Oh boy, oh boy oh boy
Well, beyond the great many things that have happened recently, one of the least deadly yet most interesting events recently has been the Intercept leak of classified NSA documents detailing interference by Russia.
https://theintercept.com/2017/06/05/top-secret-nsa-report-details-russian-hacking-effort-days-before-2016-election/...
... they identified the leaker almost immediately, mostly because the journalists who published the leak aren't too bright.
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/intercept-leaker-arrest-resulted-from-a-search-warrant-for-podcast-transcripts-not-classified-documents/According to the application, the FBI was alerted to the dissemination of classified information after a reporter for The Intercept contacted a separate contractor for the U.S. Government, asking to verify the authenticity of the leak. Included in the reporter’s request was information related to the leaker’s location (Augusta, Georgia), and a photo of the document, which the contractor then forwarded to the FBI. In its application, the FBI maintains a “crease” in the document led the government to realize only one of six people had accessed the documents.
..
Winner is charged with removing classified material from a government facility and submitting it to a news outlet. She faces prosecution under the Espionage Act.
In a statement Monday, Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein praised the “exceptional law enforcement efforts” that allowed the FBI to “quickly to identify and arrest the defendant.”
As everything currently, interesting to say the least. Wonder if this has anything to do with the 'bombshell' that's supposedly going to be dropped on Wednesday (besides Comeys testimony).
...
Sometimes criminal prosecution may be the only answer. In this case the reporter did jeopardize his source, and that did result in likely putting her in harm's way via prosecution. Should the reporter be prosecuted? Tough call.
This looks like another case of a carefully crafted leak.
Remember Bradley Manning.
1) The NSA realizes it is having trouble with leaks, so top executives there decide to "discredit leaking" by engineering a leaker who they can paint as personifying leaking as negative.
2) They search through personnel files for a young man with a disorder that would appear unattractive to mainstream types with classified access.
3) They eventually settle on Manning. A psychiatrist reviews his history and Manning is told that he has been selected to work with highly classified information.
4) He is carefully guided into a dilemma that will oblige him to publicize classified info.
5) Then his psychological history is utilized and while under 24 7 control of handlers his conflicts are cultivated until he decides he is a woman trapped in a man's body. The rest is herstory.
This leaker is probably closer to Manning than Snowden. Her language skills give credibility to her classified access, but it looks like the specific material fed to her was intended to induce a leak.