Not really, there are different internet backbones across different companies or conglomerates here . Claro is owned by Telmex and bought several companies when it arrived in the country . It bought Embratel and its backbone, a long distance operator and the first internet backbone in Brazil across the whole territory. Claro also bought NET , a HFC video service, but then a CMTS network was overlaid onto the HFC cable infrastructure, creating an internet access network to the end residential customer, something Embratel didn't have as a long-distance operator only. For instance, the IP phone service in my house is provided by Enbratel but the Gateway machine is physically ocated at Embratel headquarters. In addition there were backbones from other local government-owned telcos, now private businesses, like Telefonica in the state of São Paulo and Telemar at other 24 states. Then the international Optical cables arrived like Global Crossing ( now Layer3) , TIWS ( also Telefonica international) , 360 Networks etc. In the sequence the local backbones connected to the Optical cable companies international networks, so this is a 100 head hydra that never stops growing and interconnecting. This is a view of the last 15 years in Brasil ..I have some knowledge of the scenario, but very few interconnection engineers n these companies really know what peers to what and in which node and for what traffic etc etc ...
Ah, that sounds like quite a confusing system - i assume the confusion betwene tem has arisedfrom the multiple different companies tyring to connect everything as quickly as possible and giving everythiing enough internet. Aren't telefonica based in Spain as well? From where I'm from, there's one company that deals with connecting everyone to the internet (Openreach) which then allows ISPs to connect everyone to the internet. I've never heard of a country doing what yours does (although, it would make a nicer bit of competition betwen companies if we had more than one internet connection provider).
Anyway, did you work out if it is a connection issue? It is possible to Ping bitfinex from the command line.
I get this:
C:\Users\Laptop>ping bitfinex.com -n 10
Pinging bitfinex.com [104.16.174.181] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 104.16.174.181: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=55
Reply from 104.16.174.181: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=55
Reply from 104.16.174.181: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=55
Reply from 104.16.174.181: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=55
Reply from 104.16.174.181: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=55
Reply from 104.16.174.181: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=55
Reply from 104.16.174.181: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=55
Reply from 104.16.174.181: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=55
Reply from 104.16.174.181: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=55
Reply from 104.16.174.181: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=55
Ping statistics for 104.16.174.181:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 19ms, Maximum = 26ms, Average = 20ms
For me, normal is 19milliseconds though the internet is a bit slower due to a spike in the use of domestic internet.