Since TECSHARE doesn't want to hear rebuttals in his locked thread, I thought I would point out some of the things he missed for him in this thread.
From TS's
OP in the locked thread:
By the pattern of the removed posts, you will see the intent is harassment and preventing specific topics from being discussed. They mods are either just mindlessly removing them, or worse actively complicit in this behavior.
The intent of the mods is to do their job as mod. That should be self-evident.
Feel free to make another REE: Thread™ if me having the ability to speak in this thread bothers you so much.
That's not what bothers me. What bothers me is that you won't let other people speak and explain to you why you are mistaken in your locked threads.
For example (and mods, please feel free to correct me where
I may be mistaken):
Post #1 (reply to Vod in topic
OgNasty Ponzi passthrough and ponzi fans.. BTC losses everywhere he goes): Vod's comment was off-topic, thus it was deleted. As your post solely addressed his off-topic post, it was also deleted. This is pretty standard protocol.
Post #2 (reply to Vod in topic
More trust system abuse by Lauda): same as Post #1, your comment was deleted as it was only a response to Vod's post, which was also off-topic. You even said this:
Remind me again what this has to do with the topic? Oh right nothing, not that you or the mods give a shit about that.
Apparently the mods do give a shit about it.
Post #3 (reply to Vod in topic
More trust system abuse by Lauda): you just reposted your previous reply to Vod, whose comment was, again,
also deleted.
Post #4 (reply to Lauda in topic
Timelord2067 ad hominem, trolling, fud, accusations, fake flags, lies etc NSFW): this was written in a self-moderated thread, it even says Lauda deleted it:
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic.
Post #5 (reply to marlboroza in topic
PrimeNumber7 is an alt of Quickseller, Take 2): this was your reply:
Thanks for demonstrating how the mob handles criticism... with more mobbing.
How do you consider this to be on-topic? Its just a quip and adds nothing constructive to the conversation.
Post #6 (reply to marboroza in topic
PrimeNumber7 is an alt of Quickseller, Take 2): same principle as posts 1-4 -- the post you were replying to was deemed off-topic, and as a result your response was off-topic as well.
Post #7 (reply to Vod in topic
Trust System Abuse By Nullius): same principle -- Vod's post was off-topic and deleted, yours was simply a reply to it, so it was also deemed off-topic.
Post #8 (reply to Vod in topic
Trust System Abuse By Nullius): same principle -- Vod's post was off-topic and deleted, yours was simply a reply to it, so it was also deemed off-topic.
Post #9 (reply to Vod in topic
Trust System Abuse By Nullius): same principle -- Vod's post was off-topic and deleted, yours was simply a reply to it, so it was also deemed off-topic.
OK, you mentioned a lot of deleted posts and I am not going to go through the rest of them individually, but I hope you can see the pattern emerging here.
If a post you are replying to is deemed off-topic and deleted, and your reply only addresses the off-topic aspect of the deleted post, your post will also be deleted.
Some of your other deleted posts are just straight off-topic or trolling. As I said in the other REE thread, even TOAA learned that in order to not have their troll posts deleted, they needed to address an on-topic element in their post
somewhere,
then they were free to troll about and be a general dickhead.
OK let's take a look at the rest of the ones I think were probably just deleted for trolling/off-topic, and not because the post you were responding to was deleted:
Is some one upset their little smear fest is not working as planned?
You mean like these dogs?
(meme)
You are often wrong, but since when has that stopped you?
Now only to get to the other dozen or so people you attack...
Some how I don't find your observations to be very impartial considering your own history of trust system abuse against me.
Out of your list of 26 posts, I see 2 that are borderline on-topic and perhaps shouldn't have been deleted. The last one is hard to place given there's no context.
2 out of 26. And for those 2, most people would say, "oh well", and move on with their lives.
Well now, I know your natural response to me is "I don't care what you think", and that's part of the problem. You should care, because if you did, you might have learned a thing or two from what others are trying to point out to you. Instead you live in a perpetual state of confusion and paranoia, which I guess for you is a lot more fun than simply accepting you didn't understand the forum rules.