Yes....@Franky1 and @Mocacinno, lolzzz. I got you there.
You are quick to make conclusion based on prejudice, and that is what I mean by sentiment.
There is something you are missing there, or you consciously overlook , and that is,
www.wealthmasonpartners.com has :
How WMP Works...
It has 4 levels deep, but the width is unlimited.Did you pay attention to that line, and if you did, what does it mean to you?
It means that it has only 4X depth
But the width is unlimited....
which means, anyone can refer to as many as possible, and the commission still goes to the person.
By implication, even someone who joins in the next 5 years, and can still get 100 downlines, will get the payment from all the 4th level of new members.
The logic in
www.wealthmasonpartners.com beats the imagination of many and the prejudice, as no matter when you come in, if now or later, you still earn according to your ability. Unlike the usually Company Forced matrix you are used to.
That is why I asked that judgement should not be based of prejudice , but should be scientific.
I don't see where you "have us".
It doesn't matter if you can make 1, 10, 100 or 1000 victims... Offcourse, if you're one of the first "investors", you can actually make some money, but as a later investor, you're screwed, no matter how wide the pyramid gets... It's the setup of the system that's the problem, not the specific parameters (how many layers, how many %, how wide,... It doesn't matter if the main setup is the setup of a pyramid scheme)
A quote from
http://money.howstuffworks.com/ponzi-scheme3.htmSome victims make out pretty well in a Ponzi scheme. Although later investors certainly lose money, the early investors can come out ahead. Their testimonials are exactly what help perpetuate the scheme. Some unscrupulous characters invest with the full knowledge that they're funding a Ponzi scheme -- they cross their fingers that they aren't in the bottom rung. Of course, any money they make is at the expense of other investors. Legal questions abound as to whether these lucky initial investors should be forced to help recoup losses for later investors [source: Berenson].
I have to admit that as a non-scammer, i didn't know the exact difference between a ponzi and a pyramid (they look alike, but apparently still have some differences)... But i did know that in my country both are illegal.
Btw: am i safe to assume you're the one trying to drive traffic towards this pyramid scheme, since you're so keen on defending it?