Author

Topic: Re: A BTC stock exchange for high-risk, unverified securities? (Read 363 times)

full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
On the suggestion of someone else, we would consider setting up a B market, with lower requirements, lower startup fees, and obviously more risk.

opinions?

Why bother with an entirely new market, why not just place a little more emphasis on the "better" listings.
Primary markets, secondary markets, different rules - all that is going to happen is confusion.

If you are going to take the effort to review and then break down into a primary/secondary market,
why have a secondary market that potentially taints the GLBSE brand over outright rejection?

The only reason to separate them would be to try an portray some ethical stance, but then having a secondary market for them due to profit motive seems out of line.

Increase ways for people to make compelling presentations of their offerings with emphasis on transparency and a real business and the scum will naturally fall to the bottom.

Have listed companies follow GAAP and properly report, etc etc

Mind you, the market page is getting pretty long, maybe breaking it down into categories wouldn't be so bad.
Mining, Finance, High-Risk, etc etc
Jump to: