religion is a great instrument to control and to unite people.
I assume you meant religion is an instrument control and divide people... religion teaches you to hate people who belong to a different religion, that does not unite people, sorry
Topic: Religion is a virus (Read 1068 times)
I assume you meant religion is an instrument control and divide people... religion teaches you to hate people who belong to a different religion, that does not unite people, sorry
religion is a great instrument to control and to unite people.
Initially I presumed thoughtful discussion was gonna take place but this is definitely troll central.
Religion in itself is not so bad but the fact that it is used by humans as a tool to perpetuate evil is the problem,maybe humans are the virus.
Always there can be seen two sides in this case. Religion can get peace to the word but it depend on how people behave and how the religion teach people to behave. Isn't it the truth?
Now world religion is a controlling tool of spreading war.
Who cares about war and the death of a few million people?
Religion has convinced billions that a sky fairy will come clean up after them, so they have done nothing about global warming.
The chance of humanity not going extinct in the next century is in the single digits now. :/
Personally, I believe that people might be able to affect global warming a little. But if there isn't any, all they might do is make global cooling worse. However, the tiny bit that people might be able to do is nothing compared with the control that the sun has over such things.
Actually, the best that people can do is humbly plead with God Who has control over the sun and everything else... and Who is merciful towards those who trust in Him. What should they plead? They should plead for His protection from the global cooling that is coming.
Of course, global heating will ultimately come. When? After Jesus returns and takes His people to Heaven. After that, He will throw what is left of the world into the lake of fire >>> REAL global warming.
Now world religion is a controlling tool of spreading war.
Who cares about war and the death of a few million people?
Religion has convinced billions that a sky fairy will come clean up after them, so they have done nothing about global warming.
The chance of humanity not going extinct in the next century is in the single digits now. :/
Believing too much make the religions into virus 
Viruses of the Mind
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viruses_of_the_Mind
Also like a virus, religion tends to infect children and elderly at a much higher rate than people who are in good health... Religion is typically transmitted from parent to child, like many viruses... Religion demands large amounts or your money and time, similar to dealing with an illness... Religions contain instructions to "copy" the message, and infect others with it... so many similarities with a virus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viruses_of_the_Mind
Quote
"Viruses of the Mind" is an essay by British evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, first published in the book Dennett and His Critics: Demystifying Mind (1993). Dawkins originally wrote the essay in 1991 and delivered it as a Voltaire Lecture on 6 November 1992 at the Conway Hall Humanist Centre. The essay discusses how religion can be viewed as a meme, an idea previously expressed by Dawkins in The Selfish Gene (1976). Dawkins analyzes the propagation of religious ideas and behaviors as a memetic virus, analogous to how biological and computer viruses spread.
Dawkins defines the "symptoms" of being infected by the "virus of religion", providing examples for most of them, and tries to define a connection between the elements of religion and its survival value (invoking Zahavi's handicap principle of sexual selection, applied to believers of a religion). Dawkins also describes religious beliefs as "mind-parasites", and as "gangs [that] will come to constitute a package, which may be sufficiently stable to deserve a collective name such as Roman Catholicism ... or ... component parts to a single virus".
Dawkins suggests that religious belief in the "faith-sufferer" typically shows the following elements:
It is impelled by some deep, inner conviction that something is true, or right, or virtuous: a conviction that doesn't seem to owe anything to evidence or reason, but which, nevertheless, the believer feels as totally compelling and convincing.
The believer typically makes a positive virtue of faith's being strong and unshakable, despite it not being based upon evidence.
There is a conviction that "mystery", per se, is a good thing; the belief that it is not a virtue to solve mysteries but to enjoy them and revel in their insolubility.
There may be intolerant behaviour towards perceived rival faiths, in extreme cases even the killing of opponents or advocating of their deaths. Believers may be similarly violent in disposition towards apostates or heretics, even if those espouse only a slightly different version of the faith.
The particular convictions that the believer holds, while having nothing to do with evidence, are likely to resemble those of the believer's parents.
If the believer is one of the rare exceptions who follows a different religion from his parents, the explanation may be cultural transmission from a charismatic individual.
The internal sensations of the 'faith-sufferer' may be reminiscent of those more ordinarily associated with sexual love.
Dawkins stresses his claim that religious beliefs do not spread as a result of evidence in their support, but typically by cultural transmission, in most cases from parents or from charismatic individuals. He refers to this as involving "epidemiology, not evidence". Further Dawkins distinguishes this process from the spread of scientific ideas, which, he suggests, is constrained by the requirement to conform with certain virtues of standard methodology: "testability, evidential support, precision, quantifiability, consistency, intersubjectivity, repeatability, universality, progressiveness, independence of cultural milieu, and so on". He points out that faith "spreads despite a total lack of every single one of these virtues".
Dawkins defines the "symptoms" of being infected by the "virus of religion", providing examples for most of them, and tries to define a connection between the elements of religion and its survival value (invoking Zahavi's handicap principle of sexual selection, applied to believers of a religion). Dawkins also describes religious beliefs as "mind-parasites", and as "gangs [that] will come to constitute a package, which may be sufficiently stable to deserve a collective name such as Roman Catholicism ... or ... component parts to a single virus".
Dawkins suggests that religious belief in the "faith-sufferer" typically shows the following elements:
It is impelled by some deep, inner conviction that something is true, or right, or virtuous: a conviction that doesn't seem to owe anything to evidence or reason, but which, nevertheless, the believer feels as totally compelling and convincing.
The believer typically makes a positive virtue of faith's being strong and unshakable, despite it not being based upon evidence.
There is a conviction that "mystery", per se, is a good thing; the belief that it is not a virtue to solve mysteries but to enjoy them and revel in their insolubility.
There may be intolerant behaviour towards perceived rival faiths, in extreme cases even the killing of opponents or advocating of their deaths. Believers may be similarly violent in disposition towards apostates or heretics, even if those espouse only a slightly different version of the faith.
The particular convictions that the believer holds, while having nothing to do with evidence, are likely to resemble those of the believer's parents.
If the believer is one of the rare exceptions who follows a different religion from his parents, the explanation may be cultural transmission from a charismatic individual.
The internal sensations of the 'faith-sufferer' may be reminiscent of those more ordinarily associated with sexual love.
Dawkins stresses his claim that religious beliefs do not spread as a result of evidence in their support, but typically by cultural transmission, in most cases from parents or from charismatic individuals. He refers to this as involving "epidemiology, not evidence". Further Dawkins distinguishes this process from the spread of scientific ideas, which, he suggests, is constrained by the requirement to conform with certain virtues of standard methodology: "testability, evidential support, precision, quantifiability, consistency, intersubjectivity, repeatability, universality, progressiveness, independence of cultural milieu, and so on". He points out that faith "spreads despite a total lack of every single one of these virtues".
Also like a virus, religion tends to infect children and elderly at a much higher rate than people who are in good health... Religion is typically transmitted from parent to child, like many viruses... Religion demands large amounts or your money and time, similar to dealing with an illness... Religions contain instructions to "copy" the message, and infect others with it... so many similarities with a virus
Religion is not completely a virus. It became a virus because of the mindset of most believers. See believing in God doesn't really need religion. But, religion acts as the medium of connection to God, so they believe that they are above amongst others. This makes it easy to influence other believers that as long as they follow these religious people, they will be saved. This kind of mindset is kinda stupid since your just basically offering yourself to be controlled by others.
What would you call a scam that only grows and leads to destruction,
Is that not a virus?
I would say scam carried by virus leading to never-ending destruction.
I got the flu right now, this doesn't feel like a religion. I am delirious though but this shit doesn't make me feel safe or anything 
I am just cold and can't think straight. Well, now this sounds more and more like a religion...
I am just cold and can't think straight. Well, now this sounds more and more like a religion... Now world religion is a controlling tool of spreading war.They are not following even what religion said.So political is binding with religion and they using it for improving racism and separate people.As humans we have a huge responsibility to minimize this problem.We must spreading humanity except racism.Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
Religion doesn't start war, its a facade - people do. That said, blanket statements about religion are rarely ever helpful considering the vast array of religions out there.
Bro ever heard of Crusades, Jihad, Ghazwa? if not then please visit the following link for the quick note :
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_wars_of_religion
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_expeditions_of_Muhammad
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Muslim_conquests
Religion is not Virus, Humans are. We are the one who exploiting all the resources for our pleasure in the name of development. Religion is more like a Big Scam. you don't need to be religious to become a Moral person.
What would you call a scam that only grows and leads to destruction,
Is that not a virus?
Religion isn't anything. The force is the people, the devil, and God. If people didn't have a theme in life, there wouldn't be any religion, but there would still be evil among the people.
Now world religion is a controlling tool of spreading war.They are not following even what religion said.So political is binding with religion and they using it for improving racism and separate people.As humans we have a huge responsibility to minimize this problem.We must spreading humanity except racism.Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
Yes sir! A very dangerous virus...Religion was the greater error that has happened to mankind....and to be sincere, it is a very powerful force and it is actually a good thing...just that most so called religious leaders have use it to manipulate people for their own selfish gains! Political parties and politicians use it as a means of wining an election....it's more frequent in Africa!
Hence we all need to collectively fight this trend and to preach more of humanity! Is really disheartened to see someone been killed because of following a different religion or a different believe system!
Now world religion is a controlling tool of spreading war.They are not following even what religion said.So political is binding with religion and they using it for improving racism and separate people.As humans we have a huge responsibility to minimize this problem.We must spreading humanity except racism.Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
Religion doesn't start war, its a facade - people do. That said, blanket statements about religion are rarely ever helpful considering the vast array of religions out there.
Bro ever heard of Crusades, Jihad, Ghazwa? if not then please visit the following link for the quick note :
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_wars_of_religion
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_expeditions_of_Muhammad
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Muslim_conquests
Religion is not Virus, Humans are. We are the one who exploiting all the resources for our pleasure in the name of development. Religion is more like a Big Scam. you don't need to be religious to become a Moral person.
Religion is a fundamental right of every individual; irrespective. But the way of practice and from parent to children make a virus that can’t be control, affecting all aspect of humanity which make it a tool of war for selfish religious leaders.
Therefore, religion is not a virus. It's just a worldview that everyone can choose or not choose for themselves. The choice must be conscious. It is necessary to understand well what is religion.
Now world religion is a controlling tool of spreading war.They are not following even what religion said.So political is binding with religion and they using it for improving racism and separate people.As humans we have a huge responsibility to minimize this problem.We must spreading humanity except racism.Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
luckily i am out of this stupidity of opposing and hating religions
i feel much more comfortable being now in a much better harmony with the universe than constantly questioning them
imperfection is part of the huge opportunities this world offers to us.
humanism and perfectionism of humanism will blind people for that
Religion is a virus that destroys destruction.
Now world religion is a controlling tool of spreading war.They are not following even what religion said.So political is binding with religion and they using it for improving racism and separate people.As humans we have a huge responsibility to minimize this problem.We must spreading humanity except racism.Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
Sometimes, religion controlling the mindset of a person, I know somebody who is actually a Catholic and then after converting to other religion, she began to tell everything about God even if she really doesn't know what she is saying and she really didn't understand why she needs to convert on that religion. I am not really against religions but in her attitude, she really became different after she converts. She always says that she is with God and God is always with her. The truth is, she really doesn't know it, why I am saying this? Because she stole a lot of money in the office of my aunt, she is blaming some of her co-workers and not saying the truth but she claims that she is with God and I don't think that she is really with God. In that thinking, we actually thought that she is really crazy, and for her attitude, I am sure that religion is a virus. 
I would not call Religion a virus but I would definitely say that Religion controls the way we live our lives - if we are religious of course. Like anything else Religion has also been taken hostage by bad individuals who are trying to gain from it.
That is why it is said that Religion is a dogma - https://www.thefreedictionary.com/dogma
You either believe in the stories and doctrines or you dont, it is a way of life. Everything you do is based on your religion. It tells you what clothes to wear, what food to eat, what kind of people you spend your time with, what to do and when...
That is why it is said that Religion is a dogma - https://www.thefreedictionary.com/dogma
You either believe in the stories and doctrines or you dont, it is a way of life. Everything you do is based on your religion. It tells you what clothes to wear, what food to eat, what kind of people you spend your time with, what to do and when...
Now world religion is a controlling tool of spreading war.They are not following even what religion said.So political is binding with religion and they using it for improving racism and separate people.As humans we have a huge responsibility to minimize this problem.We must spreading humanity except racism.Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
Religion doesn't start war, its a facade - people do. That said, blanket statements about religion are rarely ever helpful considering the vast array of religions out there.
Semantics... religions do start wars
Wars are started because people refuse to settle differences through talking... religious people have no interest in settling differences with people of other religions... the majority of "holy" books (Bible, Quran, etc) state that you are commanded by god to murder anyone who even tries to convert you to another religion, even if it is your own family, parents or children trying to convert you.
If you don't believe that religious differences have started wars... you are willfully ignorant
Also, there is not a "vast array of religions out there"... I can count the religions of the world on 2 hands... 1 hand on a good day (jew, christian, muslim, hindu, buddhist)
Congrats, you're happily perpetuating ignorance.
You cant say both religions start war and then say they start because "people have no interest in settling differences".
If they are all the religions you've been exposed to, then let's be careful not to assume they are completely representative.
Finally, blanket statements about the "majority of 'holy' books" was just errant on so many levels, I just hope people don't fall for these unsubstantiated claims.
If you are going to say I'm wrong, please provide an example
I have read the entire Hebrew bible, and the Christian bible. I have read large sections of the Qur'an, Zohar, Book of Mormon, Bhagavad Gita, Mahabharata, the Pali Canon, Tao Te Ching, and Tibetan book of the dead. I have read Socrates and Plato. I have read Apocryphal books that didn't make it into the canonized bible... Let me know when you have studied all the world religions, and read each of their holy books... then perhaps we can have a debate about it
Please explain how I'm wrong about Jews, Christians and Muslims having zero interest in settling their differences... When have you ever seen Jews, Christians or Muslims do anything but sling hatred and bombs at each other?
Now world religion is a controlling tool of spreading war.They are not following even what religion said.So political is binding with religion and they using it for improving racism and separate people.As humans we have a huge responsibility to minimize this problem.We must spreading humanity except racism.Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
Religion doesn't start war, its a facade - people do. That said, blanket statements about religion are rarely ever helpful considering the vast array of religions out there.
Semantics... religions do start wars
Wars are started because people refuse to settle differences through talking... religious people have no interest in settling differences with people of other religions... the majority of "holy" books (Bible, Quran, etc) state that you are commanded by god to murder anyone who even tries to convert you to another religion, even if it is your own family, parents or children trying to convert you.
If you don't believe that religious differences have started wars... you are willfully ignorant
Also, there is not a "vast array of religions out there"... I can count the religions of the world on 2 hands... 1 hand on a good day (jew, christian, muslim, hindu, buddhist)
Congrats, you're happily perpetuating ignorance.
You cant say both religions start war and then say they start because "people have no interest in settling differences".
If they are all the religions you've been exposed to, then let's be careful not to assume they are completely representative.
Finally, blanket statements about the "majority of 'holy' books" was just errant on so many levels, I just hope people don't fall for these unsubstantiated claims.
"a pursuit or interest followed with great devotion." - Dictionary definition
Please understand that dictionary definitions are specific to the context that the word is used... this definition is only used when in a context like, "to make a religion of fighting prejudice"
The primary definition is always listed first:
Quote from: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/religion
1. a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
2. a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects: the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
3. the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices: a world council of religions.
4. the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.: to enter religion.
5. the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.
6. something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience: to make a religion of fighting prejudice.
7. religions, Archaic . religious rites: painted priests performing religions deep into the night.
8. Archaic . strict faithfulness; devotion: a religion to one's vow.
Idioms
9. get religion , Informal .
to acquire a deep conviction of the validity of religious beliefs and practices.
to resolve to mend one's errant ways: The company got religion and stopped making dangerous products.
2. a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects: the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
3. the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices: a world council of religions.
4. the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.: to enter religion.
5. the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.
6. something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience: to make a religion of fighting prejudice.
7. religions, Archaic . religious rites: painted priests performing religions deep into the night.
8. Archaic . strict faithfulness; devotion: a religion to one's vow.
Idioms
9. get religion , Informal .
to acquire a deep conviction of the validity of religious beliefs and practices.
to resolve to mend one's errant ways: The company got religion and stopped making dangerous products.
To pretend that the 6th definition of religion is the primary one, is not being intellectually honest (Also note, the 6th definition is the last to not be labelled "Archaic")
We have a moral duty to be honest. This duty is especially important when we share ideas that can inform or persuade others.
Intellectual honesty is honesty in the acquisition, analysis, and transmission of ideas. A person is being intellectually honest when he or she, knowing the truth, states that truth. Intellectual honesty pertains to any communication intended to inform or persuade. This includes all forms of scholarship, consequential conversations such as dialogue, debate, (...)
Intellectual honesty is honesty in the acquisition, analysis, and transmission of ideas. A person is being intellectually honest when he or she, knowing the truth, states that truth. Intellectual honesty pertains to any communication intended to inform or persuade. This includes all forms of scholarship, consequential conversations such as dialogue, debate, (...)
Religion is a virus (agreed)!! because in any way you see it religion is part of life!! not necessary by been on any popular one!! "a pursuit or interest followed with great devotion." - Dictionary definition. e.g all Blockchain believers are now forming a new kind of religion!! any how you want it look..
so Religion is a Virus with a host (satoshi) spreading across.
so Religion is a Virus with a host (satoshi) spreading across.
the problem is not in religions, it's in false understanding of dogmas. if you indulge fully in a religion, you have no intention of suppressing those around you
Depends on the religion... I would only agree in the case of Hinduism or Buddhism... those 2 get along with other religions
Muslims and Christians have been fighting each other for over a thousand years... Muslims love to suppress others (women are 3rd class citizens - lower than children, majority think apostates should be killed, gays should be killed, etc)... Christians love to suppress others (examples include anti-gay marriage laws, anti-abortion laws, anti-drug/alcohol laws) Religion loves to take away the choice from people who don't even believe in their religion!
Christians hate "Sharia Law", but they love imposing their own believe system on everyone (gays, abortion, drugs, etc)
Post all the parts of those Bible books that DON'T talk about the things I said.
Btw, nobody has asked you "to post every verse from the bible to prove it is not in there."
When someone can't remember what they posted yesterday...
I realize I said I wouldn't respond to him anymore... but come the fuck on man
And the "those" books that I mentioned are: Isaiah, Revelations, and Hebrews.
It's your continued deceitful attempted deception that shows that you are way off in everything.
Post all the parts of those Bible books that DON'T talk about the things I said.
Btw, nobody has asked you "to post every verse from the bible to prove it is not in there."
When someone can't remember what they posted yesterday...
I realize I said I wouldn't respond to him anymore... but come the fuck on man
Religion, being the filthy parasitical virus that it it, is precisely so, amongst a myriad of other very bad things time does not allow me to go into detail right now, because not knowing the truth, it declares falsity as absolute truth. Makes me want to puke so disgusting is it.
Thank you for informing us about what your own "filthy parasitical virus" religion is... a filthy parasitical virus religion of anti-religion. You seem to have a self-destruction wish by condemning the basics of what you, yourself are... religious.
Question for the peanut gallery...
If someone claims that something is in the bible, and I dispute that claim (because the bible does not say that)...
Would it be more reasonable for the person claiming that something is in the bible to post a verse from the bible proving it is there, or would it be more reasonable for me to post every verse of the bible which does not say that? (who seriously asks someone to post every verse from the bible to prove it is not in there?!?)
Asking for a friend
#BurdenOfProof
If someone claims that something is in the bible, and I dispute that claim (because the bible does not say that)...
Would it be more reasonable for the person claiming that something is in the bible to post a verse from the bible proving it is there, or would it be more reasonable for me to post every verse of the bible which does not say that? (who seriously asks someone to post every verse from the bible to prove it is not in there?!?)
Asking for a friend
#BurdenOfProof
We have a moral duty to be honest. This duty is especially important when we share ideas that can inform or persuade others.
Intellectual honesty is honesty in the acquisition, analysis, and transmission of ideas. A person is being intellectually honest when he or she, knowing the truth, states that truth. Intellectual honesty pertains to any communication intended to inform or persuade. This includes all forms of scholarship, consequential conversations such as dialogue, debate, negotiations, product and service descriptions, various forms of persuasion, and public communications such as announcements, speeches, lectures, instruction, presentations, publications, declarations, briefings, news releases, policy statements, reports, religious instructions, social media posts, and journalism including not only prose and speech, but graphs, photographs, and other means of expression.
Intellectual honesty is honesty in the acquisition, analysis, and transmission of ideas. A person is being intellectually honest when he or she, knowing the truth, states that truth. Intellectual honesty pertains to any communication intended to inform or persuade. This includes all forms of scholarship, consequential conversations such as dialogue, debate, negotiations, product and service descriptions, various forms of persuasion, and public communications such as announcements, speeches, lectures, instruction, presentations, publications, declarations, briefings, news releases, policy statements, reports, religious instructions, social media posts, and journalism including not only prose and speech, but graphs, photographs, and other means of expression.
Religion, being the filthy parasitical virus that it it, is precisely so, amongst a myriad of other very bad things time does not allow me to go into detail right now, because not knowing the truth, it declares falsity as absolute truth. Makes me want to puke so disgusting is it.
I don't know what the "any of that" is that you are talking about
If you have anything in particular that you are talking about, spit it out with particulars rather than with some general "ANY of that."
If you have anything in particular that you are talking about, spit it out with particulars rather than with some general "ANY of that."
By "any of that", I mean literally every single sentence in your response... the bible doesn't say any of that
The Hell of "Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi and all the Rock Bands that ever rocked" is a fake hell that is called a heaven
Where is this in the bible? Got a chapter and verse?
The real Hell is the dissolution of this universe... which includes the spirit and soul and eternity and infinity.
Where is this?
The real Heaven is an entirely new universe that is made out of physics laws that can never be corrupted like this one was.
Where is this?
The joy that was originally in this universe before corruption entered, will be greatly improved upon in the new universe.
Where is this?
Probably eternity and infinity will be expanded and extended in ways that we can't understand in this faulty universe... but without corruption.
None of that is in the bible... have you even read the bible?
The descriptions of heaven in the bible consist of only a few sentences talking about streets of gold... none of the stuff you said is in the bible
it is scattered here and there, and is a compilation of things from several places in the Bible. Since you know the Bible so well, you show me where it is. I already started you off with places to look - Isaiah, Revelations, Hebrews. What's the matter? You want me to do all your research for you?
I told you it isn't in there and you just proved it by not posting a single chapter or verse
I'm done responding to you because you lack intellectual honesty.
We have a moral duty to be honest. This duty is especially important when we share ideas that can inform or persuade others.
Intellectual honesty is honesty in the acquisition, analysis, and transmission of ideas. A person is being intellectually honest when he or she, knowing the truth, states that truth. Intellectual honesty pertains to any communication intended to inform or persuade. This includes all forms of scholarship, consequential conversations such as dialogue, debate, negotiations, product and service descriptions, various forms of persuasion, and public communications such as announcements, speeches, lectures, instruction, presentations, publications, declarations, briefings, news releases, policy statements, reports, religious instructions, social media posts, and journalism including not only prose and speech, but graphs, photographs, and other means of expression.
Intellectual honesty is honesty in the acquisition, analysis, and transmission of ideas. A person is being intellectually honest when he or she, knowing the truth, states that truth. Intellectual honesty pertains to any communication intended to inform or persuade. This includes all forms of scholarship, consequential conversations such as dialogue, debate, negotiations, product and service descriptions, various forms of persuasion, and public communications such as announcements, speeches, lectures, instruction, presentations, publications, declarations, briefings, news releases, policy statements, reports, religious instructions, social media posts, and journalism including not only prose and speech, but graphs, photographs, and other means of expression.
Bye troll... Sorry, not sorry
You sure are having your troubles today. I showed you where to look, but you want to dictate the terms of how and what I show you. Do your own research.
Let me say it to you another way. Be intellectually honest. Post all the parts of those Bible books that DON'T talk about the things I said. Do it just to show that you have the ability to read... if you do, that is.
I'll help you out. Simply Google "Bible Hub, NIV,
And do this just to be intellectually honest, according to your quote in your post that I quoted, above.
God isn't going to answer you on your terms. He isn't your servant. But if He does, you are blessed. I have answered you way more than He is willing to put up with your contemptuous stupidity.
It's too bad that a good atheist will get damned because He doesn't believe God.
What's really wonderful is that a bad Christian will get saved because he does.
What's really wonderful is that a bad Christian will get saved because he does.
I'd rather be partying in hell with Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi and all the Rock Bands that ever rocked... than in heaven being bored for eternity, while in the company of a bunch of "bad Christians" and pedophile priests
Some hells are worse than others, even if they are called heaven... good luck with that
That's right. The Hell of "Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi and all the Rock Bands that ever rocked" is a fake hell that is called a heaven. The real Hell is the dissolution of this universe... which includes the spirit and soul and eternity and infinity.
The real Heaven is an entirely new universe that is made out of physics laws that can never be corrupted like this one was. The joy that was originally in this universe before corruption entered, will be greatly improved upon in the new universe. Probably eternity and infinity will be expanded and extended in ways that we can't understand in this faulty universe... but without corruption.
Are you like trying to start a new cult or something?
Because, I have actually read the bible, and it doesn't say ANY of that...
I don't know what the "any of that" is that you are talking about, but you talked about "hell with Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi and all the Rock Bands that ever rocked." The Bible never says any of that. You said it.
But the Bible talks of the new universe in both Isaiah and the Revelation. And the New Testament talks in various places about the joy that we have and will have with God. Hebrews even says that the coming joy that Jesus understood, was the reason why He did His work on the cross.
If you have anything in particular that you are talking about, spit it out with particulars rather than with some general "ANY of that."
Moloch, you just broke our resident village idiot. He is a broken toy now, rocking in his favorite chair, looking out the window, pass the iron bars, watching the clouds, his saliva slowly drooling on his, fleshly washed, white jacket is unable to utter his name. A nurse just placed his afternoon tray, full of his favorite pink honeyberries as he calls them. He did not notice her as his eyes moved to the floor and fixated on the Bible he has dropped four hours ago.
Now, even a team of psychiatrists will not be able to put him back together.
I don't know what the "any of that" is that you are talking about
If you have anything in particular that you are talking about, spit it out with particulars rather than with some general "ANY of that."
If you have anything in particular that you are talking about, spit it out with particulars rather than with some general "ANY of that."
By "any of that", I mean literally every single sentence in your response... the bible doesn't say any of that
The Hell of "Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi and all the Rock Bands that ever rocked" is a fake hell that is called a heaven
Where is this in the bible? Got a chapter and verse?
The real Hell is the dissolution of this universe... which includes the spirit and soul and eternity and infinity.
Where is this?
The real Heaven is an entirely new universe that is made out of physics laws that can never be corrupted like this one was.
Where is this?
The joy that was originally in this universe before corruption entered, will be greatly improved upon in the new universe.
Where is this?
Probably eternity and infinity will be expanded and extended in ways that we can't understand in this faulty universe... but without corruption.
None of that is in the bible... have you even read the bible?
The descriptions of heaven in the bible consist of only a few sentences talking about streets of gold... none of the stuff you said is in the bible
it is scattered here and there, and is a compilation of things from several places in the Bible. Since you know the Bible so well, you show me where it is. I already started you off with places to look - Isaiah, Revelations, Hebrews. What's the matter? You want me to do all your research for you?
I told you it isn't in there and you just proved it by not posting a single chapter or verse
I'm done responding to you because you lack intellectual honesty.
We have a moral duty to be honest. This duty is especially important when we share ideas that can inform or persuade others.
Intellectual honesty is honesty in the acquisition, analysis, and transmission of ideas. A person is being intellectually honest when he or she, knowing the truth, states that truth. Intellectual honesty pertains to any communication intended to inform or persuade. This includes all forms of scholarship, consequential conversations such as dialogue, debate, negotiations, product and service descriptions, various forms of persuasion, and public communications such as announcements, speeches, lectures, instruction, presentations, publications, declarations, briefings, news releases, policy statements, reports, religious instructions, social media posts, and journalism including not only prose and speech, but graphs, photographs, and other means of expression.
Intellectual honesty is honesty in the acquisition, analysis, and transmission of ideas. A person is being intellectually honest when he or she, knowing the truth, states that truth. Intellectual honesty pertains to any communication intended to inform or persuade. This includes all forms of scholarship, consequential conversations such as dialogue, debate, negotiations, product and service descriptions, various forms of persuasion, and public communications such as announcements, speeches, lectures, instruction, presentations, publications, declarations, briefings, news releases, policy statements, reports, religious instructions, social media posts, and journalism including not only prose and speech, but graphs, photographs, and other means of expression.
Bye troll... Sorry, not sorry
Quote
Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
I totally agree. People are forcing children to accept certain religion when the children are to young to have their own judgement.
Leave the kids alone, let them decide what to follow later, when they can actually make a proper choice.
Why blame the parents? Parents usually baptised their child in the religion they believe would guide their child's moral values as he/she grows up.
Quote
Exactly. When they get older, if they want to follow a religion then let them be. But teaching them in the ways of a religion, making their way of life before they know better, is forcing it to children.
With this kind of mentality, children are instilled with wrong idea of liberty of their choices. They would often choose to disobey norms and moral values not thinking of any consequences of their actions.
I don't know what the "any of that" is that you are talking about
If you have anything in particular that you are talking about, spit it out with particulars rather than with some general "ANY of that."
By "any of that", I mean literally every single sentence in your response... the bible doesn't say any of that
The Hell of "Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi and all the Rock Bands that ever rocked" is a fake hell that is called a heaven
Where is this in the bible? Got a chapter and verse?
The real Hell is the dissolution of this universe... which includes the spirit and soul and eternity and infinity.
Where is this?
The real Heaven is an entirely new universe that is made out of physics laws that can never be corrupted like this one was.
Where is this?
The joy that was originally in this universe before corruption entered, will be greatly improved upon in the new universe.
Where is this?
Probably eternity and infinity will be expanded and extended in ways that we can't understand in this faulty universe... but without corruption.
None of that is in the bible... have you even read the bible?
The descriptions of heaven in the bible consist of only a few sentences talking about streets of gold... none of the stuff you said is in the bible
The "hell with Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi, etc." was something that you said, and you acted like it was a heaven for you. That's why I threw in the word "heaven." However, I already told you this, and I even told you that it wasn't in the Bible. If you read the Bible like you read what I said, no wonder you don't understand about salvation.
The rest of it is scattered here and there, and is a compilation of things from several places in the Bible. Since you know the Bible so well, you show me where it is. I already started you off with places to look - Isaiah, Revelations, Hebrews. What's the matter? You want me to do all your research for you?
It's too bad that a good atheist will get damned because He doesn't believe God.
What's really wonderful is that a bad Christian will get saved because he does.
What's really wonderful is that a bad Christian will get saved because he does.
I'd rather be partying in hell with Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi and all the Rock Bands that ever rocked... than in heaven being bored for eternity, while in the company of a bunch of "bad Christians" and pedophile priests
Some hells are worse than others, even if they are called heaven... good luck with that
That's right. The Hell of "Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi and all the Rock Bands that ever rocked" is a fake hell that is called a heaven. The real Hell is the dissolution of this universe... which includes the spirit and soul and eternity and infinity.
The real Heaven is an entirely new universe that is made out of physics laws that can never be corrupted like this one was. The joy that was originally in this universe before corruption entered, will be greatly improved upon in the new universe. Probably eternity and infinity will be expanded and extended in ways that we can't understand in this faulty universe... but without corruption.
Are you like trying to start a new cult or something?
Because, I have actually read the bible, and it doesn't say ANY of that...
I don't know what the "any of that" is that you are talking about
If you have anything in particular that you are talking about, spit it out with particulars rather than with some general "ANY of that."
By "any of that", I mean literally every single sentence in your response... the bible doesn't say any of that
The Hell of "Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi and all the Rock Bands that ever rocked" is a fake hell that is called a heaven
Where is this in the bible? Got a chapter and verse?
The real Hell is the dissolution of this universe... which includes the spirit and soul and eternity and infinity.
Where is this?
The real Heaven is an entirely new universe that is made out of physics laws that can never be corrupted like this one was.
Where is this?
The joy that was originally in this universe before corruption entered, will be greatly improved upon in the new universe.
Where is this?
Probably eternity and infinity will be expanded and extended in ways that we can't understand in this faulty universe... but without corruption.
None of that is in the bible... have you even read the bible?
The descriptions of heaven in the bible consist of only a few sentences talking about streets of gold... none of the stuff you said is in the bible
Quote
The real Heaven is an entirely new universe that is made out of physics laws that can never be corrupted like this one was. The joy that was originally in this universe before corruption entered, will be greatly improved upon in the new universe. Probably eternity and infinity will be expanded and extended in ways that we can't understand in this faulty universe... but without corruption.
That's one hell of a theory. Nothing you said really make sense, this is all looks kinda sect-stuff. I too think that religion isn't really helpful in a big sense, but some people find it comforting still.
I have a positive attitude to religion, but yes, I believe that it should not be imposed from childhood, but give the child a full awareness of this world, banal knowledge and achievements of mankind.
And only then ask him: "Do you want to be a believer?".
And only then ask him: "Do you want to be a believer?".
It's too bad that a good atheist will get damned because He doesn't believe God.
What's really wonderful is that a bad Christian will get saved because he does.
What's really wonderful is that a bad Christian will get saved because he does.
I'd rather be partying in hell with Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi and all the Rock Bands that ever rocked... than in heaven being bored for eternity, while in the company of a bunch of "bad Christians" and pedophile priests
Some hells are worse than others, even if they are called heaven... good luck with that
That's right. The Hell of "Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi and all the Rock Bands that ever rocked" is a fake hell that is called a heaven. The real Hell is the dissolution of this universe... which includes the spirit and soul and eternity and infinity.
The real Heaven is an entirely new universe that is made out of physics laws that can never be corrupted like this one was. The joy that was originally in this universe before corruption entered, will be greatly improved upon in the new universe. Probably eternity and infinity will be expanded and extended in ways that we can't understand in this faulty universe... but without corruption.
Are you like trying to start a new cult or something?
Because, I have actually read the bible, and it doesn't say ANY of that...
I don't know what the "any of that" is that you are talking about, but you talked about "hell with Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi and all the Rock Bands that ever rocked." The Bible never says any of that. You said it.
But the Bible talks of the new universe in both Isaiah and the Revelation. And the New Testament talks in various places about the joy that we have and will have with God. Hebrews even says that the coming joy that Jesus understood, was the reason why He did His work on the cross.
If you have anything in particular that you are talking about, spit it out with particulars rather than with some general "ANY of that."
It's too bad that a good atheist will get damned because He doesn't believe God.
What's really wonderful is that a bad Christian will get saved because he does.
What's really wonderful is that a bad Christian will get saved because he does.
I'd rather be partying in hell with Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi and all the Rock Bands that ever rocked... than in heaven being bored for eternity, while in the company of a bunch of "bad Christians" and pedophile priests
Some hells are worse than others, even if they are called heaven... good luck with that
That's right. The Hell of "Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi and all the Rock Bands that ever rocked" is a fake hell that is called a heaven. The real Hell is the dissolution of this universe... which includes the spirit and soul and eternity and infinity.
The real Heaven is an entirely new universe that is made out of physics laws that can never be corrupted like this one was. The joy that was originally in this universe before corruption entered, will be greatly improved upon in the new universe. Probably eternity and infinity will be expanded and extended in ways that we can't understand in this faulty universe... but without corruption.
Are you like trying to start a new cult or something?
Because, I have actually read the bible, and it doesn't say ANY of that...
It's too bad that a good atheist will get damned because He doesn't believe God.
What's really wonderful is that a bad Christian will get saved because he does.
What's really wonderful is that a bad Christian will get saved because he does.
I'd rather be partying in hell with Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi and all the Rock Bands that ever rocked... than in heaven being bored for eternity, while in the company of a bunch of "bad Christians" and pedophile priests
Some hells are worse than others, even if they are called heaven... good luck with that
That's right. The Hell of "Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi and all the Rock Bands that ever rocked" is a fake hell that is called a heaven. The real Hell is the dissolution of this universe... which includes the spirit and soul and eternity and infinity.
The real Heaven is an entirely new universe that is made out of physics laws that can never be corrupted like this one was. The joy that was originally in this universe before corruption entered, will be greatly improved upon in the new universe. Probably eternity and infinity will be expanded and extended in ways that we can't understand in this faulty universe... but without corruption.
It's too bad that a good atheist will get damned because He doesn't believe God.
What's really wonderful is that a bad Christian will get saved because he does.
What's really wonderful is that a bad Christian will get saved because he does.
I'd rather be partying in hell with Socrates, Buddha, Gandhi and all the Rock Bands that ever rocked... than in heaven being bored for eternity, while in the company of a bunch of "bad Christians" and pedophile priests
Some hells are worse than others, even if they are called heaven... good luck with that
It's too bad that a good atheist will get damned because He doesn't believe God.
What's really wonderful is that a bad Christian will get saved because he does.
What's really wonderful is that a bad Christian will get saved because he does.
I prefer the way Gandhi phrased it
Religion is certainly a force. but I don't think it's a bad one. Religion helps many people to find their place in this world and to understand it's structure. Some people try to use religion to separate people. But it is not the religion's problem. It is people business. So blaming religion in all the bad things that happen around us is dancing in circles.
Though I am a religious person, I do believe that so many religions have brought about division in people and If you doubt me look at all the terrorism going on these days, they can be attributed to religion. I think you are wrong in evaluating religion, in my opinion it is not religion that spreads war but the rulers or the government in order to achieve their interests. whereas in the matter of religion, I think people are free to choose religion, they do not have to follow the religion of their parentst
Religion refers to the beliefs and a series of practical and moral instructions that the prophets have related on behalf of God to guide and lead human beings. It points to the recognition of one controlling power, God, who, as the sole creator, guides human life towards its ultimate perfection by adopting a set of principles and by obedience of specific code of practical ethics.That is what you want it to be.
It is not what it is.
Religion is the most coercive and destructive ideology invented by the human mind.
Reality bites, people die because of your religion.
The problem with religion is... I want facts and evidence, not baseless claims backed by nothing
I don't trust the words of people 2000+ years ago... everything from 2000+ years ago is full of magical nonsense that we all know is bullshit (even "historians" of the time added magical nonsense to their "history")... why claim this one book isn't bullshit like all the rest?
I don't trust the words of people 2000+ years ago... everything from 2000+ years ago is full of magical nonsense that we all know is bullshit (even "historians" of the time added magical nonsense to their "history")... why claim this one book isn't bullshit like all the rest?
The right religion can be a stabilizing force for society.
What makes a religion right, anyway?Well i think it doesn't have a good thing well it may unite us as one, but you can see that it causes a fight or should i say its more like a clan you see, people got their own beliefs and perspective regarding on what the teaching says on the religion, i hope religion will not continue to affect our own perspective or our look on ourselves, we are God's child though.
Now world religion is a controlling tool of spreading war.They are not following even what religion said.So political is binding with religion and they using it for improving racism and separate people.As humans we have a huge responsibility to minimize this problem.We must spreading humanity except racism.Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
Religion doesn't start war, its a facade - people do. That said, blanket statements about religion are rarely ever helpful considering the vast array of religions out there.
Semantics... religions do start wars
Wars are started because people refuse to settle differences through talking... religious people have no interest in settling differences with people of other religions... the majority of "holy" books (Bible, Quran, etc) state that you are commanded by god to murder anyone who even tries to convert you to another religion, even if it is your own family, parents or children trying to convert you.
If you don't believe that religious differences have started wars... you are willfully ignorant
Also, there is not a "vast array of religions out there"... I can count the religions of the world on 2 hands... 1 hand on a good day (jew, christian, muslim, hindu, buddhist)
Let's not forget those religious denominations that start wars between groups following the same religion.
Religions poison human mind. People just cannot think straight. Their morals go out of the window, the only thing that matters is what some psychopaths wrote centuries or millennia ago.
Indeed, more now is the one that uses religion for the interests of certain groups, and not a few, precisely with the religious issues raised, it is easier to cause people to forget the common sense and easily become a battle. whereas religion should not be used. it takes our awareness to be able to understand the meaning of religion wrongly and encourage mutual respect.
Religion is certainly a force. but I don't think it's a bad one. Religion helps many people to find their place in this world and to understand it's structure. Some people try to use religion to separate people. But it is not the religion's problem. It is people business. So blaming religion in all the bad things that happen around us is dancing in circles.
I think you are wrong in evaluating religion, in my opinion it is not religion that spreads war but the rulers or the government in order to achieve their interests. whereas in the matter of religion, I think people are free to choose religion, they do not have to follow the religion of their parentst
Religion refers to the beliefs and a series of practical and moral instructions that the prophets have related on behalf of God to guide and lead human beings. It points to the recognition of one controlling power, God, who, as the sole creator, guides human life towards its ultimate perfection by adopting a set of principles and by obedience of specific code of practical ethics. Now world religion is a controlling tool of spreading war.They are not following even what religion said.So political is binding with religion and they using it for improving racism and separate people.As humans we have a huge responsibility to minimize this problem.We must spreading humanity except racism.Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
Religion doesn't start war, its a facade - people do. That said, blanket statements about religion are rarely ever helpful considering the vast array of religions out there.
Semantics... religions do start wars
Wars are started because people refuse to settle differences through talking... religious people have no interest in settling differences with people of other religions... the majority of "holy" books (Bible, Quran, etc) state that you are commanded by god to murder anyone who even tries to convert you to another religion, even if it is your own family, parents or children trying to convert you.
