later (when it spreads even more throughout, and people start taking it for granted)

I'm not sure about the point about links, backlinks, traffic, etc. There are other threads that are just links to other sites that were reported and allowed. One I happen to know about (I'm sure it isn't the only one) is the Dash Nation progress thread. There is no discussion there (other than some early discussion on the thread about the pointlessness of it) and just links posted every day to Dash and Dash Nation web sites and the Dash forum.

If links to other web sites without significant relevance to discussion here aren't allowed that should be applied consistently.

(LOL. I just checked and Dash Nation is posting steemit links now. But the issue isn't steemit links here; the Dash Nation thread was just as worthless a link farm before, and was allowed.)

The above game giveaway post may be off topic. I didn't notice where it was posted.

Charles Hoskinson is an insider, having worked with Bitshares and whatnot, so I don't think he counts as an example of steemit's credibility. Although I'm sure there is some useful stuff unfortunately 90% of steemit links I find here are:

1) posted by authors themselves; and
2) utter garbage.

As for some other shitcoin having shitty links... I'm fine with it as long as it stays in their own thread and doesn't infect the rest of the forum. There are perfectly valid ways to share one's point of view, e.g. quote the text or post it on neutral platform and link it that way instead of expecting everyone to participate in someone's misguided idea of how to "monetize" garbage.
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 1036
August 09, 2016, 10:23:32 AM
#28
Okay, I have to ask. WTF is a steamit link?

The hottest pyramid scheme right now. Also before going down the rabbit hole make sure to get enough bots upvoting your blog posts so it's guaranteed that you will be raking in the big bucks in no time  Grin

Oh and by the way the circlejerking over there absolutely puts Bitcointalk to shame  Grin I wonder when people will realize they are getting underpaid to post the useless crap they are posting here anyways and do a massive exodus to over there where the grass is always greener  Grin
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
August 08, 2016, 08:40:11 PM
#27
I'm so old and ignorant, I don't even know what steemit is.  Going to Google it now.  But if these are essentially shitposts or referral links,  then yeah, nuke them.   There's a lot of stuff I'd like zapped off this forum,  and you have to start somewhere.   I'm all for this.

Edit:  ok I sort of have an idea of what it is now.  When people here fight over the chance to make 0.0005 sat, I can see how this would be 1) Popular,  and 2) An opportunity to get our forum shat upon. 
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
August 08, 2016, 08:22:06 PM
#26
It seems to me that steem is a classic scamcoin, and steemit is being astroturfed like crazy. However, if a steemit link contains substantial, on-topic content, then the shadyness of steem/steemit doesn't warrant removing the link.

But if people are posting low-content steemit links in low-content posts, or posting steemit links constantly, then this should be reported. (Note that we might give a little extra leeway for steemit posts in the steem/steemit threads.)

I just had 9 legit post removed in the Steem thread... Kinda horse shit.

I don't really care about the link, but there was conversations in there and it was in the proper thread.

That's annoying to say the least...  Please keep mprep at bay a tiny bit.

Agree. Look, in the STEEM thread (or other relevant discussion threads) it is impossible to discuss the development and market for the coin without posting links.

There have also been some pure spam link posts in the Steem thread (i.e. not part of a discussion, just someone saying 'Please upvote'), but there needs to be a distinction made.
legendary
Activity: 4004
Merit: 1250
Owner at AltQuick.com
August 08, 2016, 08:21:25 PM
#25
Okay, I have to ask. WTF is a steamit link?

Here is an example of a bug that was found and reported on Steemit and Bitcointalk.

(note that this was a post in the Steem thread... related to Steem... and not shady... seems it falls into Theymos guild lines of not to be deleted, but was anyways.


I bet your post time by one minute Tongue

https://steemit.com/steemit/@bayareacoins/so-you-think-you-are-limited-to-5-tags-for-your-post-now-wrong-click-here-to-learn-how-to-get-your-article-listed-with-6-tags

It seems to me that steem is a classic scamcoin, and steemit is being astroturfed like crazy. However, if a steemit link contains substantial, on-topic content, then the shadyness of steem/steemit doesn't warrant removing the link.

But if people are posting low-content steemit links in low-content posts, or posting steemit links constantly, then this should be reported. (Note that we might give a little extra leeway for steemit posts in the steem/steemit threads.)
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
August 08, 2016, 08:19:30 PM
#24
Okay, I have to ask. WTF is a steamit link?
legendary
Activity: 4004
Merit: 1250
Owner at AltQuick.com
August 08, 2016, 08:16:33 PM
#23
It seems to me that steem is a classic scamcoin, and steemit is being astroturfed like crazy. However, if a steemit link contains substantial, on-topic content, then the shadyness of steem/steemit doesn't warrant removing the link.

But if people are posting low-content steemit links in low-content posts, or posting steemit links constantly, then this should be reported. (Note that we might give a little extra leeway for steemit posts in the steem/steemit threads.)

I just had 9 legit post removed in the Steem thread... Kinda horse shit.

I don't really care about the link, but there was conversations in there and it was in the proper thread.

That's annoying to say the least...  Please keep mprep at bay a tiny bit.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
August 07, 2016, 11:25:31 PM
#22
While there are some posts with steemit links that don't just point to steemit articles, there is a bunch of them that only is used for spam, and begging for likes/upvotes.

I agree begging for upvotes should be considered spam and not allowed.

However, just linking to a blog post isn't necessarily spam or in any way bad just because of the platform it happens to be on.

This post was made around the time of the DAO token sale, and was very influential.

https://steemit.com/crypto-news/@dan/is-the-dao-going-to-be-doa

It was widely linked and discussed on many crypto blogs, forums, news sites, widely retweeted, etc. (it even got a bit of mainstream coverage). A rule against posting that link here in a thread about Ethereum or The DAO, where it is clearly relevant, would be a harsh form of censorship. That certainly isn't the only substantive and influential blog post on steemit. Charles Hoskinson made one recently as well, and there certainly are (and will be) others. Those two just happen to come to mind right away.


As you can clearly see, thread contains no valid data, and only serves to leech traffic from forum to steemit, +backlinks
This is bad for the forum, and it would be better to regulate these cases/topic now, rather than later (when it spreads even more throughout, and people start taking it for granted)

I'm not sure about the point about links, backlinks, traffic, etc. There are other threads that are just links to other sites that were reported and allowed. One I happen to know about (I'm sure it isn't the only one) is the Dash Nation progress thread. There is no discussion there (other than some early discussion on the thread about the pointlessness of it) and just links posted every day to Dash and Dash Nation web sites and the Dash forum.

If links to other web sites without significant relevance to discussion here aren't allowed that should be applied consistently.

(LOL. I just checked and Dash Nation is posting steemit links now. But the issue isn't steemit links here; the Dash Nation thread was just as worthless a link farm before, and was allowed.)

The above game giveaway post may be off topic. I didn't notice where it was posted.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
August 07, 2016, 07:41:01 AM
#21
My vote on this proposal.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin
August 07, 2016, 07:13:58 AM
#20
Bumping this to the top +;

It's imperative that steemit links (posts) be removed from the forum if they don't offer any notable content other than the steemit outside link.

Some examples here:



New service- Post anonymous and author keeps 100% SteemDollars.

https://steemit.com/steemitanon/@pjheinz/post-anonymous-and-author-keeps-100-steemdollars


While there are some posts with steemit links that don't just point to steemit articles, there is a bunch of them that only is used for spam, and begging for likes/upvotes.

EDIT:


As you can clearly see, thread contains no valid data, and only serves to leech traffic from forum to steemit, +backlinks
This is bad for the forum, and it would be better to regulate these cases/topic now, rather than later (when it spreads even more throughout, and people start taking it for granted)
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
August 03, 2016, 08:49:11 AM
#19
That's kind of irrelevant to whether people linking to blog posts or discussions should be banned.

Nowhere did I suggest that people should be banned. I suggested to make links unclickable or at least moderate them as any other ref links, given that the author has a direct financial incentive to get people to visit his/her blog and sign up for the website.

Poor phrasing on my part. I didn't mean to suggest there was a call for banning the people, only the practice of linking.

I don't see a good reason to make links unclickable unless they have a high risk of leading to malware. This doesn't qualify.

Unless it is an actual steemit ref link (?r=referrer) the linker derives no direct financial benefit if someone clicks through and then signs up. If someone clicks through, signs up, goes back to the very same page, and then upvotes the post, well author of the blog post might make a penny (or quite possibly literally zero), since new signups have negligible voting power.

These links are not an attempt to gain a direct financial benefit, or if they are the person doing it is clueless about how the system actually works.

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
August 03, 2016, 08:17:52 AM
#18
That's kind of irrelevant to whether people linking to blog posts or discussions should be banned.

Nowhere did I suggest that people should be banned. I suggested to make links unclickable or at least moderate them as any other ref links, given that the author has a direct financial incentive to get people to visit his/her blog and sign up for the website.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
August 03, 2016, 07:35:12 AM
#17
My understanding is that the "authors" get paid for "upvotes", so yes, the users have to be signed in and click some button or something. New users get some free upvotes but apparently the idea is that eventually they'll need to pay (once the premine runs out?).

Nobody ever has to pay, at least not for many years when the business model could change. The upvotes don't "run out" (they do recharge if depleted by overuse over five days, at no cost).

Steemit is a blogging and discussion platform. The there are certainly low quality links to crap, and those should be evaluated on substance (or lack thereof), but most of the links are just links to people's biog posts or discussion, the same as medium, reddit, etc.

So the money is produced out of thin air?

It's basically mining. (Yes you can "mine" a little by self-voting but it is much less efficient than if others vote for you.)

Wasn't it promoted as "no premine" but the developers somehow ended up owning most of the coin supply?

You can go read the thread yourself. They told everyone right up front they were going to mine it very aggressively in order to try to obtain 80% of the initial supply (there is no fixed supply; it inflationary) and then use those coins according to a specific business plan. Literally speaking there was no premine, as anyone else could start mining the same time they did. There was even a relaunch with 24 hours notice or something, giving everyone a second chance to starting mining at the same time they did. (Personally I thought it was scammy for them to promote it as "no premine" under the circumstances of their efforts to obtain most of the supply, but as I said, literally that was and is accurate.)

That's kind of irrelevant to whether people linking to blog posts or discussions should be banned.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
August 03, 2016, 07:32:46 AM
#16
My understanding is that the "authors" get paid for "upvotes", so yes, the users have to be signed in and click some button or something. New users get some free upvotes but apparently the idea is that eventually they'll need to pay (once the premine runs out?).

Nobody ever has to pay, at least not for many years when the business model could change. The upvotes don't "run out" (they do recharge if depleted by overuse over five days, at no cost).

Steemit is a blogging and discussion platform. The there are certainly low quality links to crap, and those should be evaluated on substance (or lack thereof), but most of the links are just links to people's biog posts or discussion, the same as medium, reddit, etc.

So the money is produced out of thin air? This is so much better then, especially with the self-voting: https://steemit.com/money/@ubg/welcome-to-my-money-farm

As for quality - the garbage is what brought my attention to it, I didn't know anything about steem until I started seeing links to their "articles". I don't think I've seen anybody spamming their @medium links like that, or random noobs begging for upvotes on their reddit posts. Must have something to do with the financial incentive.

Sir, it seems to me that calling something a scam without supplying any evidence to back your words, is the actual scam.
You are implying dishonest intentions of other people while being quite ignorant.

Wasn't it promoted as "no premine" but the developers somehow ended up owning most of the coin supply?
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
August 03, 2016, 05:53:44 AM
#15
It seems to me that steem is a classic scamcoin...

...the shadyness of steem/steemit...

Sir, it seems to me that calling something a scam without supplying any evidence to back your words, is the actual scam.
You are implying dishonest intentions of other people while being quite ignorant.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1047
August 03, 2016, 04:08:08 AM
#14
It seems to me that steem is a classic scamcoin, and steemit is being astroturfed like crazy. However, if a steemit link contains substantial, on-topic content, then the shadyness of steem/steemit doesn't warrant removing the link.

But if people are posting low-content steemit links in low-content posts, or posting steemit links constantly, then this should be reported. (Note that we might give a little extra leeway for steemit posts in the steem/steemit threads.)
You just butthurt, I'm not saying steemit is perfect and we all have our doubts, but atleast you won't censor anybody, seems funny that "scams are not moderated" but if something smells a bit fishy and affects your site directly it is a problem.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
August 03, 2016, 02:44:18 AM
#13
My understanding is that the "authors" get paid for "upvotes", so yes, the users have to be signed in and click some button or something. New users get some free upvotes but apparently the idea is that eventually they'll need to pay (once the premine runs out?).

