Topic: Satoshi Nakamoto never used Bitcointalk - new claim by Craig Wright (Read 918 times)

the latest legal stuff about the tulip collateral. is just delaying it by holding it up in court. so that the 'statue of limitations' runs out so that the aussie government can no longer chase after him because of a time limit

ira klieman and wright are not enemies. they are frenemies(freinds pretending to be enemies) just trying to keep the collaterals status of ownership in question so that australian cant do anything. then when the statue of limitation elapses. craig will pay his friend some money as a thank you for playing his game..

only issue is craig has leaped passed just civil limitations and is stepping foot into criminal actions.. meaning he can still get in alot of trouble.. but hey..

The fact that a lot of people claims that they are Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of the most famous cryptocurrency Bitcoin, I don't believe on their claims anymore especially it is obvious that what they really want is "Attention" from us so that they can make their self famous. They don't even have a strong proof that can support their claims.

so Hal Finney and the other early adopters like Galvin and the rest...who gave feedback on how/what to do to improve and push BTC to the world...was just following

some 'random' guy/gal on bitcointalk on here in public and via PM... who knew the code and white paper enough that the things he talked about via bitcointalk were valuable indeed...

but gee it was just some random

guy/gal ..faking to be Satoshi..that knew enough to be one of the 'founders' on the round table of BTC and development of crypto..but what? The supposed 'fake' bitcointalk satoshi

was too shy? Had to hide his massive skills from all comers at the beginning of BTC? Was just being a 'swell fellow' and doing all the work?

What an idiot if he thinks anyone is gonna believe that mess of hooey.......desperate indeed it seems but not a lot of forethought on this current lie by faketoshi CW.

brad

Satoshi Nakamoto is a pseudonym. If he is claiming Satoshi never used Bitcointalk, it would be white lie as satoshi is one of the earliest member of this forum. If he meant the satoshi the founder of bitcoin and satoshi the early user of bitcointalk are different, he might be claiming he is also a one of the satoshi but the one who have no any significance.

He is a joke who is trying to amuse the world and create a fake identity. Unfortunately that has gone against him and that is why he is known now as Faketoshi. I am amazed by the level of confidence this guy has, I sometimes feel he is suffering from attention seeking syndrome. As he tends to always seek attention by creating fake news.

He lives with sensation, so he is always looking for ways to get other people's attention, like narcissistic symptoms, maybe. Actually we don't need to spend energy on this insignificant problem. Since the beginning Satoshi kept his identity a secret, leave it like that.

Sorry. It's just annoying to start reading a post and then get 2 sentences in to realize it's just random text to get a banner view.

And I'm no Craig Wright fan.

I bet CW doesn't know the details about satoshi accessing here in the bitcointalk, and the best way for him is to deny that the true SN doesn't interact here.

I don't think the "false impression" of Jon Matonis is definitive evidence that CW is satoshi.

The article was very great to illustrate the nature of bitcoin and blockchain technologies and to understand that blockchain is a bitcoin by-product. Still, the article was written 4 years ago and it's hard to know the authenticity of the article if he himself attempted to jazz up all the content to make CW as SN. While he has excellent credibility, and most likely, people will quickly be able to believe it.

Also, it's kinda rude to call some a campaign spammers, just because they're not on the side of CW. We have different opinions and this is a forum so I guess we should respect each other. I do believe that we still need to undergo due process.

Stop trying to sound like an authority on what people should know. If you are foolish enough to believe a man who has only ever equivocated on this subject then keep it to yourself. Gavin tried to be the dictator with his one-sided support for hard-forks and block increase. The other developers were not of this view and he couldn't take it.
Self-aggrandizing ego-maniacs like CSW, Ver, Even Gavin (With his comments about "A lot of people are pushing me to be a dictator") forgot that this is a decentralized project that needs consensus.

I think CIA or someone else had has his balls since very early days. That explains all his attempts at subverting bitcoin including his stupid comments on CSW which by his own admission, he regrets making. Yet, CSW and shitcoin shills like you fail to understand this.

I agree, this person is trying his best to remain relevant and he will do and say whatever he needs to in order to achieve that goal, there was a time in which I liked to read those kind of news just to get a good laugh and see what kind of weird story he could come up with, but then I realized that I was doing exactly what he wanted and since then I have not read a single news related to him and if we want this to eventually disappear I think we need to begin to do the same.

Wrong. Incorrect.

Empirical sources of evidence and myself as a witness proves otherwise.

Now cease and desist.

MicroGuy - claiming to be a "friend of Satoshi" in order to promote his altcoin
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/microguy-claiming-to-be-a-friend-of-satoshi-in-order-to-promote-his-altcoin-5244815

Stop trying to confuse the campaign spammers. As you know this is all explained in the following thread.  

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/craig-w-only-claims-to-be-satoshi-because-he-knows-the-real-satoshi-is-dead-2112829

Furthermore, Craig Wright was the person from the original team responsible for making posts on this forum. Gavin Andresen and Jon Matonis were both 100% correct when they identified Wright as Satoshi.

https://news.bitcoin.com/heavy-hitters-reveal-real-satoshi/


https://medium.com/@jonmatonis/how-i-met-satoshi-96e85727dc5a

Quite possibly, that's the account which advocated DDoS against various altcoins, right?

I recall a thread once with myself effectively telling him off and advising to try doing something more productive with his time.

 

---

N.B. Above link is 'satoshi' posting in response to myself in early 2010 on this very forum.

Full circle, thread topic back on track. Satoshi clearly posted in these boards.

An obligatory, I am the real Craig Wright [citation needed]

 

I wonder why people takes his claims seriously will we all know that his lying about things maybe we should forget about him since the more talks about his name the more he will became famous and I think he loves his name always brags in controversy.

So technically speaking on this he already claims that he is not Satoshi right? 

He's confusing you with BitcoinEXpress  

@microguy guy is fixated with marrying wright despite him going back on its word time and again. He even claims he knows the writing style..Ridiculous..!!Anybody who has heard wright speak will know that he can never be the Man/ Men behind an open-sourced solution to the Byzantine General's problem. He speaks like an MLM, Ponzi scheme head, the kind of people behind frauds like Bitconnect.

What kind of a knucklehead are you claiming to be on the same level as Satoshi, Theymos and others? All i could find in your post history was unabated shilling of one altcoin after another interspersed with occasional pieces of wisdom about how Alts will overtake bitcoin. Delusions of Grandeur, False Promises, Promoting shitcoins and vaporware. Quite evident why you to have a crush on wright.

You didn't 'do' anything.

I most certainly didn't 'attack' anything either.

If I recall correctly you, the self-proclaimed 'chief scientist of goldcoin', did not really understand banscore= 

You also did not comprehend potential XAUUSD trade 'backing' within cypto and/or your Goldcoin's™ (lol), hideous economic model, relative to Bitcoin and/or other altcoins.

I'm sure that Craig doesn't believe in his own claims. The only reasonable thought is that he makes such claims for self-promotion.

He again? I thought his journey about bitcoin destruction is finished. Though, why he is now making a statement about Satoshi Nakamoto never used bitcointalk? Is he done impersonating him? Because judging by his actions, Craig Wright shows more of a business side actions and behavior while the real Satoshi here on our forum showed a more technical technology expert knowing much about algorithms, hashes and security features. Craig Wright just claims and claims but actually has his own team who does the code for him. Who would believe Craig to be Satoshi? None.

I can’t understand the sensation of Craig Wright’s statement that he did not use a Satoshi account in this forum. What does it matter for the trial of Kleiman's lawsuit? Wright was unable to provide evidence of the ownership of the wallets that Satoshi Nakamoto was supposed to own, and the deadline for providing evidence for this had long expired. It is recorded that Wright lied in court and presented fake documents. In my opinion, this lawsuit took too long. It is time to officially recognize that Wright is not the creator of Bitcoin and therefore all his statements have no meaning.

Alas, the spotters themselves have been spotted.

CSW new ploy was that the real inventor of bitcoin only sent out the white paper in 2008 and that was it. any communication with other people is false.

this is because CSW wants to create a narrative that the edits/bugfixes done via users on bitcointalk were not the 'original bitcoin' but a copy that was stolen from the real inventor. and the user on bitcointalk using the pseudonym on the forum was not the words of the inventor. but the thief that stole 'the original bitcoin'
thus any quotes of 'satoshi' on this forum do not represent the 'original bitcoin' vision

...
to summarise
CSW is an idiot to the magnitude of deserving of some prison time
he knows he cant prove anything so now he is denying involvement while still trying to pretend he made bitcoin.

here is the funny thing though. CSW asked bitcointalk forum members to visit him and discuss communications they had together to help validate CSW claims.

so CSW just 5 years ago was saying he was using bitcointalk and communicating with members..

i truly hate liars, scammers. but i also hate the ones that are so dumb they have to flip flop and change narrative and unable to keep the story straight

To this day, he still asserts himself as Satoshi Nakamoto, but he does not provide any evidence that can prove it.
I suppose it is time for him to end this joke and we should abandon him. Perhaps at the present time he and his joke are only valid for the media, who are willing to believe in any theories.

This is one way for scammers to have more victims trying to lead us into his own site so he can easily gain our trust if we believe him and leave bitcointalk. Surely soon he will become the victim of his own trap and when that time comes obviously it will be like a dead end to him and a no way out. Why are some people keep on claiming that they are someone whom they are not, is it because of fame or probably because of personal interest? For years Craig keeps on claiming he is Santoshi, in fact, he is popular now but for years no one believed him so he can't benefit nor gain on his interest in doing this.

I see what you did there.

Lol, I don't know what Craig really wishes to achieve with this dust he wants to throw in our eyes but I am sure he is several motives than just being accredited as Satoshi Nakamoto. Don't you think he is using this hype and attention to make his shit forked coin of BTC more popular in this industry? I am just asking because there is no point in this law case and how he is going to justify his claims yet we keep on wasting time on it

Satoshi was the 'author' of BTC. Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi.

Either way, it's not the real satoshi that 'friended' you on ning. We have clearly established that above.

This misdirection by you is clearly unacceptable and has already been spotted by many ...


- https://twitter.com/realmicroguy/status/1255148327437365251

 

Unless you've edited them, I've found at least 3 of your posts supporting Satoshi as being the potential author.

Either way, I don't appreciate being called a liar when I've been nothing but truthful about being friends with Satoshi on Ning.

I guess you need to understand when I'm being satirical and/or facetious.

This forum is nothing like it used to be and neither is the 'Bitcoin' space now being presented herein.

You know the facts here MicroGuy or you have been easily duped.

If one calls me a 'troll', expect to be 'trolled'.

The funniest part for everyone (and BTC), is it won't really matter who 'wins' the Wright vs Kleinman case ...

Actually, I'll tell you who wins right now ... the Lawyers! 

Like some have already pointed out, it's now very new. I've also encountered it on Bitcointalk weeks ago. I think it's understandable why he'd say that: he probably doesn't know much about what Satoshi wrote on the forum, so it can be a serious risk if someone tries to test his knowledge of, allegedly, himself, and fail. Not to mention that the style of Satoshi from the forum differs a lot from Craig's style (Satoshi wasn't so harsh).
I don't think it's right to ignore because silence can be interpreted as a lack of objections. Plus, there are people still sure that Craig is Satoshi as well as many newbies who did not make their minds yet. So it's important not to be silent so that 'team Craig' doesn't win.

Interesting that when Satoshi used Nour on P2P Foundation you weren't so confident his account was hacked then.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48472954

You truly are a clown MicroGuy.

This is my long standing account and it has never been compromised.

Unlike CSW I've signed and verified myself (and I certainly know my own Bitcoin history very well indeed!) ...

Again, ...
Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/verifying-my-old-zero-balance-wallet-address-for-blockchain-research-etc-4630066

Based on your rantings, I think this bitcointalk account must have been compromised.

I knew the real BitcoinFX.

It is known that the 'satoshi' email account associated with the ning account was compromised. Hence why you only appear after this snapshot ...

- https://web.archive.org/web/20140307223923/http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto

---

Additional ...

I think it's perfectly normal that a Ning account would gain followers over time. This isn't anything out of the ordinary.

What do you mean "known to be" compromised?

https://techcrunch.com/2014/03/06/satoshi-dorian/

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/desperately-seeking-satoshi-bitcoin-creator-hunt-turns-bizarre-n46911

https://www.trustnodes.com/2018/11/30/did-satoshi-nakamoto-just-say-nour-and-who-is-wagner-tamanaha-nakamotos-new-friend

https://breakermag.com/satoshi-nakamoto-resurfaced-on-the-p2p-foundation-with-a-mysterious-message/

The fact of the matter is, you 'MicroGuy' are a manipulating liar and also seemingly complicit ...

Your tweet ...
- https://twitter.com/realmicroguy/status/1255153831555497984

"I don't see any of these @blockstream gas lighters on this list.

http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto "

...

My reply ...
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1255505028481273856

"Funny that you 'MicroGuy' only appear on the ning account page (which is known to of been compromised) long after the real satoshi had left. Herewith, an earlier snapshot with the only 2 'friends' actually accepted by the real satoshi ...

- https://web.archive.org/web/20140307223923/http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/friends/SatoshiNakamoto "

 

I mean, you could at least make up lies that aren't instantly disprovable.

Here's a transcript of what the court actually said:





In other words, the court does not decide who is or was Satoshi, but for the purposes of this ruling only, CSW owes Kleiman 50% of what CSW claims to possess.

Nope.  That was just Calvin Ayre's warped interpretation of proceedings.  And anyone who trusts Calvin Ayre is an idiot. 

MicroGuy ....

Date Registered:    April 05, 2013, 03:08:23 PM
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/microguy-93373

 

Not so. Incorrect.

Your source ?

Further, I likely already know what you might link here and its already been debunked as well.

...

Now go here @MicroGuy ...

- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/fraud-timeline.html

In terms of my friendship with Satoshi. It is my belief that I was communicating with Craig Wright.

On 26 August 2019, a US Federal Court ruled that Satoshi Nakamoto is the partnership of Dave Kleiman and Craig Wright.

So now, for the first time in history we have confirmation by a US Federal Court of the fact that CSW is at least 50% of Satoshi Nakamoto.

This guy is saying all kinds of ridiculous things...so that he can get free press..he is thinking himself like a celebrity who can feed off media & paparazzi...but he is not an actual celebrity!!

I don't know if it's dejavu or I had really read this news somewhere.

Obviously he didn't. Satoshi did.
He should stop claiming nonsense just for popularity.
Sure he is popular now, being a clown. We all know Satoshi was here and is still here in our hearts.   He is not.
Perhaps he is advertising something new again. Did the virus eat his brain already?

To summarize the summary of the summary ...

"So, to Craig, Calvin and the BSV lot ...

This is how identity works in Bitcoin !

Not your lies, hearsay, fabrications or falsehoods ...

Hard cryptographic proof linked to historical evidence trails !

Craig Wright is NOT satoshi and BSV is NOT Bitcoin.

#Bitcoin = #BTC

End."
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1245353304743436289

Nope.

...

The Stone Roses - Fools Gold (Official Video)
- https://youtu.be/NSD11dnphg0

You react like the biggest bullshitter you know has just told you another load of unbelievable bullshit without any evidence whatsoever. You ignore it or question their sources. Whatever Craig Wright says you should probably believe the opposite. Craig is only saying this bullshit because he obviously doesn't have access to that account, never has and never will, and will never be able to provide any evidence of owning that account so this is just another distraction tactic and excuse as to why he can't do something that the real satoshi would obviously be able to do very easily.

After all this bullshit is over I really hope CW ends up where he belongs and that's in jail.


Well I would agree, but this is bitcointalk where anything vaguely related to bitcoin is posted about numerous times and in numerous configurations and formats. It's pretty slow for news these days so this sort of stuff is going to be talked about. There's also seemingly quite a few people who think he is or may actually be satoshi so that doesn't help either.

Craig Wright was probably talking about how Dave K. (the "real" Satoshi) never posted here. Craig handled the forum posts while Dave was busy with jobs like coding and mining the network.

Proof that you are completely clueless (and/or complicit !?) @MicroGuy ...

Craig Wright (has categorically proven he is NOT satoshi with this blog post) by stating and claiming that the real 'satoshi' did not post on BitcoinTalk.org (bitcoin.org / smf) when quite clearly satoshi did post to this very forum!

Empirical sources of evidence i.e. blockchain (timechain) timestamps prove CSW to be incorrect.

CSW has completely backfired on himself here! Bitcoin's (BTC's) financial cryptography (hard verifiable facts) prove him to be a liar.

CSW has not signed a single publicly verifiable message to date and he has only provided excuses in a court of law, along with proven to be false, backdated 'evidence'.

He can't even sign with the known 'Satoshi Nakamoto' PGP key (let alone on the Bitcoin blockchain) ...

"Signed and Verifiable messages in Bitcoin are very easy. The real Satoshi could also prove identity via PGP.

- https://web.archive.org/web/20090131115053/http://bitcoin.org/

At the base of the page, see PGP Key; Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc :

- https://bitcointalk.org/Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc

Financial privacy is not broken using PGP.

5/12"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1222879720250990592

Look at the base of the archived page, its the same PGP key.

The PGP key is cryptographically signed for the satoshi email address in the whitepaper.

Its the same key satoshi posted on this forum ...


- https://web.archive.org/web/20090131115053/http://bitcoin.org/Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc

 

Craig Wright made the majority of the posts on bitcointalk.org. Writing style comparison examples have clearly proven this point in the past.

let me summarize the situation:



we have a hero (satoshi Nakamoto) and we have a bad guy (Craig Wright), what do we do with the bad guy?

1- ignore

2- we take hard measures to keep the guy from doing bad things

i am of the opinion that we have to choose option 1. why do we have to choose option1? because Craig Wright has already proved to be an obsessive and mentally ill person

AWESOME!!!

Thanks for all that information BitcoinFX. You have aptly summed up what we actually need to do:
The domain Bitcoin.com as well as the twitter handle @bitcoin are controlled by Roger Ver. The idiot gives credence to conspiracy theories and the COMMON PEOPLE, who mostly lack the will as well as the skill to actually dig through complex evidence, prefer to believe what they are told by people wearing suits and spewing out slick nonsense. Both Ver and the Imposter Wright are experts at this. Thankfully, Bitcoin and Real Evidence couldn't care less. When it comes down to actual decisions, you cannot fool everyone or even the judges and lawyers who WILL do their research before falling for hearsay and sly marketing nonsense. You have given a great example here that how identity can be proven and linked with Bitcoin's history. I will just arrange that a bit here to make it easier to understand. Here it goes:

BitcoinFX is one of the earliest users (u=30) who had once started a bitcoin exchange service. As he was here on the forum, he can relate with some of the earliest events in Bitcoin history. For example, Gavin Andresen posted a topic saying he wanted to start a faucet.. The faucet address is mentioned as 15VjRaDX9zpbA8LVnbrCAFzrVzN7ixHNsC on the topic. BitcoinFX sent 500 BTC into that faucet. If someone has a doubt that he is not that guy, he doesn't need to start bitching like faketoshi that "they don't want to recognize my greatness on how i gave away 500 BTC". He doesn't need to use long blog posts with technical jargon without any evidence.

All the man does is show you a transaction where coinbase addresses have funded 500 BTC into the address specified by Gavin. That transaction is open for anyone to see on the blockchain to have taken place on August 4th, 2010.

On April 1, 2020, Bitcoin FX signed messages from each of those 9 addresses which you can find in this verification post he has made. This is how, someone like him can be trusted to have actually done those things. No drama, No long blog posts, No wearing suits and brushing your hair with palm-spit like faketoshi..

---

Thanks for sharing this BitcoinFX. I'll just quote a few of your thoughts from those threads:

• Quote from: BitcoinFX on January 25, 2020, 04:00:48 PM
  "Herewith, a Signed and Verifiable message from my (old) 2010 #Bitcoin (BTC) zero balance wallet address:
  
  1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp
  
  Why can't Craig Wright do this?
  
  Not Your Private Keys, Not Your Bitcoin. 🔑
  
  Don't trust, verify.
  
• Quote from: BitcoinFX on July 01, 2019, 01:13:57 PM
  Re: Make your "we accept Bitcoin" logo
  - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.559
  
  No related transactions here - This link is simply to demonstrate how early Bitcoin enthusiasts just participated in what needed to be done.
  
  No employer, no payroll, just community volunteerism and altruism. Big 'economic cost' for most early adopters.
  

Sensationalism vs Rationalism.

- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51291248

...

Lady Gaga - Paparazzi (Official Music Video)
- https://youtu.be/d2smz_1L2_0?t=129

What the heck! I would assume he would tell everyone that Satoshi never used crypto while claiming that the first transaction was made by him as Satoshi.
Claiming that Satoshi didn't use the forum and claiming that the Satoshi Nakamoto account on this forum is his account what a nice joke.
I think only Theymos could clarify it when the account of Satoshi from this forum finally wakes up for a long time.

On one hand, I agree we should all be striving to give him as little attention as possible (read: no attention at all), as if everyone ignored him then he would almost immediately fade to irrelevance. However, whenever a thread is started about CSW, then we should be quick to debunk his lies for the sake of newbie and other inexperienced members who might be unaware that he is an identity thief and a scammer.

It is disappointing when we see senior/experienced members starting threads about him, as the only possible outcomes are to give him more publicity, and to potential lead some newbies down the path of being scammed. There is no good reason to open a thread about him unless you don't know any better.

As long as we give attention to this stupid Faketoshi, he will just continue to create claims like this as long as he is alive for sure.

His coin is a trash making him a trash too. His claims are all false and he is just making himself a clown in crypto world . I don't know how can he manage to do things like this when he already knows that there isn't that many people who are believing him.

Don't. People. Bother. To. Read. Anything. On. The. Internet. Anymore?

- https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/satoshi-3

- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54322123

I personally believe he did, isn't his account available showing his previous posts?

Clueless ! 

1. Craig Wright is NOT satoshi and BSV is NOT Bitcoin.

2. BCH is NOT Bitcoin. Stop reading 'news' sites that 'promote' either of these forks (copies) as being Bitcoin.

3. Bitcoin = BTC.  Always has, always will.

4. The real satoshi posted on this forum, which became bitcointalk.org.

bitcoin.org/smf > bitcointalk.org

I, 'BitcoinFX' can confirm that the real satoshi's posts on this forum have remained intact to this date ...

Welcome to the new Bitcoin forum!
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.188

...

"Exactly.

Plus the most damning evidence against Craig's claim here can include any (used or mined to) BTC addresses posted by early users of http://BitcoinTalk.org prior to the 2011 date.

These addresses have timestamps of transactions in the BTC, BCH and BSV blockchains ..."
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1245293506396073985

...

Herewith, my signed and verifiable message thread ...

Re: Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54167647

...

Full debunk of Craig Wight's false claims and mis-information by @MyLegacyKit on twitter ...

"Craig Wright - Satoshi NEVER Posted on Bitcointalk?

Every time when Craig is trying to rewrite history for his #Faketoshi clown act, he makes these funny mistakes. Because as usual, he has no idea what he's talking about.

Take this, for example."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1245343768045400064

...

"Here Craig spends some time figuring out on Wayback Machine how Satoshi did or did not post on the bitcointalk forum, and because he finds a few *discrepancies*, Craig claims Satoshi's posts have been edited and "Satoshi never posted on bitcointalk". "
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1245343769400090624

...

"Now the real story.

The earliest Bitcoin board was on SourceForge. In Sep 2009, Martti Malmi & Satoshi decided to set up their own forum, which happened in Nov 2009 on http:// bitcoin.org/smf. Satoshi registered Nov 19, 2009 and posted Nov 22, 2009 (with link to old forum)."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1245343770587127808

...

"Then, in June 2011 Jeff Garzik registered the domain http://bitcointalk.org. And the only thing they needed to do was a Dynamic Name Server change from http:// bitcoin.org/smf to http://bitcointalk.org as the forum environment did not change."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1245343772839489536

...

"Did not change? Yup. Craig is making up bullshit.

Forum in 2010: "Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC"

Forum now: "Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines"

So, all posts including Satoshi's were 1 on 1 *moved* by a simple DNS change."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1245343774462611456

...

"Our #Faketoshi got fooled here. He found a Dec 2010 Satoshi post with a bitcointalk link where a http:// bitcoin.org/smf link is expected.

But forum admins with a little coding experience can, and will, update these internal links during a move to a new domain... "
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1245343775762853888

...

"So yeah, Craig again shows that he has to do research for his #Faketoshi act. And while doing this research, he makes these hilarious mistakes & misinterpretations again. His cult will no doubt buy it again, but we know better.

Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto.

End."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1245343777302118403

...


lady gaga - poker face (slowed) [ russian roulette is not the same without a gun ]
- https://youtu.be/IsdWl0CwS2g

There is already evidence to the contrary, why talk about it?

that is the only way we can successfully defeat Craig Scammer Wright. but the biggest problem is the bold part in your comment. a lot of us can start ignoring him but it will never be "all" specially it won't be the media. we will continue seeing the news sites like this one here publish his nonsense and effectively give them the attention he seeks.
then another problem would be newcomers who don't yet know he is a scammer and would fall for it since the rest are ignoring him and don't debunk his lies.

Craig Wright made a sensation he only admitted as satoshi Nakamoto was the claim made nonsense without clear evidence of something ridiculous Craig Wright could prove in court that he was a satoshi Nakamoto  unlikely he just made up a story to make him well known to the residents in the community of crypto cryptocurrency world.

According to him, the account satoshi is created by someone else other than bitcoin inventor (Craig Wright as per him). He seems to be a trash now to me. I can not believe anyone else would have planned such trap back then because no one speculuted bitcoin would be such popular after few years.

Wait a minute, didn't he already said this a few weeks back? https://bitcoinist.com/satoshi-never-used-bitcointalk-craig-wright/ or is this another new statement?

There's also a thread made by someone here addressing something similar to that https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54146724.

Definitely a delusional. How can he claim he is the real satoshi when in fact he didn't do any contribution to the project? all he does is shill scams all over the place. He can't even spell "Bitcoin". Even the real Satoshi would be laughing right now in his own island because of this fool. During the dark age of Bitcoin, where is he? now he is claiming that Satoshi didn't used Bitcointalk? I don't know what this guy is smoking but it must be a very powerful one.

Proofs all over the place.

As for the satoshi never using Bitcointalk, that is misleading. The forum is the same, but the hosting, name, ownership, and URL all changed a couple times early on. When satoshi was posting, it wasn't called Bitcointalk and it wasn't at bitcointalk.org.


Your story is showing some cracks. Bitcointalk.org didn't exist until several months after satoshi's last login.

This is in fact true. There were (are) multiple people using the login to bitcointalk.org.

Satoshi Nakamoto was a group and at least three people from the group held the BTC login.

He's such a moron.

Satoshi never used Bitcointalk but "My final post, in fact, links to a domain that does not exist." So that's suddenly "my" post? I thought You did not use Bitcointalk Craig

And of course published by bitcoin.com the most trusted crypto media site in the Internet

I read this recently too.  Just a bunch of typical nonsense from the great doctor Craig Wright.  Craig is no satoshi, and I honestly don't see how anyone still believes that he is.  He first off hasn't moved any coins from Satoshi's address...that's the easy step 1.  He also has not produced any documentation proving that he opened several websites ( including this one ) with firms who keep your identity safe.  All he has to do is provide that paperwork. He's really not worth wasting time over any more.  Not as fun as it used to be making fun of him.

The conspiracy theory against santoshi Nakamoto from craig has been in place since, but the truth is craig will lost every law suit in no time from now just watch it.

He seems to be smoking some marijuana and other strong weed while leaving for court and then spits out shit from his mouth. I mean, someone who doesn't even know who Satoshi is (while still trying to claim he is Satoshi), and now this. His claim cuts his old words that he is Satoshi (no he isn't, and he proved this himself now).  

One of the most bitter-tongued person's I've ever seen is this guy. I'm not getting any pleasure while criticizing him but he's become a clown of our crypto society and I love to watch him do new things every now and then.

lol never used bitcointalk. He is desperate! He will soon be able to prove mental illness and will be free of any charges.

I read this news you linked and followed another one:

That;s the problem. And so many people are fooled by those domains, putting money in scam projects...

Wait, so his argument is that when the new domain was registered back in 2011, the evil forum administrators had already foreseen the forking of BCH, the double forking of BSV, Wright becoming an identity thief, and decided to start editing his posts 7-8 years in advance? Foxpup, have you been lending out your time machine again?

Strange it took him 10 years to say something, especially since for a full year he claims someone else was posting under his pseudonym, releasing new builds, solving bugs, etc. Perhaps he realizes that it is blindingly obvious that the person who controlled the satoshi account had actual knowledge regarding coding which CSW is hilariously deficient in, so the only way out of that particular bind is to claim it was someone else?

He's certainly right about that. Everyone knows neither the account nor the posts are his.

Whenever this man is dishing out fraudulent claims as this, it could be he wants to pump bitcoinsatoshi in other to appear to his community as been real. Wright loves controversy that is how he gains more fame.

Someone who wants to remain relevant even when it is clear that all odds are against him, will keep looking for a way to do so; this is mostly done by spreading false information etc. Sadly enough, it looks like we are the ones giving him that needed attention, but if he can be ignored then the reality will dawn on him. In my own case, I hardly read anything about him because it is not worth it. So let him continue spreading his lies, it is just a matter of time for that relevance he always sought for will be taken away from him..

What if we all just stop giving this lunatic what he wants - attention? I don't know if it's right to stop calling him out on his bullshit though, but I feel like crypto enthusiasts are the main thing that still keeps him afloat somehow, in a weird way. Let him destruy himself on his own terms

I have read this article on Google trend today (I mean it was visible to me automatically since mostly search I am using about crypto). But as same always I ignored what faketoshi wrote. Whatever he have claimed till now everything become false. Most of us we know about satoshi post here and who have created this forum. So better just ignore what he said and  I believe most of us call him a scammer. We don't need to react, he will not able to ever prove himself as satoshi nakamoto.

it is not new, the scammer made the new noise about a month ago (https://bitcoinist.com/satoshi-never-used-bitcointalk-craig-wright/) in the continuation of his desperate attempts to fool people into believing his identity fraud and he still continues providing us with fresh material to laugh at him.
obviously shitty sites such as bitcoin.com love bullshit like this which is why they are repeating it all over again.

"However, the coronavirus outbreak has given Wright some leeway, as the Florida court system is slow and not up to par right now."

Just allowing him to Stall, use your keys Craig!

The news recently surfaced in my inbox,

https://news.bitcoin.com/craig-wright-claims-satoshi-nakamoto-never-used-bitcointalk-to-communicate/

Don't know how to react! The court case seems to taking unexpected twists and turns!