Author

Topic: Punshment on the australian cops... (Read 131 times)

sr. member
Activity: 854
Merit: 277
liife threw a tempest at you? be a coconut !
October 17, 2021, 01:40:09 AM
#14
What happen in Aussie? I'm live here near Aussie (Indonesia) and dunno about these situations.

kuffars are gonna kuff Smiley.

simply.

in more details, the australian gov and its armed forces are completely rogue and will have to be eliminated.

simpler.
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1139
October 14, 2021, 03:31:26 PM
#13
I'm of the opinion that, matters that have got to do with a human life should be treated with great displeasure when proven to be true. The face of the murderers shouldn't be even looked at a second time. What can't be given back such as life, should only be paid for with life.

Sometims, the armed forces could be such jerks, even in my country. Sometimes, i feel them putting on there uniform makes eveehone there subjects as they satbd ti rrpresent the law but these things are really getting inro there head you know. I think they ought to take a courdr in course of there trainjng that woukd put it to them tgat there professiok exists because they are meant to serve the goveenmwnt and the general public. They dont seem to realease this.
jr. member
Activity: 49
Merit: 1
October 13, 2021, 02:36:12 AM
#12
What happen in Aussie? I'm live here near Aussie (Indonesia) and dunno about these situations.
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
October 13, 2021, 12:21:08 AM
#11
Common law and common sense for the win
https://youtu.be/4MtnzZMd4S4
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 12, 2021, 09:25:29 AM
#10
Is the pendulum really swinging in the other direction? He might lighten up on the Covid and vaxx mandates, but will he really teach Aussies how to maintain their freedom.


Australia: Anti-Lockdown, Pro-Life Catholic Man Replaces former Premier Gladys Berejiklian



Dominic Perrottet is a conservative within his party who has denounced the "almost religious devotion of the political left to climate change", opposed same-sex marriage, criticized "pronoun police" who impose gender neutral language, and challenged Australia's pro-abortion legislation in 2019. He supports a free-market economy to improve living conditions for Australian families and to strengthen the economy of Australia. Perrotte said before his appointment that he would end radical Covid policies that include indefinite lockdowns, restrictions on businesses and places of worship, and mandatory vaccinations. -GEG

On Tuesday morning, 39-year-old conservative Catholic Dominic Perrottet was elected the 46th Premier of New South Wales in a 39-5 landslide.

This followed the shock resignation of Gladys Berejiklian amid corruption investigation, signalling the dawn of a new era in Australian politics.

...


Cool
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
October 09, 2021, 03:16:07 AM
#9

Australia One Warning - Riccardo Bosi Former Special Forces
https://youtu.be/mXTycZUUHEk
No consent, no consent no consent https://australiaoneparty.com

nazi cop gets a good serving
https://youtu.be/C3b8kjF-EcM
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 08, 2021, 07:45:30 PM
#8

The game is over... when the people stand up
https://i.ibb.co/sQNKcYY/temp-3.jpg


And the Bilderberg people are afraid that this is starting to happen.

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
October 08, 2021, 01:40:30 PM
#7

The game is over... when the people stand up

member
Activity: 478
Merit: 66
October 08, 2021, 12:44:32 PM
#6
Looks like the Aussie pigs arrested the Aussie Cossack:


"My husband has been arrested!" - Mrs Aussie Cossack

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS5vlX92R90


Sargeant Kingston Is Coming To Arrest Me LIVE (same video except from his perspective)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohHxdG4HhDc


Interaction that caused the arrest supposedly:

"I know who you are and will take action against you" - threats from Sargeant Kingston, NSW Police

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0kby9xXUaA

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 08, 2021, 11:32:27 AM
#5
There are protections in the Aussie courts that men and women can use to protect themselves from government agents who misuse the laws, and against laws that are against freedom of the people.

In matters of immediate self-protection, Everybody has the right to protect himself.

In matters of vengeance, learn how to use the courts.

Start with gun control. Guns can be private property. If they are, they aren't guns any longer.

Cool

Ready Mr BADecker? Is a B61-12 private property too?

https://images01.military.com/sites/default/files/2018-05/B61-12-screengrab-1200.jpg

B61-12 can be private property. If they are, they aren't B61-12 any longer.

make sense only when you say it, isn't it?

I guess you have a little difficulty with "regulatory capture" concepts.

And I don't understand how you don't see courts as government agents?

So you really believe in the concept of separation of power, in practice?

me I ask a few questions :

who pays it?

who defends it?

okay, at least, me, I see the same.

For example, again, myself I would be more inclined to divide between civilian powers and military powers (the cia being in their little world).

and for illustration : aussie soldiers executed unarmed innocent children in afghanistan just to train aussie soldiers in killing.

I don't think it's yet a common practice of aussie cops.

Would you be more an engineer or a mechanic? Do you understand the difference I am trying to illustrate here?

the fundamental question I am trying to get you to pounder, is what do you do when the court system, reflection of the legislative branch will, has been corrupted and captured by the same forces who did the executives and earlier said legislative?

For example in dynastical china it was really hard to achieve, as one morning, the "boy" could say : kill them all, looking at the court, and so it was.

another one to maybe explain better if the 1st Cesar, rather than enter in the senate still hoping to find men to talk and convince rather than to kill, we could be written latin now Smiley.

in short it's like a child rape, if you survive, meaning that as long as you don't kill the childrapists, you can't be certain he won't redo it again, even on an another kid.

and that's what I like about wars... if a guy has already put an IED at the waypoint toward the village, why would the invading foreign troops not pass there again ? I hope you saw the little perspective swap here?

or resaid, bats have two wings, reliance on one only could be problematic even just  for take off, but certainly enough for landing Smiley

a court system can only be as just as it's society.

for example, I sincerly believe that american troops didn't do blooding in afghanistan, aka taking afghani innocent children, lining them : putting soldeirs who hadn't killed, and executing the children. no,...

some really believed in this nation building, war on terror etc...

I don't say that it couldn't have happened in some wicked group, but even... at a moment, just be logic, if you want to really make the enemy angry, take their children and execute them before their villages... "for blooding"...

you are sure to be welcomed next time...

I try to make you understand the difference between the "belief", the "theory", "reality" and even more important improvement way to make it all work together.

and I say that if the pedo can reach control of the courts, the situation is getting bad... I mean really bad...

but as we said in old china, it's not important if the "boy" is right or not, he said, we did.

ahah

Did you ever hear of defense contracts? I don't know any particulars about a B61-12, but if it is only licensed to the military by contract, it's private property. Being private property, it's hands off to people than the owner and the licensee.

If the military is a private company, only under contract to the government, then the whole military is private property.

However, if the military is part of the government, and if they own the B61-12, then the B61-12 is public property, and accessible by any man or woman of the public. However, access might have to be gained by the man or woman using his private capacity to access the B61-12.

In addition, there might be court battles that take years. And if it goes to a jury trial, the jury can deny access in this one instance. But the jury can grant access as well. In addition, a highly intelligent person might be able to search laws and find a way to legally/lawfully force every judge to allow access.

Now hear this. If the military won't allow access after proper, legal, lawful adjudication, it really isn't the military resisting the court order. Who is it then, if it is not the military? It's one or more men/women who happen to hold positions in the military. Take the men/women to court for disobeying a court order, and get them removed from the military to prison... or who cares? Leave them in the military in prison. Next.

The military is not men and women. It is positions written on paperwork. It is equipment. It's words on paper. Men and women might hold/control positions in the military, but they are still people, and can be adjudicated against as people.

If the B61-12 is public property, everybody has the right to access it. The limits to the access exist when people who access it prove to be a threat to others in their access of it.

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
October 08, 2021, 02:29:30 AM
#4
Australian govenment how dare you mention IVERMECTIN, Craig Kelly MP response is epic
https://youtu.be/M601yQE9f0k

Papers please.....
https://www.rebelnews.com/papers_please_police_try_new_tactic_to_stop_free_press_in_melbourne

Inside the Australian Internment camp
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bryeILm14M

sr. member
Activity: 854
Merit: 277
liife threw a tempest at you? be a coconut !
October 07, 2021, 11:22:00 PM
#3
There are protections in the Aussie courts that men and women can use to protect themselves from government agents who misuse the laws, and against laws that are against freedom of the people.

In matters of immediate self-protection, Everybody has the right to protect himself.

In matters of vengeance, learn how to use the courts.

Start with gun control. Guns can be private property. If they are, they aren't guns any longer.

Cool

Ready Mr BADecker? Is a B61-12 private property too?



B61-12 can be private property. If they are, they aren't B61-12 any longer.

make sense only when you say it, isn't it?

I guess you have a little difficulty with "regulatory capture" concepts.

And I don't understand how you don't see courts as government agents?

So you really believe in the concept of separation of power, in practice?

me I ask a few questions :

who pays it?

who defends it?

okay, at least, me, I see the same.

For example, again, myself I would be more inclined to divide between civilian powers and military powers (the cia being in their little world).

and for illustration : aussie soldiers executed unarmed innocent children in afghanistan just to train aussie soldiers in killing.

I don't think it's yet a common practice of aussie cops.

Would you be more an engineer or a mechanic? Do you understand the difference I am trying to illustrate here?

the fundamental question I am trying to get you to pounder, is what do you do when the court system, reflection of the legislative branch will, has been corrupted and captured by the same forces who did the executives and earlier said legislative?

For example in dynastical china it was really hard to achieve, as one morning, the "boy" could say : kill them all, looking at the court, and so it was.

another one to maybe explain better if the 1st Cesar, rather than enter in the senate still hoping to find men to talk and convince rather than to kill, we could be written latin now Smiley.

in short it's like a child rape, if you survive, meaning that as long as you don't kill the childrapists, you can't be certain he won't redo it again, even on an another kid.

and that's what I like about wars... if a guy has already put an IED at the waypoint toward the village, why would the invading foreign troops not pass there again ? I hope you saw the little perspective swap here?

or resaid, bats have two wings, reliance on one only could be problematic even just  for take off, but certainly enough for landing Smiley

a court system can only be as just as it's society.

for example, I sincerly believe that american troops didn't do blooding in afghanistan, aka taking afghani innocent children, lining them : putting soldeirs who hadn't killed, and executing the children. no,...

some really believed in this nation building, war on terror etc...

I don't say that it couldn't have happened in some wicked group, but even... at a moment, just be logic, if you want to really make the enemy angry, take their children and execute them before their villages... "for blooding"...

you are sure to be welcomed next time...

I try to make you understand the difference between the "belief", the "theory", "reality" and even more important improvement way to make it all work together.

and I say that if the pedo can reach control of the courts, the situation is getting bad... I mean really bad...

but as we said in old china, it's not important if the "boy" is right or not, he said, we did.

ahah
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 07, 2021, 01:50:19 PM
#2
There are protections in the Aussie courts that men and women can use to protect themselves from government agents who misuse the laws, and against laws that are against freedom of the people.

In matters of immediate self-protection, Everybody has the right to protect himself.

In matters of vengeance, learn how to use the courts.

Start with gun control. Guns can be private property. If they are, they aren't guns any longer.

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 854
Merit: 277
liife threw a tempest at you? be a coconut !
October 07, 2021, 12:17:29 PM
#1
Following this video and many others about the inhuman, insane behavior of australian cops, there must be strong punihsment.

https://www.banned.video/watch?id=615764b5e29da327524d39cc

I propose death penality, for all those caught on captors having behaved like animals. it's not because it's an "order" that it has to be followed, that the difference between a human being an a subhuman.

that's for the ground troops.

the leads? executed with their families.

the great australian purge.

in the land of the aborigens having plants illegals? pff die... with your families.

that's how worthless you are, aussies...

I hae such disdain for the people there, for their rulers... you can't imagine, but justice !

the cops die, their bosses die with their children... then will see what is gonna be done to the nwo slaves...

but it's gonna be mean, meaner even.

fuck them.

I can't say that I stand with austrlia, however I stand against those "cops"... death.

finished. a virus? let the people die... it's not your problem.

but this behavior displayed by "aussies" forces is a big a problem which lead to many death, on our side... why? because you really think that if they already behave like subhumans with australians, how do you think they did in other places? and yeah the blooding using kids, isn't a lie... throwing a motorbike on the ravine? for what? what's this behavior, of course will go berzek and ieds everything they can, fucking foreigners invading their precious rock gardens... no no no... die motherfuckers.
Jump to: