Topic: [Re] Good Reputation in the Meta Forum. (Read 274 times)

What the pharmacist means by trolling is  the presentation of facts and observable events that prove people like him are living 2 lives. On the one hand a respectable merit source and dt1 member....in the other going under the alias of huge black woman a sneaky, racist trolling sig spammer.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/racism-is-allowed-5096914

Most people in meta want to term presenting facts regarding their untrustworthy deeds as trolling.

Sorry that is not trolling that is presentation of fact that demonstrates the systems of control here are very broken and abused and infested with sneaky, greedy, sig spamming and far worse.

Of course he wants everyone to ignore this kind of "trolling"

Just the facts - want proof just ask

Don't worry about Yoshie... this person is just an observable slobbering ass kisser sucking up to the pharmacist the "merit source" for some merit scraps.  That will obviously avoid now discussing the FACTS i present here.

I wish noobs that are obvious merit scavengers and ass kissing slobbering fools would get out of meta because they have no experience here and no knowledge of how most of these legends operated before they joined 5 mins ago. Noobs have no place in meta. Anyone who has not been a member for 2-3 years is only in meta to ass kiss for merits.

Yoshie what do you say ?  how about you discuss how the pharmacist your idol is  a PROVEN greedy sock puppet racist trolling sig spammer who got busted trying to upgrade to a higher paying sig spamming ico campaign  then start on about how people here should not comment in meta about the very people that have infested the systems of control here.

Want to discuss that or just keep your tongue in the pharmacists butt hole?

Yoshie you have been here 5 minutes and want to lecture as if you have broad experience and knowledge of how most of these legends have operated over the years? Get real. Stop begging for merits and go use the discussion boards like 99% of the normal noobs here.

You're definitely right but we shouldn't also forget that as the forum grows, dynamics change. For instance i may say that at first, all the members were almost like minded so they could easily share messages at a consensus and provide better ideas. But metrics changed as the forum grew, scammers joined, greedy people joined and a whole lot of other people joined. And that has caused all these uprising negativities in fhe forum and more specifically at the meta board.
It is not to my surprise that Theymos have been making so many upgrades during the last bull run but why?? to take care of these people killing the forum. Anyways one thing I ak hopeful of is that things shall get better again. Let's call this one too a bubble, and after it's busted cheaters, thieves, scammers and etc won't survive.

> Is that true!
> very sorry?
> I know your feelings now?

The more you run on the snow, the cooler your body is, now look for it, firewood, and warm yourself, it's better for you. O? don't forget a cup of whiskey, to be warmer.

---

That's the problem, I hope that in the future everything will be better, and everything can be controlled, I understand what you mean, you are more active and more concerned about forums, especially meta, I think what can be done best for meta.
Sorry, I see every problem that arises in the forum, you respond with cold, relaxed, dignified, and reasonable, why? You are not just placed as a problem solver on Meta.
for example, Mod, problem discussion forum, account expired, stolen, red trust, banned accounts etc.

When you say "previously", what time frame are you talking about exactly?  Meta has been a shitstorm for the past couple of weeks because of the new trust system changes and the resultant trolling by certain members who've got resentments, but before that it wasn't that bad.  I'm hoping the noisy ones will quiet down eventually, once they figure out that people figure out that they're making the same arguments and attacks over and over to no effect.

Notice that the first reply here was one of negativity and reputational smearing.  I think that's part of the problem you're talking about.

It'd be so nice to have self-moderated threads available in Meta.  Everyone is free to start their own thread, but there are too many of them lately that have been hijacked with the same provocative nonsense.  Legitimate discussion gets derailed by trolls and the responses given to them, and despite my efforts I can't convince everyone to just ignore them.

You can't increase quality.
Thats total nonsense of stupid DT members who have no clue about forums and growth.
Quality of posts was on bitcointalk some years ago way higher.Thats correct.But not because it was a better forum but because this forum was mainly participated by people who were really interrested on crypto hence the high quality posts.
Crypto went mainstream and it will even go way more mainstream and there is nothing which can stop it.The side effect which we see is a massiv amount of people joining the crypto train for diffrent purposes which leads to a reduce of post quality.You would need to ban them all
to receive your so called quality back but now is here the question.Do you want quality posts back or prefer to go with crypto mainstream ?
Since bitcointalk is forum #1 for crypto there is no way more people will join that forum which will lower the quality and there is not much you can do about it.
Majority of DT members are just a bunch of idiots thinking they can bring back quality.They have no clue what they are talking about since they never run a successfull forum before.The other part of DT members are suckers trying to implement their own agenda for financial benefit
in the name of protection and quality a so called trojan horse.

I see Meta first and Meta now, whether this is good or bad, I see far from expectations either solving problems or discussion of problems, (theymos) Always giving ideas, suggestions, information, for the sake of all members, to be better, in fact partially destroy it, first Meta was the most respected and appreciated by all members of Bitcointalk, now I don't know.

I think in my mind why all the bitcointalk members don't think they are better at meta for the future in solving problems, one person who corrects, one thousand people who destroy. It's ironic if this happens.

Positive:
Previously:
Good reputation in Meta forums, first bitcointalk members are very concerned about the quantity and quality of posts. Quantity? If quantity influences the existence in the forum, quality will affect reputation highly respected in the Meta forum. a good quality post is a post that:

1. Increase member knowledge.
2. Answering member questions correctly.
3. Entertaining member.
4. Fun members (praise, congratulations, etc.)

---

Negative:
Now:
Now I note a lot of the controversial in Meta,

Usually there is a special thread to debate controversial matters. My advice,

it's better to avoid posting on Meta threads that are lacking in friendliness and are easily offended by other members, There are still many other things we can do in Meta rather than debating without endings.

All Bitcointalk members can make thousands of posts in a word meta thread, but that won't affect the meta forum's reputation at all.