Author

Topic: Quantum Computers and Bitcoin (Read 955 times)

sr. member
Activity: 269
Merit: 250
April 02, 2014, 09:00:28 AM
#16
If you haven't used your address and only have inputs but no outputs then you're safe, even quantum computers cannot steal your coins then.

This is misleading and wrong.
Any public key that hashes to the same address can spend from that address if the public key was not revealed.
So you can also brute force addresses that have only received coins.
The question is can you find efficient algorithms for quantum computers to solve these problems in a reasonable amount of time.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
April 02, 2014, 08:52:55 AM
#15
The gamers will be livid with us as we would go on a buying frenzie to get all the quantaum comps to mine da coins.
anu
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
RepuX - Enterprise Blockchain Protocol
April 02, 2014, 07:29:01 AM
#14
Bitcoin has been a great social experiment thus far, but there have been recent developments in quantum computing. Speculatively speaking, what effect might this have on bitcoin and the next generation of cryptocurrencies?

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/24/quantum-computing-research-may-back-controversial-company/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

"While the controversy has gone on for years, it may reach an end within a year or two. Mr. Williams said that in April, D-Wave will be conducting experiments with a machine managing over 1,000 qubits, about twice the number currently inside its best machine.

A 2,000-qubit machine is scheduled for the end of the year, and will be ready for experiments within a few months after that. If D-Wave can rapidly solve the kind of large problems a machine like that is expected to, that would perhaps be the most persuasive evidence possible that we have entered a new computing era."

They can't run Shor's algorithm. neither the prime one nor the modified version for elliptic curves.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Stand on the shoulders of giants
April 01, 2014, 09:25:38 PM
#13
banks depends upon cryptology ...so don't mess with us ...
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Stand on the shoulders of giants
April 01, 2014, 09:23:44 PM
#12
not for "instant rewards" but show then that there is something bigger than they are ...
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
April 01, 2014, 09:20:52 PM
#11
A real quantum computer exists outside of time and space. The real threat will be Daleks.
full member
Activity: 180
Merit: 117
April 01, 2014, 09:17:42 PM
#10
If quantum computing is able to crack SHA256 in minutes/hours, the primary target will not be bitcoin. It's lot easier to access banks, security and insurance companies, for instant rewards.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
April 01, 2014, 07:15:10 PM
#9
d-wave is a boondoggle.  a cracking good (pun) qc might come out one day, but it won't be adiabatic.
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
hm
April 01, 2014, 04:48:18 PM
#8
Fuck your quantum computers. Fuck them right up your ass.

I had to laugh. I must be drunk^^
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Stand on the shoulders of giants
April 01, 2014, 04:43:55 PM
#7
I like quantum soup ...

Symphony of Science - the Quantum World!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZGINaRUEkU
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
April 01, 2014, 04:37:26 PM
#6
Fuck your quantum computers. Fuck them right up your ass.
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1015
April 01, 2014, 04:31:36 PM
#5
If you haven't used your address and only have inputs but no outputs then you're safe, even quantum computers cannot steal your coins then.
legendary
Activity: 1153
Merit: 1000
April 01, 2014, 04:09:39 PM
#4
Bitcoin uses SHA256, the whole world uses this algo. So there will be no headline tomorrow "mega quantum computer solves sha256 hash in 3 hours". It more like "Instead of 2^78 years you would only need 2^77 years. In 10 years down to 2^67 years."
So there would be enough time to chance to different algorithms.

This topic has come up many times before.

I believe ECDSA is considered weak against a full blown quantum computer (which is still a ways away) but that other algorithms that are believed to be quantum resistant are already developed. Bitcoin would need a hard fork and switch.

SHA256 hashing should still be fine. A quantum computer can not beat SHA256 but would exponentially increase the difficulty. So ASICs would become paper weights and the quantum computer owners billionaires. Personally I find this to be acceptable, the scientists who finally get a working quantum computer deserve some rewards.
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
hm
April 01, 2014, 03:49:18 PM
#3
Bitcoin uses SHA256, the whole world uses this algo. So there will be no headline tomorrow "mega quantum computer solves sha256 hash in 3 hours". It more like "Instead of 2^78 years you would only need 2^77 years. In 10 years down to 2^67 years."
So there would be enough time to chance to different algorithms.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Stand on the shoulders of giants
April 01, 2014, 03:44:47 PM
#2
if you can decrypt with quantum computer .. what's the problem about encrypt with quantum computer Huh
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
April 01, 2014, 03:42:27 PM
#1
Bitcoin has been a great social experiment thus far, but there have been recent developments in quantum computing. Speculatively speaking, what effect might this have on bitcoin and the next generation of cryptocurrencies?

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/24/quantum-computing-research-may-back-controversial-company/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

"While the controversy has gone on for years, it may reach an end within a year or two. Mr. Williams said that in April, D-Wave will be conducting experiments with a machine managing over 1,000 qubits, about twice the number currently inside its best machine.

A 2,000-qubit machine is scheduled for the end of the year, and will be ready for experiments within a few months after that. If D-Wave can rapidly solve the kind of large problems a machine like that is expected to, that would perhaps be the most persuasive evidence possible that we have entered a new computing era."
Jump to: