Topic: Save time by choosing Bounty! (Read 313 times)
wow, this is very valuable information. thank you for providing this information. we newbie so feel very helpful. ico bench this is about its ico values. and I can see what projects are good value. very thanks
The fastest way to save your time from reading is to choose the bounty manager who really scan his project before accepting the job! If you one tell also the others about him or her because helping others is also one step of sharing your blessing to everyone.
There are some manager who do this a lot but in some reason they only accept high ranking profile starting Member so it is hard to join under them some time.
There are some manager who do this a lot but in some reason they only accept high ranking profile starting Member so it is hard to join under them some time.
I think to save time in choosing bounty campaign, one of the best thing is to check the bounty manager and his previous works and how successful they have been because experienced and good managers will not accept bounties with no good intention/ ideas. You should also check out for how much they are will to offer and how profitable it will be for you as a participant.
Thank you for your experience. It is very necessary for a newbie same me.
I think most important thing to see is the bounty manager because good managers do not take the fake/scam projects.
Secondly, the other important thing is to go through the whitepapers.
But we have to do our own research too before start promoting anything because no one this world are fully trustable because recently one of thr reputed manager of our forum try to scam the people with fake details so don't rely on anyone. Secondly, the other important thing is to go through the whitepapers.
Other parameter: look at the signatures of forum high-ranking members
Can be a good indication..
Can be a good indication..
Interesting!
A paradox:If the campaign is of very good quality, it will attract many people.
And its participants will share fewer rewards!
A paradox:If the campaign is of very good quality, it will attract many people.
And its participants will share fewer rewards!
Buddy in my opinion try to choose AmaZix or tokensuite bounties. These two agencies really select good ICOs to promote via their agency. Dont choose bounties run by other persons or new managers. Because at the end, you wont get anything. They will just scam you.
If you want to save more time choose only high paying campaigns.
And of course, choose bounty without kyc shit.
I suppose this topic is for investors, they are the ones who are gambling with initial coin offers.
And of course, choose bounty without kyc shit.
I suppose this topic is for investors, they are the ones who are gambling with initial coin offers.
~snip~
These are really just basic ideas and i would say that this is not really able to save you up some time but rather spending lots of time if you do make check up on each one of those things.From to its whitepaper itself it would really already give you some long time to read up this is why people are going lazy and skip other things and go ahead without analyzing too much which results into loss of investment.If we do really value our money then we should really do on what should be needed.I appreciate your effort on writing up this one though.
Thank you for good advice!
Also one of the best ways is to look at the signatures of the hero members and the legendary ones. They have good experience and choose the best campaigns.
Also one of the best ways is to look at the signatures of the hero members and the legendary ones. They have good experience and choose the best campaigns.
Good info , what i always look when joining bounth is that the manager is good, how much the hardcap and the hype.😄
Good info it will be very helpful to us as a newbie to consider which one we choose when joining the bounty campaign. Average bounty campaign will run for 2-3 months and very regretted if the bounty that we joined don't pay our work, because after we look up the ICO project is scam and it will be very wasted our time. With this thread I am sure will reduce some fraud in bounty campaign and it should be happen.
I think most important thing to see is the bounty manager because good managers do not take the fake/scam projects.
Secondly, the other important thing is to go through the whitepapers.
Secondly, the other important thing is to go through the whitepapers.
You should also consider the rank of the campaign manager. Usually jr. member campaign managers are dangerous because they can easily throw away their account. This means they don't have much obligation to follow through with actual bounty payouts.
I think everyone was interested sooner or later, what is Bounty? Subsequently, this interest increased, and you have already thought about choosing your own campaign. But here's the ill luck, so much time wasted in the empty, and you did not find the bounty yourself so? What to do in this case?
That's why I created this topic, where I'll try to tell you how to choose a campaign, what to rely on and what I rely on. The topic was created mainly for beginners, but I think it will be interesting to read forum users also.
Let us pass to the criteria themselves.
1. Project Team
Perhaps this is one of the main criteria for choosing a campaign. It so happened that many people do not trust the Russian-speaking team (I can make mistakes based only on people's responses), and I somehow try to bypass them, but if the project's website in the team description reaches up to how many people eat per day , then the trust certainly increases. In this case, we can proceed to step 2.
2. "Cap" (Softcap) and the idea of the project.
I rely on this point, because it is important for me to know how much the company has collected money at the moment and how it evaluates itself.
