I'm wondering if the Lightning network is effectively dead on arrival. Nobody is going to fund their transactions on Lightning if it costs $20-40 to put $100 into a hub....
There is no reason why the lighting network should be dead on arrival
When lightning comes into play there won't be such high transaction fees... At least not after it all settled down.
Transactions are still being sent.. even with a fee of 20-40$. No reason why 'the first' user of lighting network wouldn't pay such a fee.
And if the adoption works fairly well the fees 'on the lighting network' will be very low. Transactions on the main chain will still be higher than in
payment channels, but they will definitely go down.
I'm not saying that the concept and algorithm of BTH or BTG or whatever is the perfect solution...
BTG is a scam. I think this should be clear to everyone.
BCH is just a short-term solution. Doubling block size is basically just retarded. Thats the way my grandma would address the problem.
You can't just double the block size everytime the fees are going to rise. This won't work and will lead to
extreme centralization.
BCH is currently handling a small small fraction of the transaction on the BTC. Noone knows how the BCH network will react to nearly full blocks.
Segwit is way more than enough short-term solution. But if people aren't ready to use segwit, there will be no improvement of the TX/s rate.
People shouln't really complain about the transaction fees without
at least trying to use segwit addresses.