Decentralized stablecoins are tied to centralized stablecoins through collateral, if you look at the experience of DAI.
Everyone is already used to USDT, so Exved did not reinvent the wheel. Then perhaps there will be settlements with some countries through the digital ruble, but its mass implementation is planned for 2025. So far there is either limited use or planned implementation in some organizations.
Exved cannot be blamed, of course, because they want their services to be global and therefore they are forced to use a stablecoin that bears a global character, and the easiest and best option at the present time is USDT.Everyone is already used to USDT, so Exved did not reinvent the wheel. Then perhaps there will be settlements with some countries through the digital ruble, but its mass implementation is planned for 2025. So far there is either limited use or planned implementation in some organizations.
But here lies the problem, everyone is accustomed to USDT in the crypto community just as everyone was accustomed to using the dollar by all global banks and financial services before. This is what makes all of these services hostage in the hands of the United States. We see how the United States attacks these services and bans everyone who violates its policy.
So I was wondering, since Exved is a Russian platform, why doesn't it benefit from the digital ruble, for example, or will this make their services limited to certain countries only?
