Author

Topic: Raspberry Pi cluster vs Graphic Card (Read 281 times)

jr. member
Activity: 54
Merit: 11
June 03, 2019, 06:29:49 AM
#7
regarding NVIDIA Jetson

Quote
472 GFLOPs of compute performance and consume as little as five watts.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/raspberry-pi-style-jetson-nano-is-a-powerful-low-cost-ai-computer-from-nvidia/

Specifically 472 GFLOPS on FP16 and 236 GFLOPS on FP32[1]. For comparison GTX 1060 performances are 68.36 GFLOPS on FP16 and 4.375 TFLOPS on FP32[2].

Jetson Nano overwhelmingly win on FP16, but only because GTX 1060 focused on gaming which often uses FP32[3]. So clearly even cluster of Jetson Nano can't beat a GTX 1060

Source :
1. https://devblogs.nvidia.com/jetson-nano-ai-computing/
2. https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gtx-1060-6-gb.c2862
3. https://www.reddit.com/r/gamedev/comments/8rzsye/why_have_most_engines_settled_on_fp32_for/

Can this Jetson Nano run Ubuntu from a USB stick?

Yes, it runs a special version of Ubuntu

look here, this guy just did it https://www.reddit.com/r/JetsonNano/comments/bi5k8l/i_just_updated_my_os_for_the_jetson_nano_to/

/KX


thanks for the info! appreciate it
member
Activity: 378
Merit: 53
Telegram @keychainX
May 13, 2019, 06:41:01 AM
#6
regarding NVIDIA Jetson

Quote
472 GFLOPs of compute performance and consume as little as five watts.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/raspberry-pi-style-jetson-nano-is-a-powerful-low-cost-ai-computer-from-nvidia/

Specifically 472 GFLOPS on FP16 and 236 GFLOPS on FP32[1]. For comparison GTX 1060 performances are 68.36 GFLOPS on FP16 and 4.375 TFLOPS on FP32[2].

Jetson Nano overwhelmingly win on FP16, but only because GTX 1060 focused on gaming which often uses FP32[3]. So clearly even cluster of Jetson Nano can't beat a GTX 1060

Source :
1. https://devblogs.nvidia.com/jetson-nano-ai-computing/
2. https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gtx-1060-6-gb.c2862
3. https://www.reddit.com/r/gamedev/comments/8rzsye/why_have_most_engines_settled_on_fp32_for/

Can this Jetson Nano run Ubuntu from a USB stick?

Yes, it runs a special version of Ubuntu

look here, this guy just did it https://www.reddit.com/r/JetsonNano/comments/bi5k8l/i_just_updated_my_os_for_the_jetson_nano_to/

/KX
jr. member
Activity: 54
Merit: 11
May 13, 2019, 03:06:56 AM
#5
regarding NVIDIA Jetson

Quote
472 GFLOPs of compute performance and consume as little as five watts.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/raspberry-pi-style-jetson-nano-is-a-powerful-low-cost-ai-computer-from-nvidia/

Specifically 472 GFLOPS on FP16 and 236 GFLOPS on FP32[1]. For comparison GTX 1060 performances are 68.36 GFLOPS on FP16 and 4.375 TFLOPS on FP32[2].

Jetson Nano overwhelmingly win on FP16, but only because GTX 1060 focused on gaming which often uses FP32[3]. So clearly even cluster of Jetson Nano can't beat a GTX 1060

Source :
1. https://devblogs.nvidia.com/jetson-nano-ai-computing/
2. https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gtx-1060-6-gb.c2862
3. https://www.reddit.com/r/gamedev/comments/8rzsye/why_have_most_engines_settled_on_fp32_for/

Can this Jetson Nano run Ubuntu from a USB stick?
legendary
Activity: 4522
Merit: 3426
May 12, 2019, 02:00:16 AM
#4
I haven't been keeping up with hash rates, but I wouldn't be surprised if a GPU is 50 - 100 times faster than a CPU. Given that an RPi is pretty wimpy, my guess is that it would take 100 - 200 Rpis to match a GPU.
full member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 220
(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ
May 10, 2019, 04:29:50 PM
#3
did you consider AWS instead?

regarding NVIDIA Jetson

Quote
472 GFLOPs of compute performance and consume as little as five watts.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/raspberry-pi-style-jetson-nano-is-a-powerful-low-cost-ai-computer-from-nvidia/
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
May 09, 2019, 01:43:24 PM
#2
Performance of a RPi3 very low, it's only as fast as Pentium III or IV (according to few benchmark i've seen as fast), there's no way it could beat GTX 1060.

But as a side note, NVIDIA release NVIDIA Jeston Nano which have powerful GPU (for barebone PC) with price $99, i don't know cluster of Jetson Nano could beat GTX 1060 for vanity address task, but it definitely far faster than RPi3.
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
May 09, 2019, 12:35:20 AM
#1
I would like to know (if possible) if a Raspberry Pi Cluster could compeed a Graphic Card in a vanity address search (as a cheaper alternative).
I'll make an example:
You can buy a 1060 with $250 usd and make a cluster of 5 RPi3 with the same amount.
If the card "finds" a vanity address in 1 hour, would be possible for the cluster to find it earlier?
Jump to: