wasnt it like :
sending a little btc amount to your big money btc wallet
so that the btc and the btc2x money arent the same amount -
and then you send the overall btc amount to another wallet ?
so the btc2x money wouldnt sent because of not insufficent funds ?
sending a little btc amount to your big money btc wallet
so that the btc and the btc2x money arent the same amount -
and then you send the overall btc amount to another wallet ?
so the btc2x money wouldnt sent because of not insufficent funds ?
won't work, there is no guarantee that your little amount is not replayed on the other chain
your method was already covered on the other thread this post
that little amount can be replay first then replay the whole thing
I was thinking how about something like mixing coin in your own (single) address?
for e.g. I have an address with 5 unspents: u1, u2, u3, u4, u5, then make these transactions:
on BTC chain: send u1+u2+u3 back to its own address resulting u6btc
on bcc chain: send u1+u4+u5 back to its own address resulting u6bcc
similar transaction but different set, and must be done simultaneously at the same time
that would make whatever unspent on one network cannot be replayed on another chain
this is similar to spending on 2 chain to 2 different addresses
but instead, just one address is used and only half of unspent outputs needed to be spent on each chain
would this work? is there a flaw on my method?
