I personally think midrange gaming rigs will preserve the most value and allow for the quickest resale.
I lean toward gaming rigs because in the plan the gpu's are only to provide an income while we wait for asic.
We need to retain as much value as possible in the resale to place the second order.
I lean toward gaming rigs because in the plan the gpu's are only to provide an income while we wait for asic.
We need to retain as much value as possible in the resale to place the second order.
This seemed counter-intuitive at first, but makes good sense. The whole point is to use them as a stop-gap and try to get going again after as fast as possible.
My thoughts exactly.
---
Quick update:
I spent quite a bit of time last night, and most likely will be spending most of this afternoon, reading through the various offerings on the forum here.
I am looking for two things:
I am looking for a way to reward the investors willing to put the first money in, I want to solve this problem:
The only way to profit from your asset--as it stands with waiting until all share are sold--is to wait and buy the last shares. In the mean time, this mean no shares are sold, because everyone is waiting to be the last.
So far:I believe you may be right with deploying the GPU's first and as funding becomes available, instead of in one big go, and then placing the asic order.
This would have us hashing and paying dividends as quickly as the funds become available to build each rig.&
I would like to create a better "out clause" that is fair to everyone involved should we choose to wind the company down.
- would love your thoughts and opinions on this
Relevant thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/whats-with-the-buyback-clauses-in-these-securities-105842
https://glbse.com/asset/view/BAKEWELL