I hope this resolves everything
Daniel
No, it's not solving anything.
That 20 seconds video proves only one thing, a man who calls himself daniel is actually behind this project. NOTHING else.
And we have another problem,
https://kappi.network/KappiNetworkWhitepaper_1.0.pdfhttp://archive.fo/wn9a9https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos/blob/master/WHITEPAPER.mdAlthough not pure plagiarism but text spinning
Yours:
Creating success through the use of decentralized file-sharing in an open-source ecosystem to run a public cryptocurrency has allowed more people to understand how such infrastructure can improve basic social economics. Bitcoin, and Zero cash are two examples of specialized blockchain applications, and the best example of a smart contract platform would still be Ethereum, which allows for many applications of the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM).
Cosmos:
The combined success of the open-source ecosystem, decentralized file-sharing, and public cryptocurrencies has inspired an understanding that decentralized internet protocols can be used to radically improve socio-economic infrastructure. We have seen specialized blockchain applications like Bitcoin [1] (a cryptocurrency), Zerocash [2] (a cryptocurrency for privacy), and generalized smart contract platforms such as Ethereum [3], with countless distributed applications for the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM).
Yours:
A bridge is what the relationship between the DWARF and the zone is called. Both have to keep up to date information on the other’s blocks for the purpose of verifying proofs when tokens move between the two. The bridge zone has an indirection which lets the DWARF logic to stay agnostic and simple to the other blockchain’s consensus algorithm strategies.
Every bridge zone validator will operate an KAPPI powered blockchain that includes an ABCI bridge app and a full node of the original blockchain.
As new blocks are mined the bridge zone validators reach agreement on committed blocks through signing and sharing each perspective view of the blockchain tip origin. When payment is passed through a bridge zone on origin and there have been enough confirmations a corresponding account is created on the bridge with that balance. The bridge zone can share validator sets on networks such as Ethereum
Cosmos:
A bridge is similar to the relationship between a Cosmos hub and zone; both must keep up with the latest blocks of the other in order to verify proofs that tokens have moved from one to the other. A "bridge-zone" on the Cosmos network keeps up with the Hub as well as the other cryptocurrency. The indirection through the bridge-zone allows the logic of the Hub to remain simple and agnostic to other blockchain consensus strategies such as Bitcoin's proof-of-work mining.
Each bridge-zone validator would run a Tendermint-powered blockchain with a special ABCI bridge-app, but also a full-node of the "origin" blockchain.
When new blocks are mined on the origin, the bridge-zone validators will come to agreement on committed blocks by signing and sharing their respective local view of the origin's blockchain tip. When a bridge-zone receives payment on the origin (and sufficient confirmations were agreed to have been seen in the case of a PoW chain such as Ethereum or Bitcoin)
Free advice, don't try to blame it on Einar Helgason