Hasn't Kleiman's family lawyer who is representing them advised the Kleimans that once its proven that Craig Wright is to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto then bitcoin will crash to $0 meaning that court case that they filed and sue Craig Wright for will be for nothing because 500,000 bitcoins will be worthless so what's the point of the case?
Is this the beginning of the brand new FUD coming to bitcoin social media 
To answer your question, another judge in UK some time ago decided that Craig Scammer Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto and even ordered bitcoin.org and other websites to remove the bitcoin paper since according to the judge CSW owned the right to it.
Long story short, nobody in bitcoin world gave a shit apart from some posts on social media for a couple of days. Most people don't even remember it anymore LOL.
What evidence did the UK Judge see to grant Craig Wright the Bitcoin White Paper & Bitcoin.org?
I'm not an expert on the topic,but here's my two cents.
If Craig Wright was the real Satoshi,he wouldn't act as a greedy son of a b*tch.
He would have access over the 1.1 million BTC in the Satoshi wallet,which makes him a multi-Billionaire and he wouldn't waste his time and money with court cases.
It has been proven multiple times that Craig Wright is NOT the real Satoshi,so all your assumptions that BTC will crash and BSV will go to the moon are just nonsense.
Such court cases take years before a final verdict,so we can only sit and watch all this circus.
I know that Craig Wright can't prove anything,so there's nothing interesting here.
If Craig Wright was the real Satoshi,he wouldn't act as a greedy son of a b*tch.
He would have access over the 1.1 million BTC in the Satoshi wallet,which makes him a multi-Billionaire and he wouldn't waste his time and money with court cases.
It has been proven multiple times that Craig Wright is NOT the real Satoshi,so all your assumptions that BTC will crash and BSV will go to the moon are just nonsense.
Such court cases take years before a final verdict,so we can only sit and watch all this circus.
I know that Craig Wright can't prove anything,so there's nothing interesting here.
How does a baseless case run for years without any hard evidence then
The judge should have threw the case out of the court room and see it as a joke if there's no real evidence yet how the case ran for years I don't understand?~
Finally why is that the early people that worked on Bitcoin such as Dave Kleiman and Hal Finney all have died coincidently
Dave Kleiman and Hal Finney was in bad health condition for years before they left the world. Dave Kleiman was paralyzed from 1995 due to an accident and he needed help to move around and for the last three years of his life he was in the hospital and Hal Finney who was suffering from ALS for years and you can find his post in the forum when he was updating about his health conditions, so there is no mystery.Finally why is that the early people that worked on Bitcoin such as Dave Kleiman and Hal Finney all have died coincidently
When it comes to the court case, till now Ira Kleiman has not produced anything about any agreement to get any Satoshi coins but what i am surprised is he already spent around $50 million for this legal case and there is no way he is going to win the case with the way things are going and whether CSW is the creator is another story altogether.
Craig Wright spent $50 million on the case so far? Has he liquidated bitcoin holdings for this and if so were we can see the on chain data to verify this?
So in conclusion the only way we find out if Craig Wright is the real Satoshi Nakamoto is if he loses the court case and the judge orders him to give Kleiman's family over 500,000 bitcoins and we can see the 1.1 Million bitcoins in Satoshi Wallet has decreased a lot in amount of bitcoins in there after the case is finished? If so BTC will crash in value & BSV Bitcoin Satoshi Vision coin will take over?
This is the important question in the OP
The only way to prove ownership of the Satoshi Bitcoin is to either move some of them
from one of the wallets or sign a message from one of the addresses.
So in this weird court case if the Judge finds Wright guilty he would have to share the
Satoshi Bitcoin. Apart from Wrights supporters everyone knows he is not Satoshi.
Its such a nonsense case because if he is found guilty he wont be able to share what
he does not have access to, so the perfect scenario would be for the judge to order
Wright to pay the Kleiman family the same value as the Bitcoin "they are entitled to"
from the court ruling, that
would shut him up.
Bitcoin going to zero, i cant understand how or why this would happen...
When you think the case will finish and if Craig Wright is found guilty and is ordered by Judge that 550,00 bitcoins is ordered to the Kleiman's family or judge forces Craig to liquidate 550,000 bitcoins for cash settlement for Kleiman's family then after this ruling we know for sure if Craig Wright is BS?
How many wallet addresses are there amounting to 1.1 million bitcoins and where we can see this on chain data so we know after the judge verdict whether this amount has decreased or not?
If Craig Wright loses, he will have to pay Kleiman 500,000 Bitcoin or the usd value of that amount.
So it is entirely likely that Craig will owe billions in USD if he losses.
Then he will use his other court case in the UK to try and force the Bitcoin Core developers to move Satoshi’s coins so he can pay the fine and profit.
Make no mistake Craig is one of the stupidest people I have ever read about. He is as dumb as they come. He is not Satoshi that much is clear even the Australian Tax Office concluded Craig was a fraud and a liar.
Craig thinks he will be able to use some court order from a uk court to move coins on Bitcoin that he cannot prove ownership. Even as others have already signed messages on old addresses Craig said were his.
(Edit: of course this isn’t possible, no court order could ever move any Bitcoin in the way Craig wants, but his long con isn’t really about Bitcoin at all, rather it’s about controlling old addresses, some of which might be the Satoshi coins, on his BSV fork)
At most he might convince the BSV devs, miners and community (nodes) to allow him to "recover" Satoshi’s BSV coins. Of course that would collapse the BSV price even further to zero. Which is also good as the only people dumber than Craig Wright are his supporters and BSV holders. Those people truly are the dumbest shits ever to walk the Earth and deserve what’s coming.
So it is entirely likely that Craig will owe billions in USD if he losses.
Then he will use his other court case in the UK to try and force the Bitcoin Core developers to move Satoshi’s coins so he can pay the fine and profit.
Make no mistake Craig is one of the stupidest people I have ever read about. He is as dumb as they come. He is not Satoshi that much is clear even the Australian Tax Office concluded Craig was a fraud and a liar.
Craig thinks he will be able to use some court order from a uk court to move coins on Bitcoin that he cannot prove ownership. Even as others have already signed messages on old addresses Craig said were his.
(Edit: of course this isn’t possible, no court order could ever move any Bitcoin in the way Craig wants, but his long con isn’t really about Bitcoin at all, rather it’s about controlling old addresses, some of which might be the Satoshi coins, on his BSV fork)
At most he might convince the BSV devs, miners and community (nodes) to allow him to "recover" Satoshi’s BSV coins. Of course that would collapse the BSV price even further to zero. Which is also good as the only people dumber than Craig Wright are his supporters and BSV holders. Those people truly are the dumbest shits ever to walk the Earth and deserve what’s coming.
Wait you saying the Bitcoin Core Developers have the centralized power to activate a dead dormant bitcoin wallet that's over a decade old with the private keys supposedly lost to this wallet
I dont understand isnt it illegal and a crime to waste legal system resources and courts time by asking the courts to chase bitcoin core developers to activate satoshi's 1.1 million bitcoins wallet then after all that chasing realise its impossible. So Craig Wright can go jail for wasting time offence? For example if I pranked the police and called them to say somebody was murdered and they came and found no body or murder then I get arrested for the crime of wasting police time.
Where did you get the idea that Bitcoin developers could do something like that even if they wanted to?
No of course not, sorry if I was not clear in my reply above. This is a long con to get access to the BSV coins.
(I think) Craig’s game is:
- Get a UK court to order the Bitcoin Core developers to move the coins
- Obviously that will fail. But he needs this for the next steps
- Then take that order to his BSV fork
- Convince the miners, devs and community of BSV to give him the Satoshi coins on BSV
- He makes millions and maybe cashes out just before BSV finally craters to zero
Of course Bitcoin is never and was never affected in the slightest. But Craig’s con involving making some idiots in the community feel that he has that power. So that they give up the Satoshi coins on his BSV fork.
Does the victims that is Kleiman's family want settlement in BTC Bitcoins or BSV Bitcoin Satoshi Vision Coins if Craig is found guilty by Jury? If they want Bitcoins BTC then BSV is worth nothing compared to BTC right now so how him liquidating Satoshi's BSV coins be enough to pay off the Kleiman's family
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
constant b-rating and personal attacks targeted to a person can also change that person.
