Topic: S2xcoin: Why Mommy Garzik want see my peepee? Skry to Bloq to Segwit2x (Read 757 times)

Honest altcoin developers choose a different name for their creation. The fact, that some devs call theirs "BitcoinXXXX" is enough information to know about their roadmap. One little word is telling more than 1000 FUDS.

One thing we could thank Jeff Garzik for is the free coins we can dump on the market. There is nothing a group of developers, miners and merchants can do to control a whole community that knows what chain it wants.

Stand fast and stay on course.

LOL, even add blockchain.info wallet to this group - i didn't even know they were DCG-controlled! Haha, how sad for them.

LOL

poor Digital Currency Group
poor Barry Silbert
poor Jeff Garzik
poor Coinbase
poor Bitpay

S2x BTC1 is dead before arrival.

RIP

You, the community is urgently needing solution of a fork?

Anyone like to share thoughts?

PSA:
Hacklist - current enemies of Bitcoin (these people may have been well-meaning previously...but people change...):
Mike Hearn : “the "Bitcoin experiment" has "failed." goes on to Ethereum an app coin.
Hearn - Big Bank Bitcoin Bully - https://medium.com/@tradertimm/hearn-big-bank-bitcoin-bully-c61531c082e#.okh9viyze
Craig Wright - desperately claimed to be Satoshi & then flees fraud trying to file a bunch of IP patents! LOL!
Mark Karpeles
Paul Vernon
Josh Garza
Roger Ver
Jeff Garzik (2017 recent; hard forking BTC1 / segwit2x)
"Jeff Garzik wants you to connect to his Bitcoin transaction analytics (spy) company Skry, by default, in the SegWit2x fork. Jeff is a sneaky snake!":https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6n9grc/jeff_garzik_wants_you_to_connect_to_his_bitcoin/
Barry Silbert (and his DCG portfolio of companies-ie Coinbase, Bitpay, sponsoring ilk of Jeff Garzik characters)

Should note that Segwit2x hardfork is also known as (AKA) btc1

Does everyone here recognize the frivolous pursuit of a S2X hard-fork?

Bitcoin already has Segwit today as it slowly gets phased in.

Informative, thank you.

Jeff Garzik is another frustrated loser developer that wouldn't get his bullshit approved in Bitcoin so he had to leave and go work against bitcoin, with his Bloq blockchain analysis thing, and now he wants his 5 minutes of fame with the Segwit2x thing trying to bribe all miners and merchants with gov money.

Notice how developers that also didn't cut it and his commits weren't acknowledged left and went working with gov related stuff (Mike Hearn with R3, Gavin Andresen with CIA) and they also promoted their hardfork attempts (XT, Classic, Unlimited...)

We all know what's going on here.

PSA: should extend announcement of take your business somewhere else. Use a different fund than GBTC. Use a different exchange than Coinbase.  Unless if you would like to see Bitcoin's demise and fall - then use GBTC & Coinbase.

Barry Silbert and Jamie Dimon not too different.

LOLing at today's headline:
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says bitcoin is a fraud that ... - CNBC.com
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/12/jpmorgan-ceo-jamie-dimon-raises-flag-on-trading-revenue-sees-20-percent-fall-for-the-third-quarter.html

Contrasted with Morningstar performance list even with (Silbert's fake not-real) Bitcoin fund blowing away even the best leveraged investments in history:

http://news.morningstar.com/etf/Lists/ETFReturns.html

I never realized that there were so many Bitcoin-related companies that aimed to get established and then undermine & destroy Bitcoin (the Digital Currency Group Companies / Barry Silbert). But the good news is that there is a whole many more Bitcoin-related companies that are good and not trying to undermine Bitcoin.

This makes alot of sense why the bankster-backed Barry Silbert/DCG has a USA-traded public fund to kind-of track Bitcoin out (GBTC), however the Winklevoss twins has been petitioning SEC for years along with legal support and haven't been able to get their fund out. Atleast they have the gemini exchange.

Almost every bank in every country tends to block or deny doing business with anything related to Bitcoin, however all the consortium of businesses under DCG seem to get banking with no problem? hmmm?

\\

Not my intent, I apologize.

Segwit or its alternative is good in that it can fix transactions mutations (malleability) for transaction channels - ie for Lightning Network (LN). LN seems positive.

Now the problem is if Segwit is introduced along with "backdoor" fishiness (via a hardfork) spawned from the Barry Silbert DCG camp (Jeff Garzik).

This thread is all over the place.I see you that you are not a Segwit supporter,but what can you do to stop it?
Who is Jeff Garzik?I`m sure that there will be other hard forks,but this is actually good for btc ,because all the "anti-bitcoin core"  supporters will go away and the community will stay united.
So you think that Segwit is just a way to destroy btc anonymouty and catch all the bitcoin owners?
This is pretty interesting.

Both lists very helpful.
Thank you Last of the V8s and thank you OmegaStarScream

http://nob2x.org/
lotsa brokers and exchanges no wantee barry's stinking 2x

I became less worried after finding this list: http://segwit.party/nya/
I first thought that services can't go back because they actually signed something, now we currently have 3 services who changed their decision and I'm optimistic to see more, I don't see them risking their reputation and money If they see that the community is not supporting them.

Does anyone think Bitcoin wont get attacked? Or Bitcoin hasn't been attacked?

Does anyone here think attackers of Bitcoin would use media or social-media ("community" urgency)?

People, please stay educated and be mindful of software you are supporting to run a full node.

Although altcoins of XT, Bitcoin Unlimited, Bitcoin Cash, etc have failed to take-over real Bitcoin, please don't be complacent with ramifications of future hard-forks.

From Chainalysis now Skry now Bloq now Segwit2x (Jeff Garzik):

    Founded in 2014, Chainalysis is the leading provider of Anti-Money Laundering software for Bitcoin. With offices in New York and Copenhagen, we work with global financial institutions, like Barclays and Bitcoin exchanges to enable every stakeholder to assess risk in this new economy.
credit: baronofbitcoin

Opens door for AML, easy identification, etc. Things so traditional authorities identify you, classify you, and shut you down, FREEZE YOUR ASSETS, lock you up.  Just because they don't like you for not supporting the traditional Bank Swift network or a Bankchain.

From AdwokatDiabel (reddit): ...Core won't make software/nodes to support Segwit/2X. When they do push lightning, they will only focus on their chain. Everything for SW/2X is going to be done by the BTC1 team (Jeff Garzik).

At that rate, why not just abandon SegWit altogether and focus on BCC/BCH, and implement an alternative to SW like FlexTrans? Fire Core, right?




PSA: Beware of S2xGarzik-Coin hardfork (and similar failures ie Garzikcoin aka BIP 100, Bitcoin Unlimited)
These attacks of using "community" urgency have been relentless since 2015:


Bitcoin's consensus system and natural economic incentives PROTECT the real bitcoin.



Repeated History: Reading references (emphasis mine);
http://www.contravex.com/2015/08/29/the-economics-of-sinking-garzikcoin-aka-bip-100/
Adam T. says:   
August 30, 2015 at 8:49 AM   

“pre-emptive strike” — best characterization I’ve seen yet to describe the odd feeling of urgency from certain parties.
Reply   

    Pete Dushenski says:   
    August 30, 2015 at 10:11 AM   

    Odd indeed. Almost like these overgrown children seriously imagine that Bitcoin didn’t reach escape velocity 2.5 years ago and that they can rewrite history if only they obtain enough “consensus” on social media. Must suck to think that’s how the world works.




Do people know why Bitcoin is worth over $70B (now) and aware of its system of consensus, and system of checks & balances between miners, nodes, developers and users/investors?