Author

Topic: Re: Revisionism in Bitcoin Magazine (Read 395 times)

full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
August 07, 2012, 05:32:12 AM
#1

Yes there is a good reason, many of them in fact: archival purposes.  Academic purposes.  Research purposes.  When most publications make a mistake or find out something pertinent after the fact, they add a footnote to the bottom clarifying it.  They don't simply cut a new revision of the same issue with the story changed.

The PDF file format offers a fantastic mechanism for adding callout annotations.  Use that feature to note issue #1.  Address Bitcoinica's fall in issue #2.


+1
Jump to: