Author

Topic: [SCAM] WAPINTER Bounty Managers scams on Konios (Read 388 times)

member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 69
Yes he is a scammer .
I don't want to write why. I don't have the strength or the nerve to do this whorehouse in this forum.
He did not pay for 10 campaigns for which I worked hard and explained many hours (translations) each time giving absurd reasons.

Apart from all the other campaigns that are simply fraudulent. 


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wapinter-related-with-scam-why-he-repeat-to-promote-ico-with-fake-team-4496912
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 47
Unpopular opinion from an unpopular account:
-Both parties are at fault and showed unprofessionalism.
-Wapinter should've checked carefully before accepting anyone on his bounties, but this lies on Saif's fault based on what Wapinter said "co-manager accepted you"
-You yourself should know that red trusts are always a no no.
-Both parties manners aren't on point.

PS: I think Coolcryptovator is right
There is another thread we discussed about Wapinter.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wapinter-related-with-scam-why-he-repeat-to-promote-ico-with-fake-team-4496912
I think you can join there to discuse your problem instead of make new thread.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2226
Signature space for rent
There is another thread we discussed about Wapinter.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wapinter-related-with-scam-why-he-repeat-to-promote-ico-with-fake-team-4496912
I think you can join there to discuse your problem instead of make new thread. He promote some scam ICO during couple of month. And that are well proven. So I will request to OP please lock this thread and continue discussion there on old thread to avoid spam.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
@OP, ignore mdayonliner he is just a random forum spammer with 200 posts per week totally spam.
Oh really! You get the impression looking at the merit I received so far and from my post history? Merit scores determine the posting quality (ignoring the abuse part by members which are minor) of a poster and dude - I received more merit than you so far!
http://loycevsbasement.privatedns.org/Merit/history/806776.html
http://loycevsbasement.privatedns.org/Merit/history/1432468.html

Make your facts correct.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 518
Recently wapinter and his alt accounts were tagged so don't expect him to do anything more now because now he don't care about his reputation now that was already ruined by DT members.But also every bounty have rule that they hae the rights to change the rules at any time of the campaign period so you agrees that and joined but it is unfair to reject without proper reason but he don't care it anyway.
copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
@OP, ignore mdayonliner he is just a random forum spammer with 200 posts per week totally spam. about this case I don't know what else you expect? wapinter is currently banned with several of their alt accounts and a known trust abuser already has tagged them all for being alt of account seller. funny if you check the reference of their tag you'll end up reading another campaign manager we all know by the name of Yahoo having an alt account named: sllsrmember. lol.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
And I never ignored my red tag, they did. Read the damn op carefully
I was speaking for you actually  Grin
hero member
Activity: 807
Merit: 522
Long story short, I joined Konios Signature bounty just because most of the campaigns don't allow negative trust whereas Konios did.
What more you could expect from a campaign which encourage the spammers (not sure if you are one or not - I did not see your post history, so please don't take it personally. I am talking about in general) for their project? This was expected to be happened  Grin
You had the obvious red flag in front of your eyes and you ignored it.
I am proper and honest with my activity, you can check. Because I also do it: I manage communities and I run bounty programs when required, as well. So I know the rules and ethic of this game.

And I never ignored my red tag, they did. Read the damn op carefully
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
Long story short, I joined Konios Signature bounty just because most of the campaigns don't allow negative trust whereas Konios did.
What more you could expect from a campaign which encourage the spammers (not sure if you are one or not - I did not see your post history, so please don't take it personally. I am talking about in general) for their project? This was expected to be happened  Grin
You had the obvious red flag in front of your eyes and you ignored it.
hero member
Activity: 807
Merit: 522
Long story short, I joined Konios Signature bounty just because most of the campaigns don't allow negative trust whereas Konios did. I earned my stakes and now they rejected me for no reason but their newly made up rule?

Says "Good" even after seeing my negative trust on my profile:
https://prnt.sc/k320up

Requests my BTC adress and then rejects me
http://archive.is/wUkQL#selection-1423.0-1408.4

New rule makes up during the campaign(?) and my reaction afterwards
https://prnt.sc/k32apr > https://prnt.sc/k321a3

I was tagged long before the campaign, they should have been aware of that
https://prnt.sc/k321oy

Says "do whatever you want to" even though I am right on scam accusation -- which shows high levels of unprofessionalism
https://prnt.sc/k321y0

I am rejected despite those 100 stakes
https://prnt.sc/k3225q

Proof that there is no rule regarding negative trust
http://archive.is/dFsjc#selection-703.0-713.58

I love how he says "I will not accept you in any campaign Smiley" like I am interested in fucking scammers bounties now
http://prntscr.com/k390fp

This faggot (saif) tells me to read the rules and blocks me after
https://prnt.sc/k38yl0

Sheet (in case they remove my stakes)
https://prnt.sc/k31rol
http://archive.is/maZFt

As it is clear, no mistake made from my side in this process, I have followed the specified rules and I have earned it. And as I said in the chat with Wapinter, even if they had forgotten to add the rule, it was their responsibility to check the accounts and notify participants about the situation. Haven't they ever checked my profile for the signature and avatar for the time being? I don't think so.

The lesson that needs to be derived from this case is, briefly: You should not participate in a campaign which does not consist of professionals, nor does its job properly, and is managed by Wapinter Scamming Bounty Management.

Accounts involved:
Wapinter
Majharul Saiif

Can't blame koniosofficial but let's see.
Jump to: