Though an insurance is good but being given by government means no anonymity , and am not trading bitcoin with their help
Not in ever
Topic: Quick poll (Read 1357 times)
government no
insurers yes
reason: government stop activity/freedoms, whilst insurance protect against loss.
im all for consumer protection, just not government limitations
insurers yes
reason: government stop activity/freedoms, whilst insurance protect against loss.
im all for consumer protection, just not government limitations
Hi please could you quickly give your views on this topic 
Mmm nah , not really.
If Media starts speaking about Bitcoin goods instead of speaking about drugs and weapons (Silk road) and simillar bullshits that would increase the number of Bitcoiners . Most of people see it as a danger and scam .
~ Madness
Ironically, this ties in with the post I just made about a Bitcoin security paradox - coincidence??
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/a-bitcoin-security-paradox-962306
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/a-bitcoin-security-paradox-962306
Oh definitely. Having a backing sure helps. Maybe some form of regulation whereby if there is a claim of bankruptcy due to hacks, a proper investigation can be conducted. Also if there is a requirement to have accounting audit to maintain credibility that would certainly give that level of confidence to the users.
Hi please could you quickly give your views on this topic
You would probably get more and better answers if you did more than just post a question every few days and disappear.
Since when would governments offer insurance. That would be up to insurances companies wouldn't it? Regardless, bitcoin users will increase over time and so will services and products to help you secure or insure your coins.
Hi please could you quickly give your views on this topic
Jump to: