The origin of Bitcoin was definitely born in the anti-establishment and anti-banking sector of the community, but has since progressed to
something much bigger. Yes, the revolutionary views are still strong in a huge part of it's users, but without government support it will
end up in the hands of the revolutionary only. We need to pull all resources and people together to make this work.. not just the small
group of revolutionary people who started this.
something much bigger. Yes, the revolutionary views are still strong in a huge part of it's users, but without government support it will
end up in the hands of the revolutionary only. We need to pull all resources and people together to make this work.. not just the small
group of revolutionary people who started this.
That is a interesting statement because to me that falls in line with people that are not reflecting the values of anti establishment.
Meaning the masses are more inclined to endorse the idea because they are wanting to profit off it,rather than take the system down.
It seems to me to be counter productive to want to spread bitcoin by bending over for government,would be interested in what you are driving at if you are putting yourself in the early day thinking,well wanting government interaction to take it to the next level.
For me those two things are opposing but I am open to new ideas.