Nobody ever has to pay, at least not for many years when the business model could change. The upvotes don't "run out" (they do recharge if depleted by overuse over five days, at no cost).

Steemit is a blogging and discussion platform. The there are certainly low quality links to crap, and those should be evaluated on substance (or lack thereof), but most of the links are just links to people's biog posts or discussion, the same as medium, reddit, etc.


legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
August 02, 2016, 11:49:00 PM
#12
Thanks guys. I'll keep reporting the most blatant ones then.
administrator
Activity: 5222
Merit: 13032
August 02, 2016, 03:35:59 AM
#11
It seems to me that steem is a classic scamcoin, and steemit is being astroturfed like crazy. However, if a steemit link contains substantial, on-topic content, then the shadyness of steem/steemit doesn't warrant removing the link.

But if people are posting low-content steemit links in low-content posts, or posting steemit links constantly, then this should be reported. (Note that we might give a little extra leeway for steemit posts in the steem/steemit threads.)
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
August 02, 2016, 03:02:30 AM
#10
Barring that - at least maybe we could get some input from the moderation staff whether this is tolerated or should be reported.
There's no specific 'decision/rule' regarding that website at the moment (I haven't even noticed it so far), however, I'd say that it falls under advertisement spam (rule 24). I've also notified theymos and a global moderator right now regarding the matter. Personally, I support the removal of these links (when abused, not in general) and would advise that punishments be handed out to the users that have already abused it. I'll update this post with some information if neither provide direct input.
legendary
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1054
August 02, 2016, 12:12:35 AM
#9
I don't have a clue how steemit works. do they get paid if any random person looks at a link or does the reader have to be signed in to steemit as well?

either way it's cheesy and blatant.

as far as I know yes. users gets paid thru the votes. its a win-win for steem supporters as they get to spam, spread the word and earn at the same time. This may force user to join the mess seeing how they can take advantage of this opportunity.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1001
All cryptos are FIAT digital currency. Do not use.
August 01, 2016, 11:45:38 PM
#8
I don't have a clue how steemit works. do they get paid if any random person looks at a link or does the reader have to be signed in to steemit as well?

either way it's cheesy and blatant.

My understanding is that the "authors" get paid for "upvotes", so yes, the users have to be signed in and click some button or something. New users get some free upvotes but apparently the idea is that eventually they'll need to pay (once the premine runs out?). The whole business model seems backwards - get paid to spam, and pay to read? That leads to this (I'm not responsible for potential eye damage):

https://steemit.com/ethereum-classic/@rolik/ethereum-classic-wtf

Quote
Ethereum Classic WTF

3 hours ago by rolik in ethereum-classic

Hello! My name is Roma and now i want to speak with about Ethereum Classic.

What Ethereum classic Huh When it is not added poloniex I thought that this is a bug but to my surprise there was no limit when it was apparent that at 4:00 he made 12 000 btc volume per day. I started to read what it is and it is ethereum on old blockchain to hardfork. I have only one question WHY?? if erhereum community decided we should all go jump is not necessary to arrange a circus if it decided to steal at least ethereum real name. After adeed poloniex on a day of classic 60K Satoshi Satoshi get up to 500K while 150K was volume btts. Basically this is a bad idea as for me and I for what would be a classic disappeared.

Mining of this clone is generally a separate topic. In normal ethereum my video card issues 12-13 mehahesh without overclocking and this shit just 3-4 Mh/s, I'm in shock as it really is when the same broadcast.

My opinion is that we must abolish the Classic and maintains that hackers dudos their pool http://www.livebitcoinnews.com/ethereum-classic-attack-pool-under-ddos-attacks/.
Now it will be very interesting because the clone still has nine claims against the devas in my ester are dirty rats stealing idea where they were when the eth was not popular ?? one word bitch. Now appeared a warning message in their official topic about ddos if you dont agree with my thoughts please write comments down.

P.S dont forget like my post

Edit: BTW authors can vote for themselves.

Onlookers who know you as a craptsy mole/shill and/or insider will also vote. Smiley

Are there any other muddafudda/ cresty/ firerabbit shitclones you would like to support ?
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
August 01, 2016, 05:46:09 PM
#7
I don't have a clue how steemit works. do they get paid if any random person looks at a link or does the reader have to be signed in to steemit as well?

either way it's cheesy and blatant.

My understanding is that the "authors" get paid for "upvotes", so yes, the users have to be signed in and click some button or something. New users get some free upvotes but apparently the idea is that eventually they'll need to pay (once the premine runs out?). The whole business model seems backwards - get paid to spam, and pay to read? That leads to this (I'm not responsible for potential eye damage):

https://steemit.com/ethereum-classic/@rolik/ethereum-classic-wtf

Quote
Ethereum Classic WTF

3 hours ago by rolik in ethereum-classic

Hello! My name is Roma and now i want to speak with about Ethereum Classic.

What Ethereum classic Huh When it is not added poloniex I thought that this is a bug but to my surprise there was no limit when it was apparent that at 4:00 he made 12 000 btc volume per day. I started to read what it is and it is ethereum on old blockchain to hardfork. I have only one question WHY?? if erhereum community decided we should all go jump is not necessary to arrange a circus if it decided to steal at least ethereum real name. After adeed poloniex on a day of classic 60K Satoshi Satoshi get up to 500K while 150K was volume btts. Basically this is a bad idea as for me and I for what would be a classic disappeared.

Mining of this clone is generally a separate topic. In normal ethereum my video card issues 12-13 mehahesh without overclocking and this shit just 3-4 Mh/s, I'm in shock as it really is when the same broadcast.

My opinion is that we must abolish the Classic and maintains that hackers dudos their pool http://www.livebitcoinnews.com/ethereum-classic-attack-pool-under-ddos-attacks/.
Now it will be very interesting because the clone still has nine claims against the devas in my ester are dirty rats stealing idea where they were when the eth was not popular ?? one word bitch. Now appeared a warning message in their official topic about ddos if you dont agree with my thoughts please write comments down.

P.S dont forget like my post

Edit: BTW authors can vote for themselves.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087
August 01, 2016, 05:28:44 PM
#6
I don't have a clue how steemit works. do they get paid if any random person looks at a link or does the reader have to be signed in to steemit as well?

either way it's cheesy and blatant.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
August 01, 2016, 04:19:14 PM
#5
Totally agree! These useless links are becoming annoying...
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
July 26, 2016, 12:44:59 PM
#4
Here is another way to look at steemit links - these are essentially hidden ref links, which AFAIK are not tolerated here.
I report stuff like that with "Indirect ref spam." as Comment.
Didn't report many steem links, but might start with it.
An answer from staff whether or not it's worth reporting them previously would be appreciated though.



I've read the post now Wink
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
July 26, 2016, 12:40:40 PM
#3
+1, without having read anything besides the title.

Arghhh, wasted half an hour on that post.

Here is another way to look at steemit links - these are essentially hidden ref links, which AFAIK are not tolerated here.
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
July 26, 2016, 12:38:03 PM
#2
+1, without having read anything besides the title.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
July 26, 2016, 12:36:47 PM
#1
In my recent trolling constructive participation in the ETH/ETC forkage I encountered many posts like these:

Things are really getting interesting - ETC is just as legitimate as ETH - ultimately the market will decide:

Ether Wars - Ethereum Classic Price and Volume reach ATH:
https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@thecryptofiend/ether-wars-ethereum-classic-price-and-volume-reach-ath

and this user has posted quite a few of these links:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/souleater123-239941

Seemingly on topic but linking to largely vapid regurgitation of content from other sources such as reddit. I have a feeling that these links are just fishing for tips on the get-paid-to-post Steem platform, which among other things has traits of an altcoin scam.

Random other Steem link spammers from other parts of Bitcointalk:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/nippel66-193791
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/krypto-876627
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/samusnimos-878682

Some are openly whoring for upvotes.

This is becoming similar to sig campaign spam except it drives traffic out of Bitcointalk and doesn't benefit anyone here. I suggest to make the links unclickable with the "[Suspicious link removed]" tag like it's being done with some other garbage links. If the content is relevant the posters would still be able to quote the text, link to original source (reddit, news articles), share it on pastebin, start their own threads etc.

Barring that - at least maybe we could get some input from the moderation staff whether this is tolerated or should be reported.
Jump to: