SELLING MS69 DOGECOIN, ERROR COIN - DIGITALLY

minerjones

legendary

Activity: 3206

Merit: 3596

Quote from: notaek on November 13, 2015, 04:42:12 PM

Am I the only one noticing the scratch marks on a "nearly perfect" coin? The marks become more prominent when you open this image in a new tab and zoom it!

Let's see if the price reaches 1.9 BTC in next week Wink

Good luck Shibe!

Yes you are. Maybe because there is a layer of hard plastic holding the coin, but what do I know.... I'm only going off what the picture shows.

wheresmycoin

hero member

Activity: 654

Merit: 504

coin is currently being up for auction @

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/barter-trade-auction-1257758 Shocked

notaek

legendary

Activity: 1268

Merit: 1009

Am I the only one noticing the scratch marks on a "nearly perfect" coin? The marks become more prominent when you open this image in a new tab and zoom it!

Let's see if the price reaches 1.9 BTC in next week Wink

Good luck Shibe!

wheresmycoin

hero member

Activity: 654

Merit: 504

Quote from: TookDk on November 13, 2015, 05:46:46 AM

Quote from: wheresmycoin on November 13, 2015, 05:20:21 AM

--snip
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=000al7ru3ms
--snip

Love that video <3
Favorite part is when Shibe is rocketing and spreading DOGECOINS to everybody on the way, lol

Also like the mining clip, lol.

good one especially shibes mining with graphic cards instead of picks..

TookDk

legendary

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1062

One coin to rule them all

Quote from: wheresmycoin on November 13, 2015, 05:20:21 AM

--snip
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=000al7ru3ms
--snip

Love that video <3
Favorite part is when Shibe is rocketing and spreading DOGECOINS to everybody on the way, lol

Also like the mining clip, lol.

wheresmycoin

hero member

Activity: 654

Merit: 504

i have already revised price to 1.9btc in this sales thread currently: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/new-physical-sale-casascius-bitcoin-cryptoimperator-dogecoin-1108537

guess that i'll be able to achieve somewhat close to this targeted price^ during the next https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=000al7ru3ms

Grin

hedgy73

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1077

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: notaek on November 12, 2015, 04:13:36 PM

Quote from: hedgy73 on November 12, 2015, 04:02:04 PM

You forgot to factor in the cost of grading and the MS69 grade it achieved which is just 1 point off an ANACS perfect 70.

Even though personally I also think the 2.5BTC is too high, your offer is far too low.

I don't think MS69 grade literally means anything here, since it is furnished only with Zinc alloy and not with Gold or silver right? Well, if I'm wrong (probably I'm), can you propose a price for better understanding of MS69 grade?

Well then brass Cas. should sell for like $20..... Tongue

No more like 0.2 / $65 Tongue

.

hedgy73

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1077

Quote from: notaek on November 12, 2015, 04:13:36 PM

Quote from: hedgy73 on November 12, 2015, 04:02:04 PM

You forgot to factor in the cost of grading and the MS69 grade it achieved which is just 1 point off an ANACS perfect 70.

Even though personally I also think the 2.5BTC is too high, your offer is far too low.

I don't think MS69 grade literally means anything here, since it is furnished only with Zinc alloy and not with Gold or silver right? Well, if I'm wrong (probably I'm), can you propose a price for better understanding of MS69 grade?

From what I understand the grade is given to the overall quality and finish of the coin and that MS69 is a near perfect coin.

notaek

legendary

Activity: 1268

Merit: 1009

Quote from: hedgy73 on November 12, 2015, 04:02:04 PM

You forgot to factor in the cost of grading and the MS69 grade it achieved which is just 1 point off an ANACS perfect 70.

Even though personally I also think the 2.5BTC is too high, your offer is far too low.

I don't think MS69 grade literally means anything here, since it is furnished only with Zinc alloy and not with Gold or silver right? Well, if I'm wrong (probably I'm), can you propose a price for better understanding of MS69 grade?

hedgy73

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1077

Quote from: notaek on November 12, 2015, 03:56:32 PM

Quote from: Fortify on November 12, 2015, 01:19:55 PM

I don't think the asking price of 2.5 is realistic but offering 0.08 is kinda insulting and pointless to even post. Just to have it graded costs more than that.

Sorry mate, I don't agree with your proposition! OP's coin is a normal edition Dogecoin with funding error of 20,000 Dogecoins only! Now, according to this thread, I see that CryptoImperator sold the Normal edition @ $10 + 10,000 Doge. Now if I'm not wrong, 0.08 BTC is worth $26.4 which is way more than $10 + 20,000 Doge! And the price which I proposed is exclusive of shipment taxes Wink

So IMO, 0.08 BTC will be way more profitable for OP! Now, it's OP's decision to whether stick with this price or not, but I would surely be the first buyer if he agrees with this price point

You forgot to factor in the cost of grading and the MS69 grade it achieved which is just 1 point off an ANACS perfect 70.

Even though personally I also think the 2.5BTC is too high, your offer is far too low.

notaek

legendary

Activity: 1268

Merit: 1009

Quote from: Fortify on November 12, 2015, 01:19:55 PM

I don't think the asking price of 2.5 is realistic but offering 0.08 is kinda insulting and pointless to even post. Just to have it graded costs more than that.

Sorry mate, I don't agree with your proposition! OP's coin is a normal edition Dogecoin with funding error of 20,000 Dogecoins only! Now, according to this thread, I see that CryptoImperator sold the Normal edition @ $10 + 10,000 Doge. Now if I'm not wrong, 0.08 BTC is worth $26.4 which is way more than $10 + 20,000 Doge! And the price which I proposed is exclusive of shipment taxes Wink

So IMO, 0.08 BTC + shipping fees will be way more profitable for OP! Now, it's totally on OP's decision whether to stick with this price or not, but I would surely be the buyer if he agrees with this price point.

Fortify

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1192

Quote from: notaek on November 12, 2015, 09:47:46 AM

20,000 Doge is worth only 0.007BTC and since it's an $18 coin, the asking price is an overkill! I would have bought it now if it was priced at 0.08 BTC (without shipping). Well, good luck on your sale. Wink

Edit: Oops! Sorry for bumping an old thread! I overlooked the date of it's last post.

I don't think the asking price of 2.5 is realistic but offering 0.08 is kinda insulting and pointless to even post. Just to have it graded costs more than that.

notaek

legendary

Activity: 1268

Merit: 1009

20,000 Doge is worth only 0.007BTC and since it's an $18 coin, the asking price is an overkill! I would have bought it now if it was priced at 0.08 BTC (without shipping). Well, good luck on your sale. Wink

Edit: Oops! Sorry for bumping an old thread! I overlooked the date of it's last post.

CryptoImperator

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1312

Quote from: TookDk on October 16, 2015, 03:58:20 AM

Quote from: CryptoImperator on October 13, 2015, 06:12:27 PM

--snip
http://imperator.uberbills.com
--snip

That is pretty cool
Any idea if Napalm will add the 10 x gold coin? ... that would be totally awesome.

Working on that

TookDk

legendary

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1062

One coin to rule them all

Quote from: CryptoImperator on October 13, 2015, 06:12:27 PM

--snip
http://imperator.uberbills.com
--snip

That is pretty cool
Any idea if Napalm will add the 10 x gold coin? ... that would be totally awesome.

wheresmycoin

hero member

Activity: 654

Merit: 504

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: wheresmycoin on September 21, 2015, 06:27:04 PM

Quote from: bithalo on September 21, 2015, 02:52:49 PM

I'm a collector, but having a coin funded twice does nothing for me personally. I don't consider it an error coin, nor put any premium other than another 10k doges.
If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.
If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.
Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?

Have to admit that digitally errored coins are more easily to come by,
what about only one digitally errored out of a whole first series coin?
Theoretically, i think, physically or digitally errored coins are still error coin, people are used to and have only heard of physical error coin just like many have not heard of digital currencies like bitcoin.
Do mistakes made by the creator during manufacturing not considered an error?
What happens in an exact scenario but a casascius coin instead?

Small thread hijack:
What about makers like Coinographic, where many of the coins ended up not being funded at all. Would this make a loaded coin more valuable? (not including the loaded LTC)
Or maybe something like this coin that WMC is offering?? A Coinographic 1LTC that has 2LTC that was loaded by the maker.

Just my 2 satoshi.

Thanks

Physicals prices are as depressed as digital ones at the moment.. Perhaps when LTC price is higher and in much more demand than now.?

wheresmycoin

hero member

Activity: 654

Merit: 504

Quote from: CryptoImperator on October 13, 2015, 06:12:27 PM

Quote from: wheresmycoin on October 13, 2015, 05:18:58 PM

Quote from: Pistachio on October 13, 2015, 07:42:52 AM

This might be worth resubmitting to ANACS and paying the $12 research fee to try to add 'digital error' to the description. I have some Microsoul zombie coins coming in that I plan to submit this way. Do you have any documentation that can be submitted along with the coin? Maybe a notarized letter from Crypto Imperator or ask them to post a list of known digital error addresses on their website (like what Gravitate did).

There's a public address slip from CI which shows the repeated funding on dogechain.
The research fee option might help. Had seems like anacs only reconigze the physical aspects, they don't touch on the digital aspects..

http://imperator.uberbills.com

You can check all the Doges there (We are working with @naypalm to include all our coins) , the coin being sold here is: http://imperator.uberbills.com/?address=DDJFur94fADTVUPbBqyfwSEAvMZgrW2Pyy it has been funded twice by us. Why? An error made by the Dogecoin wallet, bear in mind that we always fund from the following address: DPRadvc3gsL9yi2JGP4tzUgvRGqh2DP9Y as there are other coins with more Doge that did not come from us.

BTW there is also a Super Doge with an extra 100.000 Doge due to the same error...

Hope this helps clarify this "error"

wow nice.. now that CI has an uberbill too, i can spend some time browsing through.

and thanks for the clarification

CryptoImperator

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1312

Quote from: wheresmycoin on October 13, 2015, 05:18:58 PM

Quote from: Pistachio on October 13, 2015, 07:42:52 AM

This might be worth resubmitting to ANACS and paying the $12 research fee to try to add 'digital error' to the description. I have some Microsoul zombie coins coming in that I plan to submit this way. Do you have any documentation that can be submitted along with the coin? Maybe a notarized letter from Crypto Imperator or ask them to post a list of known digital error addresses on their website (like what Gravitate did).

There's a public address slip from CI which shows the repeated funding on dogechain.
The research fee option might help. Had seems like anacs only reconigze the physical aspects, they don't touch on the digital aspects..

http://imperator.uberbills.com

You can check all the Doges there (We are working with @naypalm to include all our coins) , the coin being sold here is: http://imperator.uberbills.com/?address=DDJFur94fADTVUPbBqyfwSEAvMZgrW2Pyy it has been funded twice by us. Why? An error made by the Dogecoin wallet, bear in mind that we always fund from the following address: DPRadvc3gsL9yi2JGP4tzUgvRGqh2DP9Y as there are other coins with more Doge that did not come from us.

BTW there is also a Super Doge with an extra 100.000 Doge due to the same error...

Hope this helps clarify this "error"

wheresmycoin

hero member

Activity: 654

Merit: 504

Quote from: Pistachio on October 13, 2015, 07:42:52 AM

This might be worth resubmitting to ANACS and paying the $12 research fee to try to add 'digital error' to the description. I have some Microsoul zombie coins coming in that I plan to submit this way. Do you have any documentation that can be submitted along with the coin? Maybe a notarized letter from Crypto Imperator or ask them to post a list of known digital error addresses on their website (like what Gravitate did).

There's a public address slip from CI which shows the repeated funding on dogechain.
The research fee option might help. Had seems like anacs only reconigze the physical aspects, they don't touch on the digital aspects..

Pistachio

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

This might be worth resubmitting to ANACS and paying the $12 research fee to try to add 'digital error' to the description. I have some Microsoul zombie coins coming in that I plan to submit this way. Do you have any documentation that can be submitted along with the coin? Maybe a notarized letter from Crypto Imperator or ask them to post a list of known digital error addresses on their website (like what Gravitate did).

wheresmycoin

hero member

Activity: 654

Merit: 504

Quote from: AT101ET on October 13, 2015, 01:36:29 AM

I'll offer 0.125 BTC with shipping to the UK.

Much higher..

AT101ET

legendary

Activity: 3192

Merit: 1348

I'll offer 0.125 BTC with shipping to the UK.

wheresmycoin

hero member

Activity: 654

Merit: 504

Only one exists..

Once gone it's really gone forever!

All offers considered..

odolvlobo

legendary

Activity: 4466

Merit: 3391

Anyone can add any amount to a coin, so in my opinion the fact that it is over-funded is not worth much, even if the manufacturer did it. If anything, over-funding a coin might lower its value because it may no longer be considered pristine.

owlcatz

legendary

Activity: 3570

Merit: 1959

Quote from: wheresmycoin on September 21, 2015, 06:19:35 PM

Quote from: owlcatz on September 21, 2015, 04:51:09 PM

Quote from: bithalo on September 21, 2015, 02:52:49 PM

I'm a collector, but having a coin funded twice does nothing for me personally. I don't consider it an error coin, nor put any premium other than another 10k doges.

If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.

If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.

Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?

I agree with Bithalo... I had this with an over funded lealana - I was able to sell it over funded (face value of 0.2, but should have been 0.1) for just around 0.24 BTC, so I agree, this is not an "error" coin, it's just over funded, so don't expect some outrageous price, even if graded.

Take the face value + what it costs for the grading, add more for whatever you feel an MS69 of this is worth, and there is your "value/price"... Of course, that is just my opinion. Tongue

Thanks for clarifying, I was also wondering what the error was! Wink

Curious to know, is this lealana overly funded by smoothie?

Nope, it had nothing to do with smoothie at all, it was a buyer-funded holo marked, so that certainly didn't help the sale price, forgot about that, sorry! Tongue

edit - I do think your coin looks very nice in the pic though, love seeing all the different graded and ungraded coins around here!

wheresmycoin

hero member

Activity: 654

Merit: 504

Quote from: hedgy73 on September 21, 2015, 06:37:21 PM

Quote from: wheresmycoin on September 21, 2015, 06:27:04 PM

Quote from: bithalo on September 21, 2015, 02:52:49 PM

I'm a collector, but having a coin funded twice does nothing for me personally. I don't consider it an error coin, nor put any premium other than another 10k doges.

If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.

If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.

Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?

Have to admit that digitally errored coins are more easily to come by,

what about only one digitally errored out of a whole first series coin?

Theoretically, i think, physically or digitally errored coins are still error coin, people are used to and have only heard of physical error coin just like many have not heard of digital currencies like bitcoin.

Do mistakes made by the creator during manufacturing not considered an error?

Also seems pricey to me.

I'd say physical mistakes like spelling or manufacturing are more commonly associated with error coins, not double funding.

On bittrex you can currently buy 10,000 doge for 0.005BTC ($1.15).

But it's your coin so you set the asking price

.

Price is negotiable.

hedgy73

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1077

Quote from: wheresmycoin on September 21, 2015, 06:27:04 PM

Quote from: bithalo on September 21, 2015, 02:52:49 PM

I'm a collector, but having a coin funded twice does nothing for me personally. I don't consider it an error coin, nor put any premium other than another 10k doges.

If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.

If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.

Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?

Have to admit that digitally errored coins are more easily to come by,

what about only one digitally errored out of a whole first series coin?

Theoretically, i think, physically or digitally errored coins are still error coin, people are used to and have only heard of physical error coin just like many have not heard of digital currencies like bitcoin.

Do mistakes made by the creator during manufacturing not considered an error?

Also seems pricey to me.

I'd say physical mistakes like spelling or manufacturing are more commonly associated with error coins, not double funding.

On bittrex you can currently buy 10,000 doge for 0.005BTC ($1.15).

But it's your coin so you set the asking price

.

wheresmycoin

hero member

Activity: 654

Merit: 504

Quote from: bithalo on September 21, 2015, 02:52:49 PM

I'm a collector, but having a coin funded twice does nothing for me personally. I don't consider it an error coin, nor put any premium other than another 10k doges.

If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.

If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.

Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?

Have to admit that digitally errored coins are more easily to come by,

what about only one digitally errored out of a whole first series coin?

Theoretically, i think, physically or digitally errored coins are still error coin, people are used to and have only heard of physical error coin just like many have not heard of digital currencies like bitcoin.

Do mistakes made by the creator during manufacturing not considered an error?

What happens in an exact scenario but a casascius coin instead?

wheresmycoin

hero member

Activity: 654

Merit: 504

Quote from: owlcatz on September 21, 2015, 04:51:09 PM

Quote from: bithalo on September 21, 2015, 02:52:49 PM

I'm a collector, but having a coin funded twice does nothing for me personally. I don't consider it an error coin, nor put any premium other than another 10k doges.

If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.

If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.

Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?

I agree with Bithalo... I had this with an over funded lealana - I was able to sell it over funded (face value of 0.2, but should have been 0.1) for just around 0.24 BTC, so I agree, this is not an "error" coin, it's just over funded, so don't expect some outrageous price, even if graded.

Take the face value + what it costs for the grading, add more for whatever you feel an MS69 of this is worth, and there is your "value/price"... Of course, that is just my opinion. Tongue

Thanks for clarifying, I was also wondering what the error was! Wink

Curious to know, is this lealana overly funded by smoothie?

wheresmycoin

hero member

Activity: 654

Merit: 504

Quote from: monbux on September 21, 2015, 02:36:33 PM

Quote from: bithalo on September 21, 2015, 01:55:01 PM

What did this coin cost you... around $10?

Is this even the limited numbered coin, worth slightly more?

Is it the only error coin? If so, then I guess I could understand why the price is so high Shocked

yup, this is the only digitally error dogecoin i know of. But we need CI's confirmation.

owlcatz

legendary

Activity: 3570

Merit: 1959

Quote from: bithalo on September 21, 2015, 02:52:49 PM

I'm a collector, but having a coin funded twice does nothing for me personally. I don't consider it an error coin, nor put any premium other than another 10k doges.

If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.

If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.

Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?

I agree with Bithalo... I had this with an over funded lealana - I was able to sell it over funded (face value of 0.2, but should have been 0.1) for just around 0.24 BTC, so I agree, this is not an "error" coin, it's just over funded, so don't expect some outrageous price, even if graded.

Take the face value + what it costs for the grading, add more for whatever you feel an MS69 of this is worth, and there is your "value/price"... Of course, that is just my opinion. Tongue

Thanks for clarifying, I was also wondering what the error was! Wink

bithalo

legendary

Activity: 1470

Merit: 1017

Star Wars Ep. 9 is here

I'm a collector, but having a coin funded twice does nothing for me personally. I don't consider it an error coin, nor put any premium other than another 10k doges.

If I had a coin funded twice, I wouldn't care.

If someone wants to waste 2.5B on a $10 coin, more power to them.

Assuming it matters to some, how does one prove no other coins have been funded twice? Has the OP verified that with CI?

monbux

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1029

Quote from: bithalo on September 21, 2015, 01:55:01 PM

What did this coin cost you... around $10?

Is this even the limited numbered coin, worth slightly more?

Is it the only error coin? If so, then I guess I could understand why the price is so high Shocked

bithalo

legendary

Activity: 1470

Merit: 1017

Star Wars Ep. 9 is here

What did this coin cost you... around $10?

Is this even the limited numbered coin, worth slightly more?

wheresmycoin

hero member

Activity: 654

Merit: 504

Hello All,

Letting go of this one and only MS69 Digitally Errored 2014 Cryptoimperator 10000 doges coin.

Funded twice by creator, total 20000 doges.

Currently asking for 2.5btc (there are no any others HIGHER, LOWER OR EQUAL to ms69 since this is the only digitally errored one)

Topic: SELLING MS69 DOGECOIN, ERROR COIN - DIGITALLY (Read 2416 times)