nevertheless, I will still consider any offerEDIT: I should add, I'll accept offers in CGB as well
Topic: Serp error coin (Read 1267 times)
I decided to bump this thread because I reconsidered selling it again, so I'm taking offers. Serp hasn't made any new coins thus far, so it is a bit rarer nevertheless, I will still consider any offer
EDIT: I should add, I'll accept offers in CGB as well
nevertheless, I will still consider any offerEDIT: I should add, I'll accept offers in CGB as well
v2 39 is one.. i think a quite a few of v2 that are printed with 5 character firstbits may be also..
blockchain.info had a problem with firstbits for several weeks, think it started mid to late july but I'm not positive..
blockchain.info had a problem with firstbits for several weeks, think it started mid to late july but I'm not positive..
You are right. I just ran them through and checked them via script. All of v0.1 and v1 are labeled with the correct first bits. 44 out of 48 coins in v2 are labeled 1 character too short. For version 2, coins #20, #29, #33, and #41 are the only ones labeled with the full first bits.
Sorry about that all and thanks for bringing it more to my attention.
I have updated http://serpco.in/bits.txt to reflect this.
Hey everyone. The coin in question here is labeled 16J2e and it's full address is 16J2e5LGkMTAjn7JZt4o78od4KKS9ZXf4P. During the creation process I used blockchain.info's api to get the first bits. Apparently there was a timing or indexing issue there because the bits returned ended up changing. Lesson learned, I'll not rely on that method in the future.
I have not found any other coin that is mislabeled but I will be running a script to verify them all here shortly. For reference on the coins already produced the labeled address and the full bitcoin address can be verified below:
http://serpco.in/bits.txt
I have not found any other coin that is mislabeled but I will be running a script to verify them all here shortly. For reference on the coins already produced the labeled address and the full bitcoin address can be verified below:
http://serpco.in/bits.txt
v2 39 is one.. i think a quite a few of v2 that are printed with 5 character firstbits may be also..
blockchain.info had a problem with firstbits for several weeks, think it started mid to late july but I'm not positive..
Well there are a few offers ;p
I think I wanna make more than that
Just for the 2 coins with shipping was already ~.2BTC 
Hey everyone. The coin in question here is labeled 16J2e and it's full address is https://blockchain.info/address/16J2e5LGkMTAjn7JZt4o78od4KKS9ZXf4P">16J2e5LGkMTAjn7JZt4o78od4KKS9ZXf4P. During the creation process I used blockchain.info's api to get the first bits. Apparently there was a timing or indexing issue there because the bits returned ended up changing. Lesson learned, I'll not rely on that method in the future.
I have not found any other coin that is mislabeled but I will be running a script to verify them all here shortly. For reference on the coins already produced the labeled address and the full bitcoin address can be verified below:
http://serpco.in/bits.txt
I have not found any other coin that is mislabeled but I will be running a script to verify them all here shortly. For reference on the coins already produced the labeled address and the full bitcoin address can be verified below:
http://serpco.in/bits.txt
Ahh thanks serp for the address and clarification.
Anyway, like I said, this thread is just for me to see what possible offers would be. If there none, that's perfectly fine by me
Hey everyone. The coin in question here is labeled 16J2e and it's full address is 16J2e5LGkMTAjn7JZt4o78od4KKS9ZXf4P. During the creation process I used blockchain.info's api to get the first bits. Apparently there was a timing or indexing issue there because the bits returned ended up changing. Lesson learned, I'll not rely on that method in the future.
I have not found any other coin that is mislabeled but I will be running a script to verify them all here shortly. For reference on the coins already produced the labeled address and the full bitcoin address can be verified below:
http://serpco.in/bits.txt
I have not found any other coin that is mislabeled but I will be running a script to verify them all here shortly. For reference on the coins already produced the labeled address and the full bitcoin address can be verified below:
http://serpco.in/bits.txt
Ahh thanks serp for the address and clarification.
Anyway, like I said, this thread is just for me to see what possible offers would be. If there none, that's perfectly fine by me
Hey everyone. The coin in question here is labeled 16J2e and it's full address is 16J2e5LGkMTAjn7JZt4o78od4KKS9ZXf4P. During the creation process I used blockchain.info's api to get the first bits. Apparently there was a timing or indexing issue there because the bits returned ended up changing. Lesson learned, I'll not rely on that method in the future.
I have not found any other coin that is mislabeled but I will be running a script to verify them all here shortly. For reference on the coins already produced the labeled address and the full bitcoin address can be verified below:
http://serpco.in/bits.txt
I have not found any other coin that is mislabeled but I will be running a script to verify them all here shortly. For reference on the coins already produced the labeled address and the full bitcoin address can be verified below:
http://serpco.in/bits.txt
I figured it was something like that
Hey everyone. The coin in question here is labeled 16J2e and it's full address is 16J2e5LGkMTAjn7JZt4o78od4KKS9ZXf4P. During the creation process I used blockchain.info's api to get the first bits. Apparently there was a timing or indexing issue there because the bits returned ended up changing. Lesson learned, I'll not rely on that method in the future.
I have not found any other coin that is mislabeled but I will be running a script to verify them all here shortly. For reference on the coins already produced the labeled address and the full bitcoin address can be verified below:
http://serpco.in/bits.txt
I have not found any other coin that is mislabeled but I will be running a script to verify them all here shortly. For reference on the coins already produced the labeled address and the full bitcoin address can be verified below:
http://serpco.in/bits.txt
Checked and it is. The coin also looks great.
I don't think that necessarily means that the coin isn't loaded properly. Looking it up on block chain, I see that the address it goes to, the first bits are all capitalized, and it was loaded in 2011. I think what may have happend is by chance the first bits of your coin happen to be the same as the first bits of that address, which held a balance well before your coin did. First bits are not case sensitive it seems.
At any rate, I'll buy it from you for .03BTC
At any rate, I'll buy it from you for .03BTC
The coin is definitely funded, and I'll provide the address for you. I can't right now because I'm on my mobile (old blackberry x_x)
16j2e5
There are others like that, just hadn't been noticed or posted about it until you did..
I don't think that necessarily means that the coin isn't loaded properly. Looking it up on block chain, I see that the address it goes to, the first bits are all capitalized, and it was loaded in 2011. I think what may have happend is by chance the first bits of your coin happen to be the same as the first bits of that address, which held a balance well before your coin did. First bits are not case sensitive it seems.
At any rate, I'll buy it from you for .03BTC
At any rate, I'll buy it from you for .03BTC
The coin is definitely funded, and I'll provide the address for you. I can't right now because I'm on my mobile (old blackberry x_x)
I don't think that necessarily means that the coin isn't loaded properly. Looking it up on block chain, I see that the address it goes to the first bits are all capitalized, and it was loaded in 2011. I think what may have happend is by chance the first bits of your coin happen to be the same as the first bits of that address, which held a balance well before your coin did. First bits are not case sensitive it seems.
At any rate, I'll buy it from you for .03BTC
I will overbid that to 0.1BTC. If you ship it to me ;pAt any rate, I'll buy it from you for .03BTC
Curses! Just like my luck on eBay...
I don't think that necessarily means that the coin isn't loaded properly. Looking it up on block chain, I see that the address it goes to the first bits are all capitalized, and it was loaded in 2011. I think what may have happend is by chance the first bits of your coin happen to be the same as the first bits of that address, which held a balance well before your coin did. First bits are not case sensitive it seems.
At any rate, I'll buy it from you for .03BTC
I will overbid that to 0.1BTC. If you ship it to me ;p At any rate, I'll buy it from you for .03BTC
I don't think that necessarily means that the coin isn't loaded properly. Looking it up on block chain, I see that the address it goes to, the first bits are all capitalized, and it was loaded in 2011. I think what may have happend is by chance the first bits of your coin happen to be the same as the first bits of that address, which held a balance well before your coin did. First bits are not case sensitive it seems.
At any rate, I'll buy it from you for .03BTC
At any rate, I'll buy it from you for .03BTC
I have no idea dude. I would pay the lowest amount possible.
-hidden bump-
10 BTC
Just kidding
I have no idea dude. I would pay the lowest amount possible.
-hidden bump-
So I discovered one of my two serp funded aluminum Casascius coins have an error. It is loaded with .05BTC The firstbits don't correspond with the address on blockchain.info
The firstbits are 16j2e
I 'might' sell it. I want to know what would you offer for it? So far, this is the only one out of his 3 batches of 48.
Reply your possible offer here
The firstbits are 16j2e
I 'might' sell it. I want to know what would you offer for it? So far, this is the only one out of his 3 batches of 48.
Reply your possible offer here
Jump to: