I just use the report to moderator button. Based on this response I use the OP.
Thanks for clarification. If there are no negative consequences for the OPs of these posts, then it's a good workaround.
It doesn't solve the "interesting threads been taken over by spammers" issue, but that's another story. There are topics I started and then regretted to haven't set them to "self-moderated". Maybe it could be allowed to do that
retroactively, if it's technically possible. Then if your thread gets "taken over" and you are interested in it to continue open, you change it to self-moderated; and if not, then it can be reported and archived.
I have been thinking about the mega -thread issue quite a bit lately. In my mind one source of constant redundant shit topics, is BTC price, and whatever the movement of the day was. I think creating 1 or 2 megathreads, that do not allow signatures/advertising could be a nice solution to this problem.
Maybe this is not even necessary - one could simply enforce the "on topic" rule. The "Bitcoin price" discussions all belong into the Speculation forum. "Economics" also is full of these often pointless, trivial speculation threads.
One could even differentiate between "interesting threads" which get moved into "Speculation", and spam threads which are directly thrashed. However, it's maybe not easy to distinguish them, so it would mean some work for moderators. So a "Speculation threads get thrashed, publish them in the Speculation forum!" sticky thread maybe is the best option.
@coinlocket$: That's exactly what I meant.