Well the buy back has been the bottleneck in this strategy. Normally my sell volume is considerably higher than my buy volume. To offset this I have been doing research as to where I can buy coins from on a regular basis at stamp or below. For example, the local cash trade in new york is such that even new guys don't pay higher than 1-2% above stamp. I am actively trying to build relationships with users from that market. Eventually I would like to open a branch in locations like that so I could have employees making buys for me on a regular basis.
The real reason I asked for shorter terms was to build a rep. I see this as me putting in work(maybe taking a little too much risk) now for higher interest at shorter terms so that I can later get larger loans at lower rates and much longer terms. At that point I would have established a clear history of repayment and can gradually drop my interest rates and lengthen terms.
The way I am trading the volatility(downward trending market) doesn't matter as much. If I am selling for cash deposits I can sell at +8% consistently and have access to the cash for buys pretty much immediately. I normally have my buy ads running at -10% to -5%(current running at bitstamp because I ran low on coin) and have a couple go to guys that I can buy from at any point for stamp to +2% for cash deposits. If the price happens to drop more before I am able to make a buy I've profited on my btc loans by default.
In an upward trending market I plan on using icbit to help secure my sells. This will require more research on my part but essentially if I sell off 10btc today I should buy 10btc worth of futures contracts. I could also theoretically do this for a downward trending market and sell contracts.
Basically I plan to reset daily so the price from day to day shouldn't matter as much. If I sell off 10btc today I need to make sure I buy back a minimum 10btc today.
Yo mentioned:
"I plan to allow users to buy/sell bitcoin directly to/from my company and have a method for lenders to track their loans to/from the company."
Those words are music to my ears. But I just wanted to make sure I am understanding this properly. Is this a move toward establishing a direct competitor in the fixed-btc exchanges (like bitsimple, local bitcoin) or is this a move to limit the liability and create transparency by having an open system to match the loans to the actual transaction it financed?
I want to essentially be a fixed btc-exchange and offer users to loan the company funds directly(and eventually borrow from me) but an open system that matches loans to transactions is a great idea!