The idea of the project is very important. Agree, if you are interested in the project, then there is more confidence in it, which can later lead even to investments in this very project. But if the idea is absolutely "sucks", then it will be difficult to collect the "cap" either. That's why I combined these 2 items.
3. Whitelist
This point should be given some kind of attention, because if WL contains a solid text, it not only repels, but creates the illusion that the team is lazy to the point that it is not corny to insert graphics into its paper.
4. Bounty Campaign Manager.
After you have finished working with the company itself, you can go to its manager. I have my list of top managers (in my opinion) that I trust. Basically, this is not one person, but several that sit on the same account. An example is the needmoney account. I rarely take on a company whose manager is Newbie. Trust to them disappears immediately.
5. Conditions and distribution.
I do mostly social work, but once in 3-4 months I also take a subscription. At the moment, the most optimal conditions are: 5 repost / retweets and 2 posts / tweets per week. I try not to take more, but there are exceptions, when the remaining items aroused my confidence. Basically, I take those campaigns in which the share of social services ranges from 10% to 35%.
6. Reports
I met 3 ways that managers use when checking reports.
1. One post for the whole campaign. It's pretty simple, create one post, the link to which you send to the form, and edit it throughout the campaign.
2. One week - one post. Here, in my opinion, a little easier, since you do not steam when copying links, but just do everything at the end of the week.
3. Report form Google. This way is used by the Russian-speaking manager Sergei.Gerasimenko. The most difficult of all ways, I try to avoid it, because it happened that it just flies out of your mind that you need to send a report to the form.
Choose for yourself the ways that you will adhere to as you complete your campaigns.
7. Site Ratings, ala ICObench.
Perhaps the last point in importance is this point. Very often I met with comments of users that on these sites to buy a rating easier than a parrot turnip. I leave it at your discretion, and check with him or not, it's up to you.
On this my criteria are over. I tried to get the most out of the water, and go exactly to the criteria that are most important when choosing a campaign, and thanks to which I select the campaigns Bounty. Please note that the paragraphs express only my subjective opinion, and stick or not - it's up to you. Many can write: "This is obvious." I agree, it is obvious for people who have repeatedly faced the choice of campaigns, but not for beginners, for whom basically this topic was created.
I hope I have helped you to some extent, I will be glad to hear feedback, and also wishes. Good luck!
Do you think bounty hunters have as much patience to check all these details? They are mostly spammers who would hop on to any campaign available and try to make maximum money out of it. To be honest, as long as the campaign is giving over a million dollars for a bounty, it is safe to join it. It ensures that you would earn at least 50-100$ from it. I personally don't do twitter campaigns anymore and left them long ago, but people from countries like Philippines and Nepal do not mind making an extra buck or two. That's why I created this topic, where I'll try to tell you how to choose a campaign, what to rely on and what I rely on. The topic was created mainly for beginners, but I think it will be interesting to read forum users also.
Let us pass to the criteria themselves.
1. Project Team
Perhaps this is one of the main criteria for choosing a campaign. It so happened that many people do not trust the Russian-speaking team (I can make mistakes based only on people's responses), and I somehow try to bypass them, but if the project's website in the team description reaches up to how many people eat per day , then the trust certainly increases. In this case, we can proceed to step 2.
2. "Cap" (Softcap) and the idea of the project.
I rely on this point, because it is important for me to know how much the company has collected money at the moment and how it evaluates itself.
The idea of the project is very important. Agree, if you are interested in the project, then there is more confidence in it, which can later lead even to investments in this very project. But if the idea is absolutely "sucks", then it will be difficult to collect the "cap" either. That's why I combined these 2 items.
3. Whitelist
This point should be given some kind of attention, because if WL contains a solid text, it not only repels, but creates the illusion that the team is lazy to the point that it is not corny to insert graphics into its paper.
4. Bounty Campaign Manager.
After you have finished working with the company itself, you can go to its manager. I have my list of top managers (in my opinion) that I trust. Basically, this is not one person, but several that sit on the same account. An example is the needmoney account. I rarely take on a company whose manager is Newbie. Trust to them disappears immediately.
5. Conditions and distribution.
I do mostly social work, but once in 3-4 months I also take a subscription. At the moment, the most optimal conditions are: 5 repost / retweets and 2 posts / tweets per week. I try not to take more, but there are exceptions, when the remaining items aroused my confidence. Basically, I take those campaigns in which the share of social services ranges from 10% to 35%.
6. Reports
I met 3 ways that managers use when checking reports.
1. One post for the whole campaign. It's pretty simple, create one post, the link to which you send to the form, and edit it throughout the campaign.
2. One week - one post. Here, in my opinion, a little easier, since you do not steam when copying links, but just do everything at the end of the week.
3. Report form Google. This way is used by the Russian-speaking manager Sergei.Gerasimenko. The most difficult of all ways, I try to avoid it, because it happened that it just flies out of your mind that you need to send a report to the form.
Choose for yourself the ways that you will adhere to as you complete your campaigns.
7. Site Ratings, ala ICObench.
Perhaps the last point in importance is this point. Very often I met with comments of users that on these sites to buy a rating easier than a parrot turnip. I leave it at your discretion, and check with him or not, it's up to you.
On this my criteria are over. I tried to get the most out of the water, and go exactly to the criteria that are most important when choosing a campaign, and thanks to which I select the campaigns Bounty. Please note that the paragraphs express only my subjective opinion, and stick or not - it's up to you. Many can write: "This is obvious." I agree, it is obvious for people who have repeatedly faced the choice of campaigns, but not for beginners, for whom basically this topic was created.
I hope I have helped you to some extent, I will be glad to hear feedback, and also wishes. Good luck!
How ironic it is that you write such a long post in order for us to save time.
~snip~
These are really just basic ideas and i would say that this is not really able to save you up some time but rather spending lots of time if you do make check up on each one of those things.From to its whitepaper itself it would really already give you some long time to read up this is why people are going lazy and skip other things and go ahead without analyzing too much which results into loss of investment.If we do really value our money then we should really do on what should be needed.I appreciate your effort on writing up this one though.
Very helpful for beginners, it turns out there are so many criteria that we must be careful in choosing a bounty. But I doubt the last criterion, is the rating site reliable? Because many people say that ratings from rating sites are not an indicator to see successful ico or not.
But how can we choose the best bounty,do you ha e any ideas for that bro.
I suggest the people to pick the bounties from reputed managers it might save time for us to find the good bounty because normally the managers will make enough research about the project before involving into that so chance of scam is less in that case.
I suggest the people to pick the bounties from reputed managers it might save time for us to find the good bounty because normally the managers will make enough research about the project before involving into that so chance of scam is less in that case.
Thank you for your informations. I looked the manager, project and number of participant. I hope I choosed true one. It is really hard to find good campaign
~snip~
These are really just basic ideas and i would say that this is not really able to save you up some time but rather spending lots of time if you do make check up on each one of those things.From to its whitepaper itself it would really already give you some long time to read up this is why people are going lazy and skip other things and go ahead without analyzing too much which results into loss of investment.If we do really value our money then we should really do on what should be needed.I appreciate your effort on writing up this one though. 
I think everyone was interested sooner or later, what is Bounty? Subsequently, this interest increased, and you have already thought about choosing your own campaign. But here's the ill luck, so much time wasted in the empty, and you did not find the bounty yourself so? What to do in this case?
That's why I created this topic, where I'll try to tell you how to choose a campaign, what to rely on and what I rely on. The topic was created mainly for beginners, but I think it will be interesting to read forum users also.
Let us pass to the criteria themselves.
1. Project Team
Perhaps this is one of the main criteria for choosing a campaign. It so happened that many people do not trust the Russian-speaking team (I can make mistakes based only on people's responses), and I somehow try to bypass them, but if the project's website in the team description reaches up to how many people eat per day , then the trust certainly increases. In this case, we can proceed to step 2.
2. "Cap" (Softcap) and the idea of the project.
I rely on this point, because it is important for me to know how much the company has collected money at the moment and how it evaluates itself.
The idea of the project is very important. Agree, if you are interested in the project, then there is more confidence in it, which can later lead even to investments in this very project. But if the idea is absolutely "sucks", then it will be difficult to collect the "cap" either. That's why I combined these 2 items.
3. Whitelist
This point should be given some kind of attention, because if WL contains a solid text, it not only repels, but creates the illusion that the team is lazy to the point that it is not corny to insert graphics into its paper.
4. Bounty Campaign Manager.
After you have finished working with the company itself, you can go to its manager. I have my list of top managers (in my opinion) that I trust. Basically, this is not one person, but several that sit on the same account. An example is the needmoney account. I rarely take on a company whose manager is Newbie. Trust to them disappears immediately.
5. Conditions and distribution.
I do mostly social work, but once in 3-4 months I also take a subscription. At the moment, the most optimal conditions are: 5 repost / retweets and 2 posts / tweets per week. I try not to take more, but there are exceptions, when the remaining items aroused my confidence. Basically, I take those campaigns in which the share of social services ranges from 10% to 35%.
6. Reports
I met 3 ways that managers use when checking reports.
1. One post for the whole campaign. It's pretty simple, create one post, the link to which you send to the form, and edit it throughout the campaign.
2. One week - one post. Here, in my opinion, a little easier, since you do not steam when copying links, but just do everything at the end of the week.
3. Report form Google. This way is used by the Russian-speaking manager Sergei.Gerasimenko. The most difficult of all ways, I try to avoid it, because it happened that it just flies out of your mind that you need to send a report to the form.
Choose for yourself the ways that you will adhere to as you complete your campaigns.
7. Site Ratings, ala ICObench.
Perhaps the last point in importance is this point. Very often I met with comments of users that on these sites to buy a rating easier than a parrot turnip. I leave it at your discretion, and check with him or not, it's up to you.
On this my criteria are over. I tried to get the most out of the water, and go exactly to the criteria that are most important when choosing a campaign, and thanks to which I select the campaigns Bounty. Please note that the paragraphs express only my subjective opinion, and stick or not - it's up to you. Many can write: "This is obvious." I agree, it is obvious for people who have repeatedly faced the choice of campaigns, but not for beginners, for whom basically this topic was created.
I hope I have helped you to some extent, I will be glad to hear feedback, and also wishes. Good luck!
That's why I created this topic, where I'll try to tell you how to choose a campaign, what to rely on and what I rely on. The topic was created mainly for beginners, but I think it will be interesting to read forum users also.
Let us pass to the criteria themselves.
1. Project Team
Perhaps this is one of the main criteria for choosing a campaign. It so happened that many people do not trust the Russian-speaking team (I can make mistakes based only on people's responses), and I somehow try to bypass them, but if the project's website in the team description reaches up to how many people eat per day , then the trust certainly increases. In this case, we can proceed to step 2.
2. "Cap" (Softcap) and the idea of the project.
I rely on this point, because it is important for me to know how much the company has collected money at the moment and how it evaluates itself.
The idea of the project is very important. Agree, if you are interested in the project, then there is more confidence in it, which can later lead even to investments in this very project. But if the idea is absolutely "sucks", then it will be difficult to collect the "cap" either. That's why I combined these 2 items.
3. Whitelist
This point should be given some kind of attention, because if WL contains a solid text, it not only repels, but creates the illusion that the team is lazy to the point that it is not corny to insert graphics into its paper.
4. Bounty Campaign Manager.
After you have finished working with the company itself, you can go to its manager. I have my list of top managers (in my opinion) that I trust. Basically, this is not one person, but several that sit on the same account. An example is the needmoney account. I rarely take on a company whose manager is Newbie. Trust to them disappears immediately.
5. Conditions and distribution.
I do mostly social work, but once in 3-4 months I also take a subscription. At the moment, the most optimal conditions are: 5 repost / retweets and 2 posts / tweets per week. I try not to take more, but there are exceptions, when the remaining items aroused my confidence. Basically, I take those campaigns in which the share of social services ranges from 10% to 35%.
6. Reports
I met 3 ways that managers use when checking reports.
1. One post for the whole campaign. It's pretty simple, create one post, the link to which you send to the form, and edit it throughout the campaign.
2. One week - one post. Here, in my opinion, a little easier, since you do not steam when copying links, but just do everything at the end of the week.
3. Report form Google. This way is used by the Russian-speaking manager Sergei.Gerasimenko. The most difficult of all ways, I try to avoid it, because it happened that it just flies out of your mind that you need to send a report to the form.
Choose for yourself the ways that you will adhere to as you complete your campaigns.
7. Site Ratings, ala ICObench.
Perhaps the last point in importance is this point. Very often I met with comments of users that on these sites to buy a rating easier than a parrot turnip. I leave it at your discretion, and check with him or not, it's up to you.
On this my criteria are over. I tried to get the most out of the water, and go exactly to the criteria that are most important when choosing a campaign, and thanks to which I select the campaigns Bounty. Please note that the paragraphs express only my subjective opinion, and stick or not - it's up to you. Many can write: "This is obvious." I agree, it is obvious for people who have repeatedly faced the choice of campaigns, but not for beginners, for whom basically this topic was created.
I hope I have helped you to some extent, I will be glad to hear feedback, and also wishes. Good luck!
Jump to: