Therefore, users who distribute my photos without my knowledge have such status as thieves. They stole it and now use it in their messages, edit it, etc.
Funny reply, so what about those using trump's image without his knowledge all over the internet?. If you want people to stop using your photos on the internet without your permission then you need to stop posting them on the web and better still avoid using the web. Like previous users have said, i don't see any of the claims above as plagiarism, when you commit plagiarism you steal people's work and claim it as yours and fair use of your picture isn't plagiarism period.
First, find at least one of the photos on the Internet and show me here! They are unique, as you will not find any of them, which is already the right to authorship. And I have the originals and the camera, which they were shot. I will issue a certificate for you - do not worry. I have already contacted a lawyer. And be sure that anyone who uses it without my permission will break the law.
And let you be adequate and not compare a public person, a state person with a private person. You still give as an example of an actor who earns his face ...)))))
The most striking thing is that the matter is not in the faces and if even the photo shows nature and I am the author of this photo, then using the photo without my permission is also a violation of my rights attorneys.
And if you distribute a photo taken by Trump himself at home, you will also violate Trump's copyright.
So do not talk nonsense.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
What kind of illegal things?
Who mentioned illegal usage of photos, you or me?
2. Only the court has the right to establish the legality or lawlessness of some facts.
Is this court of law? Or discussion forum?
3. The fact that the user once did a favor and then slandered other people 100 times is useful?
Isn't the fact that user posted facts?
4. The user has the right to only assume, suspect, have an opinion or an inclination (like - do not like the project).
Can we say that user, based on facts presented in thread, have right to assume and suspect that minex is scam and discuss about it?
And also indicate that no investigations are legally binding, as they are not conducted by authorized services, but in turn, these “false accusations” can be prosecuted.
Ever heard of news reporters?
Now you are complaining that someone is using your picture and personal information.
As you said
this isn't your name, and now you are pretending to be a guy which you claim you are not, luring people to register under your referral link for your own financial gains, isn't that called identity theft?
Identity theft is the deliberate use of someone else's identity, usually as a method to gain a financial advantage or obtain credit and other benefits in the other person's name, and perhaps to the other person's disadvantage or loss. The person whose identity has been assumed may suffer adverse consequences, especially if they are held responsible for the perpetrator's actions. Identity theft occurs when someone uses another's personally identifying information, like their name, identifying number, or credit card number, without their permission, to commit fraud or other crimes.
sourceIn case identity is really yours (which you claim it isn't), there are also other laws for this
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49587152 so make sure to read all laws regarding your...
referral link.
1. What is the illegality of my attraction of people to the coin? It is forbidden? Not? Then it is better for you to be silent.
2. So then spend a discussion here and do not claim that someone is a crook or not a crook.
There is a presumption of innocence: Anyone held accountable for a criminal offense is presumed innocent until proven otherwise. (Art. 383 of the New York Code of Criminal Procedure).
3. User facts are not legal facts. Neither the court nor even a lawyer established them. It's just his subjective reflections - no more.
4. It may suspect, but based on its opinion, but not on facts that are not proven by authorized bodies. It can also be assumed but not blamed. NEVER CANNOT BE ACCUSED WITHOUT OFFICIAL EVIDENCE! That's when the fact is proved by the court - then it can. Maybe then jump on his head, discussing the fact of fraud to someone else.
5. No comments. I heard the nightingales sing.
6. I had the right to defend myself. My lie did no harm to anyone. I hoped then that these users would stop and stop disseminating information. Is this prohibited by law ??
7. To begin, I will inform you that my links are not valid and the referral program was completed on January 24th. I just copied what was at hand. And even if I used it, it does not contradict any law, since it is officially authorized by Chain2Pay OÜ.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
P.S. Here everyone can see what
BitPotus is capable of. A person who can only insult, sexually harass, and blame someone.
It sounds like that. He is guilty. Why? Because I'm so sure.
Do not talk nonsense.
