From my new understanding from this thread I wasn't fully aware of Rollbits AML Policy, especially thise one. So Razer just sent in my money back to the old address from 1 year and 3 months ago without talking to me or confirming that it was fine to do this.
I now understand that in the company standpoint it is fair especially when a user agrees to their policies.
I understand the premise of this policy (to ensure that the company can legally prove that they rejected your business via the blockchain (deposit in, deposit sent back to same address) however there is a major flaw in it. The company
must check with the user if the address is one that is accessible or provide proof of source to be able to go to another place, so that it is legally on recordThis is a stupid process to not even confirm with the user that the address is one that is in their control, and to force them into issues with their custodial wallet provider by trying to request the funds from the same address that wasn't the user's to begin with.
In the future OP, use a non-custodial wallet like Bitcoin Core, Electrum, or Sparrow...if you haven't already learnt that lesson after the 1+ years.
In the meantime, do not give up on this. The way rollbit handled this was incorrect and you must fight to get the issue resolved ... The way you must do that is to prove and force Rollbit to admit that they did not handle this situation appropriately so that they rectify the issue.
I won’t give up for now but I don’t know if I can do much sadly. Alot of people here seem to be saying that there is no hope, so I'm not sure of what to do.
This shouldnt have happened to you OP, how can they just send such a large amount like that without confirm with you that you had access to the address ??
These days alot of people use exchanges whose addresses are not controlled by us, even if you had used your own wallet they should confirm with you first that you still have access to the wallet
Rollbit refunding you the money is great, but its irresponsible to just send it like that.
I see holydarkness has sent a PM to Razor, i hope he will rectify this
I’m quite sad about it but I have a math quiz on Thursday and an exam next week that I can’t fail. The entire rollbit thing has gotten me off track because I spent way too much time being excited to come back to Rollbit only for this whole thing to happen, causing me even more stress.
[...] went through a Google Meeting with SmokeyLisa to ensure that It was me who was verifying and then the Rollbit Team did a deep investigation on my account and my money to ensure that I wasn’t laundering any money or breaking the rules of the website
[...]
I've give your explanation a thorough reading, the above part I snipped from the rest probably explains how and why this thing happened to you. In fact, I was going to ask about it in case you didn't explain it first.
IIRC, many casinos established a rule when someone was suspected to do an AML and prove their source of income [which are not from ML activities], they can only withdraw to their deposit address, let's call it a second layer of prevention against AML.
I'm not sure if Razer will do anything about it, given the fund already went through and it's a rule of AML, but I'll send Razer a PM, see if there's anything he can do.
It must be a complicated case. The case was over a year ago and when a fund is sent from a custodial wallet then accident like this is obvious. Rollbit part can't be told as wrong but considering the time that was gone, it needed a confirmation of whether the address have the access or not.
We can learn a lesson from it though. It's better to send funds to anywhere from a noncustodial wallet rather then a third party custodial wallet. OP would access his money without any problem.
this 5 minute per post rate limit is quite annoying. Tried responding to everyone here earlier today but I wasn’t able to lol.
I honestly thought this would be a straight quick forward case it saddens me how it all ended up like this. I just hope that this situation can be fixed. Am I like at least eligible to participate in a lawsuit FTX or something at least? (even then, the lawyer fees… for just around $6K) I’m not even sure what to do anymore other than to hope that Razer fixes this situation. I worked hard to earn this money and I always thought of the KYC lock as some sort of “emergency funds” whenever I really needed it in the future, and now that I needed it I can’t do anything because of all these unfortunate events
This is a stupid process to not even confirm with the user that the address is one that is in their control, and to force them into issues with their custodial wallet provider by trying to request the funds from the same address that wasn't the user's to begin with.
Don't call that a stupid process, it's a policy and every company has a way of doing things which can save guide their own action, and beside what's most stupid is to make a direct deposit from an exchange account to another centralized account, even if it is not for such a case, some things could really be taken into consideration before taking an action, even if the FTX was still to be active and account accessible by users, their could have still be a possibility that the users wallet for sending out coin is not the same as of receiving most exchanges make use of the cold wallet for payout and other wallet for receiving the OP should have also taught about this before sending out coin from an exchange.
As others have explained above, the casino did nothing wrong by sending out the payment to address the credit to their account. For something that took time, aside from the AML verification issue, for the casino to be sure that who they are still dealing with is the owner of the account, it's right for them to return the fund back to where it was deposited, from which they believe only the right owner will have access to it.
The Op made a huge mistake by not reminding the casino about receiving addresses when the issue was getting to the resolution stage. He should have informed the person in charge of the issue to allow him to choose where he wants to be paid, but I doubt if such requests could have even been accepted.
From a company view they are right, but from a moral standpoint this is completely wrong. To literally everyone it is basically common sense to double or triple check where you are sending money to ensure it’s not lost or sent to the wrong person. Unfortunately from what I'm reading here from this thread, their policies apparently overrule this common sense rule, which although is extremely stupid, rules are still rules and when you sign up to sites you gotta agree with their stuff. Just sucks though. If they really cared about money returning safely to the owner they would’ve discussed it with me knowing it’s been over a year and not set up another prevention of AML. They are only correct from their company viewpoint, as rules are rules. Overall it’s still extremely fucked up that something like this happened, especially at a time where I needed to get money.
This is my first time ever getting into serious trouble with any gambling casino. In the past I’ve moved funds from the third party company hot wallet to Rollbit and my Exodus wallet. I really did trust them both equally and it didn’t matter to me at the time. I would’ve never expected some situation like this to happen. I didn't know when their investigation was going to end either. I asked for an update saying that I'm willing to participate in any further KYC, questions or interviews to help complete their investigation. They just ended it completely randomly returning my money to that address without talking to me or anything. I wasn't even told that I was suspended until I logged in myself, so for a moment I thought everything was fully completed. I also did not know that they used FTX either. They moved to their own private wallet or whatever way worked for their website where a third party can’t fuck them over in December 2022 Just an unfortunate serious of events that couldve been prevented in multiple different ways, if I thought about some event like this happening, or if SBF didn’t exit scam fraud people or if the company partnered using a different exchange company or if Rollbit didn’t have this extra layer of AML and discussed to me. There were so many possibilities but sadly this is we’re i’m at I got the worst one of all. My luck.
The entire time I was expecting to come back to Rollbit with my money in my Rollbit wallet after their investigation was completed and for a moment I even thought they were done (and didn’t inform me about my suspension) so I posted on their discord chat out of happiness only to log in and see that I was banned from their site with at the time with no context. Had I known that Rollbit would’ve sent it back to my depositing address I would’ve been telling them immediately the whole time. I had no clue this was going to happen and I wish that I knew the possibility of this prior.
This shouldnt have happened to you OP, how can they just send such a large amount like that without confirm with you that you had access to the address ??
These days alot of people use exchanges whose addresses are not controlled by us, even if you had used your own wallet they should confirm with you first that you still have access to the wallet
Rollbit refunding you the money is great, but its irresponsible to just send it like that.
I see holydarkness has sent a PM to Razor, i hope he will rectify this
Because... Rollbit suspected that the fund was part of AML, and after proven that it's not [it'll be held if it is], the fund will be withdrawable to the depositing address? That's part of their procedure, and Rollbit is not the only platform that apply this policy. How is it irresponsible? And I don't think they have to rectify it, they've done their part by sending the money they owed to OP.
OP, one thing that has been bugging my mind since yesterday, I guess this is the first time I heard about an account got KYC-locked, for 15 months. What is it and why?
They never directly stated that it was AML but I assume it to be based upon their questions and interviews. The interview was person specific, meaning it could only be me who knew how to login to certain accounts and etc. After, they reviewed the interview and started an investigation and asked me questions, I remember one that was like "Why did you deposit from the company to Rollbit" or something. They never told me why they started their investigation, nor the interview. But based upon the situation and what they asked I narrowed it down to because it was over a year since the KYC, so they wanted to ensure it was me and the bit of suspicion from sending from there to Rollbit, which is also understandable.
Although I was locked since July 2022, I only verified KYC recently which is why it took 15 months. I always thought one day I could return to Rollbit as soon as I KYC verified and receive my money back. I also always thought the locked money could be used as part of "emergency funds" and now is the time where I need it and I can't access it because of this horrible situation. I was doing a deal with someone for an in-game item and not realizing how stupid or risky it was at the time sent the money from the companies hot wallet address to Rollbit and then withdrew almost the same amount to the person who was using a CashApp wallet which apparently gambling casinos hate. I normally sent my money from the company's hot wallet address to my own personal Exodus wallet that I have been using for years or to Rollbit since I equally trusted them both. I understand now how suspicious that can look on Rollbits side as well as how stupid it is but Rollbit NFTs were a major factor to how I was successful online so I obviously trusted them wholeheartedly with my money. I never knew something like this would've possibly happened in the end and since I'm not a thief and I was still new to gambling sites I had no idea about how suspicious it looked at the time especially the depositing and withdrawing immediately after. Combined with their questions is why I believe that they were investigating me for money laundering or theft. At the time I remember being told by a Rollbit Staff member that even if I KYC verified the funds would've been sent to him and not reverted to my Rollbit wallet. It made no sense to me, how could Rollbit stop the transaction at Pending but not return my money? So after hearing this, I didn't even want to make any attempt to KYC verify until I received an answer stating that I could get it back. I continued asking every once in a while if theres anything that could be done as well as checking up on the Rollbit community since they were still my friends.
I thought about the situation fully and understood why they did all this extra stuff, even though they never directly stated to me about why the investigation happened or anything. They just wanted to confirm that I'm the original owner and they also wanted to confirm that it was gained legitimately and they wanted to ensure that I wasn't laundering, stealing, exchanging cryptocurrencies, etc. Since they now know I earned my money in a legitimate fashion, (which Rollbit NFTs buying and reselling were also a major starting foundation as to how I started earning money online) and since they knew the situation they wanted to return it to me but unfortunately even with their good intention the bad outcome happened to me still.
[Fix this quote on post you made, please]
I believe you're meaning to wrote this below?
In regards to my last message, ah great. My luck "User 'Rollbit Razer' has not chosen to allow messages from newbies. You should post in their relevant thread to remind them to enable this setting."
How to not become a newbie? Could someone send the message to him if thats allowed?
It is a personal message as stated in the original forum post since I wanted to send one privately
simple answer to become not newbie is to rank up to Jr Member, for that, you'll need 1 merit. To be able to get merit, you have to make posts that people [who'll give you merit] deemed a good post.
I wonder... were you're meaning to say that you've been in process of KYC for 15 months, and that's because you're yet to submit the documents they requested for KYC?
I see, thank you. I guess I could contribute to the forums a little bit to rank up. I've also answered the question below in my previous post of why it took so long.