Topic: Rothschild: Get Ready For One World Currency By 2018 (Read 7986 times)

I hate conspiracy theories like this they make me half think what they say will come true but the other smarter half of me thinks this is to suppress certain thoughts and to make the world behave in a sheep like manner. If I was a betting man which we all are here I would bet they are trying to make us fear and act accordingly. Don't fear and act irrationally that way they can't control us

There is a zero percent chance of a one world currency in 2018, I'll offer anyone odds of 100 to 1 if they want to take it. It would take much time to transition to such a thing, it takes years to dissolve previous currencies and replace them with new ones, it would be even more extreme if it was happening world wide.

I don't think so. The world still have many problems about currency itself, some country in Africa and Asian has high inflation which affect to very low price when converting to US Dollar.

To date, the "basket" includes five currencies: the US dollar, the euro, the Chinese yuan, the British pound sterling, the Japanese yen. The world currency "phoenix" will coexist for a while with national currencies, but gradually the national currency will be replaced by "phoenix". the world monetary system based on Phoenix has started working, the states will have to abolish all currency restrictions, agree to the establishment of a world central bank, participate in the creation of a world monetary union. Let's see if Fenix will appear in 2018 ...

I do not exclude the possibility that Satoshi Nakamoto is sponsored by the Rothschild group of programmers. Rothschild mixed reputation so we still don't know the authentic names of the parents of bitcoin. Conspiracy theory seems really crazy idea. The emergence of a common currency will be the crown of globalization. I wonder who will lead the world government?

Yes, the article look very fascinating indeed. And the author has predicted that by 2018 we would have one currency. If you look at bitcoin right now, somewhat all of us wants it to be globally mass adopted, meaning it could be used by people regardless of what country they are. So bitcoin is laying out how we can have "one world currency".

The possibility of Bitcoin to be the only one world global currency is extreme and far-fetched. Every country in the world has its own economic setup dictating its own currency. The very nature of Bitcoints to be a decentralized crypto-currency goes against the acceptance as one global currency by the individual governments. To govern a country, they will not naturally accept the decentralized economic freedom offered by BTC and rule out the technology and the capacity for innovations. Even though it has been accepted by a few first world countries in their payment system, there are far more third world countries who need to constantly fight for existence. Hence, BTC is still not accepted there.

Even, in the level of micro transactions it is even more difficult as we can't wait for hours to get confirmation when paying in coffee shop with bitcoin. This concept didn’t really exist before. Presently, it acts more like store of wealth like gold right now. At this level what is required is faster confirmation and less fee might be used as suitable payment method for micro transactions. The pricing in Bitcoin is still too unstable, like any other crypto currency. Hence, to replace dollar we will need a currency that will have a much more stable exchange rate.

The way we cannot believe all humans of the world regardless of religion, race, creed or color to be able to live in perfect harmony with one government that represents the interests of all people equally. Similarly, it is still impossible to believe in the one world global economy (BTC) to replace every individual economic setup.

Bitcoin might be the prequel of what was actually planned.

Maybe they created bitcoin just to see how we are going to react to the new currency or cashless society? I also think It is not a coincidence that bitcoin was founded in 2009, just after the RE bubble. The founder also is being anonymous aaaand,

I think CIA created bitcoin and they left the project when it was in its early stages so they can observe our future behaviors better.

Bitcoin might be the prequel of what was actually planned.

Maybe they created bitcoin just to see how we are going to react to the new currency or cashless society? I also think It is not a coincidence that bitcoin was founded in 2009, just after the RE bubble. The founder also is being anonymous aaaand,

I think CIA created bitcoin and they left the project when it was in its early stages so they can observe our future behaviors better.

There will never be a one world currency until there's a one world government. There will never be a one world government until there's only one person, or rather shape shifting lizard, left on the entire planet.

What we should be more concerned about is the abolition of cash. That's very real, ongoing and potentially more damaging.

It's more likely not gonna happen in the next year, every country has its own currency and they won't replace it soon.
If we compare a currency that meet the criteria for one world currency, USD seems to be the one than any other currencies or even bitcoin. There are more transactions using USD all over the world than other currencies obviously, but I don't say it the best currency for the world, I prefer bitcoin but it need more time to become a mainstream currency.

I have doubts about some Illuminati-like organization trying to achieve this goal but if there ever is, it's definitely not happening by the end of this year. There's just too much factors still to consider. Some keep pointing out that this group has already supposedly controlled the economy of America and Europe, what does that make of Russia and China though? They definitely have their own game they're trying to play. China for example is developing it's own digital currency. More like the currency wars would just go digital...

World rulers have this idea and they will do anything to make it happened. It is in their interest; one world, one government, one currency... as we heard in that movie: `one ring to rule them all`...But it is to soon for that. Much more to do so that can be implement and 2018 is practically here. However we are going in that direction for sure.

There will never be a one world currency until there's a one world government. There will never be a one world government until there's only one person, or rather shape shifting lizard, left on the entire planet.

What we should be more concerned about is the abolition of cash. That's very real, ongoing and potentially more damaging.

It's more likely not gonna happen in the next year, every country has its own currency and they won't replace it soon.
If we compare a currency that meet the criteria for one world currency, USD seems to be the one than any other currencies or even bitcoin. There are more transactions using USD all over the world than other currencies obviously, but I don't say it the best currency for the world, I prefer bitcoin but it need more time to become a mainstream currency.

Agreed! There is absolutely no way in this world, no matter how hard governments tried or got paid that there could be a "one world currency" fully adopted and integrated to anywhere near the same degree as cash/credit, etc. that we have now. I could see it happening, but definitely not by 2018... 

I have doubts about some Illuminati-like organization trying to achieve this goal but if there ever is, it's definitely not happening by the end of this year. There's just too much factors still to consider. Some keep pointing out that this group has already supposedly controlled the economy of America and Europe, what does that make of Russia and China though? They definitely have their own game they're trying to play. China for example is developing it's own digital currency. More like the currency wars would just go digital...

If you are referring to Brexit, than it is not relevant in this context . Because UK has never been part of EURO zone , they have British pounds.

The Rothschild family is the head of the organization in which I entered in Colorado. All the Occult Brotherhoods are part of it. It is a Lucifer Organization to install his reign in the whole world. ... Supposedly the Rothschilds have personal dealings with the Devil. I have personally been in his villa and have experienced it. And I know it is true.


John Todd

For the first time in its history, Western Civilization is in danger of being destroyed internally by a corrupt, criminal ruling cabal which is centered around the Rockefeller interests, which include elements from the Morgan, Brown, Rothschild, Du Pont, Harriman, Kuhn-Loeb, and other groupings as well. This junta took control of the political, financial, and cultural life of America in the first two decades of the twentieth century.

Thats funny. The Rothschilds must be scratching their heads on the latest development in cryptocurrencies. Now every Tom, Dick and Harry can make their own private currency that cant be censored and does not need a central bank for distribution. Thank god for the internet thats making at all possible.

As you know Rothschild family is really strong and powerful in united states' economy. They hold shares of american companies including banks. So they never want to harm banking sector with bitcoin, I guess.

Where do you guys get all the time these hoaxes about Rothschild lol

It was a stupid idea. I certainly understand that Rothschild is the ability to get full control over the economies of the world, but I have a question who is willing to voluntarily enslave yourself to them. And the period of 2018 I generally just laugh.

Well, in the case the Rothchilds are directly behind the particular The Economist newspaper from that day that talked about the Phoniex world currency in 2018, then we have just to wait a couple of months and see what happens. But 2018 is just too near. What are the chances this happens? There are no real signs of national currencies disappearing. Are the Rothchilds going to release Rothchildcoin without no support from the nations? are the nations going to suddenly support this Rothchildcoin out of nowhere?

I don't see it clear at all. If it said 2025... that's something more realistic than 2018. We are still in the early days of Bitcoin, I just don't see much changing 1 year only.

There's a clip on youtube with a good example of how centralized & uniform american media is.

If you dislike links search on youtube for: "Media Brainwashing - News simply repeats the same taglines & phrases OVER and OVER".

Link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jH8dejYGa5A

There's other evidence if you want it.

Well, that is a good catch, but it's not enough. Having a big stake on a company doesn't necessarily mean that they control every single newspaper on a daily basis and the Rothchild guy whose owns the stakes are going to be looking personally on everything every single day before releasing it, or at least, I don't imagine Lynn Forester de Rothschild reading The Economist headlines everyday before approving them for release. Or maybe they are such control freaks that actually do that... who knows..

The connection comes from Lynn Forester De Rothschild owning a majority stake in the Economist Group which wields a controlling interest in The Economist magazine. Its mentioned in the 2nd paragraph of her wiki bio.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynn_Forester_de_Rothschild

The Economist these days is shady in that many of its feature articles are written anonymously. It could be accurate to say anonymously written pieces are becoming a signature move for globalists.

I feel like bitcoin is just start of something bigger.
Bitcoin isn't what these guys seek for. They want full control over money, above nations. bitcoin's price isn't really controllable cause its supply is fixed.

The connection comes from Lynn Forester De Rothschild owning a majority stake in the Economist Group which wields a controlling interest in The Economist magazine. Its mentioned in the 2nd paragraph of her wiki bio.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynn_Forester_de_Rothschild

The Economist these days is shady in that many of its feature articles are written anonymously. It could be accurate to say anonymously written pieces are becoming a signature move for globalists.

We are almost there and, we are not close to that being true and even if it was we have bitcoin that will allow us to resist and avoid using that currency, also the plan of a single currency for the entire world is never going to work, just look at the euro and look at the failure of their union.

Yeah, well I couldn't possibly imagine any other reasons why the creator of Bitcoin would want to stay anonymous.  /s

Maybe they created bitcoin just to see how we are going to react to the new currency or cashless society? I also think It is not a coincidence that bitcoin was founded in 2009, just after the RE bubble. The founder also is being anonymous aaaand,

If the United States has a "Shadow Government" like so many speculate, it would be the Rothschilds.

I'm saving this thread because this is all very fascinating to me, I am going to see if there are any connections between this and Bitcoin.

So where are you getting the Rothchild-Phoenix connection from? I remember reading about The Economist thing, and I remember the mention the Phoenix but that was as far as I know just some sort of fictional piece/prediction and there was never a Rothchild connection so I want to see the evidence of Rothchild being involved in this so called 2018 global currency.

Rothschild: Get Ready For One World Currency By 2018

A Rothschild publication predicts that a one world currency is likely to be put in place as soon as 2018 – eroding individual nations’ sense of sovereignty.

The Rothschild-controlled Economist magazine published an article 30 years ago that highlighted the proabability of a world currency by the year 2018.

Thefreethoughtproject.com reports:

One must also keep in mind that the controlling interest of The Economist is held by the powerful Rothschild family, who regard themselves as the “custodians of The Economist magazine’s legacy.” In essence, the magazine operates as a quasi-propaganda arm for the Rothschild banking empire and related businesses and, is in many ways, meant to prime the pump of public opinion for the globalist agenda to be implemented.

The excerpt below appeared in the print magazine on January 9, 1988, in Vol. 306, pp 9-10.

Ready for the Phoenix

THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency. Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let’s say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favoured by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today’s national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the last twentieth century.
–
At the beginning of 1988 this appears an outlandish prediction. Proposals for eventual monetary union proliferated five and ten years ago, but they hardly envisaged the setbacks of 1987. The governments of the big economies tried to move an inch or two towards a more managed system of exchange rates – a logical preliminary, it might seem, to radical monetary reform. For lack of co-operation in their underlying economic policies they bungled it horribly, and provoked the rise in interest rates that brought on the stock market crash of October. These events have chastened exchange-rate reformers. The market crash taught them that the pretence of policy co-operation can be worse than nothing, and that until real co-operation is feasible (i.e., until governments surrender some economic sovereignty) further attempts to peg currencies will flounder.

…

The New World Economy

The biggest change in the world economy since the early 1970’s is that flows of money have replaced trade in goods as the force that drives exchange rates. as a result of the relentless integration of the world’s financial markets, differences in national economic policies can disturb interest rates (or expectations of future interest rates) only slightly, yet still call forth huge transfers of financial assets from one country to another. These transfers swamp the flow of trade revenues in their effect on the demand and supply for different currencies, and hence in their effect on exchange rates. As telecommunications technology continues to advance, these transactions will be cheaper and faster still. With unco-ordinated economic policies, currencies can get only more volatile.

…

In all these ways national economic boundaries are slowly dissolving. As the trend continues, the appeal of a currency union across at least the main industrial countries will seem irresistible to everybody except foreign-exchange traders and governments. In the phoenix zone, economic adjustment to shifts in relative prices would happen smoothly and automatically, rather as it does today between different regions within large economies (a brief on pages 74-75 explains how.) The absence of all currency risk would spur trade, investment and employment.

–

The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF. The world inflation rate – and hence, within narrow margins, each national inflation rate- would be in its charge. Each country could use taxes and public spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather than print money to finance its budget deficit. With no recourse to the inflation tax, governments and their creditors would be forced to judge their borrowing and lending plans more carefully than they do today. This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing are taking that sovereignty away in any case. Even in a world of more-or-less floating exchange rates, individual governments have seen their policy independence checked by an unfriendly outside world.

–

As the next century approaches, the natural forces that are pushing the world towards economic integration will offer governments a broad choice. They can go with the flow, or they can build barricades. Preparing the way for the phoenix will mean fewer pretended agreements on policy and more real ones. It will mean allowing and then actively promoting the private-sector use of an international money alongside existing national monies. That would let people vote with their wallets for the eventual move to full currency union. The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power.

…

The alternative – to preserve policymaking autonomy- would involve a new proliferation of truly draconian controls on trade and capital flows. This course offers governments a splendid time. They could manage exchange-rate movements, deploy monetary and fiscal policy without inhibition, and tackle the resulting bursts of inflation with prices and incomes polices. It is a growth-crippling prospect. Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes.

Only ten years later, in 1998, The Economist was once again engaging the public in an effort to forward the globalist agenda, with an article entitled “One world, one money.”

Very much in line with the 1988 piece, the publication attempts to explain why a much more centralized and controlled system would be beneficial to the global economy, while wholly ignoring the fact that such a centralized global currency would be a massive coup for the international banking cartel, and the Rothschild banking empire’s financial bottom line.

Additionally, it must be noted that the creation of a global currency would give an inordinate amount of geopolitical capital to unelected international bankers, and subsequently take power away from the citizens of each nation and their respective governmental representatives.

Does anyone really want international bankers to have such a vast amount of political power on top of the massive financial influence and sway they already hold in the halls of power?People want more say in their own lives, not having policy dictated to them by international banksters and bureaucrats.

Control over a nation’s money supply is, for all intents and purposes, the lifeblood of a state’s sovereignty – without this independence, the state only exists in name but is subservient to supranational powers whose interests lie outside of domestic and national political/economic concerns.

“GIVE ME CONTROL OF A NATION’S MONEY SUPPLY, AND I CARE NOT WHO MAKES ITS LAWS,” said Mayer Amschel Rothschild, founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty.

Although the Rothschild family now generally keep a very low public profile, they still have significant business operations across a wide spectrum of sectors. While you may not find any one particular Rothschild on the Forbes’ most rich list, the family is estimated to control $1 trillion dollars in assets across the globe, thus having a strong voice across the geopolitical spectrum that many perceive as a hidden hand manipulating events silently from behind a veil of secrecy and silence.

Are you starting to get the picture?

http://www.anonews.co/rothschild-world-cuurency/