When it comes to hardware wallets, many will agree that the Passport is one of the best airgapped devices that can be bought at the moment, and for someone who has enough BTC that he wants to keep in a safe way, that $200 or $250 is not something that should be considered expensive or bad investment.
However, anyone can make an airgapped device from an old smartphone or computer, which costs practically nothing if such a device is collecting dust somewhere.
I have read some of the posts on this site, and most people believe that Passport is the best. As someone who doesn't understand the underlying technology, relying solely on one company is always less reassuring than using multi-signature technology. For example, if my hardware wallet malfunctions and I buy a new wallet that has been compromised in the supply chain, what should I do? However, with multi-signature technology, it would require both two counterfeit wallets simultaneously to be compromised.
I happen to have two Ledgers, so I am using the Ledger + Trezor solution. I won't store any assets solely on the Ledger, because it is closed-source.
I happen to have two Ledgers, so I am using the Ledger + Trezor solution. I won't store any assets solely on the closed-source Ledger. When sending a transaction, the Ledger (purchased in September 2022) displays the xpub of the two wallets and the transaction information, while the Trezor only displays the transaction information. Both displays are normal, which is why I haven't discarded the Ledger.
I don't understand the underlying technology. What is the problem for trezor? May I ask? Is it because that no secure chip in the Trezor?
By the way, Dear dkbit98, do you think Keystone and BitBox are currently the best altcoin wallets? Thank you for your advice.