Topic: [reputation] buckrogers (Read 4064 times)
One ray gun coming up.
I want my ray gun buck!
I am an American citizen
Bit Pop
2757 Roosevelt Road
Moundridge, KS 67107
620-345-0753
Libra
I am an American citizen
Bit Pop
2757 Roosevelt Road
Moundridge, KS 67107
620-345-0753
Libra
LOL Buck.. You attacked everyone on all the forums and news sites that spoke the truth...
Did you buy this from Meganet? I want to buy one for bitpop
EDIT:
Some of your comments Mr. Buck
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/josh-garza-speaks-paybase-launch-amazon-shopping-using-paycoin/
so what are you betting on? what's got you so pissed off? did you buy any of anything of what you mentioned? or are just simply trolling to try and discredit someone with a passion to make a difference? Josh is actually going to take this to a level unimaginable by a simpleton such as yourself. Or maybe you are still waiting on your LTCgear shares to come someday. No, i got it, you heavily invested in KNC, thats it, has to be
2 • Reply•Share ›
Scott did get paid and is still on the payroll.
Did you buy this from Meganet? I want to buy one for bitpop
EDIT:
Some of your comments Mr. Buck
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/josh-garza-speaks-paybase-launch-amazon-shopping-using-paycoin/
Quote
so what are you betting on? what's got you so pissed off? did you buy any of anything of what you mentioned? or are just simply trolling to try and discredit someone with a passion to make a difference? Josh is actually going to take this to a level unimaginable by a simpleton such as yourself. Or maybe you are still waiting on your LTCgear shares to come someday. No, i got it, you heavily invested in KNC, thats it, has to be
2 • Reply•Share ›
Quote
another professional? what's your thing dude? and how can it compare? prove me wrong! game on!
Scott did get paid and is still on the payroll.
Quote
sorry to inform you of the facts, but the reporters here don't get paid for their interviews ...Especially not Scott, he would rather not do an interview if it involved any sort of payment, he is as unbiased as one can be.
**edit** let me rephrase that, I am not sure about what they get from their Job, but Scott does not take money from anyone he interviews, that is as unethical as it gets, and Scott is probably one of the most ethical guys I have ever met, and i know about 50,000 other people who would say so.
**edit** let me rephrase that, I am not sure about what they get from their Job, but Scott does not take money from anyone he interviews, that is as unethical as it gets, and Scott is probably one of the most ethical guys I have ever met, and i know about 50,000 other people who would say so.
That's ok everyone is entitled to their opinion.
My intent was never to denigrate anyone, but when being attacked for having and stating my opinion, I will respond with the same tone to which I am addressed.
I was never employed by GAW. I wish I was paid for the effort I attempted to put into trying to defend someone and something I once believed in, but in the end turned out to be something much worse.
If this was a civil discussion which it never was here, then any responses would have been polite and informative.
But from what most everyone says about this topic outside of Bitcointalk regarding the people who post nasty pictures and degrading disgusting graphical remarks towards whomever, they say "don't even bother going there, because you are dealing with irrational people some of which are most likely children with no verbal filter".
After coming here by request from frankenmint to answer some valid questions which was total unrelated to my reaching out to him and the administrators of this site about a separate question all together, I agreed simply because if there were any concerns, I wanted to address them. I could have easily said no, and had whomever believe that I am the "shill" some of the users in this endless thread call me.
So what am I to think? I have been on Bitcointalk long before anything GAW was ever here, and was a member who posted , was friendly, did business with people and so on, and when now I come to try and respond willingly from someone with concerns, and answer truthfully I get responses like the following from you and Paul revere:
"So yeah, tough shit, you got called out on it, deal with it."
"@ Buck : Sorry, I don't care about what a worthless douchebag scam shill like you thinks, but thanks for asking."
Maybe its just better not to engage with irrational people as they say.
I did my best by answering any question thrown my way, only to have the same tone and response as if I was doing something wrong now...its pretty silly that this goes on here or is even allowed to be unmoderated in such a manner. A lot of you should be ashamed for being childish and irrational individuals.
I guess you cant argue with a brick wall.
Long live "whatever"
My intent was never to denigrate anyone, but when being attacked for having and stating my opinion, I will respond with the same tone to which I am addressed.
I was never employed by GAW. I wish I was paid for the effort I attempted to put into trying to defend someone and something I once believed in, but in the end turned out to be something much worse.
If this was a civil discussion which it never was here, then any responses would have been polite and informative.
But from what most everyone says about this topic outside of Bitcointalk regarding the people who post nasty pictures and degrading disgusting graphical remarks towards whomever, they say "don't even bother going there, because you are dealing with irrational people some of which are most likely children with no verbal filter".
After coming here by request from frankenmint to answer some valid questions which was total unrelated to my reaching out to him and the administrators of this site about a separate question all together, I agreed simply because if there were any concerns, I wanted to address them. I could have easily said no, and had whomever believe that I am the "shill" some of the users in this endless thread call me.
So what am I to think? I have been on Bitcointalk long before anything GAW was ever here, and was a member who posted , was friendly, did business with people and so on, and when now I come to try and respond willingly from someone with concerns, and answer truthfully I get responses like the following from you and Paul revere:
"So yeah, tough shit, you got called out on it, deal with it."
"@ Buck : Sorry, I don't care about what a worthless douchebag scam shill like you thinks, but thanks for asking."
Maybe its just better not to engage with irrational people as they say.
I did my best by answering any question thrown my way, only to have the same tone and response as if I was doing something wrong now...its pretty silly that this goes on here or is even allowed to be unmoderated in such a manner. A lot of you should be ashamed for being childish and irrational individuals.
I guess you cant argue with a brick wall.
Long live "whatever"
You are not fooling anyone with this revisionist history. I quoted your own posts, look above if you forgot. You started calling people "idiot #1", "idiot #2", etc for posting something you didn't like. Civil discussion
. You sound exactly like Garza by demanding respect where you display none yourself.Even now you're trying to paint yourself as some sort of a victim while a simple glance at your post history tells otherwise. You don't become "friendly" by claiming so. So yes, tough shit. You want to play a tough internet guy you get Newton's third law.
Ironically I mentioned earlier today that despite being a dipshit you probably didn't deserve to be doxed, and this thread is supposed to be about said doxing and your complaints to the mods about that. Well, once again I'm proven to be wrong by yet another narcissistic sociopath on the intertubes, just my luck I guess.
I am not exactly sure what your intentions are here?
My only concern was public doxxing on this forum.
Anything else that followed was a request by someone who asked me to respond to some questions he had.
I am not trying to "fool" anyone.
Honestly I feel that this discussion has been warped into something it was never intended to be.
I feel I have answered any questions that were requested I answer, and I don't need to prove anything.
It wont matter what I say here anyway as I can see, because people will always have their opinions.
I am not here to change anyone's opinions.
I am here to state that public doxxing should not be allowed, especially on this forum, and in general.
I think if anyone has any serious questions unrelated to my previous posts on the GAW related topic, as I have already explained and addressed in detail everything about what I said and why I said it then I would answer it.
I feel that you are taking what I said about civil discussions out of context with your cute smiley face, if you read the post I said "If this was a civil discussion which it never was here, then any responses would have been polite and informative." which they were not.
I wish you the best,
Have a good day.
That's ok everyone is entitled to their opinion.
My intent was never to denigrate anyone, but when being attacked for having and stating my opinion, I will respond with the same tone to which I am addressed.
I was never employed by GAW. I wish I was paid for the effort I attempted to put into trying to defend someone and something I once believed in, but in the end turned out to be something much worse.
If this was a civil discussion which it never was here, then any responses would have been polite and informative.
But from what most everyone says about this topic outside of Bitcointalk regarding the people who post nasty pictures and degrading disgusting graphical remarks towards whomever, they say "don't even bother going there, because you are dealing with irrational people some of which are most likely children with no verbal filter".
After coming here by request from frankenmint to answer some valid questions which was total unrelated to my reaching out to him and the administrators of this site about a separate question all together, I agreed simply because if there were any concerns, I wanted to address them. I could have easily said no, and had whomever believe that I am the "shill" some of the users in this endless thread call me.
So what am I to think? I have been on Bitcointalk long before anything GAW was ever here, and was a member who posted , was friendly, did business with people and so on, and when now I come to try and respond willingly from someone with concerns, and answer truthfully I get responses like the following from you and Paul revere:
"So yeah, tough shit, you got called out on it, deal with it."
"@ Buck : Sorry, I don't care about what a worthless douchebag scam shill like you thinks, but thanks for asking."
Maybe its just better not to engage with irrational people as they say.
I did my best by answering any question thrown my way, only to have the same tone and response as if I was doing something wrong now...its pretty silly that this goes on here or is even allowed to be unmoderated in such a manner. A lot of you should be ashamed for being childish and irrational individuals.
I guess you cant argue with a brick wall.
Long live "whatever"
My intent was never to denigrate anyone, but when being attacked for having and stating my opinion, I will respond with the same tone to which I am addressed.
I was never employed by GAW. I wish I was paid for the effort I attempted to put into trying to defend someone and something I once believed in, but in the end turned out to be something much worse.
If this was a civil discussion which it never was here, then any responses would have been polite and informative.
But from what most everyone says about this topic outside of Bitcointalk regarding the people who post nasty pictures and degrading disgusting graphical remarks towards whomever, they say "don't even bother going there, because you are dealing with irrational people some of which are most likely children with no verbal filter".
After coming here by request from frankenmint to answer some valid questions which was total unrelated to my reaching out to him and the administrators of this site about a separate question all together, I agreed simply because if there were any concerns, I wanted to address them. I could have easily said no, and had whomever believe that I am the "shill" some of the users in this endless thread call me.
So what am I to think? I have been on Bitcointalk long before anything GAW was ever here, and was a member who posted , was friendly, did business with people and so on, and when now I come to try and respond willingly from someone with concerns, and answer truthfully I get responses like the following from you and Paul revere:
"So yeah, tough shit, you got called out on it, deal with it."
"@ Buck : Sorry, I don't care about what a worthless douchebag scam shill like you thinks, but thanks for asking."
Maybe its just better not to engage with irrational people as they say.
I did my best by answering any question thrown my way, only to have the same tone and response as if I was doing something wrong now...its pretty silly that this goes on here or is even allowed to be unmoderated in such a manner. A lot of you should be ashamed for being childish and irrational individuals.
I guess you cant argue with a brick wall.
Long live "whatever"
You are not fooling anyone with this revisionist history. I quoted your own posts, look above if you forgot. You started calling people "idiot #1", "idiot #2", etc for posting something you didn't like. Civil discussion
. You sound exactly like Garza by demanding respect where you display none yourself.Even now you're trying to paint yourself as some sort of a victim while a simple glance at your post history tells otherwise. You don't become "friendly" by claiming so. So yes, tough shit. You want to play a tough internet guy you get Newton's third law.
Ironically I mentioned earlier today that despite being a dipshit you probably didn't deserve to be doxed, and this thread is supposed to be about said doxing and your complaints to the mods about that. Well, once again I'm proven to be wrong by yet another narcissistic sociopath on the intertubes, just my luck I guess.
Sounds like he's complicit in fraud
Here is an interesting factoid, Buck:
Did Scott Fargo manage to pull some strings with the scumbag Homero for you?
So Daffy and this Buck Rogers asshole are the same person? Interesting.
Did Scott Fargo manage to pull some strings with the scumbag Homero for you?
So Daffy and this Buck Rogers asshole are the same person? Interesting.
excuse me? what are you referring to? or are you another one of those guys who just likes to re-post and make random comments?
@suchmoon, we have all made bad judgement calls in our day, and be believing up to point that Josh and GAW were legit, was my error.
Truthfully I was in belief that they were 100% legit as their first few months of doing business or so seemed to be on the up and up for the most part, and they came through with a lot of their items regarding miners, hosting, make up time for downed miners, etc....
I had no evidence or reason to think or prove otherwise, and was told like everyone else to just "Hold" when they moved the paycoin thing, as we all believed in JG at the time, and he was very good at making people think things were coming SOON.
I'd like to say I'm sorry for saying things in the "attack" quotes you found and posted, and was simply functioning in defense mode for something I thought could actually make a difference here and felt strongly about it. A lesson learned in posting from feelings and beliefs, but at that time that's simply what it was.
Unfortunately like so many other came to find out, I was wrong.
So to be clear, I was wrong in my thinking that Josh and GAW would "change the industry" and do these amazing things.
I apologize to the people I had argued with on this matter, and I have learned a hard lesson here.
If you want to ask me any other questions, please do i'll do my best to answer what I can.
I removed that BTCLend signature as well, as it offended you I guess? I was under the impression that they were a loaning site and not XPY specific, and had BTC and other coins as well.
Thanks,
buck
Truthfully I was in belief that they were 100% legit as their first few months of doing business or so seemed to be on the up and up for the most part, and they came through with a lot of their items regarding miners, hosting, make up time for downed miners, etc....
I had no evidence or reason to think or prove otherwise, and was told like everyone else to just "Hold" when they moved the paycoin thing, as we all believed in JG at the time, and he was very good at making people think things were coming SOON.
I'd like to say I'm sorry for saying things in the "attack" quotes you found and posted, and was simply functioning in defense mode for something I thought could actually make a difference here and felt strongly about it. A lesson learned in posting from feelings and beliefs, but at that time that's simply what it was.
Unfortunately like so many other came to find out, I was wrong.
So to be clear, I was wrong in my thinking that Josh and GAW would "change the industry" and do these amazing things.
I apologize to the people I had argued with on this matter, and I have learned a hard lesson here.
If you want to ask me any other questions, please do i'll do my best to answer what I can.
I removed that BTCLend signature as well, as it offended you I guess? I was under the impression that they were a loaning site and not XPY specific, and had BTC and other coins as well.
Thanks,
buck
It's really hard to offend me and you haven't even come close, nor has anyone on the intertubes for that matter.
But I'm not buying this act. There is a huge difference between supporting something/somebody (mistakenly or not) and denigrating anybody who dares to question the thing/person/entity that you're supporting. The only group of posters who did something close to what you were doing were GAW's paid shills (EvilPanda et al). Were you paid too? If not then I guess I'm sorry you were so deluded as to do it for free.
Anyway, back to recent events - nobody forced you to come on Bitcointalk and AGAIN start attacking people for their opinions on btc.com. So yeah, tough shit, you got called out on it, deal with it.
That's ok everyone is entitled to their opinion.
My intent was never to denigrate anyone, but when being attacked for having and stating my opinion, I will respond with the same tone to which I am addressed.
I was never employed by GAW. I wish I was paid for the effort I attempted to put into trying to defend someone and something I once believed in, but in the end turned out to be something much worse.
If this was a civil discussion which it never was here, then any responses would have been polite and informative.
But from what most everyone says about this topic outside of Bitcointalk regarding the people who post nasty pictures and degrading disgusting graphical remarks towards whomever, they say "don't even bother going there, because you are dealing with irrational people some of which are most likely children with no verbal filter".
After coming here by request from frankenmint to answer some valid questions which was total unrelated to my reaching out to him and the administrators of this site about a separate question all together, I agreed simply because if there were any concerns, I wanted to address them. I could have easily said no, and had whomever believe that I am the "shill" some of the users in this endless thread call me.
So what am I to think? I have been on Bitcointalk long before anything GAW was ever here, and was a member who posted , was friendly, did business with people and so on, and when now I come to try and respond willingly from someone with concerns, and answer truthfully I get responses like the following from you and Paul revere:
"So yeah, tough shit, you got called out on it, deal with it."
"@ Buck : Sorry, I don't care about what a worthless douchebag scam shill like you thinks, but thanks for asking."
Maybe its just better not to engage with irrational people as they say.
I did my best by answering any question thrown my way, only to have the same tone and response as if I was doing something wrong now...its pretty silly that this goes on here or is even allowed to be unmoderated in such a manner. A lot of you should be ashamed for being childish and irrational individuals.
I guess you cant argue with a brick wall.
Long live "whatever"
Sounds like he's complicit in fraud
Here is an interesting factoid, Buck:
Did Scott Fargo manage to pull some strings with the scumbag Homero for you?
So Daffy and this Buck Rogers asshole are the same person? Interesting.
Did Scott Fargo manage to pull some strings with the scumbag Homero for you?
So Daffy and this Buck Rogers asshole are the same person? Interesting.
@suchmoon, we have all made bad judgement calls in our day, and be believing up to point that Josh and GAW were legit, was my error.
Truthfully I was in belief that they were 100% legit as their first few months of doing business or so seemed to be on the up and up for the most part, and they came through with a lot of their items regarding miners, hosting, make up time for downed miners, etc....
I had no evidence or reason to think or prove otherwise, and was told like everyone else to just "Hold" when they moved the paycoin thing, as we all believed in JG at the time, and he was very good at making people think things were coming SOON.
I'd like to say I'm sorry for saying things in the "attack" quotes you found and posted, and was simply functioning in defense mode for something I thought could actually make a difference here and felt strongly about it. A lesson learned in posting from feelings and beliefs, but at that time that's simply what it was.
Unfortunately like so many other came to find out, I was wrong.
So to be clear, I was wrong in my thinking that Josh and GAW would "change the industry" and do these amazing things.
I apologize to the people I had argued with on this matter, and I have learned a hard lesson here.
If you want to ask me any other questions, please do i'll do my best to answer what I can.
I removed that BTCLend signature as well, as it offended you I guess? I was under the impression that they were a loaning site and not XPY specific, and had BTC and other coins as well.
Thanks,
buck
Truthfully I was in belief that they were 100% legit as their first few months of doing business or so seemed to be on the up and up for the most part, and they came through with a lot of their items regarding miners, hosting, make up time for downed miners, etc....
I had no evidence or reason to think or prove otherwise, and was told like everyone else to just "Hold" when they moved the paycoin thing, as we all believed in JG at the time, and he was very good at making people think things were coming SOON.
I'd like to say I'm sorry for saying things in the "attack" quotes you found and posted, and was simply functioning in defense mode for something I thought could actually make a difference here and felt strongly about it. A lesson learned in posting from feelings and beliefs, but at that time that's simply what it was.
Unfortunately like so many other came to find out, I was wrong.
So to be clear, I was wrong in my thinking that Josh and GAW would "change the industry" and do these amazing things.
I apologize to the people I had argued with on this matter, and I have learned a hard lesson here.
If you want to ask me any other questions, please do i'll do my best to answer what I can.
I removed that BTCLend signature as well, as it offended you I guess? I was under the impression that they were a loaning site and not XPY specific, and had BTC and other coins as well.
Thanks,
buck
It's really hard to offend me and you haven't even come close, nor has anyone on the intertubes for that matter.
But I'm not buying this act. There is a huge difference between supporting something/somebody (mistakenly or not) and denigrating anybody who dares to question the thing/person/entity that you're supporting. The only group of posters who did something close to what you were doing were GAW's paid shills (EvilPanda et al). Were you paid too? If not then I guess I'm sorry you were so deluded as to do it for free.
Anyway, back to recent events - nobody forced you to come on Bitcointalk and AGAIN start attacking people for their opinions on btc.com. So yeah, tough shit, you got called out on it, deal with it.
@suchmoon, we have all made bad judgement calls in our day, and be believing up to point that Josh and GAW were legit, was my error.
Truthfully I was in belief that they were 100% legit as their first few months of doing business or so seemed to be on the up and up for the most part, and they came through with a lot of their items regarding miners, hosting, make up time for downed miners, etc....
I had no evidence or reason to think or prove otherwise, and was told like everyone else to just "Hold" when they moved the paycoin thing, as we all believed in JG at the time, and he was very good at making people think things were coming SOON.
I'd like to say I'm sorry for saying things in the "attack" quotes you found and posted, and was simply functioning in defense mode for something I thought could actually make a difference here and felt strongly about it. A lesson learned in posting from feelings and beliefs, but at that time that's simply what it was.
Unfortunately like so many other came to find out, I was wrong.
So to be clear, I was wrong in my thinking that Josh and GAW would "change the industry" and do these amazing things.
I apologize to the people I had argued with on this matter, and I have learned a hard lesson here.
If you want to ask me any other questions, please do i'll do my best to answer what I can.
I removed that BTCLend signature as well, as it offended you I guess? I was under the impression that they were a loaning site and not XPY specific, and had BTC and other coins as well.
Thanks,
buck
Truthfully I was in belief that they were 100% legit as their first few months of doing business or so seemed to be on the up and up for the most part, and they came through with a lot of their items regarding miners, hosting, make up time for downed miners, etc....
I had no evidence or reason to think or prove otherwise, and was told like everyone else to just "Hold" when they moved the paycoin thing, as we all believed in JG at the time, and he was very good at making people think things were coming SOON.
I'd like to say I'm sorry for saying things in the "attack" quotes you found and posted, and was simply functioning in defense mode for something I thought could actually make a difference here and felt strongly about it. A lesson learned in posting from feelings and beliefs, but at that time that's simply what it was.
Unfortunately like so many other came to find out, I was wrong.
So to be clear, I was wrong in my thinking that Josh and GAW would "change the industry" and do these amazing things.
I apologize to the people I had argued with on this matter, and I have learned a hard lesson here.
If you want to ask me any other questions, please do i'll do my best to answer what I can.
I removed that BTCLend signature as well, as it offended you I guess? I was under the impression that they were a loaning site and not XPY specific, and had BTC and other coins as well.
Thanks,
buck
And he still has BTCLend referral in his sig 
Just a quick sample of buck's posts from the glory days of GAW:
And it goes on and on like that.
Just a quick sample of buck's posts from the glory days of GAW:
there is no scam except the opnes you idiots are trying to attempt to make here...by slandering companies and people for doing what no one else has the cahones to do.
curious, did your mom let you use the computer without permission again tonight? bad boy..go back to your room.
the truth is there is no shitty truth, the shity TRUTH if yopu need to hear it, is that you "idiots" are simply trolling and ganging up on a company and a person who are trying to make a difference in this world , to make a change....do you like calling china at 5 am to talk to the guy in his basement and ask him if he will send you a replacement part for your shitminer you just bought? good luck waiting 3 weeks for that if he answers the phone at all, oh and i hope you speak the language or you might get a food delivery instead.
Folks: idiot # 3 here: are you serious dude? what has anyone done in the past few years that has come close to what GAW has attempted to do and will do to change the course of crypto as we know it making it accepted worldwide? do you not see that as a benefit for every crypto out there, not just XPY?
And it goes on and on like that.
Is there a TL;DR; version?
"I'm invincible attacking everyone from my high horse unless bad people post something I don't like in which case I will whine to mods". I think that sums up buckrogers.
Is there a TL;DR; version?
Jump to: