Author

Topic: REPORT 5 - @THEYMOS LIST US FORBIDDEN NAMES PLEASE - ACCUSATION OF SUCHMOON (Read 2640 times)

hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
Great, I dont want to have bad wording here. Retarded spammers spam this thread, staff lies and probably internally theymos has to clear up things.

There is no ivnvestigation, only provocation for badworiding which seems to be the key in these discussions. Well if this is the quality and the language of this forum, then I will lock now for a day this thread because retarded a$$holes continue to post und an unable moderation is not honest enough to do a job, easy job, simple job, just to follow the rules.

It is locked until tommorow.

@theymos
I care to elaborate, cleanup this thread so that I can unlock it.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
Boki, explaining to you how the forum works is on topic in this thread. that's why those threads don't get deleted.

You rambling and accusing people of stealing your identity and being criminals because of that is NOT on topic for the ION thread, so it gets deleted.

It's very simple.

As for future things, it is very likely that you will be suffering from the same thing that the Boy who Cried Wolf did. By making so many false accusations and insane, rambling posts thtat no one could understand, it will be hard for people to take you seriously in the future.

So I will try to say it again.

Us explaining why ION is a piece of shit is not off topic on the ION thread.

Explaining to you how the forum works is On topic in this thread.

If you have a problem with broken rules. Click "report to moderator" and leave a short explanation of the issue, 1 sentence max.

If you get ignored, it is because the mods don't agree. Don't go ranting and raving about it, that plan obviously doesn't work. Can't you see that by now? You do all this, and get no results, I click the button and type 2 words and your horseshit vanishes from the ION thread. Shouldn't you realize by now that I know how the forum works and you don't just by the results? if you can't handle the forum working that way, go find a new one.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
@theymos
Oh yeah and I almost forgot. You said I can post name in investigation thread, then you did threat and ban me for doing so.

If this is about investigation, I am pretty sure you dont want me to post data of the accused person who runs this forum (you), but I could do it if you insist on transparency. I know that your name and surname is forbidden to use on this forum, sadly you allow others that what you forbid to do about yourself.

@theymos, this is not transparency, exactly as the agenda with bitcoinXT was, but thats another agenda, has nothing to do with this, correct, except that you behave on the same way in pushing something or lets say not taking care about something that you maybe should but you do care to threat me which you actually should not do.

I did not get any reply from you lately after you did threat. Please reply.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
@theymos
You asked me to make a thread, then you allow edition of facts. Post about double standards was not for fun, it states exact problem => DOUBLE STANDARDS. Is the tactic to delete all accusation and then to say, "I dont understand, could you open accusation thread"?

Care to elaborate?
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
MODERATION ACTIVELY DELETES MY POSTS, INSTEAD TO DO THEIR JOB. THIS ARE REMOVED FOR NO REASON

May I translate it into spanish? We have a troll that has already been temp-banned 3 times and this post would be an excellent reminder to him Smiley.
Sure. Attribution isn't necessary, but would be appreciated. Smiley

Done! Thanks again for your effort.
No problem. I'll PM you if I update this list so you could edit the translated one.

THIS IS MPREPS LAST PM TO ME, UNDER IT I WILL REPLY TO HIM IN THIS POST:
3. As before, anything that the legacy insecure government/banking system requires to be secret is not allowed anywhere. This includes social security numbers, credit card numbers, and certain account numbers.

Quote
With all that your argumentation is nothing more than dust. As far as I can see, californian birth of dates can be checked in public, california even offers a service for everybody. This is another point of your argumentation that is wrong.
Date of birth isn't considered "ultra" sensitive as well, as far as I know. Can't really see why you're pointing that out.

Quote
Now you still claim that there was no abuse, you simply do not want to understand or ignore it. Listen again, publishing all the information was against the law. There are several reasons, including life threats of more than 10 people, why this is information is not public and why do I care at all to remove. I said authorities are aware, especially if some squad comes to kill, they will not come from mprep from bitociontalk, it is not on you to decide which laws in which country is against law. But this particular case is forbidden by law in any country. Stop saysing everything was legit if you have proof that it wasnt.
Prove it in a court of law, bring a court order to theymos ordering him to remove all those doxxes and then I will agree with you. Otherwise, no and it's not my concern since I'm neither the owner nor the policy maker of this forum. Just because I took existing rules and compiled them in a thread (an unofficial list BTW) doesn't mean I can change whatever I want.

Quote
If you so confident about it, write to interpol, explain them why it was legal, I am sure they will like your explanation.
I don't have to explain myself to anyone. I've done nothing illegal and anyone who contacted me in regards to legal matters, I've redirected to the ACTUAL LEGAL OWNER AND OPERATOR of this forum - theymos. I have no legal or internal power to change policy except suggesting changes which may or may not be implemented.

Quote
Quote
3. You are free to post a dox that was deleted from the coin thread in the appropriate place (it used to be a variety of sections; now it's Investigations)
Pure lie, do you force me to get banned? Theymos said the same, I posted A******** M**gan, then he banned and threats me to ban if I ever use this b*tches name again.

Really, do you provocate me into a ban or you must be really bad informed, by intention or not?

Conclusion: you want to get me banned or you did not read accusation nor investigation thread.
Firstly, here are the bans issued to you I am aware of:

February, 2016 - 14 days - Reason: Altcoin giveaway. Requested by me (I can't issue bans, except for permanent bans for newbies). Issued by another moderator.
June, 2016 - 14 days - Reason: "Spamming, trolling, continuous off-topic replies even after having a big number of posts deleted(and refusing to continue posting on-topic in other threads, even in the split thread especially for this)" - Reported and issued by another moderator.

I've never tried to provoke you into getting banned nor am I aware of theymos threatening you with a ban. I've noticed and glanced at a few posts in your investigation thread though I have not (and probably will not) read the massive deluded ramblings of yours. These PMs is the highest tolerance limit I can take.

Quote
4. We can't reliably check who is who in reality. As such, if someone calls himself whatever you are named in real life, we don't moderate it UNLESS (and this is as per the NEW rule, a.k.a. that wasn't the case when you were doxxed) he uses that account to DOX you (e.g. "boki15 name is the same as my username", etc.) OR we are required by to do so by a court order.

Pure lie! If you cant check, why did you ban A******** M**gan immediately and you left ***** ******* to spread shit even after everybody of you was informed that this user uses my data.

I am ready annoyed of your hypocracy! Stop that please, it makes you less creditable.

UNLESS you stop hypocracy and dont twist everything into some bla, bla, bla, you will not be able to convince me that you really do what you say. You simply supported this crime and instead to excuse yourself, you keep on bureacracy and some lies, it is pure lie what you wrote including that there was no rule break and that there is no sensitive information.

You ask to show you something, if I show you say you are not a judge. Why do you ask at all then? Either you do it on intention or you must be stupid. I dont believe you are stupid, means you only care to wash your name like if you have done everything correctly and did not support any crime, lol, through you as thread mod it became and came to the crime. If you would do your job correctly, this would have never happened, so far, you could read some books about "Moderation for dummies" before you send me some WIKI links.
As accusations, ignorance, delusion and broken English seems to be your main way of communicating (what I've experienced via PM and via the many off-topic posts I've deleted), I'll assume you're not of the greatest memory as well. Unless the user that was banned is a newbie, I wasn't the one that banned him since I physically can't. I don't remember banning anyone unless he was a spam bot or spammed ref links, ads, etc. nor did I find any requests to have him banned. You're barking up the wrong tree.

Quote
5. If there are still doxxes of you outside the Investigations board, report it and it'll be handled. If they contain information mentioned in (1.), they will be removed.

I consider this again as a lie and loosing my time. I reported offtopic post in the thread where I acuse suchmoon. You guys are even not able to clean it up there, but you, yes exactly you, do remove my posts from the thread because you made an hypocratic decision that it is offtopic only because you dont understand it, actually because you dont want to understand it even if you do.

Accusation thread contains still my name. Do you suggest me to remove it and leave it at all? This you would remove immeditelly, what I report you just ignore. Oh no my friend, after you messed things up and I got life threats by retards, you will not wash your hands so easily out.
If you reported those threads before the DOX rule came in action - they were invalid. If there are still doxes (outside Investigations) of you after the new rules, you don't report them and still complain about it, I'll assume you just want something to complain about.

Quote
6. A person is a criminal only when proven by a court of law. That's how the civilized world works.

You really think that you can preach me morals? Listen friend, I was involved in first child embassy in this world and many other projects, my familly almost lost their lives for helping bunch of innocent people, primarly elder people, children and families without fathers. Groups hunted me, threated me and my family. I do not need some crypto mods who cant differentiate beetween black or white to preach me morals or explain me laws that you have 0 clue about. It is my freedom to call someone criminal who does break law. If judge decides it is correct, then this person will be punished and if there is no proof, then it does not mean this person is not guilty, it means this person will not be punished because there is no judge decision without any proof, oh yeah, except in US, country of state rubbing warmongers.

You sound like student of law and your interpretation of this case is very wrong, so wrong that I would assume that you do it with intention.
I wasn't talking about morals, I was talking about legality - two both somewhat similar and also completely different things (morality ≠ legality). I couldn't care less what you did back in your life and nor does the law. Calling someone a criminal can give them reason to sue you for defamation and unless you happen to prove he is indeed a criminal, you get punished either by a jail sentence or a fine (depends on the country, some may not have such law though many EU countries do). [sarcasm] But then again, you're the expert - what do I know. [/sarcasm]

Quote
8. There is no grand conspiracy to silence you. You just happen to post off-topic / trollish posts in a thread where that doesn't belong, instead of creating your own thread for such matters. You also don't seem to acknowledge that the rules since the doxxing situation have changed and they work retroactively, meaning that the dox in your signature (or anyone's signature for that matter) is no longer allowed.

You are hypocrat. You cant define what is offtopic as well as ontopic, you swap it to the agenda how it fits. Even if you lie 100 times in a row, it will not make a little bit truth of it.

Oh yeah, you talk now about doxx in my signature really? You just proved your hypocracy!

I am offtopic and grand conspirancing asking for a ban of users who clearly break rules. Offtopic gets after you delete onesided my posts. This means, even if I post ontopic, you make it offtopic by deleting an important part which makes it ontopic you hypocrat.

Well, you did your job on this. Until now, I did not acuse you, but now it is changed. You did support doxx on me as well as illegal usage of documents. You can be fool by saying you dont understand anything and my language is bad or whatever crap comes to your mind. It will not change any fact.
You're deluded (or at least confused) beyond any professional help. Conspiracies, baseless accusations, completely misinterpreted situations... Can't really help you there.

Quote
9. If I missed something, BRIEFLY remind me - don't write barely coherent (or completely incomprehensible) walls of broken English.

You missed everything and we could start from beginn, then you will say again that you dont understand and will say again that you there was no rule break......

Lets make a hangout and lets see if my english is broken.
Sure, buddy. Whatever you say... .... ... and yeah, your English is indeed broken, no need for thinly veiled threats.

Anyway, it's been an interesting time corresponding with an individual so self-entitled, deluded to the point of resorting to conspiracy theories to avoid the possibility of him having the blame (e.g. off-topic posting, trolling, disregarding rules, etc.), unable to grasp the difference between basic concepts of everyday life such as legality and morality or ownership and volunteering/contracting/employment/etc., so confused as to pretty much misinterpret everything explained to him, unable to grasp his limitations of the proficiency of the English language and most of all just outright unable to grasp how life actually functions in general.

Which leads me to believe that any constructive, useful and perhaps even leading to a peaceful resolution discussion is out the window at this point. I've tried to help (and spent too much time doing so) and yet you continued to push your own agenda of us being corrupt, evil and you being the innocent angel you happen to believe you are. As I see the same signs as a previous user showed + some more that I never thought a single person could exhibit, I welcome you alongside said user in my PM block list. Enjoy your stay, No. 2 and thanks for the English exercises you've provided - both in writing and comprehension of text.

P.S. I think I should address the personal text you chose, which encapsulates the delusion and self-entitlement that you seem to radiate so perfectly: "The world is mine". Boki, it isn't mine, it isn't anyone else's and it sure as hell isn't yours - stop pretending like it is and you might actually step out of the strange frame of mind you seem to be in.



If you're a troll and are trolling me, interesting choice of style, I prefer communicating with a bit more sophisticated and classy trolls, since the broken English is a bit cliché. Tough luck though, I think you made me laugh more than anything else so if that was your goal, congratulations. Enjoy the sad life that you chose.










MY REPLY TO YOU MPREP:
Quote
OK, let me put it this way: the forum doesn't consider that information "ultra" sensitive and we can't determine how specific information was retrieved, only if it can be retrieved via legal means (which it can) OR as theymos put it:

Here we have it again, first you say you are not a judge, now you do say that for you it is not sensitive, even if it is forbidden by law, even in US.

Quote
Date of birth isn't considered "ultra" sensitive as well, as far as I know. Can't really see why you're pointing that out.
I did hope you will explain me why was user who doxxed suchmoon was banned, I did not ban this person either.

Quote
Prove it in a court of law, bring a court order to theymos ordering him to remove all those doxxes and then I will agree with you. Otherwise, no and it's not my concern since I'm neither the owner nor the policy maker of this forum. Just because I took existing rules and compiled them in a thread (an unofficial list BTW) doesn't mean I can change whatever I want.

But you play judge in saying that you do not consider information as sensitive even if it is clearly forbidden by law and in my country there is so called "Anzeige" against suchmoon, owners of this forum and staff working here, actually it contains word "Moderation" (no my english is not bad, thats in german my friend). They are also told that I assume it is A******** M**gan and the reasons why I assume that she is this person.

Quote
I don't have to explain myself to anyone. I've done nothing illegal and anyone who contacted me in regards to legal matters, I've redirected to the ACTUAL LEGAL OWNER AND OPERATOR of this forum - theymos. I have no legal or internal power to change policy except suggesting changes which may or may not be implemented.

Now you are playing a judge again, I though it is the court which decides if you have done something illegal or not if there is a court about it. You contradict yourself all the time.

Quote
Firstly, here are the bans issued to you I am aware of:

February, 2016 - 14 days - Reason: Altcoin giveaway. Requested by me (I can't issue bans, except for permanent bans for newbies). Issued by another moderator.
June, 2016 - 14 days - Reason: "Spamming, trolling, continuous off-topic replies even after having a big number of posts deleted(and refusing to continue posting on-topic in other threads, even in the split thread especially for this)" - Reported and issued by another moderator.

We are getting closer, we had this discussion where you said that it was marked as giveaway and I had to be banned. You are the same mod and you did not ban suchmoon for her giveway. Can you look up Wikipedia for a word "Hypocracy" and tell me if my english is good enough to describe suchmoons approval to make giveaways where you ban others for the same?

But back to bans, I was again banned for 3 days because theymos said I am allowed to post name only in investigation thread and then banned me for doing it. Now you do ask me to make another accusatoin thread where most have difficulties to understand double meaning of the current thread which has to be there because theymoss make his threat.


Quote
As accusations, ignorance, delusion and broken English seems to be your main way of communicating (what I've experienced via PM and via the many off-topic posts I've deleted), I'll assume you're not of the greatest memory as well. Unless the user that was banned is a newbie, I wasn't the one that banned him since I physically can't. I don't remember banning anyone unless he was a spam bot or spammed ref links, ads, etc. nor did I find any requests to have him banned. You're barking up the wrong tree.

You cant check and I am dumb because I cant check too? If it was not you, then you can simply write it wasnt you, if you can check it, check it please, if you dont want to check, write that you dont wont, just dont tell me my memories are bad if I have to keep since months everything sorted out because you guys flip it all the time around and now accusing me in trolling because you guys in group used my name for intimidation process.

Quote
If you reported those threads before the DOX rule came in action - they were invalid. If there are still doxes (outside Investigations) of you after the new rules, you don't report them and still complain about it, I'll assume you just want something to complain about.

You know what, there is real life example of how stupid such statement is. Shortly, different states voted if genocide from turks supported by germans was genocid. Most countries accepted and voted for acceptance to define it as genocid. Do you know what argumentation germans and turks had?? This law against genocide did not exist in 1945 and thats why it cant be applied and it cant be called genocid. Of course they failed with such argumentation.

You do argument here in the same way, you make something illegal legal just because you deleted it now, but you still call me delusional and continue your verbal provocation

Quote
I wasn't talking about morals, I was talking about legality - two both somewhat similar and also completely different things (morality ≠ legality). I couldn't care less what you did back in your life and nor does the law. Calling someone a criminal can give them reason to sue you for defamation and unless you happen to prove he is indeed a criminal, you get punished either by a jail sentence or a fine (depends on the country, some may not have such law though many EU countries do). [sarcasm] But then again, you're the expert - what do I know. [/sarcasm]

And you call me delusional??? You say my english is bad?Huh I WAS TALKING ABOUT MORAL AND IF YOU REALLY THINK THAT YOU CAN PREACH ME MORAL! IT IS NOT ABOUT YOU NEITHER ABOUT YOUR CRAPPY CONSULTATION ON US LAW WHERE YOU EVEN CAN'T SPECIFY THE STATE IF YOU ALREADY SPEAK ABOUT IT.

It is really bad that english as your first language is so bad, but it is known that US has the worst level of education, I dont wonder at all about your ability to understand where you actually decided long time ago just to ignore facts and loose your and my time in writting useless provocations instead of solving the issue.

I accuse in public and suchmoon could start this case, I cant wait for it, you know what, I'll go by myself to the embassy as soon as I am back in Vienna, just to tell them about it, I will show them your threat and the whole story as I am interested what they will say about identity theft. Maybe you want to accuse me defamination, I do accuse you in allowing defamination and if in US law system is working, then you should get some jail sentence or get punished by some fine. Do you want us to do it? Now you could also say that I will be charged for defamination of yourself, lets bring it immediatelly to the court instead of talking and waiting, please sue me now for your incompetence and support for crime.

Quote
Sure, buddy. Whatever you say... .... ... and yeah, your English is indeed broken, no need for thinly veiled threats.

Thanks, I am not your buddy, hope you will sue me to show you this and my english is still better than your understanding level and this is not base on skills, some say on IQ but I dont like definition of IQ, it is simply not correct.

Quote
Which leads me to believe that any constructive, useful and perhaps even leading to a peaceful resolution discussion is out the window at this point. I've tried to help (and spent too much time doing so) and yet you continued to push your own agenda of us being corrupt, evil and you being the innocent angel you happen to believe you are. As I see the same signs as a previous user showed + some more that I never thought a single person could exhibit, I welcome you alongside said user in my PM block list. Enjoy your stay, No. 2 and thanks for the English exercises you've provided - both in writing and comprehension of text.

You only tried to silence me and to say that my english is bad and thats why I dont understand why you are right.

Now you do provocate me into ban, if you do not want conversation, you could have written and I wouldnt write you further, like stated in first PM, I wanted to spare all users this whole talk, especially because I had to say again A******** M**gan and it was never my intention to break rules, no matter how crappy mods are doing their job.

It is the same now, I will not write you if you dont want it and I was not writting you. You stating that I am on your ignore list only proves your ignorant position on this case and everything what happened.


Quote
P.S. I think I should address the personal text you chose, which encapsulates the delusion and self-entitlement that you seem to radiate so perfectly: "The world is mine". Boki, it isn't mine, it isn't anyone else's and it sure as hell isn't yours - stop pretending like it is and you might actually step out of the strange frame of mind you seem to be in.

I think you do threat me in spreading false information about me as addition to intimidation process which is ongoing since months and is supported by staff, actually mainly by you as you are the mod of the threads where everything happend.

Quote
If you're a troll and are trolling me, interesting choice of style, I prefer communicating with a bit more sophisticated and classy trolls, since the broken English is a bit cliché. Tough luck though, I think you made me laugh more than anything else so if that was your goal, congratulations. Enjoy the sad life that you chose.

Now I am trolling you??? You know what, you are surely an ******! Like said before I will not write you anymore and if you dont want to be asked about issues in threads where you are mod, maybe you should step down from being moderator at all.

You clearly missed the meaning of "The world is mine", but as I said, from hypocrats, I've never expected high IQ but I made mistake, you are not clever hypocrate.
 
Complaining about my sad life means your are not very happy with yours, but why should I explain you psychology if you are clever enough and if you are so happy in your hypocratic world Smiley.

Quote
Sure, buddy. Whatever you say... .... ... and yeah, your English is indeed broken, no need for thinly veiled threats.

Another bad style twist of yours, who and where did threat you?HuhHuhHuh??

Do you have any other argument why you behave like hypocrat or is it only your false interpretation of my english skills? I still dont see you judging about your hypocracy and lies that you support, but yeah, I am sure you will try to sue until some real lawyer explains that it is actually you who breaks the law.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
Hey mods, can you take care that nobodies goes offtopic??? Are you able to do it?

We have here a user he clearly does not understand the issue and nothing what is happenening, please delete this spam and other spams fromt this later or you will continue playing fool and saying that you dont understand anything.

Let me help you out a little here by posting some link and quotes

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/unofficial-list-of-official-bitcointalkorg-rules-guidelines-faq-703657

From the Rules FAQ

Q: What about deleting DOXes?
A: Nope, we don't delete them either as long as they comply with the following rules:

Quote from: theymos on August 05, 2016, 04:23:54 AM
<...>
1. Personal information must be confined to the new "investigations" board (under Scam Accusations), which is only visible to Members and above. Personal information is defined as anything which links a user's online identity (username, email, etc.) to their meatspace identity, excluding links that the person himself has posted. It is not allowed to post somebody's personal information in any other public place, including in signatures.
2. It is not allowed to post someone's dox if it is especially obvious that you're just using the dox as a weapon. For example, if there are no remotely-plausible trade complaints, then the person can't be a scammer, and their dox should not be posted.
3. As before, anything that the legacy insecure government/banking system requires to be secret is not allowed anywhere. This includes social security numbers, credit card numbers, and certain account numbers.
<...>

Why aren't they deleted? Because such doxing is just compiling information about a user already available publicly, often via search engines.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15823315

That thread explains the current DOX rules as of the 5th August 2016.  Its the change that seems to have confused you most
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 254
Let me help you out a little here by posting some link and quotes

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/unofficial-list-of-official-bitcointalkorg-rules-guidelines-faq-703657

From the Rules FAQ

Q: What about deleting DOXes?
A: Nope, we don't delete them either as long as they comply with the following rules:

Quote from: theymos on August 05, 2016, 04:23:54 AM
<...>
1. Personal information must be confined to the new "investigations" board (under Scam Accusations), which is only visible to Members and above. Personal information is defined as anything which links a user's online identity (username, email, etc.) to their meatspace identity, excluding links that the person himself has posted. It is not allowed to post somebody's personal information in any other public place, including in signatures.
2. It is not allowed to post someone's dox if it is especially obvious that you're just using the dox as a weapon. For example, if there are no remotely-plausible trade complaints, then the person can't be a scammer, and their dox should not be posted.
3. As before, anything that the legacy insecure government/banking system requires to be secret is not allowed anywhere. This includes social security numbers, credit card numbers, and certain account numbers.
<...>

Why aren't they deleted? Because such doxing is just compiling information about a user already available publicly, often via search engines.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15823315

That thread explains the current DOX rules as of the 5th August 2016.  Its the change that seems to have confused you most
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
MODERATION, PLEASE DELETE ALL OFFTOPIC FROM THIS THREAD. EVEN YOUR STAFF SEEMS TO HAVE TROUBLES UNDERSTANDING AND THEYMOS THREATS BEHIND THE SCENES SO THAT IT SHOULD NOT BE POSSIBLE TO WRITE ACCUSATION LIKE IT SHOULD BE WRITTEN. ALL OFFTOPIC HERE DISTRACTS FROM THE ISSUE


FINALLY @theymos GIVE US THE LIST OF FORBIDDEN NAMES ON BITCOINTALK
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
We have ignored user who posts offtopic. And it is still there. Retarded a$$holes break rules all the time, this is how bitcointalk seems to be used properly.

@theymos
WTF? Your mods shouldnt be sleeping, but hey, they are sleeping in my thread, during my reportts, hell yeah, this is 100% how bitcointalk was meant to be used, correct?
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
It is very easy for them to do their job when the forum is used properly.

Your posts are simple, they are off topic, so when someone clicks report and types "off topic" it doesn't take much effort by the mods to read the post, see that it's off topic, and delete it.

Because you refuse to be clear and concise with the explanation of your issues, it will be a lot harder to get the mods to do what you want them to do.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
Bitcointalk took it very serious, they do deal like real brokers with it, they silence and ban me. Looking at your posts, including the last one from last thread, you are more motivated in trolling and spreading some fud (your support for this agenda). I am not sure if you understood what it is about, reading your posts brings me to assume that you got but this forum users do always surprise with their false interpretation.

If any of those posts that still have his name are mine and boki informs me so i will happily star out said name with an edit.

Maybe boki can list them and action could be taken rather than trying to dox others.

Personally anyone having a flip out over someone posting a common first name should probably worry about other things.  if their surname, address etc are listed thats a serious problem and needs dealing with

P.S  Im glad we finally have a post somewhere useful to discuss this issue.  Maybe we will get it sorted out and the offtopic spam in other threads will stop
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
There's no point in arguing with boki.

This thread has served a purpose because I think we have been able to explain to mods what the actual problem is.

He is accusing people of criminal activity, but it's highly unlikely that anyone with a functioning brain will be able to interpret what he is saying, so he can't really harm anyone with his rambling.

Hopefully his rants will be contained here and we can use other threads in the forum the way they are intended to be used.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
Great, here:

Quote
Unless you want to claim you didn't accuse me of deleting your posts?

Unless you start going offtopic in actively trying to set up agenda, I would ask any of Admins or Mods to either warn you not to do it anymore or to ban you which they should have done much earlier.

@SaltySpitoon
This thread proves my words, lets see how you or anybody else will care about it. Will you remove offtopic posts before you can answer all the questions from OP. I do not want to have here bad wording, this forum is full of it.

I'll let the mods/admins judge that. Your clearly incapable of it.
Your accusing SuchMoon and others (I consider myself included because of previous accusations) of a lot of things on the forum.
You want the mods/admins to take action on SM and the group you've made up in your head.
It makes sense to me to come on to this thread, instead of waiting for my own thread, to post about our interactions.


I'm here posting because your accusing SM and others of illegal activity.
With no proof.

I think the mods should ban the accounts that have your real information. I never cared about who you were, or pretending to be, as you don't provide any interesting data or opinions on the threads I see you in. Then we can move on from this silly drama and go back to ignoring you.

As for the rest of it. Until you have proof about your accusations about us. I feel I'm right on topic.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Quote
Unless you want to claim you didn't accuse me of deleting your posts?

Unless you start going offtopic in actively trying to set up agenda, I would ask any of Admins or Mods to either warn you not to do it anymore or to ban you which they should have done much earlier.

@SaltySpitoon
This thread proves my words, lets see how you or anybody else will care about it. Will you remove offtopic posts before you can answer all the questions from OP. I do not want to have here bad wording, this forum is full of it.

I'll let the mods/admins judge that. Your clearly incapable of it.
Your accusing SuchMoon and others (I consider myself included because of previous accusations) of a lot of things on the forum.
You want the mods/admins to take action on SM and the group you've made up in your head.
It makes sense to me to come on to this thread, instead of waiting for my own thread, to post about our interactions.


I'm here posting because your accusing SM and others of illegal activity.
With no proof.

I think the mods should ban the accounts that have your real information. I never cared about who you were, or pretending to be, as you don't provide any interesting data or opinions on the threads I see you in. Then we can move on from this silly drama and go back to ignoring you.

As for the rest of it. Until you have proof about your accusations about us. I feel I'm right on topic.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
Quote
Unless you want to claim you didn't accuse me of deleting your posts?

Unless you start going offtopic in actively trying to set up agenda, I would ask any of Admins or Mods to either warn you not to do it anymore or to ban you which they should have done much earlier.

@SaltySpitoon
This thread proves my words, lets see how you or anybody else will care about it. Will you remove offtopic posts before you can answer all the questions from OP. I do not want to have here bad wording, this forum is full of it.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
You responded with quoting some ramblings about theft I never made nor do I know where they came from. We're off to a great start on this thread.

This isn't off-topic. Suchmoon mentioned you've accused several users, including him, on here with a lot of ridiculous stuff. I'm one of them. Unless you want to claim you didn't accuse me of deleting your posts?
Then there's the most recent accusation of you claiming I hacked Jessica Garza's iPhone with no proof.

The only thing mods have problems with is your selective insanity.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
For super duper mega hacker, you seem to be lazy reader, I will help you

What a wonder, this is exactly the way how you love conversations to be Smiley

Super duper mega hacker tracked homero's wife, her iphone as she was never aware how far the tech nowdays is. Naive to think that you dont know it or that you dont understand.

Maybe you could start explaining your signatures that you've removed, /S that you've put after our meetup, thread that you created with cyrus, other threads spreading lies in meta. As theymos is opinion that we all should dig and show him, do your part on, show it please.

You forgot about the elite super duper haxxor, me!
Boki15 PM'd me and accused me of deleting posts.

Sorry dude... clearly I can't keep up with all aspects of the drama.

WOW literally making up accusations on another user with zero proof!
Shouldn't you finish up with SuchMoon first?
I told you specifically what I tracked on the XPY debacle. Josh Garza's wife was not on the list and what your stating is illegal. Thanks for proving to everyone on your own thread what you do.

@SaltySpitoon Bare witness to the type of talk Boki15 produces. Have a great time with him.
I can repost our PM where he accuses me of deleting his posts.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
What a wonder, this is exactly the way how you love conversations to be Smiley

Super duper mega hacker tracked homero's wife, her iphone as she was never aware how far the tech nowdays is. Naive to think that you dont know it or that you dont understand.

Maybe you could start explaining your signatures that you've removed, /S that you've put after our meetup, thread that you created with cyrus, other threads spreading lies in meta. As theymos is opinion that we all should dig and show him, do your part on, show it please.

You forgot about the elite super duper haxxor, me!
Boki15 PM'd me and accused me of deleting posts.

Sorry dude... clearly I can't keep up with all aspects of the drama.

WOW literally making up accusations on another user with zero proof!
Shouldn't you finish up with SuchMoon first?
I told you specifically what I tracked on the XPY debacle. Josh Garza's wife was not on the list and what your stating is illegal. Thanks for proving to everyone on your own thread what you do.

@SaltySpitoon Bare witness to the type of talk Boki15 produces. Have a great time with him.
I can repost our PM where he accuses me of deleting his posts.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
What a wonder, this is exactly the way how you love conversations to be Smiley

Super duper mega hacker tracked homero's wife, her iphone as she was never aware how far the tech nowdays is. Naive to think that you dont know it or that you dont understand.

Maybe you could start explaining your signatures that you've removed, /S that you've put after our meetup, thread that you created with cyrus, other threads spreading lies in meta. As theymos is opinion that we all should dig and show him, do your part on, show it please.

You forgot about the elite super duper haxxor, me!
Boki15 PM'd me and accused me of deleting posts.

Sorry dude... clearly I can't keep up with all aspects of the drama.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
You forgot about the elite super duper haxxor, me!
Boki15 PM'd me and accused me of deleting posts.

Sorry dude... clearly I can't keep up with all aspects of the drama.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
Quote
Still incredibly confused, but whatever. All I care to address is your main question and related questions, I don't greatly care about any disputes individuals are caught up in. I'm just having a bit of a hard time picking out what you intended to say, but its getting clearer.

I dont really think I'm the best person to help you resolve your ongoing issue, since there seems to be a lot of prior back and forth with other moderators/admins/users and each time I make a reply, some new information comes out making my previous best guesses of the situation obsolete.

My best assumption at this point (again I'm sure it will be wrong and new info will come out as soon as I post this) is that this battle that you had previously was before the new Doxing rules were implemented. One of the quotes you have linked is from August 8th, so I'm guessing this has been a much longer ongoing thing. After August 5th, any applicable threads were moved to the Investigations board. If the threads you are talking about are still out there elsewhere, please report them and they will be moved there. As I said, my best guess at this point in time about why some users were allowed to do something and others weren't is because they were in two different times. Before and After the doxing rules came into play.

This sounds promissing, your answers are different then those from your comods/admins. You are very correct in your assumption, it goes since very lnog time and has a lot of factors, but to bring you to the starting point, it was GAW thread where suchmoon and here buddies started verbal harrasment attacks because I asked them to stop harrasing other bitcointalk users, especially newbies. This was starting point, where suchmoon tried to change it to another agenda, saying that I shill and so on. Then she created several threads spreading again lies and agenda (think on the supermarkt test from OP). This is where some trolls, which are on my ignore list, like Phildo, they come and answer somthing without even to think about it. They all knew that I am Boris, suchmoon had even conversation with me over PM, this conversation started with me stating my name. We will get much closer when you ask yourself how and why so many users do support usage of someone's name and stolen data, even when they were pointed to it, they ignored it, as well as staff and theymos which never replied. As next, I think it is alarming if you understand how low level all this is, especially how wrong the reaction from beginn until now was, I mean bitcointalk staff.

theynos replied and came to clean up after suchmoon has been doxxed and his solution was to threat and ban me. I do not understand this solution and nobody of bitcointalk staff is explaining it. Can you?

Phildo is to be banned, together with owlcats and others.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
the majority of your post made me confused as to what you were even asking/saying. The only "forbidden" names that will result in a ban are those imitating other forum members.

For example Theym0s, Saityspitoon, Sat0shi, etc. You can name yourself that of any real person you want, there are plenty who have. I have absolutely no confidence that Theymos sent you a PM saying that you couldn't be named A.Morgan. Unless you have left out 99% of the backstory.

Here is the part of the backstory that I know:

A while ago I asked boki15 to stay on topic in one of the threads where he started trolling for reasons that I can't be bothered to remember now. After EXTENSIVE attempts to clean it up ranging from direct confrontation to mod reports to PMs to complete ignore boki15 wouldn't calm down and started accusing me as well as a bunch of other users of some sort of persecution. Not quite sure exactly what he was imagining there because I was mostly ignoring him at that time, but e.g. bitpop and myself were supposedly using his real name or something like that, despite me having no idea what that name was until he started repeatedly bringing it up (basically streisanded himself).

Anyway, it looks like boki15 was trolling not just me, bitpop, Phildo, owlcatz, other users but also moderators and admins until he seems to have pissed theymos off.

So first of all I'd like to apologize to everyone involved if my past confrontation with boki15 has escalated this whole thing. Second, kudos to boki15 for finally creating a proper thread where it belongs. Hopefully this will resolve whatever issues might still exist.

You forgot about the elite super duper haxxor, me!
Boki15 PM'd me and accused me of deleting his posts.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 254
If any of those posts that still have his name are mine and boki informs me so i will happily star out said name with an edit.

Maybe boki can list them and action could be taken rather than trying to dox others.

Personally anyone having a flip out over someone posting a common first name should probably worry about other things.  if their surname, address etc are listed thats a serious problem and needs dealing with

P.S  Im glad we finally have a post somewhere useful to discuss this issue.  Maybe we will get it sorted out and the offtopic spam in other threads will stop
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
the majority of your post made me confused as to what you were even asking/saying. The only "forbidden" names that will result in a ban are those imitating other forum members.

For example Theym0s, Saityspitoon, Sat0shi, etc. You can name yourself that of any real person you want, there are plenty who have. I have absolutely no confidence that Theymos sent you a PM saying that you couldn't be named A.Morgan. Unless you have left out 99% of the backstory.

It's is very difficult to understand what boki is talking about because he likes to ramble.

In the Ion thread, someone created the user that is currently named u848921 as a troll. That user name used to be boki's actual name. When the rule about doing was changed, that user name was changed, but all the posts that quoted that user still had B***s in the post because of how the forum works.

Instead of concisely and clearly explaining what was going on, boki rambled on for days about a conspiracy of people stealing his identity and that we were going to jail. In response, he put a name claiming to belong to suchmoon in his signature.

Eventually I figured out that boki's name was b***s and explained the situation and u848921 stopped posting eventually.

After the rules changed I guess boki was forced to change his signature, but all mentions of b***s have not been removed. Boki thinks this is some sort of conspiracy, but due to how much trouble I've had figuring this out, I'm sure that mods just haven't been able to figure out what he is rambling about.

It appears that all the posts that quoted the user have been deleted/edited/moved, but there are still some posts where people typed the name b***s instead of quoting him that still exist.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 254
I do believe you may have hit the nail on the head with that one.

What happened before the doxing rule came in vs trying to do the same now gets different results and outcomes.



Personally not a fan of doxing anyway.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
Ok, thanks for removing it if it was again against the rules. You are not very correct in your assumption, they used my name and my private data which is stolen, it is not available on internet. We already have real crime here. Lets go deeper in next posts.

Back to topic, as they were clearly breaking law, moderation and administration were all the time full aware about everything and then they just ignored it, all the time, ass addition I was threaten by all of them, just look at mprep's pm which I posted in investigation thread.

Back to your statement:
only place with you are allowed to post someone else's personal information is on the Investigations section: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=227.0
theymos said the same, where I posted the name. Now explain me why does bitcointalk staff follow double standars. Let's start with the user who doxxed suchmoon as NAME THAT YOu FORBID TO WRITE DUE TO HYPOCRACY. Why hypocracy? Because they assumed it was me and many users including your staff were supporting it.

Great, we get closer. THIS IS USERNAME OF THE USER WHO DOXXED SUCHMOON, THIS USER SEEMS TO BE BANNED, PLEASE EDIT IF IT IS FORBIDDEN TO WRITE THE USERNAME OF THE USER WHO DOXXED SUCHMOON:
Alexandra Morgan (username of person who doxxed suchmoon)
Boris Tosovic (suchmooon and her gangbang gang using my name because they though I doxxed her)

Removr these usernames too if they break any rule. The one seems to be the real name of one bitcointalk user and the other one is my. Now I am in public known person and can always prove that it is me. For that your team tries to silence me instead to the the right thing.

Theymoss knows that this particular case is being investigated by authoritites, especially because invloved have acces to user databases and other information like medical information which is forbidden to share and it is also forbidden to accept such information and it is for sure not allowed to use it in such agenda like they did. As last, bitcointalk staff were talking part on this crime. This is what I do not understand, why does your staff take part on an crime which should end in pure silencing, especially not if your mods continue to spread myth about "Free Speech".

I can't find this user and do not want to repost the doxx.

After this, look at my Firstname Surname (or just my email) and explain why the user who used my name, addres and tel number was allowed to do it, where theymoss and moderation knew every detail about it.

You could also try to explain why was doxxing user immediatelly banned and I was banned 3 times because I pointed your staff to criminal act? Please exlplain it if you have any other explanation than Hypocracy.

EDIT:
I concentrated on posting the part that you asked for, immediately after I saw that full name was in pic and I immediatelly blured it and reuploaded. I can verify it with reposting of uploads (both) if you again do not trust my words. It is not my goal to break any rule, it is more the opposite.

Still incredibly confused, but whatever. All I care to address is your main question and related questions, I don't greatly care about any disputes individuals are caught up in. I'm just having a bit of a hard time picking out what you intended to say, but its getting clearer.

I dont really think I'm the best person to help you resolve your ongoing issue, since there seems to be a lot of prior back and forth with other moderators/admins/users and each time I make a reply, some new information comes out making my previous best guesses of the situation obsolete.

My best assumption at this point (again I'm sure it will be wrong and new info will come out as soon as I post this) is that this battle that you had previously was before the new Doxing rules were implemented. One of the quotes you have linked is from August 8th, so I'm guessing this has been a much longer ongoing thing. After August 5th, any applicable threads were moved to the Investigations board. If the threads you are talking about are still out there elsewhere, please report them and they will be moved there. As I said, my best guess at this point in time about why some users were allowed to do something and others weren't is because they were in two different times. Before and After the doxing rules came into play.

sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 254
boki please keep your rambling here and only here.  Im sure the moderators will appreciate it more than us users enjoy you trying to derail the ION thread constantly.

As for your doxing i have been following that thread for some time.  It took ages for anyone to work out you had been doxed and we only knew because you repeatedly told us someone had doxed you and then YOU pointed out the user who you claimed was using your real name.  So it was as much a self doxing as anything else.  It was so unimportant to most of us i dont even remember anything beyond Boris (which is a fairly common first name i believe) and honestly dont care to try and remember.....

P.S I still have no idea why you are claiming suchmoon was behind this.  The only people who would have any clue who was using that account would be the Moderators (or higher) who can likely check the IP address and only then if the user was dumb enough to use the same IP as they use on their main account. Your constant rambling about the "gangbang gang" doesnt help you appear same and trying to dox others is not likely to help.

As for your posts getting constantly reported please stop the off topic rambling.  Even i have reported them and i believe im still at 100% accuracy for reports...
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
the majority of your post made me confused as to what you were even asking/saying. The only "forbidden" names that will result in a ban are those imitating other forum members.

For example Theym0s, Saityspitoon, Sat0shi, etc. You can name yourself that of any real person you want, there are plenty who have. I have absolutely no confidence that Theymos sent you a PM saying that you couldn't be named A.Morgan. Unless you have left out 99% of the backstory.

Here is the part of the backstory that I know:

A while ago I asked boki15 to stay on topic in one of the threads where he started trolling for reasons that I can't be bothered to remember now. After EXTENSIVE attempts to clean it up ranging from direct confrontation to mod reports to PMs to complete ignore boki15 wouldn't calm down and started accusing me as well as a bunch of other users of some sort of persecution. Not quite sure exactly what he was imagining there because I was mostly ignoring him at that time, but e.g. bitpop and myself were supposedly using his real name or something like that, despite me having no idea what that name was until he started repeatedly bringing it up (basically streisanded himself).

Anyway, it looks like boki15 was trolling not just me, bitpop, Phildo, owlcatz, other users but also moderators and admins until he seems to have pissed theymos off.

So first of all I'd like to apologize to everyone involved if my past confrontation with boki15 has escalated this whole thing. Second, kudos to boki15 for finally creating a proper thread where it belongs. Hopefully this will resolve whatever issues might still exist.

Well, you do not need to remember, I have all deleted posts and can reupload or repost them every time. Stop lying, write truth



I give you credits for social post and excusing yourself. Its just.... hmmm, you ask others who helped you, you could excuse yourself in front of me, dont you think?
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
the majority of your post made me confused as to what you were even asking/saying. The only "forbidden" names that will result in a ban are those imitating other forum members.

For example Theym0s, Saityspitoon, Sat0shi, etc. You can name yourself that of any real person you want, there are plenty who have. I have absolutely no confidence that Theymos sent you a PM saying that you couldn't be named A.Morgan. Unless you have left out 99% of the backstory.

Here is the part of the backstory that I know:

A while ago I asked boki15 to stay on topic in one of the threads where he started trolling for reasons that I can't be bothered to remember now. After EXTENSIVE attempts to clean it up ranging from direct confrontation to mod reports to PMs to complete ignore boki15 wouldn't calm down and started accusing me as well as a bunch of other users of some sort of persecution. Not quite sure exactly what he was imagining there because I was mostly ignoring him at that time, but e.g. bitpop and myself were supposedly using his real name or something like that, despite me having no idea what that name was until he started repeatedly bringing it up (basically streisanded himself).

Anyway, it looks like boki15 was trolling not just me, bitpop, Phildo, owlcatz, other users but also moderators and admins until he seems to have pissed theymos off.

So first of all I'd like to apologize to everyone involved if my past confrontation with boki15 has escalated this whole thing. Second, kudos to boki15 for finally creating a proper thread where it belongs. Hopefully this will resolve whatever issues might still exist.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
Ok, thanks for removing it if it was again against the rules. You are not very correct in your assumption, they used my name and my private data which is stolen, it is not available on internet. We already have real crime here. Lets go deeper in next posts.

Back to topic, as they were clearly breaking law, moderation and administration were all the time full aware about everything and then they just ignored it, all the time, ass addition I was threaten by all of them, just look at mprep's pm which I posted in investigation thread.

Back to your statement:
only place with you are allowed to post someone else's personal information is on the Investigations section: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=227.0
theymos said the same, where I posted the name. Now explain me why does bitcointalk staff follow double standars. Let's start with the user who doxxed suchmoon as NAME THAT YOu FORBID TO WRITE DUE TO HYPOCRACY. Why hypocracy? Because they assumed it was me and many users including your staff were supporting it.

Great, we get closer. THIS IS USERNAME OF THE USER WHO DOXXED SUCHMOON, THIS USER SEEMS TO BE BANNED, PLEASE EDIT IF IT IS FORBIDDEN TO WRITE THE USERNAME OF THE USER WHO DOXXED SUCHMOON:
Alexandra Morgan (username of person who doxxed suchmoon)
Boris Tosovic (suchmooon and her gangbang gang using my name because they though I doxxed her)

Removr these usernames too if they break any rule. The one seems to be the real name of one bitcointalk user and the other one is my. Now I am in public known person and can always prove that it is me. For that your team tries to silence me instead to the the right thing.

Theymoss knows that this particular case is being investigated by authoritites, especially because invloved have acces to user databases and other information like medical information which is forbidden to share and it is also forbidden to accept such information and it is for sure not allowed to use it in such agenda like they did. As last, bitcointalk staff were talking part on this crime. This is what I do not understand, why does your staff take part on an crime which should end in pure silencing, especially not if your mods continue to spread myth about "Free Speech".

I can't find this user and do not want to repost the doxx.

After this, look at my Firstname Surname (or just my email) and explain why the user who used my name, addres and tel number was allowed to do it, where theymoss and moderation knew every detail about it.

You could also try to explain why was doxxing user immediatelly banned and I was banned 3 times because I pointed your staff to criminal act? Please exlplain it if you have any other explanation than Hypocracy.

EDIT:
I concentrated on posting the part that you asked for, immediately after I saw that full name was in pic and I immediatelly blured it and reuploaded. I can verify it with reposting of uploads (both) if you again do not trust my words. It is not my goal to break any rule, it is more the opposite.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
So this is about you posting someone's name and it being deleted due to the new no doxing rule I'd take it? I interpreted your first post as saying that you were banned for creating a forum account with a name similar to someone else's. The only place with you are allowed to post someone else's personal information is on the Investigations section: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=227.0

You can read here for more info on where/when its allowed. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/new-investigations-board-restrictions-on-posting-personal-information-1576015


Edit* I also saw the image you had posted and that helped me better understand what you were asking. I did remove it however as I didn't want you accidentally getting in trouble for posting the name Theymos asked you not to, albeit partially blurred out. You can put it back up if you feel it necessary as I'm not 100% sure that it would constitute going against the ban warning, but I figured it would be on the safe side to do so, and since you posted the pm for my sake, I'd rather you not get banned for trying to help me help you.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
the majority of your post made me confused as to what you were even asking/saying. The only "forbidden" names that will result in a ban are those imitating other forum members.

For example Theym0s, Saityspitoon, Sat0shi, etc. You can name yourself that of any real person you want, there are plenty who have. I have absolutely no confidence that Theymos sent you a PM saying that you couldn't be named A.Morgan. Unless you have left out 99% of the backstory.

@theymos
I never post PM, I would not post it without your confirmation as it is called private. Please post your reply to me so that other users like SaltySpitoon do not question it.

@Salty
I am confused too, especially as it seems that my name is allowed to be spreaded all over the forum and used for mockups on questionable agenda which turned out to be criminal.



EDIT:
@Salty
As I am not sure that theymos is interested at all in doing the right thing after some bitcointalk members supported this agenda over months. I do not like people calling me lier, this is not whole PM, only the mentioned part in this thread, I'll give me the permission to post it as prove that I do not lie and one user already asked for it.

*Image Removed by Saltyspitoon*
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
the majority of your post made me confused as to what you were even asking/saying. The only "forbidden" names that will result in a ban are those imitating other forum members.

For example Theym0s, Saityspitoon, Sat0shi, etc. You can name yourself that of any real person you want, there are plenty who have. I have absolutely no confidence that Theymos sent you a PM saying that you couldn't be named A.Morgan. Unless you have left out 99% of the backstory.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
Please remove my first name "Boris" from to spoken thread.

@theymos sent me an PM threatening to ban me if I use again the name which many people could have, like US's soccer female star A. Morgan
This is her, just to void confussion:


If she scores, I am not allowed to comment on it on bitcointalk? Why not?

@theymos and your team, I would like to void confussion in future, can you publish a list with forbidden names on bitcointalk?


You were the one who allowed it, I am the one who is loosing time because of lack of moderation and administration here. Will you pay refund for lost time and for making work that should have been cleared long time ago by your staff and now it is again your staff that refuses to clean up their mess. Will you pay me for doing job of your colleagues?

You say one thing, then you dont hold on it, then you explain by some third thing and you dont keep on this third thing. Later you ask/tell me "I explained you 2 times", are you dumb?

Ok, great. Does anybody know what mind manipulation means? Is it allowed on this forum, I mean to manipulate someones mind by simple human brain functions? You may ask how, here is one best example, please try it and you will see that it works:

1. Go to supermarket and say that you want to test reactions if you are caught on stealing (just to be sure that you do not break law)
2. In the moment where someone tells, "You are thief, you've stolen lollypop", exactly in this moment you shold answer to this person "Who cares what a pedophile tells me?"
3. Everybody in this room will ignore the fact that you've stolen something, everybodie's brain will be busy with the question if this other person is pedophile or not.

I see such manipulation all the time on your forum, which is sadly supported by your staff and only people who are supported by your staff do things like that.

Back to topic, this is not my job to find these threads and to check where have I some access or not. You do owe me something now, these are the posts that still include names:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15860762;topicseen#msg15860762
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15793067;topicseen#msg15793067
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15790942;topicseen#msg15790942
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15719742;topicseen#msg15719742
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15717509;topicseen#msg15717509
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15684769;topicseen#msg15684769
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15676282;topicseen#msg15676282
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15363938;topicseen#msg15363938
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15363834;topicseen#msg15363834
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15363658;topicseen#msg15363658
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15363587;topicseen#msg15363587
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15363313;topicseen#msg15363313
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15362713;topicseen#msg15362713
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15347797;topicseen#msg15347797
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15347584;topicseen#msg15347584
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15344102;topicseen#msg15344102
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15341871;topicseen#msg15341871
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15338303;topicseen#msg15338303
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15328860;topicseen#msg15328860
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15325724;topicseen#msg15325724
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15323290;topicseen#msg15323290
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633.msg15298979;topicseen#msg15298979

But wait, I sent you already a bunch of links, they are removed. Oh no, whoever was deleting them was for sure not lazy, he/she just did not care.

Qestions:
Why do we need moderators if they do not follow rules?
Why do we need rules if nobody follows them?
How to prove legit side if publishing documents has to be done?


I accuse not only suchmoon and her gangbang gang, but some of your staff members in support of clear criminal act like identity theft.
Involved Moderators:
Cyrus, Mprep
Jump to: