If the evidences are so strong, why did they received only 1 negative?
When I see really strong proofs against someone, they usually receive 2 or more trusted negative trusts
Because people don't bother themselfs , also it's useless if you are aren't on the DefaultTrust it won't really affect on them . take the Investement based-game section for example ,most of them if not all are scammers , it would take shitload of time to give them all negative trust and they may comeback and comeback .
I said a while back that, seeing as Quickseller was effectively Tomatocage's hitman (whether or not you believe they are different people), then when TC reluctantly removed QS from his trust, I believe he had an obligation to the forum to address the effect of that action and personally revisit the accounts which have benefited from QS's downgrading, reconfirming (or not) trust on a case by case basis. He doesn't appear to have done that.
....without increasing Trust during the months or whatever however we should only allow Senior member or Hero members (with 1500 posts or above for example) and above to give that otherwise their would be a lot of abuse .
All that would do would increase the value of those enabled accounts.
The crux of all these problems is the transferability of accounts, giving them a value. The official line is that it can't be stopped, so it's allowed.
Until that changes, nothing else will.
Agree on this one but this is why I gave an example for 1500 (it could be more) , someone with much high quality posts will be more then likely known on the community and made a reputation for him self , so he will definitly not sell his account . but again .. yes agree most of the website that use this kind of system don't allow Proxy & VPN's and double accounts .
