Quote from: Faketoshi/blog/law-regulation/if-gold-turned-to-lead/
Any criminal who has received bitcoin has left a record that is admissible in court.
As if he thinks he's an authority on what's admissible in court.
How'd that last case turn out for you, Craigy? Oh, that's right, the judge said:
Quote
“Dr. Wright’s demeanor did not impress me as someone who was telling the truth. When it was favorable to him, Dr. Wright appeared to have an excellent memory and a scrupulous attention to detail. Otherwise, Dr. Wright was belligerent and evasive. He did not directly and clearly respond to questions. He quibbled about irrelevant technicalities. When confronted with evidence indicating that certain documents had been fabricated or altered, he became extremely defensive, tried to sidestep questioning, and ultimately made vague comments about his systems being hacked and others having access to his computers. None of these excuses were corroborated by other evidence. ”.
Quote
"I completely reject Dr. Wright’s testimony about the alleged Tulip Trust, the alleged encrypted file, and his alleged inability to identify his bitcoin holdings”.
Quote
"There is clear and convincing evidence that Dr. Wright’s non-compliance with the Court’s Orders is willful and in bad faith”.
Quote
"the evidence establishes that he has engaged in a willful and bad faith pattern of obstructive behavior, including submitting incomplete or deceptive pleadings, filing a false declaration, knowingly producing a fraudulent trust document, and giving perjurious testimony at the evidentiary hearing. "
What a loser. It's obvious he's wrong, because if he were right, he'd be locked up already for being the criminal that he is.
