Author

Topic: [Re] Mod and admin do not choose, who he is, Incorrect Member, rules run. (Read 205 times)

member
Activity: 210
Merit: 19
Anyway, I think there is no meaning of creating such thread
You're correct,and what the OP stands to gain from creating this sort of topic is what I really do not understand.
The member in question is allowed to follow due process and appeal his red trust appropriately,though I doubt it'll yield anything
It's best to lock this topic.
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 280
I think Lauda got OP wrong. OP tried to say everyone who tries to diddle the rules/system, will be penalized.

Anyway, I think there is no meaning of creating such thread.

Now I realized why OgNasty told me "No sense rubbing salt in the wound." when I created 2 threads about Lauda DT- off.
hero member
Activity: 2366
Merit: 793
Bitcoin = Financial freedom
I don't get what is the intention of creating this thread.
Not nonsense, I saw him extraordinary in his collaboration when poating, indeed he made a mistake, by buying an account, this was out of mind if I saw his post, with extraordinary Merit income.
He still can post and get merits as always,no one is stopping him from doing do that.Merit is not an income.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
What is this nosense? English, do you do it?
Not nonsense, I saw him extraordinary in his collaboration when poating, indeed he made a mistake, by buying an account, this was out of mind if I saw his post, with extraordinary Merit income.
Try-hard merit farming in the Meta section is common practice nowadays. Trust =/= merit.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
What is this nosense? English, do you do it?
Not nonsense, I saw him extraordinary in his collaboration when poating, indeed he made a mistake, by buying an account, this was out of mind if I saw his post, with extraordinary Merit income.

Try-hard merit farming in the Meta section is common practice nowadays. Trust =/= merit.
This is what I mean, words and deeds are not the same, this is an example for others, for account farmers.


He still can post and get merits as always,no one is stopping him from doing do that.Merit is not an income.
yes, it is certain, but in vain what is sought by getting red trust. So people judge a little doubt about S_Therapist, who has always given creative ideas.

I think Lauda got OP wrong. OP tried to say everyone who tries to diddle the rules/system, will be penalized.

Anyway, I think there is no meaning of creating such thread.

Now I realized why OgNasty told me "No sense rubbing salt in the wound." when I created 2 threads about Lauda DT- off.
I feel sympathy for the OP, with posts, OP, and I see a red trust mark, hopefully with me making this, there is a meeting point or a solution between the OP and the one giving red trust, that's all.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
What is this nosense? English, do you do it?
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
I do not believe, for what happened to (S_Therapist) made everyone stunned by the post he almost entirely produced (Merit) and weighed certainly in the Merit system rules, but everything was destroyed in the blink of an Eye, by marking -8: - 3 / +0 red is really ironic what happened.

I think that mod and admin, enforce wrong rules have penalties, rules run.
Is this one law of karma for him because it often gives red marks to other members.


S_Therapist#Reference#1. Self admitted account buyer. Account buyer's are not to be trusted.
2. Buying forum account which has probably been hacked.
3. Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming.
Jump to: