Topic: rebranding from Vanillacoin to Vcash. (Read 2068 times)

lol forget about this poll...  XVC went higher than 50k within one week of it coming out

Optimized VCASH NVIDIA miner for sale. 0.2 BTC Pm for details.

nice shoot Thank's for profit of this coin muahahaaa 

He needs some cool tunes
Not just any will suffice
But they didn't have Ice Cube
So he bought Vanilla Ice

Vcash is much better than vanillacoin. Vanilla means very ordinary things in IT world. So Vcach rebranding will attract some attention.

You think the name decred is catchier than Vcash?  Joking?

the name is not really appealing in either case, vanilla was stupid, it seems a sort of chocolate or something and cash is redundant, you need something catchy like decred

I just checked the website and don't know how would a LinkedIn account convince me Vcash is useful though. I stop reading when I spot a high concentration of empty buzzwords like on vcash homepage: "Vcash was engineered to be innovative and forward-thinking. It prevents eavesdropping and censorship, promotes decentralized, energy efficient and instant network transactions."

ftfy

really looking forward to see what John-Connor has in store for us in the new annual timeline coming out this week

poloniex says, the ticker will be change in 24hours
keep buying and hold   

About time.  I said they should change that name a long time ago.  Vcash sounds much better.

Using X indicates that it's not a national currency. This is an ISO (4217) standard.

the day that he does what your asking, will be the day VCash gets hyped. until then it will just continue with its steady growth as people try it out, and watch as John-Conner keeps releasing new things for the project.

we dont need to have a discussion on the perfection of his model until VCash becomes a finished project, and John himself decides to start marketing it.  as it is VCash is an unfinished product which works better than 90% of its competitors, and runs well with more features than any other project with its marketcap.

 I'm still waiting to see your whitepapers on this project that you have been working on forever.  Until I see an unbreakable  solution to the byzantium generals problem or towards sybil attacks in 0 conf instant transfer, I will assume that all projects run these risks, and it is a matter of proper mitigation, not absolute solution that will decide the success of the project.

maybe John has figured it out, or maybe he hasn't.  Only time and a proper peer review will bring this to light.( the same goes for your project)

no one is forcing people to buy VCash, if you want to try it out you can mine it instead of buying it.  John Connor himself has clearly warned and discouraged people against buying it with the intention of profiteering.  On the other hand, he has been working on it for a couple years now, and those of us watching it and buying it see it having potential.

Either way VCash and its current marketcap are in no way hyped.

This is absolutely moronic, i'm losing all faith in this project with such nonsense.

There are 500 COINS with X ticker at the start and this guy decided to do the same.

https://twitter.com/vdotcash/status/708538224172371968

Re: rebranding from Vanillacoin to Vcash.


And stop being anonymous. Publish his LinkedIn account.

And release fully detailed white papers on Zerotime and Chainblender so they can be properly peer reviewed.

Until he does those, it is just another scam coin hyping tokens on n00bs.

I think that while the name change will help, more changes besides the just name are necessary to bring the value back to 50,000 satoshis and beyond. They need to improve the look and functionality of the wallet for one. Another is clear up some of the controversy surrounding the coin.

One old criticism that has not seemed to fade is the Developers (John Connor) use of Bitcoin and Peer-coin code without the proper attribution. To me, simply including a simple attribution statement like 99% of other alts do would clear up this old but lingering wound. I mean what is the big deal if you used portions of existing code, its not like his current stance of claiming he wrote the whole thing from scratch is helping with the market-share. By including proper attribution, you would silence those naysayers and everyone else probably wouldn't even notice, so its seems like a win-win.

today John Connor release new wallet from vanillacoin and start rebranding it.
source : http://vanillacoin.net/news.php

any chance vanillacoin reach 50k satosi after rebranding..?
let's discuss it