If you don't believe that religious differences have started wars... you are willfully ignorant
Also, there is not a "vast array of religions out there"... I can count the religions of the world on 2 hands... 1 hand on a good day (jew, christian, muslim, hindu, buddhist)
And organized science is one of the worst religion viruses.
Now world religion is a controlling tool of spreading war.They are not following even what religion said.So political is binding with religion and they using it for improving racism and separate people.As humans we have a huge responsibility to minimize this problem.We must spreading humanity except racism.Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
Religion is important to each and everyone of us to have a right path to walk through our lives. Religion taught us morality and other good traits that our great great grand parents handed down to us.
For me religion is both business and hope its not a virus. There may be some church officials that are meddling with political decision but they are just human beings. We shouldn't let our beliefs to our religion be taken away because of those hypocrites that are running the church.
Just make sure you keep your religion to yourself and do not harm others.
You have the right to your own private delusion. No issues.
Now world religion is a controlling tool of spreading war.They are not following even what religion said.So political is binding with religion and they using it for improving racism and separate people.As humans we have a huge responsibility to minimize this problem.We must spreading humanity except racism.Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
Religion doesn't start war, its a facade - people do. That said, blanket statements about religion are rarely ever helpful considering the vast array of religions out there.
Now world religion is a controlling tool of spreading war.They are not following even what religion said.So political is binding with religion and they using it for improving racism and separate people.As humans we have a huge responsibility to minimize this problem.We must spreading humanity except racism.Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
Religion doesn't start war, its a facade - people do. That said, blanket statements about religion are rarely ever helpful considering the vast array of religions out there.
Now world religion is a controlling tool of spreading war.They are not following even what religion said.So political is binding with religion and they using it for improving racism and separate people.As humans we have a huge responsibility to minimize this problem.We must spreading humanity except racism.Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
Religion is important to each and everyone of us to have a right path to walk through our lives. Religion taught us morality and other good traits that our great great grand parents handed down to us.
For me religion is both business and hope its not a virus. There may be some church officials that are meddling with political decision but they are just human beings. We shouldn't let our beliefs to our religion be taken away because of those hypocrites that are running the church.
I think you are wrong in evaluating religion, in my opinion it is not religion that spreads war but the rulers or the government in order to achieve their interests. whereas in the matter of religion, I think people are free to choose religion, they do not have to follow the religion of their parentst
Quote
Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
I totally agree. People are forcing children to accept certain religion when the children are to young to have their own judgement.
Leave the kids alone, let them decide what to follow later, when they can actually make a proper choice.
Religion has always been used as a means of controlling the masses. It justifies political actions so no one questions anything. After all, who would dare question GOD. They even found a way to justify slavery thanks to the bible.
The only way religion can be culled and humanity put back on the right track is if we educated everyone, which is a worthy ideal and realistic in the near future thanks to the internet.
More intelligent people do not believe in religion.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/atheists-more-intelligent-than-religious-people-faith-instinct-cleverness-a7742766.html
The only way religion can be culled and humanity put back on the right track is if we educated everyone, which is a worthy ideal and realistic in the near future thanks to the internet.
More intelligent people do not believe in religion.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/atheists-more-intelligent-than-religious-people-faith-instinct-cleverness-a7742766.html
I'm also agreeing with the OP. We all are born with a religious labelled in our ass given by our parents whether we believed that religious concepts or not. Religion shouldn't act as a tool for deviding people. We all are human beings before we get our religious label.
As I can see, having a religion is better than nothing. Because it helps us to become a self- discipline person, but that doesn't mean that we should blindly followed what our religious leaders tells about the concepts of our religion and what written on books. Sometimes there are so many wrongful facts are written in books as well as dummy religious leaders whose worrying about maintaining their power and wealth for just saying God's sake. We should have the ability to choose what is wrong and right.
Religious leaders should guide the people how we should spend a better life without making any disturbences to other people's. If everyone do this simple thing regardless of their religion world will be a far better place than where it now. That's how I see religion.
As I can see, having a religion is better than nothing. Because it helps us to become a self- discipline person, but that doesn't mean that we should blindly followed what our religious leaders tells about the concepts of our religion and what written on books. Sometimes there are so many wrongful facts are written in books as well as dummy religious leaders whose worrying about maintaining their power and wealth for just saying God's sake. We should have the ability to choose what is wrong and right.
Religious leaders should guide the people how we should spend a better life without making any disturbences to other people's. If everyone do this simple thing regardless of their religion world will be a far better place than where it now. That's how I see religion.
Humanity is a virus. We contribute the most to the destruction of the planet. Religious is but one of humanity's creation that is affecting the planet.
I think we are more like a plague.
Quote
Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
I totally agree. People are forcing children to accept certain religion when the children are to young to have their own judgement.
Leave the kids alone, let them decide what to follow later, when they can actually make a proper choice.
Humanity is a virus. We contribute the most to the destruction of the planet. Religious is but one of humanity's creation that is affecting the planet.
Now world religion is a controlling tool of spreading war.They are not following even what religion said.So political is binding with religion and they using it for improving racism and separate people.As humans we have a huge responsibility to minimize this problem.We must spreading humanity except racism.Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
It resembles a virus because it propagates from host to host. It is transmitted from parents to children. It persists in whole communities and countries, ruling over reason and common sense.
Some hosts fight the virus and win, some succumb and become physically and/or mentally ill.
Regardless, it affects people in a negative way.
I think for third world countries religion could be a great solution for getting people into education and building schools most of us could agree on.
The right religion can be a stabilizing force for society.
What makes a religion right, anyway? 
Yes have huge responsibility for minimizing the problem but how it can be if the people above us are the ones who manipulates everything. Religion, politics, wars, economy, news, I mean almost everything.
The right religion can be a stabilizing force for society.
Now world religion is a controlling tool of spreading war.They are not following even what religion said.So political is binding with religion and they using it for improving racism and separate people.As humans we have a huge responsibility to minimize this problem.We must spreading humanity except racism.Religion must not going to parents to children.People can be choose what they following or not.
Jump to: