Author

Topic: rjbrande copy/pasting a lot of posts (Read 569 times)

legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
March 02, 2017, 02:01:37 PM
#5
If the user doesn't have a signature, there is a chance that he could be permanently banned (like this one).
You should check this thread for bans from Jan 2017 onwards and save yourself the effort of investigating deeper.

I'm using signature ad block and saw the byteball avatar so I didn't bother checking to see if he had the signature or not. Thanks for the tip though!
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1064
March 02, 2017, 11:26:24 AM
#4
If the user doesn't have a signature, there is a chance that he could be permanently banned (like this one).
You should check this thread for bans from Jan 2017 onwards and save yourself the effort of investigating deeper.
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
March 02, 2017, 10:50:38 AM
#3
He was already caught and banned the other day.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
March 02, 2017, 10:29:16 AM
#2
Yeah, the account is definitely ban worthy. It seems like the traditional spammer/farmed account. However, I couldn't find it with a simple search on rizzarolla's list: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1597201.0;all

It's quite possible that there is more behind that one.
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
March 02, 2017, 10:02:10 AM
#1
User rjbrande is copying many of his recent posts, and should be banned. He posted this unrelated and obvious copy/pasted post in adaseb's vanity generation service thread, so I took a deeper look:

Vanitygen is a command-line vanity bitcoin address generator. If you're tired of the random, cryptic addresses generated by regular bitcoin clients, you can use vanitygen to create a more personalized address.
The example below illustrates a session of vanitygen. It is typical, and takes about 10 sec to finish, using a Core 2 Duo E6600 CPU on x86-64 Linux:

$ ./vanitygen 1Boat
Difficulty: 4476342
Pattern: 1Boat                                                                 
Address: 1BoatSLRHtKNngkdXEeobR76b53LETtpyT
Privkey: 5J4XJRyLVgzbXEgh8VNi4qovLzxRftzMd8a18KkdXv4EqAwX3tS

(archive) is a copy/paste mix of the vanitygen thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/vanitygen-vanity-bitcoin-address-generatorminer-v022-25804
The example 1Boat is the exact same.

Final Conclusion

PPC Ad Media network works well for all types of sites, small or big. The revenue depend on the site niche, quality of site, traffic and visitor location. The publishers who have tried this ad network can share their experiences below.

(archive) is copied off an offsite review of PPC. See the Final Conclusion part: http://www.way2earning.com/2016/12/ppc-ad-media-review/

PureVPN packs everything you need to protect your Web browsing into a single package, and just happens to have the best overall speed-test scores i've seen.
I feel my data is safe and getting set up is easy and the cost is so reasonable.

(archive) is copied from PCMag's review. 2nd line is written by himself though.

rjbrande also loves spamming the UBIQ Coin thread with copy and pastes.

(post history archive as there's quite a few)
and page 2 of post history archive

-snip-

The Ubiq chain has a more accurate targeting algorithm paired with an 88 second block time, in order to more effectively handle hash rate fluctuations.
Ubiq has developed and actively tested several fundamental upgrades over a simple clone of the Ubiq codebase.
Again UbiQuoin price rising.Now price 58 satoshi.I buy 32k UbiQuoin price 41 satoshi I sell UbiQuoin when price 60+ reached.waiting for UbiQuoin price rising.Great UbiQuoin.
Ubiq has developed and actively tested several fundamental upgrades over a simple clone of the crypto codebase.
Note for the above 2: 99% copy and paste. The original said ETH codebase.


Ubiq has additional characteristics which make it appealing to developers, miners, and traders, as we work to create a blockchain appropriate for real world usage.


and probably more, all copied from the Pre-ANN of Ubiq. I stopped looking at this point though.
Jump to: