Topic: 💰 Review MyCryptoMixer.com and receive 0.002 BTC 💰 (Read 2526 times)

I've been advertising MyCryptoMixer for a long time, but I never tried their services until this week. I'll be honest with my review, because I think it'd be better if we had more mixers than just one monopolizing the forum. The more mixers means the more privacy.

Once I firstly visited mycryptomixer.com, I saw a well-made and neat website. Especially, when you prepare your deposit, the owners have made a really good job. I find it cool that "Funds distribution", it clearly proves that the mixing experience is simple, but with a lot of options!

Although, I had an issue once I broadcasted the transaction: #msg56448980. Fortunately, I got the money I mixed, so I'm okay now, problem solved.

These are my suggestions:

• Be more active on forum or email. You have no idea how soothing it'd be if you just had reply on the thread instead of having me wait. I know that you wouldn't scam me, it's pretty clear that your services are legit, but you can't just let your customers wait without a sign of support. I deposited the minimum amount. I wonder how anxious I'd be if I wanted to mix 1 bitcoin.
• Add bech32 depositing addresses. It'll reduce the fee. Slightly, but it will. (Or let your customer choose the address type)
• I personally find it redundant to have both LoG and MyCryptoCode. What's the point? For example, I hadn't downloaded the LoG, because I thought that MyCryptoCode and order id were enough. I do have the order's password, so I can prove that I'm the one. No need for LoG. Not to mention that if you share your LoG (as I saw on the ANN thread) mixing is losing its point.
• This one is optional, but I'd find it really cool if you had a submission form, where everyone can provide you a signature from an address to prove their ownership. No need for order id and MyCryptoCode.
• Let's say that I'm a little "obsessive" and I noticed that "Nothing yett" below the Outgoing Transactions. Remove that extra "t".

---

My conclusion is that MyCryptoMixer is a pretty satisfactory mixer. Their main purpose is to make mixing simpler, and I can confirm that they've achieved it. And one last thing to say, to all of the mixers out there on the scamming paradise known as "Internet": If you're not on bitcointalk, then you've lost my trust.  

i have nice review about your scam here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-mycryptomixercom-is-a-scam-they-took-0027-btc-5318977

Hello,

I sent same. And i can't see any transaction.

What happens with this quality service?

Hi, I submitted a transaction of $7000 (Order ID zvxe87-62gd4c-kulbq7, th id da824c9063bd9aea76a7a84973daa8b3fce596cb8e80b6fa7fd39765299a6fcc) for 15 min of mix-up and still haven't got any funds sent, it's been 10 hours already. This DOES look like an exit scam to me. Mycryptomixer, any comments?

Regarding the reference to the dark market and the Russian evading state regulations example: MCM may be considered a money transmitter under FINCEN, which means they'd need a license:

https://cryptobriefing.com/bitcoin-coin-mixers-legal-crosshairs/

"Users of mixing services, however, need to be more vigilant. They are liable, according to FinCEN guidance, of being found to be intending to conceal the identities of funds or are, in fact, operating as transmitters. Transmitters need licenses. Concealing the identity of a sender or receiver of funds is a breach of the Funds Travel Rule if conducted by a registered financial institution.

While non-custodial wallet developers are not in breach of any legal obligation, those who use their software could be. The concern for those using mixing services is that in both the Harmon and Bestmixer cases, the enforcement actions were premised on the intent to conceal dirty Bitcoin.

Perfectly valid privacy-based grounds for mixing cryptocurrencies risk being swept up in the zealous delivery of law enforcement. Even if the primary purpose of this software is to protect people’s identities, there may be a tendency for law enforcement to assume these coins were ill-gained."

Hello everyone!
We have pushed a small update today and another bigger one is coming soon!

Changelog
- Added mixing calculator
- Added mixing strength meter
- Small frontend changes on landing
- Easier to read blog - updated fonts and formatting
- The website is now available without javascript - we are working on making the mixing process usable without it now!

Smooth mixing experience and the uncomplicated website formation make MyCryptoMixer one of the best in the mixing industry, so I share my review here(Just got paid for this review, btw).
First about the fee: 0.25 MBTC was deducted for each output address user initiates to put in but it worth paying this fee for reaching the high anonymous level of mixing experience. Compared to industry standards, there is room for developing some parts of the onion version of the website. The min amount for starting the mixing process is not small and it should be around 0.001 BTC for identifying more target networks.

Usually, Brave browser's protective website shields find the third-party site cookies and block unnecessary ones but there was only one unnecessary cookie folder on MyCryptoMixer. Tried the website with Opera and Tor browsers, from my understanding, Javascript should be enabled for loading the page. Anyway, the website works like a charm except the small security issue mentioned above these lines. If not used, the live update of mixing status will not be refreshed instantly which I liked as the best part of progress.

Yesterday's BTC rally increased the network bottleneck and increased the mining fee for processing the transaction on crypto exchanges. I intentionally finished mixing around the peak points of the market rally and the incoming transaction was processed with a high priority network fee. No high charge or deduction from received satoshis was the case. After 2 hours of sent funds, the status of mixing has been changed to {completed}. In any case, I have downloaded the LoG before the sending BTC and every part of conditions has been covered correctly by MyCryptoMixer as expected. Looking forward to mixing the LTC and other altcoins.

I haven't thoroughly read other reviews so I apologize if I am giving any suggestions that have already been mentioned. The following review is paid, but my honest feedback -


User experience: The interface of the site is extremely professional, neatly organized, and designed with functionality in mind. I am not having to hunt for information and details about the service is clearly laid out and easy to access. There are no issues with responsiveness with the website. All buttons are functional and lead to correct pages and I see no issues with the front end of the site. FAQ section lays out in detail all corners of the transaction and gives clear instructions on how to initiate a transaction while also mentioning more nuanced details including confirmation number requirements, minimum/maximum deposits and withdrawals, as well as offering reassurance by laying out security features systematically built in site including a letter of guarantee.


Functionality: I elected to choose the instant withdrawal with no delay. Bitcoins sent to the deposit address were promptly confirmed within seconds and once the coins were confirmed, the outgoing transaction was registered almost immediately and coins were sent to the withdrawal address within seconds. The total time, including Bitcoin transaction confirmation took approximately 7-8 minutes so the site was quickly responsive and the service was fast. The bitcoin output was different than the input and I received different coins so the coins were adequately mixed.

Overall thoughts: Very promising mixer and I would give it a shot. Max output is only around one BTC but nonetheless as the service grows I imagine the cap transaction will increase. This was mentioned before but with combined miner fees and service fees, the service is a bit pricey for a newly established mixer. Nonetheless, you do get what you pay for.

---

A few suggestions I have for you as well as some grammar corrections for the site to give more professional look.

One suggestion is that the Letter of Guarantee does not clearly outline how to restore the session if you exit out of the tab after initiating a coin mixing session. I would recommend putting clearer instructions on how to restore a session and adding a tab or link stating "Restore Session" on the home page with directions on how to do so. A simple mechanism of inputting the order ID and getting back to the session  I think would be efficient in case someone exits out of the tab.

Another minor suggestion I have is once a mix is initiated, having a "?" symbol beside the "status" of the transaction indicating that one confirmation is needed to verify the transaction. I understand that your FAQ section has it listed out, but nonetheless it's easy to miss so I'd recommend making it clear that one confirmation is needed right there on the page. Here's a screenshot of where you might think about adding it -



A few grammar errors I noticed on your FAQ's as well as some phrases that can be reworded. I think there are entire sections that needed to be looked at to sound more professional but nonetheless I still went ahead and included the grammar corrections so that you have an idea on how you can improve. Your layout is top notch but I would recommend implementing some of the changes I have posted below because incorrect grammar on crypto businesses, for me, tend to make them less trustworthy; Corrections are put in parenthesis -

I've used the site now and done so quite easily without any great rigmarole or hitches in the process.   I believe it is quite usable for the general public and streamlined enough to not confuse with too many options.   I varied my mix use to have a large delay as this relates to security and cover of the input and output of the transactions, I was in no rush to push through the payment and it went all to plan as laid out initially.      The fee is also variable and also helps to vary the transactions done so giving better cover to the mix, both are simple sliding scales with the address to forward the final payment also clear to enter.  

  I didnt find any complicating points or much to confuse the process, the delay is upto 24 hours but I can imagine some might like a bigger delay to be possible sometimes.   Part of the process is a letter that contains all the details and should be saved or printed off as a record, I just emailed this to myself as Im not too paranoid about security and I use 2FA on access to that email.  Its possible people might want to use some encryption on that further and/or destroy it soon after the process is completed.
  Its really fast to use, there isnt a vast amount to explain to the process and they even give the option to mix instantly which I do believe would be a popular option though I dont recommend to choose this unless you are pushed for time as the mixer is best given more time and traffic; but its nice they let people decide for themselves.  
  
All the best crypto sites should be open, simple and easy reference for anyone in the public to use and this is one of them, I look forward to their ETH edition.

Hello.

I would like to test your mixer as well. Please send me the coins and I will test it.

3QciAGvdzV9C3oeoBKoAhopLscXwhv2EAy

The front page of the site says "mixing made simple," and I must admit it's pretty simple.  The layout is better now than when I first visited the site.  I like htat the mixing buttons are available near the top of the page now, as opposed to only being at the bottom at first.  All the pertinent information, including a link to the PGP public key are right there, and that's handy.  I hate having to look for that kind of stuff.

The mixing page itself is fairly simple, and straight forward as well.  Nicely done.  I tried the service twice, with different settings on the time delay; one I set for about an hour, and the other I set for instant.  Both times the service worked as advertised.  The instant transaction arrived as soon as the sent transaction had one confirmation.

The only complaint I have about the service are the fees.  The service charges a minimum of 0.5%, but the default is set to 4.46%.  On top of the service fee there's also fee of .00025 BTC for each transaction/address.  This is a subtle note found at the bottom of the page, in fine print:


I know the service is new, and wants to turn a profit, but being new and one of the most expensive mixer's isn't likely to make this service as appealing.

My overall assessment; MyCryptoMixer seems like a well-designed, simple, and effective mixer, but I find it to be too expensive.  

I don't mind submitting a review if you provide the .002 BTC to test the service. If you do select me, please send me a PM. I'd be happy to write you a review.

bc1qx0xenpejvjjkcw978hhypuage5ag083anaztlu

Hello!
Make sure to check out our recent blog post! - Get Involved In Crypto While Under Quarantine
https://mycryptomixer.com/blog/get-involved-in-crypto-while-under-quarantine/

Also bumping this because some people that got coins up front have still not posted their review
@seleme
@STT
@Continuous
@DireWolfM14
@TwitchySeal

There are still 44x 0.002 BTC rewards up for taking!

I have used a few mixing services and found that they didn't have great customer service, especially unreliable. I have no problem with the site when I try it out but my opinion you need the customer service had great response time. The most important thing in this service is trust, they will be more secure when everything is listened actively.

---

I have seen similar designs on many mixers but the same colors are not good-looking for a brand mixer. For the future, rebranding the website-service and using the different color combinations can be food for thought. The simple instructions are accessible on the site for the smooth mixing process. I have forgotten everything written here for using the fresh mind and explore the website on my own skills, knowledge.

The points I want to report:

• The site's speed is fast and the welcome interface is smooth. Clean design and GUI invite simplicity that is crucial for BTC mixers.
• Why don't you use three confirmations for over 3 BTC and 1 confirmation for the smaller amounts? Probably, the site should be prepared for any possible double attack and three confirmations for large amounts exclude the attack of double-spending.
• Mixed coins were sent back when my transaction got approximately the first confirmation. The automated mixing service increases the service quality, reliability in my eyes.
• I suggest having a signature campaign here for the promoting the BTC mixer on the crypto forums.
• I can see you created a new announcement thread before suggesting this but adding a weekly wrap-up will be a nice intention. The weekly or monthly updates about the service will keep your thread more active.
• Since this is not only a BTC mixer it will be a good idea to add more supported coins, especially LTC and ETH. If you don't have enough time to add the ETH mixer soon, please delete the second choice from the website.
• 0.5% fee is good and cheap enough for the fast transaction. The fee affects the anonymity but the liquidity shouldn't be a big issue for long term thinkers with washing the BTC on alternative places.
• I have used the Opera browser and used double VPN with the TOR network for the full anonymity on the onion version of the mixer. Zero cookies from the third-party search engines and the Opera internal adblocker was not able to catch anything.
  
  
• Actually, proper settings were used for better anonymization of mixed coins. Next time, I will use the Mycryptocode for avoiding receiving the previously mixed coins in the new transaction.
• Minimal amount of mixing is 0.0003, it can be lowered in the future. Surely, someone will want to test the service but the high minimal amount can be deal-breaker.
• I wish the admin will fix all the disadvantages found by testers.

Btw,thanks for the reward

hey mate ive been looking for a good crypto mixer, I'd be very interested in trying it out and providing a review with a possible youtube video if you'd like

---

Drop me a pm

When mixing coins for the first time, you will receive a "MyCryptoCode" - a randomly generated unique string which will allow you to get coins only from pools that have no connection to your other transactions. Make sure to enter it before every mix to ensure the highest level of anonymity.

While MyCryptoCode associates your inputs together, we use one way hash function bcrypt, industry standard for hashing passwords, to store the connection. Once a new order is created, we compare provided MyCryptoCode against all stored hashes to determine which inputs can be used. What this means, is that we can only determine the connection knowing the MyCryptoCode in the first place.

For technical reasons we had to use reasonably low cost parameter for bcrypt function, it is still very unlikely someone would be able to brute force enough of the associated codes to make any connections in sensible time with current technology.

You can enter anything You want there but it won't do anything as there are no hashes like that.

Since this thread poped up again, may I ask what's the utility of "mycryptocode" again? I provided a random 10 char string and it got accepted?!
The same applies to smartmixer!

Here is my review:

I am not an expert in using mixing services, so I can't say anything about the technical or security details.

The site is very userfriendly. Simple design and easy to navigate. Everything is easy to understand so even people who don't frequently use mixing services can quickly find their way.
I opted to use no transfer delay and from the moment my coins arrived, they were transfered immediatly back to my wallet adress. The service does what it needs to do!
What I don't get, is that you can choose your fee between 0.5 and 5%. I choose 0.5% as 5% is too high in my eyes.

It would the nice if you could add other coins to mix (such as litecoin)

edit: reward received, thanks!

There are many websites that mix bitcoins but  but you don't like their complicated interface, there’s so many ways to mix your own coins but you will waste time. Everything is very simple and clear at mycryptomixer, especially you can delay your transations up to 24hours and adjust the service fee. I feel everything is okay.

This could easily be one of those recently vanished exit scams back once again e.g. smartmixer.

I don't know why anybody would trust a completely new mixer site that doesn't have an reputation whatsoever.

As far as I am concerned most of these sites are simply waiting around for the right opportunity to run off with funds, e.g. right after somebody deposits a large amount.

Think about it, these platforms are designed to facilitate tax evasion, money laundering and returning the fungibility of blacklisted funds, do you really think theft is out of bounds? No matter what these platforms say, their primary clientele are almost certainly criminals.

I wouldn't see myself as having so much authority as to whether or not i could decide whether a mixer is legit or not. (Especially since i'm advertising a direct competitor)

I'm just unleashing some of my thoughts here in this thread, and it's really up to anyone themselves to give value to them, or not.

That would be good advice in general for every new service, yes. Although, getting your money back is not the only concern you should have with a service. (Again, is it functioning correctly? Does it mix funds adequately? -- And i simply don't have an answer to that question, so i guess i presume (until i have reason to believe otherwise) they do what they tell everyone they do -- which is adequately mixing funds. (Although......)

You should just keep in mind that there were lots of other mixers in the past that also said they did so, but actually didn't. Bestmixer (seized, but servers DID keep transaction logs!!!), Bitblender (exit scamming), Smartmixer (selective scamming), and there's lots more.

Again, not saying MyCryptoMixer.com has the same intentions (ofcourse i'm not saying that.), but it's something everyone should keep in mind. That of course also goes for mixers such as Chipmixer.com (I would always recommend anyone to swap their private keys received from Chipmixer ASAP, since there is always a risk they could get seized, etc..)

The design of the website is fine. Also, the interface of the mixing service is very easy. After adding ethereum mixing service, it will be more popular i thing.  Good luck with your new service.

I have sent a PM, please check it also.

Speaking of similar and the model which was broken in the past, i can smell something fishy about the whole service and I'm you guys (Loycev, mocacinno) fish it out.
With that been said, i didnt see what make their services different from the smart mixer which was previously accused, i dont say the OP site is scam but their service require some few precautions about ( never use huge fund on there and use their tor only).

Regards.

I don't think this is exactly right.

Just tested: Even on Tor with the safest settings, you still force users to load your (non-script) GTM tags. Users (I) will actually have to manually block the request. It seems to be the only thing that's actually working on your .onion site right now

---

---

Other than that;

I do think it's a good thing you're using a LoG w/ PGP, unlike some other mixers which didn't do so in the past (looking at you smartmixer.).

And i have no idea how solid your mixing process actually is, and whether you can actually weather a chainanalysis "analysis", I also don't understand how anyone here can claim they do, or have a "fantastic mixing service". I guess we will just have to give them the benefit of the doubt? (We've seen mixers with similar (or the same) mixing models been broken in the past.)

I would also like to add that this mixer is not revolutionary in any way (from what i can see) (and i don't see how your SEO ""guys"" are going to make it revolutionary either), and it really is just same old same old to me. I don't know. (Take my comments with a grain of salt.)

@MyCryptoMixer: i've read your reply, and i'm happy you'll be looking into the issues i wrote down

There are some extra remarks i do want to give, and 2 small apologys i need to make:

The apology (1):
I'm a guy that has, at any given time, at least 20 open tabs on my browser. Next to MyCryptoMixer.com, there was a tab open with an exchange i sometimes use that uses the exact same color scheme as your site. The exchange had an option to get notified of deposits by mail, phone, sms, push notification, telegram bot,... They had contact options via mail, ticketing system, facebook, skype, whatsapp, telegram,... I accidentally clicked their tab instead of yours, that's why i wrote the part about not needing so many contact options. It was an honest mistake, and i'll remove this mistake from my review (i'll scratch it).

The apology (2):
After re-reading my initial post, i do come of as quite harsh. I forgot to clearly mention there are loads of good things about your site (layout, security, workflow design,...), but i figure you'll always have tons of people telling you the positive things because they want that payment. That's why i tend to bring up the "bad" things that are fixable instead of focussing on how nice feature "x" is, or how good it is you added header "y", or that you've cleaned up the server signature. Don't read my post as: "this guy thinks my mixer is all bad", but rather as "this guy is bringing up some things i might need to look into to make my service even better"

The extra remarks:
I get that your SEO guy needs those stats, but instead of giving your visitor's data to google, have you tought about Matomo? I've used it's predecessor (piwik) on privacy-centered sites for many times. They give you about the same info as google analytics, but they're just a free (open source) php/mysql script that runs on your own server, keeping all your visitor's info with you (and there even is an anonimizing function included).

About cloudflare: i do get why people use cloudflare. Don't get me wrong, they do a great job and for any site where privacy isn't so very important, i wouldn't mind seeing the use of cloudflare's cdn, ssl certificates, dns services,... I realise you're defenately not the only one using cloudflare for a mixer, but every time i see a mixer using cloudflare, i raise exactly this point. What people seem to miss is that, eventough it looks like you're using a secure connection, cloudflare actually acts like a MITM. This means the data is encrypted between your browser and cloudflare with cloudflare's cert, cloudflare DECRYPTS the data (they now know everything, including the deposit address, the letter of guarantee, the withdrawal address, the user's ip, browser fingerprint, timestamp,..). They have ALL tools in hand to completely de-anonimise the mixing session. Sure, they re-encrypt this data with your cert before they foreward the package to your server, but nothing is stopping them from sharing the complete de-anonimised mixing session with the CIA, FBI, ATF, DOD,...
I get you need a WAF, i get you need DDOS protection, i get that it's only the clearnet... But a lot of your users won't know what tor is, they just want privacy and they're looking at you to provide them with this privacy. The very least you should do (in my opinion) is print a very big, bold warning on the clearnet version telling your users that, eventough their coins will be safe from bad guys, their session *might* be monitored by law enforcement unless they use the tor version.

There are a couple of hosts that offer Ddos protected dedicated servers. If you combine this with a decent setup and a letsencrypt certificate, you're much safer than you are now (security wise).

Last but not least: i messed up some of the header recommandations. I have a couple of secure setups i'm involved with (but not that many) and i have a messy checklist to verify if everything is more or less correct. Sometimes this checklist is not up-to-date and headers that are no longer best practices are still on the list. You've given me something to think about, and if you are correct, i'll remove those headers both from the services i'm involved with and my checklist... Thanks

BTW, i'll send you a PM with an address, so i can review the rest of your setup

I will keep it short and will mention the general experience + some issues. The website was simple, self-explanatory and very easy to navigate. Decided to try the new mixing service and got my coins in one hour due to the network congestion. Site design is straight to business, no eye strain with fancy colors. Instructions are clear, even noobs can get a fresh BTC by clicking a few buttons after reading the help area. BTW, Segwit addresses are supported and this means low fees will be applied on the final amount.

I have several concerns about the liquidity because the deep liquidity pool is essential for cleaning the traces and no other questions will be asked if the random outputs are used in mixing. Actually I guess the received coins will be from the same day transactions which have been used by other authors here. Between 0.5% and 5% service fee range, the user can choose how anonymous he wants to see the new coins, honestly, 5% is high for larger turnovers. Adding a transaction ID is simple and straight but maybe a direct link to blockchain explorer will be useful for saving time and calculating the cost or loss which can be done at the first step if there was a mixing calculator.

Before clicking to the "continue" button, the max and min transaction limits warn the user who doesn't need to dig the FAQ for finding that info. Anyway, I doubt someone will ignore the gold rules and will try to mix 1.08 BTC on a new mixing service. My suggestion is about adding a small pop-up window for receiving feedback after each successful transaction, sending service quality review in the form of short answers to questions will be a win-win for both parties. You can add multiple languages too depending on the demand from regions.

Reason for edit: Reward received

Because of multiple requests we have now published a tutorial on how to use MyCryptoMixer - We also have an animated video tutorial that is work in progress.
The tutorial will also be visible on the main page with the next update.
https://mycryptomixer.com/blog/getting-started-with-mycryptomixer/

Noted, input fields will be added.

Yes, this is just for testing purposes, we have multiple pools ready to send into the site.

I received a 0.003 BTC to test the mixer, so I did
First, I had to adjust my Tor settings to "Safer" instead of "Safest":

This is unfortunate, it would be great if the site can work in the safest possible browsing mode.

The 0.003 BTC I received wasn't enough to pay for fees and still meet the minimum mixing amount (0.003 BTC), so I used other funds. That gave me a chance to use the QR-code, and scan it with a tablet. Note that it's always wise to check if the scanned address matches the one shown on the screen. This worked as expected.

Things I've noticed
Changing the mixing time isn't very intuitive: I can't click where it says "After 2 hrs", which is what I expected to do. I use a small screen for my Tor browser, so I had to scroll a bit to find where to change this. If I add a new address after adjusting the mixing time, everything resets again. The same happens when I remove an address. I can imagine this is annoying if a user sets many different receiving addresses.
I choose "Instantly", so I can complete my review tonight.

Maximum amount
Quoting the site:
Your SEO guys should also man up and get rid of Google in the source code

Although it's true that there are other mixers that use Cloudflare, great mixers don't use it. Taking privacy to the absolute maximum achievable level is how a mixer can show they care about privacy.

This my insights/review in the page, assuming that I am very satisfied to the security and algorithm of this mixing website, I will put some points in other areas:

1. The first thing that I'd notice is the UI, it is actually a bit similar to a mixing website as well.
solution: You change your them in a different way, and create some unique palette.

2. Other coin should not be posted if it is not yet working.
solution: Just put the word  "soon" is enough, do not put the image on it, if the other option is not yet done, I think people will continuously ask you that question on when will you put that.

3. I don't know if you will put your contacts there, or just because it is only a preview?
suggestion: if you will going to put the contacts on it then I think it would be good, just a little glimpse like if you are in LA, Europe or what. I just want to know where does the company is based.

4. The design is quite dull for me I guess? no offense. Put some real-time clock as well, since time is very important in mixing.
suggestion: put some animation when you will click the buttons/options.

5. Make a company tagline , it will help the people know your difference in other companies in a phrase only. Make sure it will be a good one, because remember, first impression will last. Also , make some official accounts as well, and put it in the contacts.

This is about my review in the UI, and nothing else.

Oh well, our GTM is ultra important because our SEO guys can not live without it.
You can avoid this by using the TOR mirror of the site. We did research and many other sites are also using this.

The issue here is not the cretificate, it is the ease of putting load on our service through clearnet. We're present on tor network and you are advised to use it when accessing the service with highest privacy in mind. We're exploring the possibilities of making the service available without CloudFlare (or other public content delivery network), but since this takes time, for now we find it sufficient to offer tor alternative. I'm not pointing fingers here, but please note many other mixers also use CloudFlare or other doubtful provider for their clearnet service.

The CloudFlare is set to support old TLS standards, on our end we accept 1.2 and 1.3 only. We'll consider disabling these on CloudFlare too.

We're going to investigate these options, though I can not guarantee either will be implemented due to the nature of our service.

We're going to investigate and put approperiate headers in place

Our robots.txt is generic, there's absolutelly no restricted content on MyCryptoMixer.com website

We opted in to use V2 address as our default address for recognizability. We'll consider adding v3 address in the future.

This is no longer a recommended practice. No other mixers are using it.

Last time I checked we didn't offer sending SMS, making phone calls nor push notifications. Our contact options are restricted to contact form, email and bitcointalk topics.

As with the previous point. we do not have a big help center nor ticketing system. Our blog has no connection with the rest of the site.

Sending to native segwit addresses (P2WPKH) is still not supported by many wallets out there, we had to opt for P2WPKH-in-P2SH for the best support across available wallets and services.

We are considering opening an API for advanced users in the future. We are also working on a visuals stripped no js version of the service which will work on TOR strict security mode.

Setting precise value is not advised. Using random values is highly encouraged.

Unfortunately you have to send us your LoG in this case. It is not possible to get around this without compromising security.

Really appreciate the feedback Mocacinno. Please message me your bitcoin address so you can start testing the mixing process!

First, everything was smooth and easy for me and I doubt the new users will overthink about the process. I have tested the new service with sending the minimum required amount for mixing and I am impressed with the quality of the service. Instead of the BTC mixing, I strongly prefer to mix the Ethereum but this choice has been frozen due to unknown reasons.


For the header titles on the first page, I suggest to change the lines and use the better ones. Not untrackable, maybe untraceable and using more tempting motivational letters

There is only one way to contact and ask the questions which have not been answered in the help or FAQ section. Adding a Telegram, Twitter and other well-known social media sites will increase the awareness for the mixing services including Mycryptomixer.

There is no mixing calculator which can be useful for calculating the concrete input and output BTC amounts. Using the calculator will help the user to find the precise amount for mixing, I hope you will add this feature too in the future.

Letter of Guarantee and the visualization of the mixing process were prepared well and I didn't feel bad about the lack of any feature. After sending the BTC, the system shows it "unconfirmed input" and after first network confirmation, the output has sent to the stated BTC address instantly. Overall, as I said in the beginning, I am impressed and will continue to use the Mycryptomixer.

I just received the mixed coins and read all the above reviews. I'll try to avoid repeating what have already been  said and will focus on things which I believe should be improved.

• The first thing I noticed is that setting a precise value using "Funds distribution" and "Transfer delay" sliders is very hard. It gets harder whenever you add a new receiving address.
• You provide an order_id for each mixing operation but I can't find how to use it. Where to enter it in order to restore my session and check its status?
• JS, CloudFlare and all google's services aren't suitable for mixers. You should use more privacy-oriented alternatives
• According to your FAQ, the mixing order is vald for 24 hours only. What will happen if the depositing transaction doesn't confirm within those 24 hours
• There is nowhere where you explain how your mixer works so we can judge how reliable it is and to what degree it can be resistant to chain analysis

Other than that, everything went smoothly. I received the mixed coins exactly as I was expecting and have to say that the process was not complicated and didn't require any technical knowledge however transactions fees are a little bit too high.

I am received 0.0031 BTC from MyCryptoMixer to test his service. So here is how it's going

I agree with some previous feedback, you can't have google tag script or any analytics on your mix service.

First, about website interface. The design looks simple and easy to use, I don't think it will be difficult for a beginner to cope. Everything that happened during the transaction was clear to me. Nevertheless, I think some explanation would be desirable about: what is "Order ID" or "MyMixerCode"? Also, you need to give your user info what is important to know about mixing transaction if something goes wrong (it is useful for bitcoin mixing novice). Just edit FAQ.

the transaction process itself goes by the usual method. I sent 0.003 BTC, with 1-hour transfer delay and 1.5% service fee. Received exactly 0.00270500 BTC to the destination address, (first confirmation) after 1 hour and 5 minutes. There was a little delay, not sure why. the initial transaction was regularly confirmed.
So, I sent 0.003 (+ 0.0001 tx fee). Mixing service cost me 0.000295 (flat fee + 1.5% for mixing service). In this case, it is more than 10% (+ 0.0001 tx fee) which is a little tricky because I set service fee to 1.5%.
There is an option to send mixed coins to 5 different addresses where you can set transaction time for each address. Now I'm sorry I didn't try it, I hope some of the other testers will try it.

I did not see any technical problem during the transaction, but some things need to be implemented here.
- Service fee can be from 0.5-5%. It is a user decision, I guess 0.5% is acceptable as low fee service. I suggest changing to have a slider for a fee, something like the slider on transfer delay. rather than the form-input field.
- Also, in this case, the calculator where the user can see how much BTC they can expect on the destination address. (as far as I understand you have this in your plan)
- You have an additional flat fee of 0.25 mBTC per each destination address which is not clearly highlighted on mixing page, though it changes significantly mixing costs, especially in small transactions.
- "MyMixerCode" is a random generic string, so if I want to use them again, I need to remember them or write it somewhere... It is unnecessary to complicate, why not let the user type in a phrase on their own which he will remember.
- if you delete all logs 24 hours after successful mixing, where you keep user mixer code and details related to this code?
- Don't call them "MyMixerCode" and in another place "MyCryptoCode". it confuses.
- Maybe it can be added some more features what happens to the transaction, time remaining ... We have only this: https://ibb.co/gWVYTvD
- There is no live support! I think it is important. support only via email sound very slow and unreliable. Who would like to wait for a reply to the email to know "where is his money"

Disclaimer 0: this is a work-in-progress.... It'll be updated soon

Disclaimer 1: i only read the posts by the owner of the mixer, i did not read the posts of other testers in order not to be influenced.
   
Disclaimer 2: I have not actually used your mixer, i'll only test it out with my own funds AFTER i get the confirmation i'll be getting payed. I'm not going to throw my own money at this project, and lose mixing and miner's fees, if i'm not 100% sure i'll be getting refunded. If i get a confirmation of payment, i'll test out the mixer and update this review EDIT: received some testing funds and actually ran a mixing session

Disclaimer 3: i'm holding you to a higher standard than i hold myself... You are delivering a mixing service, you should be helt to the highest standards.

Disclaimer 4: there are many things i like... But i think you'll have more added value from the topics that need improvement

Security
There are several remarks i'd like to have fixed if i would ever have to consider using the mixer:

• You use cloudflare's SSL... Cloudflare acts as a MITM... They DECRYPT every package between the browser and their servers, then POTENTIALLY re-encrypt this data using your server's ssl cert. Cloudflare is a US based company, if a 3 letter agency requests data, they'll give all unencrypted data (no doubt in my mind). The sollution is as easy as ditching them and moving to a letsencrypt x3 certificate... They even have a certbot to make life easy for you
• You are not enforcing HSTS
• You are loading external javascript from googletagmanager.com, they'll be able to inject js on your page, and they'll be able to track your visitors. Google is a US based company... Same as cloudflare
• You are loading external javascript from google-analytics.com, they'll be able to inject js on your page, and they'll be able to track your visitors. Google is a US based company... Same as cloudflare
• You are not enabling DNSSEC
• HPKP is not enabled
• Your domain does not have clientUpdateProhibited set
• Your CSP header is not set
• X-Content-Type-Options header was not set
• XFO header was not set
• X-XSS-Protection header was not set
• X-Frame-Options header was not set
• You have a robots.txt file set, this is often used to crawl your site and find vulnerable scripts
• Referrer-Policy header was not set
• Feature-Policy header was not set
• Your server support TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1., miminum is 1.2
• mymixerxtukle6mo.onion is a V2 address... It's as easy as setting HiddenServiceVersion 3 in your torrc. You can even run V2 next to V3 if you really want
• Access-Control-Allow-Origin header was not set
• Public-Key-Pins header was not set
• Public-Key-Pins-Report-Only header was not set
• What's with all these methods to either contact you or get push notifications... You're a mixer, don't offer to send sms's or phone calls, don't have so many contact options...Your presence on bitcointalk and an email address suffices EDIT: misclicked... I was looking at the wrong tab when i wrote this
• Limit your attack vectors... Why would you run a blog on the same tld? Why such a big help center? The more scripting, the more potential attack vectors. If you want a blog and a ticketing system: fine... Rent two extra dedicated servers from a different provider, add an a-record for blog.mycryptomixer.com and for tickets.mycryptomixer.com, link to these subdomains instead of your main domain. If your blog contains a vulerability, the hackers will only learn info about those visitors that visited your blog... If there is a sql injection, they only mess up your blog's db, if they succeed in elevating permissions they now have access to a completely isolated server running only your blog...

Design

• Don't use any techology that won't work on Lynx or w3m... To start: no javascript... Not all browsers support this, and (as noted above) you'll be tempted to link to external librarys
• I'm not a fan of scrolling... Your main page fills several screens, it contains starting mixing sessions, but also a salespitch, a faq, a bigger-than-need to be header and footer
• I get you can change the service fee between 0.5 and 5%, but why is it always set to high >4% by default? I'd either chose a lower range (1-2%) or set no default and let the user chose by himself
• Why wouldn't you go with a native segwit wallet? It makes you likeable in the community... Don't overload the first mb of those blocks if it's not necessary

Workflow/Usability

• I'd like a bit more emphasis on the button to start a mixing session... I mean, it's a big button with the bitcoin symbol on it, but it might not be 100% clear that this button starts a mixing session
• the slider for the time delay and the div where the time delay is actually shown are seperated by the button to add new addresses. This makes it a bit confusing
• I've verified the letter of guarntee, and it checks out (i realise i'm invalidating my own mixing session this way, since an exact timestamp is shown, but i used funds that could be tied to me anyways, and a lot of people know i speak dutch... So whatever) However, i'd like to have a message signed with an address. I already have my wallet open to send the to-be-mixed funds, so it's just easyer to verify a signed message using my already open wallet
• For me, it's clear what the order ID and mycryptocode means, but for others this might be confusing
• It's nice to push updates, however, i'd still urge you not to use technology that's not supported on all browsers... Maybe you can have a "simple" version where the user will need to refresh his order-page manually but where you cut out all non-essential code next to a "full featured" version where you use ajax, jquery,... Whatever floats your boat?
• The 0.25 mBtc fee per address was a bit harder to find... I chose a fee between 0.5 and 0.75 and mixed between 0.004 and 0.01, and ended up paying >5%. I know why these funds are asked, but some newbie might not know about fees, so he might feel scammed if you don't make it more obvious that on top of the 0.5-5%, the user is going to have to pay the miner's fee aswell...

Taint analysis
It's really hard to do a real taint analysis without using specialised algo's and parsing the whole blockchain and putting it in a relational database... However, i did do some manual checks (following the inputs/outputs chain) and without going in depth, everything seemed fine to me

I don't want to get paid, please don't send me anything.

I just want to point out that your design makes me think of several other mixers, but that could just be a coincidence.

Just like those several other mixers, you also use Cloudflare on your clearnet address (bad practice!)
https://who.is/whois/mycryptomixer.com


That's not even the worst thing: You also embedded a google TAG MANAGER.
You basically let google track everything on your site. That's terrible. I don't see how you can tell you offer privacy when you have such intrusive tracking/analytical tools embedded on your site.

Unless i'm missing something, how exactly is this "Bringing privacy back to the users"

(Even for people who disabled javascript you added a GTM tag. That's just.. lol)

My 2 cents quick and dirty:

Before I start, the website and its contents remind me a lot of smartmixer, seriously... - I hope there is no affiliation... Its quite strange though that there are so many similarities when it comes to layout, contents, wording, "ETH soon" etc. - some titles are even exactly the same... Even if you are not affiliated - why would you "copy" from a service provider who rightfully earned himself a bad reputation?

Well, now lets get right into the mixing part. The service is easy to use and even newbies shouldnt face any problems when trying to mix coins for the first time. The website has a simple layout and is very clean - I like that. The necessary steps are explained well enough and I didnt face the slightest problem. The mixing worked fine and I have already received the mixed coins. As someone mentioned earlier, I would like you to be a little bit more transparent when it comes to fees - please present that information also on the respective pages and not just on homepage. Other than that, not much more I can say for now. Your service did exactly what it is supposed to do - mixing coins. No need to be a rocket scientist in order to use your service and thats cool.

I see the other guys are already analyzing your service "technically" - lets see what comes out of that.

I support that cause a mixing company thats up to the task ought to work in almost every angle because the purpose of using their services to keep ones fund save and clean.
I would have love to join the reviewer of the company but i have limited time to spend online these days and i dont like doing things half way.

Well you are right I just disabled the JS on chrome and the site is just showing me the blank page.

So that means they are going against their own reccomendations on their "Step-by-step guide on how to mix your coins" article?

It's because they use JavaScript. Even if you visit the clearnet link and disable JavaScript from your browser settings, you will get a blank page (Your Tor settings are probably set to disable JS).

---

will add my review later when I receive the mixed coins

Correct. In my opinion a mixer should work in that setting.

Standard.

One more thing the source code won't get changed, It is the same for all levels of securities nothing gets changed. You probably not seeing anything because your security setting is set at a safer/safest level.

It automatically disables javascript, images, fonts, etc.

So set your tor to standard and then it will work perfectly I believe.

Regards

Is this offer still open? If so, i'd like to review your mixer aswell... I'm always interested in new mixers entering the market

This is my review :
Honestly here I am a new user in Bitcoin Mixer

Website display

- Look simple
- Easy to access, even though the connection is a bit poor
- Save data and I do not find that annoying like advertisements on the website display

In the case of a transaction

Honestly at this time I have not done any transactions in the bitcoin mixer, that's why I only saw a simple one

Feature addition
- Adding local languages in each country, this will make it easier for users and will be faster in understanding users who do not really understand in English.

Note: the review that I gave is quite simple and I'm talking improperly from what I see from the bitcoin mixer

How are your Tor security settings? I used Tor on my desktop.

That is a nice thing to do, but openly stating that you are helping people break the law is.... risky to say the least....


I've just re-read the sentence and I think I've now really understood the meaning... You meant that the LoG can only be downloaded during the active mixing, rather than it losing all of its value afterwards... My bad, sorry about that

Updating the first post now that I've received the first payment.....


A bitcointalk official thread could sort this out while still being anonymous enough I think, not sure why LoyceV said using Twitter for announcements was a bad idea, Facebook is quite obvious....

Working fine here. It has all the functionalities and complete pages. You should try it again, Are you using tor on mobile?

I thought it was obvious: I got an empty page, and I didn't lower my Tor Security Level to see if that changes anyting.

Thank you for your response, master. That's why I said "IMO" (in my opinion), it means just in my point of view. If it seems non-sense or not suitable to apply, that's fine to ignore it. AFAIK, we have the right to deliver an opinion, right?

kawetsriyanto, is there a mixing service that made their team public? It is ironic to offer a service that makes cryptocurrency transaction private while having their identity publicly available. That also puts them at risk of getting arrested and their services shutdown so easily.

So, what is your impression on them at least on tor level? Do they check all your security measurements or not? You are too technical but a personal conclusions is actually what I look for from established members (might be more people here without familiar on tor/onion etc.).

Sadly missed it . I think at the beginning users will not take risk since you are very new on the forum. So it would be nice if you send upfront for honest reviews. Suddenly you can't gain trust from here especially forum users are familiar with such as mixer and many of them turned into scam.

Anyway feel free ask btc addy if you have changed your mind. Will try for honest review from my end. Best of luck.

That's a terrible idea for privacy.

http://mymixerxtukle6mo.onion/ shows an empty page, with only a title. The page source shows this:
I think I'm using the default Tor Security Level.

I sent 0.003 BTC with 1.5% fee  and the interface is simple and user friendly,  fast processing and just like any other mixers out there probably trusted.


No facebook page, telegram and twitter for updates?

I notice that you dont have a referral program, will you add it to its feature?

Sent  my Order ID.

Thank you!

Edit: Reward received.

Okay, here is my review.

Site perfomance:
- Design everything looks simple, clean and very user friendly.
- I tried to test the website in many devices and it works very responsive.
- Fast and stable connection.

Suggestion: Add other languages (Optional).

Features:
- I like the idea that you're using JS that keep things like when the incoming transaction arrive and outgoing transaction is sent without the need to refresh the page everytime.

Mixing
Advantage:
- Like I said the "live updating". Page update itself after the incoming transaction have been broadcast into the blockchain.
- Implementing the idea of mixing an ETH.
- Can add up to 5 address.

Disadvantage:
- I've set the delay for 2 hours, 1 receiving address and set the service fee by the 4.74%. The fee calculator seem a bit become misleading if you don't look at the homepage and read the "flat fee" that you additional substract 0.25 mBTC for the miners fee.

Might as well note the 0.25 mBTC miners fee in the "?" description of Service Fee.


That said, the mixing goes everything smooth.

I don't see your team information and your official channels on the site? Don't you plan to show your team members to the public? Or from the beginning, you plan it anonymously. Anyway, I think it will be useful if you have own community to share your updates and get feedback from the community itself. You can consider an official telegram group, discords, or other else. IMO

Here, 4th reply in this thread

"First 50 users are eligible for reward of 0.002 BTC!"

But where does it say only the first 13 will receive the funds first so they review it?

Maybe put in th OP?

Correct,

Terms of participation

- Your account rank must be “Full member” or higher!
- You can’t participate if your account has negative trust
- Your review needs to be constructive and have at least 250 characters

Rewards

- First 50 users are eligible for reward of 0.002 BTC!
- Only 1 reward for each unique user!
- After all reviews have been posted our team will choose the best one which is eligible for 0.01 BTC reward!

How to start?

- Hop on https://MyCryptoMixer.com
- Test our BTC Mixer
- Post your review and help us improve!
- Message us on Bitcointalk with your Order ID and BTC Address to receive reward!
- After receiving reward edit your post here and confirm it!

Reserved

What does that mean? Do you mean that people need to mix with their own funds first or something like this?

If not: 1NinjabXd5znM5zgTcmxDVzH4w3nbaY16L

We strive to avoid political discussion but in this case we will comment that privacy and freedom are basic human rights.

---

This is part of the task... now try to find them after the testers have mixed

---

The Letter of Guarantee is signed via PGP and we delete it from our server after a successful mix. We don't need to have it on our server as we only need to verify the PGP signature to be sure that it's real.
In case a problem arises:
1. You post the LoG publicly and all users can see that it was signed by us
2. You can track the bitcoin addresses in there and see if the coins arrived
The LoG obliges us to send coins to selected outputs when you input coins. If we do not comply You can show it to the community and end our reputation.

---

Technical details about MyCryptoCode

While MyCryptoCode associates your inputs together, we use one way hash function bcrypt, industry standard for hashing passwords, to store the connection. Once a new order is created, we compare provided MyCryptoCode against all stored hashes to determine which inputs can be used. What this means, is that we can only determine the connection knowing the MyCryptoCode in the first place.

For technical reasons we had to use reasonably low cost parameter for bcrypt function, it is still very unlikely someone would be able to brute force enough of the associated codes to make any connections in sensible time with current technology.

---

Our current changelog
Mixing calculator
Create an detailed explanatory video and dedicated page on how the mixing process works
There was a small text mistake with MyCryptoCode / MyMixerCode - It’s the same thing
Note about transaction fees added to every address on Creating mix screen

Later on
More precise, manual input for delay and percentage distribution

Can I join? I can review your platform too  
Here's my BTC add if you decided to add me to the list: 1HJx172Qbv8C67gU3vmfWqtbQvJSB9bVfx

Here's my past work regarding reviewing other platform:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53316016

Here is my review:

Design is smooth, light with easy navigation and very mobile friendly which is an A for me.

I opted for the coins to sent out to 2 addresses, I reduced the transaction fee a bit to enable the first outgoing transaction time be due before the first confirmation, It didn't the work as the transaction got confirmed earlier than I expected.
The process was straight forward and should easily be understood by anyone using your service for the first time. However, after filling all the necessary details and advanced to next page it there was nothing showing about the time interval I had selected except if I when I had to refer to the letter of guarantee.

My suggestions:

• A detailed video tutorial explaining the whole mixing process should be added.
  
• As I mentioned in my earlier post, let users be aware of the risks attached using MyCryptoCode feature.
  
• On the mixing page a time (preferably a count down) about when the each out outgoing transaction would be broadcasted should be added.
  

I just got my first output transaction, second one should be in about 6 hours.

I have already received the funds, so I'm going to start with the basics of the site, and once the mixing process gets finished, I'll add that to this post.

---

---

First impresion
The site has a fresh, intuitive and user friendly interface, pretty easy to navigate and with some FAQs.

The mixer
When you click on "Mix BTC", you get another intuitive page. You can add up to 5 different addresses, you can use the slidebars to change the % of the coins going to each wallet and the time delay. You can also set the service fee, which the site suggest to leave on irregular amounts to help decrease traceability, and the "Cryptocode".

Once everything is set up, you get to the next step, a dashboard-kind page where you can download the letter of guarantee, see the address you have to send the coins to, the order ID, the MixerCode, and a space where your incoming transaction will be displayed along with the outgoing ones.

Things I noticed so far

- There is no kind of "warning" message about the "feePerAddress" on the mixing page itself. A user that jumps straight into mixing without reading the FAQ might get surprised if s/he receives less coins than the ones s/he is expecting to receive back. It's not really a big deal, but small details make the difference

- When you are setting up the mixing you can choose to enter a Cryptocode, which later on is called MixerCode. Changing the name of the things from one step to the next is not something I'd do

- As some other users have pointed out, logs are said to be deleted 24 hours after the mixing. Nevertheless, you can enter the MixerCode that you get on the first mixing you do to prevent your previous coins from coming back to you. That means that some kind of log is kept. It may not keep the personal information, but saying all logs are deleted and then keeping some is rather deceiving. Following with this, if every time you use a MixerCode on a new transaction, you get a new code (this would be the 2nd code, on the 3rd mixing), said code will contain the information on the last mixing, but also the information of the first one; in the end, you are creating a chain that makes traceability much easier. So this thing you say on the FAQ, is definately not true


- I was curious enough to check the address you sent the testing coins from, I've been able to get the addresses of so far 5 tester. It's not really realted to the review itself, but may leave the door open to some privacy concerns about a mixing not mixing their coins.... (or maybe it's just me being paranoid)

- The slidebars for time delay and percentage are okay, but some users may want to input the values in a more accurate way (with a keyboard/keypad, for example)

What did I do while the coins got mixed?
Well, I've received some test coins, I've sent them and now I have to wait to get them back... during that time, I've decided to check the whole rest of the site, even if it is not related to the mixing process itself. I first went to check the help center, should I have a situation that requires help.

The help center is something rather basic. You can read the same 10 questions that the landing page has, some links to articles of the blog of the site and of course, a link to the contact form.

Next thing I checked, the blog. The site is rather new, so I wasn't expecting much content, and that's exactly what I found. 4 very generic articles about why people should mix bitcoins/privacy. Some typos and grammar mistakes, which again are no big deal, but small details count. There's a tutorial on how to use the service in one of the articles, a place where rather few people would search for it, and a strange asterisc with no further explanation about it


Apart from that, apart from being generic, the 4 articles talk about pretty much the same. It did strike me that there is no single reference to manual mixing of the coins; considering it's a blog article talking about what bitcoin mixing is.

There are a couple other disturbing points on the blog, but this one in which you actively state that you are helping people evade the law is the most disturbing one...


Saying that someone uses and benefits from your service on a monthly basis, when the feature you are refering to is currently not available can be catalogued as lying, which is not the gratest idea on a new site....


Apart from that, I checked the PGP public key, but there's not much that can be done only watching it

Some more notes

Reading the following on the Letter of Guarantee some questions arose


I understand you can make some mistakes that should be corrected before the mixing ends; I can think of people putting a wrong output address.... and not many more things (which I'm sure there are).

But the real question here is: if the letter of guarantee is only valid during mixing, and after mixing "all" logs are destroyed, what would happen in the event of someone not receiving the coins because of a mistake on the sites end? Or any similar incident that could not be foreseen until after the mixing takes place.

---

---

Opinion so far
There is room for improvement; it looks like a promising mixing service, but pretty much like any new mixing service you may find. Tomorrow, when I receive the coins I've sent, I'll end this post.

It will also be good to read the review of the more tech savy users.

---

---

Edit 1, first payment received: I sent the coins at 03:37AM and received them back at 09:22. I had set a delay of 337 minutes, so the coins arrived a bit after what I expected, not a big deal.

The mixng dashboard updated once it received the amount to be mixed, and as I had set 2 outputs, it did the math and it clearly shows how much coins wach address is receiving. It took me some time to figure out how this was calculated, because I was expecting lower amounts due to the 0.25mBTC fee, but I think I got it right

I did some trials and amounts did vary depending on whether the flat fee was applied after or before the service fee.

Will update once I get the second one


Second transaction received right on time

Correct, It will ensure You won't receive coins from neither A nor B in future mixes.

While MyCryptoCode associates your inputs together, we use one way hash function bcrypt, industry standard for hashing passwords, to store the connection. Once a new order is created, we compare provided MyCryptoCode against all stored hashes to determine which inputs can be used. What this means, is that we can only determine the connection knowing the MyCryptoCode in the first place.

For technical reasons we had to use reasonably low cost parameter for bcrypt function, it is still very unlikely someone would be able to brute force enough of the associated codes to make any connections in sensible time with current technology.
We have now ended the campaign for reputable members with coins sent upfront.

We have sent coins to:
@efialtis
@Harkorede
@Danslip
@Dalmar
@mrdeposit
@seleme
@PuertoLibre
@khaled0111
@Csmiami
@Xardasim
@STT
@Continuous
@asu
Looking forward to hearing the reviews!

From now on only the regular review terms will work

I was going to make mention of the same thing as @Khaled just did, I was actually saving it for my review.

Correct me if I'm wrong, I'm still not getting a total hang of this feature, so let's say I mixed a coin sent from Address A, and
MyCryptoCode is CodeA, and after a while I mixed another coin sent from Address B and using the MyCryptoCode A. will my CryptoCode A now ensure I don't receive coins from either address A and/or B when next I decide to mix ? Hence associating coins A and B together and so on.


I suggest you include this in the explanations of how the "MyCryptoCode" works, some would prefer to opt for the best anonymous measures available.

I'll do the review, I've used a few different services in the past and even done a review for a few sites.  I'll send the BTC address by PM in a minute.    I need to move some money this week anyhow, whats the time scale required for the testing and review ideally ?


Will update this post to confirm receipt and when proceeding with testing and then the review.

edit:
received with thanks, will test with funds.

Please send another address in a private message.


We have set the minimum amount at 0.003. Reason is that it's just not good economically with around 0.25mBTC fee per address to mix less than that.
Splitting Your order into 5 outputs will kill you with on-chain fees.

Please message me your address and let's get mixing


The "MyCryptoCode" is a random, unique identifier, we associate with the coins you send us. We do not associate the code with transactions you receive from us, so even if you were to use it, the trace is lost the moment your coins enter our mixer.

While MyCryptoCode associates your inputs together, we use one way hash function bcrypt, industry standard for hashing passwords, to store the connection. Once a new order is created, we compare provided MyCryptoCode against all stored hashes to determine which inputs can be used. What this means, is that we can only determine the connection knowing the MyCryptoCode in the first place.

For technical reasons we had to use reasonably low cost parameter for bcrypt function, it is still very unlikely someone would be able to brute force enough of the associated codes to make any connections in sensible time with current technology.

Please send us your BTC address

In your website, you claim that you remove all logs after the mixing process is completed.
However, the "MyCryptoCode” utility, according to your website again, is to prevent sending the user his own coins in later transactions/mixing. Doesn't that mean you save all deposit transaction inputs in your databases and link them to the user's id/MyCryptoCode!?
Am I missing something?


By the way, am interested in testing your mixer and leave an honnest review.

Here you go! 1FmXgj3nqZjq6R6S3KGprum6anHYpFdZPa

I may publish it tomorrow, since it's already late and I want to try the delayed times I've already seen you have

I'm willing to try this mixer. Why not, everyone deserves a chance. this would be a very cheap way of trying to scam and I don't think that's the case here.
is there any requirement here for the minimum mixing amount? Is it okay to mix "only" 0.002 BTC?

We were thinking to go Senior member and up, but send me Your BTC address and we'll do it.

The fact that You are wearing a Blender.io avatar and signature doesn't make it sound objectively at all.

Exactly

We have already sent out the first BTC for testing to @efialtis @Harkorede @Danslip @Dalmar

You never know, and in my opinion it's better to have enough options with these types of services in as much as their long-term goal is to provide better security and remain in service, we've had multiple long-existing bitcoin mixers either getting seized by some Agencies or Exit scamming, which led to some thinking mixing might eventually go extinct.

I have some experience with mixer, so if funds are provided by the mixer, I'd have no trouble doing some testing. Altough, you'll have to keep in mind that I'm not an IT guy, so my review wouldn't be focused on the technical aspects of the mixer

I respect the fact you guys are doing the best to make your service popular but i dont see any reason why myself and others will leave long-existing bitcoin tumbler like Blender.io that offer service fee from 0.5% to 2.5% and make use of a mixer company created last year and offer see ice fee of 0.5% to 5%.
But for the review i also recommended loyce and Darkstar


If the trust member of the forum wanted to do the review, i dont see any reason an escrow have to be involve cause trust member will wang to paint his account red because of 0.003BTC.

With the most recent BTC mixer scam, I don't think you'll get many people willing to send funds to your mixer just to get a few bucks.

Good to see you really seem to be interested in actual reviews of reputable members. Lets see if some of our "experts" such as @DarkStar_, @DireWolfM14, @LoyceV will help.

Edit: Oh Loyce just posted before I finished my post.

I'd like to take this offer, i will PM you an addy from my main account LoyceV tomorrow.
You can expect a honest review, good or bad.

Yes, I personally cannot provide a review, and I cannot risk and try to serve you, you must search for reputable members and help you!!!

Our service is based on trust and we believe the same should happen on happen on Bitcointalk. As far as a couple points could be just some people not liking your thing, more than that just doesn't put you in a good light.


That's a fair point. Thanks for the suggestion as we are pretty new on Bitcointalk and are always looking to improve.

On top of the 50 rewards we will also provide additional 10 reputable forum users with 0.003 BTC for testing - sent by us upfront.
Please message me your bitcoin address if You would like to take part @efialtis @Harkorede

This has happened before, and I can assure that no experienced member will risk their BTC to try out the platform, If OP indeed needs honest reviews from reputable users, he would have to send them the rewards first or at least make use of an escrow.

None of the experienced members around will go ahead and „risk“ their funds - even if it’s not a lot - in order to do this. You may reconsider, choose trusted members and send them the „bounty“ upfront so they can test and review. That’s just my two cents though.

Negative trust members are not allowed. They can have a lot of experience and can give honest reviews if they are using this kind of service and have worked before.

Need to know a specific reason, I think I can give a good review, worked with a lot of mixing sites before but still cannot review here.

Regards

Ladies and gentlemen,
Recently we have started our cryptocurrency mixing service - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54089921
Our website - https://MyCryptoMixer.com, also available on TOR - http://mymixerxtukle6mo.onion/
We are here to bring privacy back to all cryptocurrency users by making coins mixing as easy as possible!

To get some more opinions we have launched a Review Program to reward every user that gives us a review of the service!

Terms of participation

- Your account rank must be “Full member” or higher!
- You can’t participate if your account has negative trust
- Your review needs to be constructive and have at least 250 characters

Rewards

- First 50 users are eligible for reward of 0.002 BTC!
- Only 1 reward for each unique user!
- After all reviews have been posted our team will choose the best one which is eligible for 0.01 BTC reward!

How to start?

- Hop on https://MyCryptoMixer.com
- Test our BTC Mixer
- Post your review and help us improve!
- Message us on Bitcointalk with your Order ID and BTC Address to receive reward!
- After receiving reward edit your post here and confirm it!

We are keen on hearing all of your reviews so we can improve our service!
Best regards,
MyCryptoMixer

---