It is always a good idea to use multiple AI content detection tools, as some of them can give false positives. For instance, most of the other AI checkers I tried said this text was written by a human.
Won't gonna disagree, but firstly it looks like the op pattern created via AI and I used the hivemoderation to check and saw there is 98% above is being chances of AI written content and right now I have also checked the post but in others, AI detector is it's shows human written content.
But I have sended to OP a pm also to not use the AI and quote mine 1st post but I haven't get any replies from him/her that he is not using AI. In the past time I used to use the multiple extensions for AI detection and I saw most of the time the hivemoderation result was accurate and that is why I using this one, Anyway even if it is not written by AI it could be also good advise for the starting.
<✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂✂>
It’s the OP’s first post on the forum, I’d give him a chance to see what he can do with his time here.
Agree and that is why I also wanted to warn him for correcting I always try to be soft with the newbies and it should be if they also try to correct themselves.
How we all attacked the newbie very quickly, literally from the first post.
But I am surprised by the results of your check from this site. I, like you, trust its checks, but I do not use the extension since I do not trust extensions.
And since I often check posts, I am surprised that you and I got different results.
Most likely, the OP used a translator, not AI.
But if we answer the OP's post, then yes, of course, we are all incredibly happy to see you as a newbie. There was no need to create this topic (and now it is also controversial) if you declare yourself a modest newbie. Let your curiosity and zeal for knowledge manifest themselves in more pressing issues.