Topic: Re: legal action against Inno3d for defective P106-090 (Nvidia GTX 1060) cards (Read 130 times)

Dear Sirs, good day.

At the current moment we are starting preparation of the lawsuit to the Stockholm Arbitration against the Inno3d Company in relation to the significant discrepancy between the quality of the delivered product with the declared characteristics - viz, falling continuously, with the growth of the DAG file, ETH/ETC hashrate on the cards P106-090 6gb and systems based on them (MC3865-9-090–6gb).
The problem essence is following: systems MC3865-9-090-6gb were shipped by Inno3d with the declared hashrate of 200mh on ETH/ETC, that was correct for the period February - April 2018, but thereafter continuous decrease of card performance, at each change of epoch, combined with an increase of DAG file, have started.
At the beginning of September 2018 performance of 1 system with 9 cards is only 182-184mh on ETH and 178-179mh on ETC, these parameters are obtained by overclocking the cards at +200 on core and +600 on  memory, which is recommended by Inno3d.

Taking into consideration the fact that cards P106-090 6GB are completely specialized product intended for ETH/ETC mining, non-fulfillment of their main function is considered by us as an irreparable defect admitted in the design and release of goods for sale by Inno3d.

In addition to preparing of the standard lawsuit, we are considering the possibility (and chances) of reclassifying a claim into a class action to Inno3d/Nvidia or filing two claims in parallel (main and group).
If there are owners of the above products which were purchased either directly from the Inno3d plant in Hong Kong or from local distributors by Bank transfer with a full set of official supporting documents (regardless of the country of your location and, accordingly, the purchase) we invite you to join the filing of a class action for the entire cost of the purchased products and lost, due to the decreasing hashrate, profit.
All the costs related to the work of lawyers, payment of Arbitration fees and hearings in the amount of up to 100.000 EUR inclusive, will be incurred at our expense, in case the costs exceed the amount of 100.000 EUR they will be divided proportionally between the participants who filed the lawsuit based on their claim amounts (since costs for hearings at the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce are directly depend from the amount of the claim).

On top of all earlier mentioned - if on the forum there are owners of cards Manli P106-090 6gb and systems M-P106L9-N6G also get in touch with us, because in case of the class action to Inno3d success it (lawsuit) can be submitted directly to the parent Company PC Partner which owns brands Inno3d and Manli (they also own the brands Zotac and, partially, Sapphire).
In fact, these cards and systems are made in the same production plant but for different markets (Inno3d – Europe/USA, Manli – Asia).

With best regards,