@ james.lent
Your signature bias is showing.
Your signature bias is showing.
Yeah im sure it is, taking into account that you're being paid to post non constructive texts, i'd rather not prolong this convo. Next time if you want to make a proper reply, at-least review the entire OP first. Cheers.
We are dealing with a accusation and I asked for clear documentation that he had contacted support before posting here. If I clicked on the links or not thats really beside the point as you will never know the truth. Find its best to be vague when dealing with these type of issues.
There has been a up tick in accusations against cloudbet like you state but I do not think they are all legit and this is coming from some one that does not use their service any longer.
The signature aspect is a sideshow because the forum allows them. So railing against random people will not prove anything and most likely make you come off as a dictator.
If people are going to constantly attack members for having signatures we should also be addressing non signature spammers as well. Mods should also get off the fence and tell people to cut out these attacks on signatures as the forum allows it!
Very similar thread:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/cloudbet-scam-warning-1440736
